Aussie cricket fans need to lower their standards

By Patrick Effeney / Editor

If you truly believe that the way for the current Australian cricket team to progress is to abide by the ‘pick and stick’ mantra then you have to resign yourself to poor performance from young players.

Failure is inevitable. The idea that Usman Khawaja, Phil Hughes, Ed Cowan, James Pattinson, Mitchell Starc and Matthew Wade are going to excel in their first outing against every single side they play is pure nonsense.

There are plenty of false dawns when it comes to young cricketers. Think Phil Hughes’ amazing away series against South Africa at the start of his career in 2008/09, or David Warner and Ed Cowan’s (relatively) bright start to their careers.

But 10 games isn’t enough to get used to the rigours of playing different Test nations in extremely variable conditions and create an experience platform for sustained success. 20 isn’t either.

The two English players the Aussie team is having trouble with at the moment are Ian Bell, arguably the most in-form willow-wielder on the planet, and James Anderson, who is challenging Dale Steyn for the mantle of cricket’s top quick bowler.

If you think back just a little while you’ll remember that these two players used to be laughing stocks of their trade.

Everyone remembers jeering Ian Bell off the pitch when he fell for yet another low score in the 2005 Ashes series in England. He was just about the only Englishman in the land having a horrendous time, averaging a tick over 17.

James Anderson, before becoming the best skin-flinger in the world, averaged just a tick under 40 for his first 15 Tests. What’s more, he faded in and out of Test relevance more times than Julia Roberts has since Erin Brockovic.

Had England applied the infamous Roarer phrase: “He’s not cut out for Test cricket,” and let these two players wither in County cricket like poor Mark Ramprakash then we wouldn’t be watching Bell and Anderson tearing the Aussie side to pieces now. Now that I mention it, anyone got a time machine?

Instead England endured a horrific period of stop-gap players (Ronnie Irani anyone?) and the leanest of results while they developed a truly world-beating squad.

Only now, after years of humilation at the hands of the Aussies, and the South Africans, and the Indians, and most others, do they finally get to laugh the loudest.

And if the Aussies want to have a good belly laugh at the expense of a good cricket team they have mercilessly crushed, then they too should expect a lean trot of results.

It is so obvious that novices won’t be as good as the finished item, so why should we expect them to be? Time will improve them, but for right now there shouldn’t be an expectation for this squad to beat the peaking South Africans and English.

So if you’re a supporter of installing Usman Khawaja and Phil Hughes into the top order, or a fan of James Pattinson and Mitchell Starc, then you’ll also have to lower your standards from five years ago.

Look at Ian Bell now, however, and you have a taste of what could be for your mate Uzzy when he turns 31. Look at Anderson and know that James Pattinson could be that good or, considering the absurdly successful start he’s had to his career, better than the lanky Lancastrian.

It all comes with the territory of a ‘pick and stick’ mentality.

I know losing doesn’t sit well with Australians, so aside from everybody switching off the network showing the cricket, blocking all interweb access to Cricinfo and jamming your thumbs in your ears and yelling “lalalala” whenever the highlights for the cricket comes on the telly, I don’t know what else to suggest other than to increase your patience threshold.

There should be no expectation that this raw team will win every Test, just as there should be no expectation for young players to score off every ball.

Dismissals and losses help these youngsters learn, and both those with bats and those with beers in their hands need to have the patience to accept that improvement will take time and exposure at the highest level.

And if you can’t accept that, then start writing your “Ring up Ricky” and “Kome back Katto” signs in preparation for a long Australian summer.

Follow Paddy on Twitter @PatrickEffeney

The Crowd Says:

2016-09-02T01:08:40+00:00

Ruggamaton

Roar Rookie


Totally agree mate!

2013-08-21T21:05:11+00:00

nickyc

Guest


Sorry mate. Getting you confused with someone I know called Effy.

2013-08-20T23:50:14+00:00

JimmyB

Guest


They don't like it up 'em! ;)

AUTHOR

2013-08-20T23:18:18+00:00

Patrick Effeney

Editor


I did say relatively. And what are the next two scores on that list?

2013-08-20T23:13:43+00:00

Chris

Guest


I remember thinking exactly that at the time. And watching the Barmy Army sing "Cheerio" to the Aussie fans was bliss.

2013-08-20T23:04:23+00:00

JimmyB

Guest


And wasn't it bloody great, you could almost hear the collective deflation. Made up for some dark days as an England supporter.

2013-08-20T22:59:06+00:00

Chris

Guest


Bearing in mind we're 12 hours behind, that Boxing Day was the best belated Christmas present in years. Australia 98 all out, England 157-0 at the close. The most one sided day of Test cricket I've seen in ages.

2013-08-20T22:57:18+00:00

Chris

Guest


I had to go to a fancy dress party where the theme was "Bad Taste". I wore a replica Australia ODI shirt that had been given to me as a joke by my Australian colleagues. Felt ill wearing it....

AUTHOR

2013-08-20T22:47:35+00:00

Patrick Effeney

Editor


Fantastic question, and I would posit that it's only one that can be truly answered with the benefit of hindsight (and not the Richard Hinds kind). I think you just have to make the best decisions at the time with the best evidence available and hope. The evidence from Shield tells us that Khawaja and Hughes are too good for that comp, but not yet good enough for international cricket. There are a couple of others getting there, but not to these guys' level yet.

AUTHOR

2013-08-20T22:45:28+00:00

Patrick Effeney

Editor


That's a new one on me, Nicky!

AUTHOR

2013-08-20T22:44:07+00:00

Patrick Effeney

Editor


Semantics Kev. Perhaps Aussie fans need to lower the standards of their expectations? But your point is taken, just depends which standards you're talking about!

2013-08-20T22:04:18+00:00

Jo M

Guest


They are treating him poorly. Dropped for Boxing Day on the back of 13 odd wickets in the previous 2 tests, sorry "player managed out" in case he was injured. I think he made a good point in his interview when he said it is hard to be consistent when you only get to play every 2nd game. I would imagine that, like Hughes, Khawaja and Bird to a lesser extent, his confidence is totally gone. All of these players would go out thinking they have to perform or they will be dropped again, instead of just going out to play and concentrating on what they have to do. The coaches comments don't help either.

2013-08-20T21:59:03+00:00

Red Kev

Guest


While I agree with the article, the headline "Aussie cricket fans need to lower their standards" is wrong - we need to lower our expectations of team performance but raise our standards. Low standards particularly by the selectors is why we are in this mess, it is why Ponting played two years too long, it is why Watson is still in the side, it is why the walking disgrace Glenn Maxwell has a baggy green cap.

2013-08-20T21:52:54+00:00

zatoo77

Guest


There is one way of lowering expectations look at the scorecards of 2010-2011 ashes. Shore oz won a test they still lost a lot worse. The one where we score 98 you would think one thought to play golf and the other cricket.

2013-08-20T16:42:15+00:00

nickyc

Guest


Burns was hugely disappointing while playing for Leicestershire this summer. I guess he's a different player in Oz. Bird doesn't seem to do enough with the ball or have the pace to trouble test batsmen or do you think his performance at Chester-le-street was just a one-off?

2013-08-20T16:31:22+00:00

nickyc

Guest


Doh, I mean Paddy!

2013-08-20T16:12:40+00:00

nickyc

Guest


But Effy what made you think that Pattinson was going to "carve up" Eng in the first place? Even though SA beat Eng last year even the world's best attack - Steyn, Morkel and Philander - conceded an average first innings score of 375. Still I guess that proves your point about better managing expections.

2013-08-20T15:41:54+00:00

nickyc

Guest


Eng don't have a specific plan to play a weaker side before they play Oz. They play seven tests every summer - 2012 was an exception due to the Olympics - with 2-3 tests against Ban, NZ, SL or WI followed by 4-5 tests against Aus, Ind, Pak or SA. Your overall point though is a good one. It's also worth noting that Eng still like to play longer 4-5 test series against the best sides in preference to more one dayers. This includes overseas series like Ind and SA.

2013-08-20T15:34:50+00:00

Hookin' YT

Guest


Why not Chris. Wife bought me an All Blacks jumper in 2011 to give me the shits. Wore it on Saturday. Wife is a pom, so was great grandad. I'm in!

2013-08-20T14:59:35+00:00

JimmyB

Guest


JGK still hasn't spilt the beans has he? Did you read about CA changing their own rules to accommodate Robson, Jacques etc. Interesting.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar