The greatest batsman of the modern era: #3 Ricky Ponting

By Luke Smyke / Roar Pro

Anyone with an interest in cricket will have their own opinions regarding the greatest batsman of 90s/00s era.

With the odd exception, the gentlemen who regularly occupy the discussion are Ricky Ponting, Sachin Tendulkar and Brian Lara.

It might occur that in 20 years time, players like Rahul Dravid, Kumar Sangakkara and Jacques Kallis also become prominent in the debate due to their indisputably superlative numbers, but this is where we notice the very limitation of factoring in statistics alone.

The aura that accompanied these men each time they strode to the crease had an effect on everyone within sight; even as a spectator in the bathroom at the MCG could you feel a tingle when Ponting took guard.

This is an effect that cannot be sculpted through sheer weight of runs but through a combination of presence, batsmanship and approach.

While it is fair to categorize these three above the other leading players of their time, they too can be demarcated from each other.

The Australian candidate, who finished his international career with over 26,000 runs and 71 centuries, typified the Australian blue-collar image as an uncompromising, hard working warrior.

With forearms like medieval bedposts, exaggeratedly assertive movements and a surly look of hunger in his squinty eyes, he was the most physically imposing of the three.

Even his front foot leave became distinguishable for the sense of purpose in which it was done.

Much like his former captain, Steve Waugh, Ponting was harder than carbon steel. He would glare at opening bowlers with disdain, accost those who made personal jibes in his direction and receive blows on the body like they were letters of junk mail, trifling and unworthy of attention.

In fact he wouldn’t even take a backward step to play his characteristic pull shot, preferring instead to symbolically go at the bowler.

Amid the zenith of his career, between 2000-2007, he seemingly peeled off big scores at will, as his side achieved every feat known in the world of international cricket.

However, it is the latter part of that accomplishment that diminishes his worth in the context of this comparison and particular argument.

Place the numbers on the table and he belongs with Tendulkar and Lara, but that is to neglect some increasingly vital factors that contributed to the finished product.

For the largest part of Ponting’s career, he shared the dressing room with arguably the greatest ever international side, including four other players who would feature in many critics’ greatest XIs.

Should Ponting have failed in a Test match, chances are Matthew Hayden, Waugh, Mike Hussey, Justin Langer, Adam Gilchrist or Damien Martyn would have chimed in with a big score and the Aussie scorecard would register an impressive total.

Should the rest of the line-up, in very abnormal circumstances, misfire, then Glenn McGrath, Jason Gillespie, Brett Lee, Shane Warne or Stuart Macgill would all be more than capable of resurrecting the abject situation.

As a consequence, not only was Ponting riding a wave of success on behalf of the team, but he was utilising the psychological advantage his side held over all of its opponents.

One cannot underestimate the impact this has on a professional sportsman; you only have to look at an ordinary player who enters a champion team to see.

The Melbourne Storm are a case in point. Who on earth were Bryan Norrie and Maurice Blair before they crossed the border?

As this brilliant Australian team began to destabilise, so too did Ponting’s performances.

Sure you can argue that by this stage he was getting a little long in the tooth, but the modern game has shown batsmen are often at the peak of their powers when they on the other side of 34.

Ponting was simply not the same player when he had the extra pressure of being widely responsible for his team’s success.

Furthermore, Ponting never had to combat his own attack, stocked with two of the greatest bowlers we will ever witness, nor did he have to duel with Wasim Akram or Curtley Ambrose at the peak of their powers.

A truly fabulous player in his own right, but comfortably beneath his two rival legends from the northern hemisphere.

The Crowd Says:

2013-10-06T07:07:50+00:00

Max Willis

Roar Pro


Ricky Ponting was my childhood hero until he retired, but in saying that i disagree with you Muhammad, as i still think Sachin and Lara were better players than Ponting. Although in my bias position, i have to say that Ponting had both Tendulka and Lara covered in the fielding department!

2013-09-26T20:34:16+00:00

brian

Guest


And on that note, if I was to choose someone to bat for my life, it'd be Steve waugh or Ricky ponting , arguably the two toughest cricketers of all time. They'd take any blow to the body, rupture an Achilles heel,fracture a finger yet still play on in the match.

2013-09-26T20:32:36+00:00

brian

Guest


He has played some many match winning innings His 100* against south Africa in 2002 chasing I think 290 or 300 to win comes to mind. His 156 match saving hundred against England in 2005, arguably the best innings ponting has ever played and one of the best of all time. His 143* again against south Africa in 2006 chasing 280. There are many others but those come to mind

2013-09-23T06:46:07+00:00

Muhammad Irfan

Roar Rookie


Great.No comparison b/w Ponting and sachin.Sachin is just a media product fail at impotant junture of match.never cross the line in his long career. Ponting was the best big match player.Scored more hundred on bowling friendly ptches. Pakistan Start playing test matches in early 1950s and won 115 test matches and Ponting who debut in 1995 won 110 test matches. similary result can be obtained by comparing india is well.

2013-09-23T06:36:31+00:00

Muhammad Irfan

Roar Rookie


Ponting is for superior than any one else in many aspects of the game.most successfull captain of his time brilliant feilder and set a value for one drop batter.You may argue that he has world beaters in his side but at the same time he was an excellent man manger of modern era.Handling such greats is not an easy jobs. On the other hand Sachin Lara and kallis were not a good captains. One more thing about Punter is that He was at his best when it matters the most he is big match player.whereas other three used to choke in big match.

2013-09-22T04:18:08+00:00

Prakash badu

Guest


Of course, it is just bias to say ponting was weak against spin as he is only a aussie to play n enjoy spin attack among the cangroos; besides some question about punter not playing agains his own Mcgrath n other quick bowlers of his era, its just to show him down because it has no any truth as he is the best batsman against pace n he could play more beautifully if he had to. What i just want to enlighten is his alroundership in captaincy, batsmanship n fielding(probably the best fielder of his era), one can recall how sachin's performance was degraded with extra pressure when he was provided with captaincy n eventually he only concentrated on his bating leaving all the pressures on bay, but unlike to this ponting fulfilled all his responsibilities with ease which makes him a multidimensional, and great legend of his era....

2013-09-18T02:06:41+00:00

JGK

Roar Guru


Ponting wasn't weak against spin. It was really only Harby that seemed to trouble him. He played Murali very well.

AUTHOR

2013-09-13T14:28:08+00:00

Luke Smyke

Roar Pro


That title goes to the ace that hails from a land where palm trees are as common as street signs and rum is consumed as invariably as water. Brian Charles Lara, or the Prince of Trinidad as he was commonly referred to, was an outlier even to this league of extraordinary gentlemen. A maverick among mavericks. A glance his cricinfo profile page will reveal a flattering account of his career in numbers, a viewing of one of his many centuries will engender an appreciation of his once in a lifetime value. Recognisable by his extravagant, guillotine like backlift and a pronounced crouch in his otherwise impeccable batting stance, Lara wasn’t just a brilliant player but a pleasure to watch. He was every bit of an entertainer as a sportsman, and a man who would undeviatingly dictate when you would conveniently tell your boss you had glandular fever or explain to your girlfriend it was strictly a gathering for those with y chromosomes. Although not as technically sound as Sachin nor as dominant against the short ball as Ponting, Lara knew his game like James Bond knows females. Armed with a ferocious square drive and scintillating cut shot, Lara dealt severely with any width and left many a point and cover fieldsman terrified. His extraordinary backlift allowed him to strike the ball with extreme velocity yet he possessed the deft touch of a French painter to compliment it. There is no adjective in the English language that could adequately describe the ease in which he accounted for spinners. Perhaps Robin Petersen could enlighten us. But all these details are common knowledge, the enormity of his achievements are either ignorantly disregarded or simply not realized. “The prince” began his international career in 1990 and by the time he loosened his jockstrap for the final time in 2007 he had the record for the highest test score, the second most double centuries of all time and 3 of the greatest innings’ ever complied, according to wisden. Coupled with a test average of over 50 and over 50 international centuries on the resume, his figures are outstanding in themselves. His true greatness however, lay in the overwhelming responsibility he held for the nearly the entire duration of his career. Peruse through every scorecard of his 131 test matches and 299 one-day internationals and his name almost jumps out at you in bold and underlined font, as the vast majority of his fellow island dwelling acolytes possessed the skill set of a Sunday Moore Park league hacker. Yes there were exceptions, Richie Richardson, Carl Hooper, Jimmy Adams and Shivnarine Chanderpaul were all very good players, but of this group only Chanderpaul has scored consistent runs for a significant period of time. Chanderpaul was also a far inferior player away from home, never having registered a century in Australia and having an difference in average of over 16 runs in countries where his passport was required. Conversely, Lara relished the opportunities abroad scoring big hundreds in South Africa, England, Australia and the subcontinent. The West Indies were an ordinary team for much of Lara’s career, he began with a lethal pace battery of Ambrose and Walsh to support his self inflicted totals but as we entered the new millennium not only did “the prince” have very few capable batting partners but he had bowlers who would make John Howard look like a reasonable grade cricketer. His name then became etched in gold, size 52 font on the West Indian team sheet. For 17 years, Lara was the West Indies cricket team; opposition sides knew that if he were to be removed early it was literally game, set, and match. He held the unflattering record for a time, of being a member of a losing side on the most occasions, all the while churning out brilliant performances at the tip of a hat and keeping his team competitive. The West Indies, after all, had such a proud history in the game that it crushed patriotic cricket lovers to acknowledge the volatile demise they were suffering. Lara was the glimmer of hope, the one man that could restore respectability and keep the sport alive in the Caribbean. He did it all with such panache and bravado, that one marvels at how he was never really effected by the pressure he bore. Ponting had dogged determination and aggression, embodying the “blood, sweat and tears” mentality that Australians worship. Whilst his achievements as a batsman should not be trivialized, he benefited largely from the strength of his unit. Tendulkar has poise, grace, and the closest thing to a perfect temperament and technique one could envisage. He, like Lara carried his nation’s hopes as though he was negotiating their way out of a nuclear war. But the latter did it alone and with such audacity. You could have forgiven Lara for withering away at the hands of expectation or going into his shell out of desperation to survive. But he didn’t shirk. He encapsulated flamboyance; he was the definition of flair. As the floodlights dimmed at Kensington oval in Bridgetown for what was to be Lara’s final international appearance, he asked the remaining fans, “did I entertain?” Yes Brian, we weren’t for a moment occupying the full capacity of our seats. You were, as Tina Turner once famously put it, simply the best.

AUTHOR

2013-09-13T14:27:42+00:00

Luke Smyke

Roar Pro


The one individual who is revered more vehemently than Ganeesha himself in the subcontinent, is Sachin Tendulkar. A worthy recipient of his god status, this stocky, vertically challenged master will finish with a record that may be forever unsurpassable when he eventually calls time on an international career that commenced way back in 1989. Blessed with quick hands and a classical technique, Tendulkar has been a favorite of commentators for the duration of his career, as the elegance of his strokeplay captures the eye of the game’s purists. Tendulkar is the most diverse of the three, being able to score freely all around the ground and interchange comfortably between attack and defence, depending on situation. Critics often marginalize his success for the high percentage of his runs being scored on batsmen friendly conditions in the sub continent, and this is a legitimate criticism. Despite the fact that he has consistently performed exceptionally abroad, the bulk of his centuries in both forms of the game (disregarding 20twenty cricket) have been scored in Asia, where the fast bowling threat is almost completely nullified by the barren composition of their playing strips. However, what is most important in this comparison is the acknowledgement of his fellow soldiers. Tendulkar donned the navy blue cap for nearly his entire career with a formidable army. Rahul Dravid, VVS Laxman, Saurav Ganguly, Virender Sehwag and MS Dhoni played their entire careers to date with Tendulkar. With Dhoni as the exception, who will likely match the feats of these greats in the coming seasons, the four all played over 100 tests, compiling over 100 centuries between them. Even considering the great teams that have presided our game throughout the 20th century, this batting line up would have to lie on the summit. Had there not been such a major discrepancy in the bowling and fielding departments, this Indian side would have been a major hurdle for the dominant Australians to overcome on a consistent basis. Consequently, although his wicket was always a bit of a prized scalp, the opposition still had to account for four or five other world class batsmen. That is not to say he was devoid of pressure, on the contrary he had arguably the most out of any sportsman in the history of mankind, bearing the weight of over a billion hopeful Indians on his shoulders each time he took centre stage. It is rather an understanding that his pursuit of runs was ameliorated by the reality that the fielding side had plenty of batting prowess to contend with when encountering India, not simply the little master. It is unequivocal that Tendulkar should exist in any expert’s greatest X1 and that he be a vowel in the cricket alphabet, but he was not the finest of them all.

2013-09-13T12:44:23+00:00

Nikhil V

Guest


I think that your forgetting the fact Ponting doesn't care about his batting stats. The only stat he cares about is his 110 odd wins and I think this shows his true measure, he carried the weight as a captain and still scored runs. Crickets a team game so personally his 110 wins Is greater than Tendulkars 100 100's.

2013-09-13T11:57:53+00:00

felix

Guest


Ponting has never liked anything bowled at a slow pace,unstoppable on bouncing high paced tracks with fast bowlers who every now & then thought they could take his head off because of his hight & forward press but how wrong they were for more than 10 years,he deffinetly was good in making the opposition teams think the match was over before it started,due to the sheer aggresion by the aussie top order including him,probably has more shots than Kallis but nowhere close to the variety of shots Lara has,Was my favourite player to watch not listen to.

2013-09-13T10:54:48+00:00

Vistro

Guest


To bat for my life I'll go to Kallis and to win a match go to Lara ,i stand to be corrected but I don't recall Tendulkar or Ponting batting 1& halfday to save the match if the score is 60/6 on day 4 chasing 340 to win.

2013-09-13T09:20:13+00:00

TimD

Guest


Its an interesting question, and certainly one that welcomes debate. I think the one are where Ponting perhaps can claim to be the best of the bunch is pressure runs on tough wickets. My stats knowledge is not great, but in terms of winning games, in tough situations with big scores, I think Ponting may be looked back on as the best of the bunch?

2013-09-13T09:06:04+00:00

JimmyB

Guest


Ponting unquestionably is one of the greats as is Kallis. Tendulkar is a run machine who has carried a billion hopes with him every time at the crease. Then you have Lara, IMO the best to watch and despite his achievements probably the least interested in stats.

2013-09-13T08:21:46+00:00

DubbleBubble

Guest


I've always thought Ponting was somewhat overrated. His greatest period of dominance came from around 99 to '06 when most, if not all, the great pacemen had retired and the pitches were flat as pancakes. Also, he was quite weak against spin. A very good batsmen but not a great.I agree with your assessment that he is not deserving to be categorised in the Lara/Tendulkar class.

2013-09-13T06:48:08+00:00

Ret

Guest


Ken Barrington had batting stats to rival everyone bar the Don. Significantly higher average than Viv. However nobody puts the two in the same category. Kallis is the modern Barrington. Great technical player who lacks Lara's, Tendulkar's and Ponting's ability to win a game with a couple of hours of batting dominance. That's why he's not in the discussion.

2013-09-13T05:13:20+00:00

clipper

Guest


Agree with the last line.

2013-09-13T03:12:57+00:00

stainlesssteve

Guest


Kallis certainly gets greatest cricketer, for mine, for his all-round ability and not least for his humility. He is a grown-up. Unlike some. No names. Ricky's not a journeyman, James. Only Mark Waugh, amongst recent Australians, rivals Ricky for grace, correctness and having plenty of time. So he should have retired earlier? OK, but this can only be seen in hindsight.

2013-09-13T02:41:13+00:00

James the Elder

Guest


No argument from me on that selection. What amazed me though was that that Ian Chappell wrote an article on the great batsmen of this generation and never mentioned Kallis once. Not once. It was if the man never existed.

2013-09-13T02:39:21+00:00

Dsat24

Guest


Butch James He could hit them like the best of em. Heads that is.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar