Rugby league needs to let its wild ones play

By Luke Smyke / Roar Pro

In the cut-throat modern sporting industry and progressive disposition of 21st century life, many vital contributors to their respective trades are quickly forgotten once they part from the limelight.

What’s most disheartening about this is that the masses who revere the game these individuals once belonged to often do not acknowledge how important they were to that code.

It’s as though life in the Western world has become so fast that we can’t even take the time to absorb and understand what has taken place.

The game of rugby league has become a considerable part of Sydney’s, even Australia’s culture. The sport has developed unlike any other Australian sport over the past 20 years, becoming a multi-million dollar business.

Back in 1993 there were only two teams in the competition who hailed from outside New South Wales. Now there are five.

In those days, many first graders needed to work during the week to supplement their playing wages. Today, a number of reserve graders earn enough money to support their families.

And finally, the ’93 NSWRL was a suburban sport that primarily caught the eye of passionate sport-goers and working-class males

Whereas the contemporary version is a corporate enterprise that is broadcast globally and celebrated by men and women alike, with a following that would almost qualify it as an epidemic.

Furthermore, it provides thousands of jobs in roles that would previously have been unimaginable, such as sport scientists, video analysts, marketing coordinators and social welfare consultants.

As a corollary for the stakes of the game being raised, with the game’s profile having been boosted and substantially more revenue extracted, competition for positions within a team or the teams coaching staff become hotly contested.

This, in turn, forces people to cede their audacious, individualist streak in the yearning for consistency.

With the precariousness of jobs, perhaps moreso for coaches than players, players are encouraged to adhere to set structures and are often vilified for making mistakes in an attempt to set the game alight through personal innovative endeavors.

The irony is that it is these latter plays that bring spectators through the turnstiles and finance the game.

Sure, the diehards will continue to turn up irrespective of their side’s aesthetic quality, and some simply marvel at the flawless execution the leading sides exhibit.

But it is unanimous that one will be left begging for more when they witness a Benji Marshall flick pass or a Chris Sandow chip and chase. These rare talents are slowly being purged from modern game, to the audience’s detriment.

Benji Marshall wasn’t any less prominent in the media this season than he was during the early stages of his career, but the common tone of his features was considerably more unforgiving.

He was incessantly ostracised for his patchy form and there were numerous calls for his axing.

While these claims were arguably justifiable, those who were weeping with ecstasy like Laurie Lawrence at the Seoul Olympics when Marshall announced his departure from the code need a reality check.

It is undisputable that the Tigers and Marshall were substandard this year, but to place the brunt of the blame on him is unfair.

He is a one of a kind footballer; a man who can be credited for the healthy state of the sport at junior level, having inspired thousands to replicate his gaudy yet brilliant displays.

With season 2013 as evidence, this scarce breed of footballer cannot also be a team’s general. That would be like having someone adopt the role as bartender and beer consumer concurrently – an utterly foolish initiative.

Yet if we have both, as separate entities under the same unit, we have the recipe for successful proceedings; one who controls and guides, the other who provides the spark and entertainment.

Why then are we condemning these special talents for exercising their autonomy and exuberance?

The game has become rigid, predictable and strikingly meticulous in style.

It is now a general rule that the side that best adheres to the defensive patterns implemented by the coaching staff will emerge the victor.

Accordingly, players must conform to their individual roles, each contributing to that team’s overriding game plan.

If a side has one or two players that direct the ship, then the eccentric individuals can still exist, even flourish in a regimented environment.

We still have a few that roam around in Inglis and Slater, and even the likes of Blake Ferguson and Todd Carney, but the continuation of this breed of player appears impermanent.

Marshall is gone, and seemingly forgotten. Sandow is playing reserve grade.

Shaun Johnson is rock one week, diamond the next, shouldering the unfair burden that Marshall did of having to guide and create at the same time.

Michael Jennings and Jarryd Hayne are still wonderful players who are excelling for both their club and state. Yet the charisma that they previously brought to the turf has dwindled a little as they are instructed to follow the blueprint of their superiors.

Just let them play, sir. The preeminent ones cannot be coached.

What needs to be understood is that these players will forever be important to our game. They shouldn’t be limited in showcasing their natural aptitude for broken field brilliance, but rather encouraged to play it as they see it.

Yes, the game will continue to develop and it will likely become more mechanical, but these stars can penetrate even the most dogged, committed defensive lines.

They won’t just be effective in maximising the game’s marketability or boosting ticket sales, but they will always be assets to successful teams if utilised correctly.

If you have one or two strategical geniuses who lay a structured platform, you can have a free running game breaker who is mercurial and errant.

This has been seen with a number of recently successful sides – Slater compliments Smith and Cronk, just as a young Marshall did Scotty Prince.

Rugby league is in a very healthy state, but it shouldn’t rest on its laurels as it is in danger of repudiating its freakishly unique luminaries.

Benji Marshall was the epitome of this description and the game has a lot to thank him for. May his legend live on.

The Crowd Says:

2013-09-24T16:44:41+00:00

catcat

Guest


When I first read this article I thought the clubs have to share some blame. Hayne and Marshall are at two clubs that are basket cases at the moment, and because of board issues have not had strong playing rosters the last few seasons. I think this has really impacted the performance of both these players (compare say to ben barba) Back in 90s the little guys were around the 6/7/1 positions, but these days you could argue they are all at fullback (and a few at 6/7). They have been pushed back there behind the line, away from hits to do there thing at fullback. Even wingers are preferred tall and agile (fast and nippy can't get the cross field kick)..... Origin is an interesting example where good defence is preferred over tactical ability..... and that happens in a few club teams too

2013-09-23T20:36:04+00:00

SVB

Guest


Yep the late 80's and early 90's was the golden period. The 'What you get is what you see' ad was the best one for me. You had around 6 or 7 really good half backs as well as loads of creative five eights. You had expansion into Brisbane, GC and Newcastle. Out of Sydney teams like Canberra were starting to win comps, and Newcastle and Illawarra were competitive. The Sydney teams all still had their army of supporters. Then Superleague stuffed everything around in the mid 90's, and by the 2000's RL was a different game (but still watchable). These days frankly it has become unwatchable. Game needs its character back.

2013-09-23T20:27:56+00:00

SVB

Guest


I agree with you. They need to stop letting big men dominate the game because it just becomes a wrestling contest. There should only be a limited amount of substitutions so little men are advantaged at the back end of a game, and are able to use their creativity and flair to break open a game.

2013-09-23T18:49:11+00:00

russell johnson

Guest


Somewhere along the line some coach will come up with strategies, drills and game plans that will break this trend and alter the game as a whole. that's just what happens in sport. But the idea that ru can and will provide a platform for Mr Marshall's skills is as ludicrous as the idea that SBW was a better League player because of his time in union. But then again people like to put two and two together and make whatever number suits their argument, journalists most of all apart from Phil Gould!

AUTHOR

2013-09-23T07:57:23+00:00

Luke Smyke

Roar Pro


Ye things will always develop and change over time but its difficult to fathom that the game will return to the free flowing state that was inherent in bygone eras.

2013-09-23T03:08:13+00:00

john badseed

Guest


The rot started with 'supercoachjackgibson' who, after being entranced by NFL style play introduced a more professional style of League. This meant a move toward a more structured style of play. Reduce risk, stick to a plan, concentrate on defence. His campion easts and parra teams, containing the most brilliant players of the time, were as good as any teams I have seen, and the job Bellyache does with the Storm mirrors the coaching of Gibson. Yet Gibson also brought into this period the style of grafting through the early tackles then having bomber Peard put up a bomb on the last tackle and pray for an error by the opposing team. This was of course copied by all the other teams and for a while it appeared to be the games only weapon. It became as boring as hit it up for 5 and kick for the corner in attack and wrestle every tackle in defence that we yawn through now after all clubs decided to copy Bellyache.

2013-09-23T02:51:33+00:00

Ken

Guest


But Rugby League was always willing to change the rules to adjust the game. You can't just take a static shot of 1993 and say that's Rugby League and anything else is wrong. I'm sure in 1993 there were some people complaining on the first alt.nswrl newsgroup that it's never been the same since limited tackles, 1 point field goals and smashing blokes around the head was outlawed.

2013-09-23T02:48:26+00:00

Ken

Guest


I don't disagree with your basic point - in a professional era conformity to the 'best practice' encourages everyone to play to a similar script, it's undoubtedly true. I'm not sure that Marshall is the best example of this though, has anyone truly tried to shackle him? I think his form over the last couple of seasons is just the flipside of playing with flair. Form is a rollercoaster and, against top-line opposition, that style of play only works if you are at the absolute peak of your game. That he could play at 100% like that for so many years successfully is a testament to the talent he has but if he drops down to 95% then professional opposition have him beat. The late 80's, early 90's were golden years in a number of ways. The amount of star players was relatively high, the game had been cleaned up considerably but not completely and the players were still basically semi-pro and willing to chance their arm more than nowadays. These things ebb and flow though, it's not like the current style of play will be around for ever, defensive and attacking patterns have historically come in and gone out of style often

2013-09-23T00:07:00+00:00

greggy.h

Guest


The game of rugby league has been hijacked to the detrimate of fans.In the name of improving the game aspects of the play, rules etc have been tweeked in an attempt to provide a better product.Anyone who is of the age that can compare the old game to this modern structured trash can lament the younger generation have missed out on.The old game was not perfect,after 20 years of the new version the same problems exist and it is inescapable the public a gladiatorial game than set structures which bore the fans to eventually decide to follow other pursuits.Whoever decided to carbon copy our game to NFL has a lot to answer for, rugby league lost it's tradition from that point,and unless this is recognised and acted on the fan base will continue to slide and slide until the powers that be finally realize that the old game was and always will be more attractive entertainment to follow and spend their money on, and that's the bottom line,money,the power brokers are only concerned with. Old saying IF IT AINT BROKE DONT FIX IT unfortunately the game has been gradually changed to what is played today!!!!!!

Read more at The Roar