SPIRO: I see some light in the Wallabies' dark tunnel

By Spiro Zavos / Expert

The experiment with dumb kicking rugby is or should be finished, if the Wallabies’ performance in Cape Town, losing 28-8 against the Springboks, means anything to Ewen McKenzie and his other coaches.

As per Sean Fitzpatrick’s memorable phrase, this was a Test of two halves.

When the Wallabies played their dumb kicking rugby, they were beaten 23-3 in the first 40 minutes of play.

When they brought on Will Genia and used his passing and running game to play more a more expansive, ball-in-hand, typically Wallaby game, they drew the second half 5-5.

The running scoreline gives a good indication of the run of play: Wallabies 3 – Springboks 0, W3-S3, W3-S10 (after 14 minutes of play), W3-S17 (16 minutes of play), W3-S20 (20 minutes of play), W3-S23 (32 minutes of play), W3-S28 (72 minutes of play), W8-S28 (75 minutes of play).

The Springboks scored 20 of their points in a 18-minute period of play, from the 14th to the 32nd minute in the first half.

It was in this period Nic White, playing his last game for the Wallabies in a long while surely, kicked away ball after ball.

The effect of this kicking was to deny the Wallabies any attacking play in the back line. The ball was virtually handed to the Springboks on a platter to run back at the Wallabies.

By halftime, the Wallabies had lost the game on the scoreboard, and they had lost on the possession and position statistics. They had made 66 tackles to 28 by the Springboks.

We need here to consider the tactics and methods of the kicking game.

The first point to make is that kicks, unless they are for position or touch, are useless and actually worse than useless when they can’t be re-gathered.

The second point to make is that virtually every Wallaby kick, generally from White, had exactly this effect.

The re-gathering kick is not about length, but everything about height. The height of the kick has to reach the elevation that enables chasing runners the chance of catching the ball on the burst.

This is such an elementary observation that it is amazing the Wallaby coaches, players and rugby reporters who support the kicking game (Bret Harris of The Australian go and stand in the shame corner) do not seem to have a clue about this obvious point.

The masters of the kick and chase game are the Springboks. For the most part, especially when Fourie du Preez is kicking, the elevation on the ball is of such a height the kick can be re-gathered.

The Springboks’ kick-offs are similarly beautifully weighted.

By way of comparison, the Wallabies’ kick-offs were easily taken in by the Springboks, the ball was driven forward and then booted out, except for the occasion when the Springboks used the solid platform of a strong take to launch an attack from inside their 22, which yielded their second try.

And an observation on du Preez. His positional play, his ability to make scuttling breaks, his choice of runners with pop-up passes, his longer passes to put players into gaps and his varied kicking game makes him the prince of halfbacks.

He is in the elite class of the greatest halfbacks in the history of the game, a champion fit to join the other champions like Ken Catchpole, Des Connor, Gareth Edwards, Chris Laidlaw and John Hipwell, who sadly passed away last week.

The Wallabies clearly went into the Test with a plan to take du Preez out of the game. Michael Hooper, especially, tried to take du Preez out just after he had passed the ball.

But the champion was unruffled and smoothly, like the Rolls-Royce player he is, went about his business, keeping the momentum of the Springboks’ attacks at the sharp edge.

It will be fascinating to see how the All Blacks try to counter the influence of du Preez in next week’s Test at Ellis Park.

If there is a tiny weakness in du Preez’s play, it is the couple of steps he sometimes takes before popping up a pass. You’d expect the All Blacks to be more effective than the Wallabies were in clattering du Preez if he doesn’t release his pass quickly enough.

Back to White. He was clearly on instructions to kick the ball away whenever he got it. And when he didn’t kick it away in the first half, Quade Cooper did. Both players kicked poorly.

The Springboks were given plenty of room to run the ball back at the Wallabies.

The point here is the Springboks don’t like making plays from set pieces. They have some moves from scrums inside the red zone involving Bryan Habana. But they prefer to re-act rather than act with their play making.

So when the opposition kick balls to them, especially high balls that are not chased, this is playing into their hands.

They take the ball to the middle of the field and then get their big forwards to rumble forward in a series of tank-like attacks.

The intention, generally, is to win a penalty for the dead-eyed goal kicker Morne Steyn to convert.

Occasionally, though, they put the ball through the hands in the backs and cut loose with a scything attack.

This sort of attack is becoming more common from this Springboks side, as newish backs players like Willie Le Roux and JJ Englebrecht become more comfortable in the side.

The Cooper experiment, like the White experiment, is surely over for a while, as well.

He did make some tackles but he missed a lot, including gifting a try to the Springboks by coming out of the line when the Springboks were metres away from the Wallabies’ try line. He dropped high balls, too.

But the worst part of his play was the way he played so deep when the Wallabies tried to run the ball in the second half.

Rod Kafer, a long time admirer and proponent of Cooper’s play, expressed his disappointment at the depth on his play and his unwillingness to take the ball to the line with his shoulders square (to stop the drift defence) and the ball in two hands.

I know some Roarers will complain ‘here he goes again bagging Quade’, but the point is without an effective play maker, and Cooper is not that play maker right now, a team like the Wallabies that are without a dominating and domineering pack, does not have many tricks to play to trump their opponents.

Matt Toomua played splendidly in his cameo role at inside centre. This should give McKenzie the message that Christian Lealiifano needs to be shifted to number 10 and Toomua to inside centre.

Ultimately, I’d like to see Kyle Godwin at inside centre. And for now, anyway, Tevita Kuridrani remain at outside centre.

I know his hands are letting him and the team down. But this can be worked on. A Godwin/Kuridrani centre pairing would give the Wallabies the size they’ve lacked in the middle of the field since Stirling Mortlock retired.

I also think teams are working Israel Folau out at fullback. His lack of a left foot was exposed by the Springboks, and other teams, probably the Pumas next week, will play to this more and more.

Folau needs to go to the wing and having a roving brief, like David Campese, especially inside the red zone.

Enough of the gloom, there was enough in the second half for the Wallabies and their supporters to take heart.

The break has given Genia a chance to re-examine his game and return to what he does best, passing long and breaking from mauls and rucks.

Ben McCalman provided some shoulder and energy to the pack with a series of surging runs when he came on.

You can see the makings of a good loose forward back three with McCalman, Michael Hooper and Scot Higginbotham when he comes back.

The scrum gave a glimpse, too, that something good is being achieved, when they held the ball in a scrum and shunted the Springbok pack back as if it was, say, the Wallaby pack for most of this year.

More importantly, it is a sign of a team with lots of guts and some skills to be down by 20 points at halftime, when there was no wind to take into account, and come out square 5-5 in the second half.

The Springboks might have scored a record victory at Cape Town, making the tunnel the Wallabies are in seem an awfully dark place.

But, in my view, there was just enough light from the second half performance to suggest the end of the tunnel might be closer than the record score makes it seem.

The Crowd Says:

2013-10-02T00:25:00+00:00

Neutralobserver

Guest


one for you biltongbek. On 30 Sept you said ""there is no doubt not getting the bonus point has already decided the winner."". I understand your point of course but do you think the SA team agrees with you? If they do then undoubtedly you are right. Do the NZ team agree with you? If so then you are undoubtedly right. Have you considered this scenario? Both teams are tired but the AB's know they only need lose and keep SA to less than four tries. The Springboks know they have to win with a bonus bonus point. Maybe McCall goes off after sixty minutes and they lose the leadership he brings to the team. Maybe an NZ player is sent off early [justifiably or not] with a red card. Who knows...but one thing to remember is that SA at Ellis Park against NZ will want to show the world that they are a great team and can do the business. And you know they are a great team. Currently the odds on the match are around even with NZ paying $1 to $8 to win the championship. Thats a good bet if you think you think SA have the bottle. What ever the result the game should be s spectacle.

2013-10-01T07:29:11+00:00

Daz

Guest


Don't rub it in too hard OB. Yes there is kicking and then there is kicking. The ABs kick well and with purpose and chase and contest like hell.

2013-09-30T23:52:41+00:00

wannabprop

Guest


Well spotted Ajax. While watching live streams on the bloody laptop, I've been wondering just why there seems to be (constantly) so much space out wide against the WBs. I don't see a defence coach listed with the Reds - does anyone know who it is currently? I vaguely recall the guy in that role left after 2011 (after doing a great job), and they've gone downhill since. Wallabies defence has been up and down (but generally poor) since Deans took over. Scrivener doesn't appear to be up to it either. Hopefully a clean out when contracts are up (end of year?). Need a good scrum and defence coach at the very least.

2013-09-30T23:40:47+00:00

Ribald Gadfly

Guest


It's a good thing for the referee that the cross kick try meant so little. Patrick Lambie was insistant that the ball touched the assistant referee after it was taken out. Nevertheless the officials incorrectly allowed the quick throw in that led to the try. No harm done in this instance thanks to the large margin, but another example of less than exemplary officiating. For the second game in a row for the Springboks this is less than ideal.

2013-09-30T23:33:07+00:00

Mike

Guest


"a permanent rye smile" I always imagined him drinking Scotch, but nothing wrong with Bourbon if that's your thing... ;)

2013-09-30T21:10:22+00:00

stainlesssteve

Guest


surely it has to come soon, just by virtue of probability theory? A scintillating heartstopping intelligent Wallabies performance? Or does this now require Divine Intervention? Robbie would be wearing a permanent rye smile in his sleep methinks

2013-09-30T18:50:14+00:00

mania

Guest


nicWhite should shoulder some of the blame, equally with link. link came up with a dumb gameplan of kicking away all possession and white blindly stuck to it despite all evidence displaying that it was a losing strategy.

2013-09-30T15:40:09+00:00

flatdogSA

Guest


"And an observation on du Preez. His positional play, his ability to make scuttling breaks, his choice of runners with pop-up passes, his longer passes to put players into gaps and his varied kicking game makes him the prince of halfbacks." That's very un "thugby" like!

2013-09-30T15:38:44+00:00

colfaxtim

Guest


I cant wait to see the AB's and Boks play. I hope both teams keep 15 on, as it will be a crucible of test rugby. Shame about the bonus point difference in the teams. It might be a distraction through the week, but come the weekend whoever wins in my view will know they have been measured against the next best in world rugby, at this juncture. A true test, irrespective of bonus points and who wins the championship. Two years out from a world cup these two sides are playing some extraordinary rugby. It could go either way.

2013-09-30T15:03:04+00:00

Magic Sponge

Guest


Rugby is Life Moore and Hooper are our best forwards, ok AAC to Fback, Joc to replace Kudriani until he stops spilling the pill. Love kudrianis defence though. Could give Davies instead of Mogg. Cant wait for Higgers and Pocock. That is why I am optimistic for 2014.

2013-09-30T15:02:36+00:00

jammel

Guest


Getting there! I think the Wallabies need to pick a team and stick with it for a while - too many changes particularly at 10 are ruining our chances. And people like Cummins, Tomane, etc. get a few changes then are dropped.... Secondly, we need to kick sensibly, and strategically - kick for field position or otherwise hold the ball! I'd aim for something like the following when everyone's available: Robinson Moore Kepu Horwill Fardy Mowen Higginbotham Pocock Genia Toomua AAC CL12 Folau JOC Beale 15: AAC 14; O’Connor ( be a good boy please or we will kick you in the #@**) 13; Folau 12; Kuridrani 11: Tomane 10: Lealiifano / Cooper 9: Genia 8. Timani 7. Mowen (captain) 6. Fardy 5. Douglas 4. Horwill 3. Kepu 2. Moore 1. Robinson

2013-09-30T14:17:43+00:00

IvanN

Guest


we blame the team, when we are fairly beaten. everytime NZ has beaten us good and properly, we blame the team for not being up to scratch and if we feel the team is good enough but the tactics are all wrong, we blame the coach. Not sure where your hatred for SA and Bok supporters comes from, but IMO it has something to do with a small weenie. good luck with that.

2013-09-30T14:11:32+00:00

CHT

Guest


Not sure what game you watched Spiro but Cooper had a great game, in spite of a rather poor platform from the Wallaby forwards... Mowen is a passenger fair and square and he shouldn't be a test starter... You can put Simmons in that camp too. Hooper, Cooper, AAC are the three gents showing the most heart out there!

2013-09-30T13:18:04+00:00

Rugby is life

Guest


Ok Magic now we have a discussing. A team but no justification. I will give you Ryan at 3. Aulea at 8 has good Mongrel Sorry can't have kuridrani looks like Tarzan plays like jane. Mogg is injured. Folau is over rated over hyped. Can catch a high ball but that's it. Not deserving of a Wallaby jersey right now. Has potential but is absolutely lost out there. I am a Hooper fan but it is like the chicken hawk and foghorn leghorn. "go away boy you're bothering me " I want to see beau. Played his heart out against the Lions. Gives everything. Moore is off his game

2013-09-30T13:17:31+00:00

Magic Sponge

Guest


Cause QC is a time bomb who has yet to produce and it is time to blood new players who will have a go and is not scared to run it.

2013-09-30T13:01:02+00:00

Magic Sponge

Guest


2, 3, 7, 8, 12 , 11,14, 15. Would not pick but rest of team spot. Mongrel is what I want as well. My team 1. Sio 2. Moore 3. Ryan 4. Horwill /Mowen based on form. 5. Timani 6. Fardy 7. Hooper 8. Aulea 9. Genia 10. CL or Foley 11. Kudriani 12. AAC 13. JOC/ 2014Folau 14. Mogg 15. Folau/ JOC

2013-09-30T12:53:46+00:00

Mike

Guest


"although it’d be nice if it wasn’t the halfback’s job to solve that problem." Fair enough for the halfback to do that though, isn't it? He feeds the forwards short ones while the 5/8 looks after the backs. Its a rugby cliche, but nothing wrong with doing it, so long as it doesn't become a slavish habit.

2013-09-30T12:37:03+00:00


Fortunately for "US" Bok supporters, you are in the minority and your one eyed biased view doesn't matter ;)

2013-09-30T12:34:57+00:00

Rugby is Life

Guest


Actually Zero, I commented that Quade's defence had improved, some copy book tackles. I noticed a turnover when he clawed the ball out as well. But he isn't capable of the dominant tackle. I can't question his bravery, in my view for whatever reason he is not the player he was 2 years ago. I think anyone taking the man of the match award for oz would have been embarassed, Its like a booby prize, best of a bad lot. Might just throw in another tow cents worth. Robinson made a huge difference to our scrum when he came on. In fact if you look at the impact he made on the game it could be argued his was greater than any other player in the Australian side. But that role is so undervalued and under appreciated it is rare that the prop gets accolades for doing his job well. When the CEO is only concerned about running rugby what can you expect.

2013-09-30T12:27:01+00:00

Aaron

Guest


Do you bok supporters ever blame your own team? Really getting a bit sick of all the whinging out of SA. The softest bunch of supporters in world rugby imo.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar