Player ratings: Wallabies vs England

By Scott Allen / Expert

The Wallabies’ opening match of the end of year tour against England at Twickenham fell on the second of November – 22 years to the day after the Wallabies and England played the 1991 Rugby World Cup final at the same ground.

In just under two years time, on the third of October 2015, the two sides will face off again at the same ground in a crucial pool match in the next Rugby World Cup.

The weekend’s match was seen as an opportunity for both teams to stake their claim of an early advantage over the other.

The members of the 1991 Wallabies team would have been dismayed by the performance from the 2013 Wallabies and if the Wallabies play like that in the 2015 Rugby World Cup they won’t make it out of the pool stages.

While the refereeing was dreadful (from the man in the middle, the men on the touch lines and the TMO) that cannot be an excuse for how poorly the Wallabies played, particularly in that second half.

The forwards were completely outplayed in the contact areas again.

There were very few good performances from the Wallabies and unfortunately some absolutely terrible performances.

Here are my player ratings for each of the Wallabies. No doubt there won’t be universal agreement with my ratings, so have your say below.










The Crowd Says:

2013-11-09T10:11:41+00:00

Bobby Dazzler

Guest


I think your ratings are pretty spot on. I know I was critical the other day about Ewen McKenzie's positional selections, but based on your comments of Sitaleki Timani and Ben Mowen, why not move BenMowen to second row. I'm sure our No.9's would also appreciate BenMowen being relieved of the job of passing them the ball from the back of our scrum.

2013-11-06T10:15:07+00:00

Chan Wee

Guest


Another analysis and different views; long but interesting. "" Expert Witness: November Tests 05th November 2013 13:42 Expert Witness returns to Planet Rugby with former England and Lions flank Peter Winterbottom the newest addition to our panel. With the result of New Zealand's warm-up in Tokyo never in any doubt, we focus on England's opener against Australia at Twickenham. Slow off the mark, rusty out of the blocks, Stuart Lancaster's troops nevertheless increased their tempo in the second-half to overcome a committed Wallaby display. Expert Witness welcomes one of England's most-capped flankers of all time, Winterbottom, to rake over the coals of the Bonfire weekend events. "I think the most telling observation I could make was the lack of shape of both sides," observed the former England openside. "It was a very narrow game of rugby, with a high error count. "England's tactics seemed very basic, and the paucity of width on their game was evident from the first minute. Even from second phase I don't think either winger got a direct pass, which is very disappointing. "I have no issue with basic rugby; indeed the All Blacks are masters of that style of game. But if you play that way, execution and shape have to be spot on, and details such as re-starts and kick chases have to be delivered with a high degree of accuracy. "At one point in the game, England took an openside drop-out from their 22, only to have Cole, Mako Vunipola and Lawes chasing that restart. A classic case of poor strategic thinking and poor tactical delivery. "Looking at Australia, Wallaby sides are always inventive and are one of those teams that's always looking to make the ball do the work through inventive handling," explained Winterbottom. "It was therefore quite puzzling to see the Aussies kick to our back three on so many occasions. "When a full-back gets a man-of-the-match award, yet doesn't score a try, then you question the amount of deep kicking that took place by the opposition. "I don't believe that Brown made one run from an openfield pass; every run was a counter attack out of defence, which tells you Australia played a very aerial game." Examining the match stats, Australia kicked to open field on 16 occasions, eight more than in the third Test v the British and Irish Lions. Winterbottom explains that he was very surprised to see the positional selections of some of the Australian backs. "Picking their best midfielder, Adam Ashley-Cooper, on the right wing, tells you there's going to be some kick chasing. However, looking at the wider agenda, it made little sense to have a man of his penetrative brilliance in midfield out on the wing, although I can see how playing Israel Falau in the middle of the back three can give him more freedom. "However, once they'd selected him there, I was surprised how they failed to get him onto the phase ball at pace, and into a situation where he could use his devastating outside break." And what of England? They started spluttering and misfiring like an old car fired up for the first time after winter. As the engines warmed up, so did the performance, led by another excellent showing from the England front-row. Not far behind were the back-row; a distant second in the corresponding fixture last season, Tom Wood, Chris Robshaw and new boy Billy Vunipola woke up from the initial exchanges to provide a platform of huge power at ruck and maul. Winterbottom believes that England's kick chasing, poor in the first-half, improved, led by the commitment of fellow flankers, Robshaw and Wood. "Although I still believe that that England back-row lacks balance and that we don't have a real flyer at seven, Robshaw's kick chasing, Wood's graft and industry, and Billy Vunipola's huge power blended well," commented our expert. "Michael Hooper, a thorn in England's side before, was driven back the moment he laid his hands on loose ball. England, led by the behemoth Vunipola brothers, used their superior bulk to smash the Australian loose defence way back over the gain line. "The lighter weight Aussie loose forwards were powered off the park. This is fine against a side noted more for skill and handling than power, but I'll be interested to see how more powerful sides like South Africa, France and New Zealand, cope with the same strategy," said Winterbottom. "On the credit side, the front-row went well. Dan Cole controlled the scrum height all day, and, to be cruel, Slipper lived up to his name and slipped off his bind many times due to Cole's pressure. It was also good to see the hooker being forced to hook. I believe the new laws will aid good technical scrummagers, especially those that like to set to scrum height. Cole is a master in this area and the Wallaby scrum was pretty much demolished in terms of effectiveness. "A lot of people have criticised Will Genia and said he was quiet; any scrum-half is going to struggle against so much back-foot ball and he rarely had the chance to use the ball with his side going forward with momentum. "This also means that Quade Cooper, a man that craves front-foot gainline ball, creeps deeper and deeper into the pocket, and, being such an intuitive player, probably back into his mental shell too, despite the boost MacKenzie has given him in naming his as vice captain. "This absolutely emphasises the importance of dominating the area a yard behind the tackle line, something England did better than Australia." In terms of the midfield, England seemed industrious rather than creative. A new combination produced in the public schools of Leicestershire and the Rugby League hotbed of Wigan failed to impress, with Billy Twelvetrees missing a number of crucial tackles. "Billy was unlucky, but he stepped up out of the defensive line too many times. Once he created a dog leg, the Australians will exploit this. He needs to hold back, communicate and place trust in the two guys either side of him," said Winterbottom. "Joel Tomkins looks solid if unspectacular. I believe he played both lock and centre in the 13 man code. There is a reason he started at lock, and on this showing, one wonders if he has the pace and guile that England need at outside centre. "Many people are quick to criticize Brad Barritt, but the defensive certainty and organisation he brings to the midfield is invaluable. He was missed greatly." Looking forward to Argentina and New Zealand, it appears England's second-half showing will provide an impetus to work off. But Winterbottom believes that there is a lot of work still to take place: "I think we lost four line-outs out of seven. Now a line-out is a sum of many things; the throw, the lift, the guard, the catch. But simple things went wrong, and you have to question the overall leadership of our line-out rather than the individual components. We overthrew a longer ball, we were not straight, we threw short, making the catcher stoop down to catch off the lift. All in all, not great, until Dylan Hartley came on, although I'd emphasise that Tom Youngs was not aided by his colleagues. "And on the subject of impact, Ben Youngs' introduction changed the pace of England's attack considerably. Lee Dickson is used to an armchair ride at Saints, but Ben showed the sniping pace he's known for and added a lot in the last 20 minutes. "However, the biggest concern I have is that lack of fluidity or attacking intent in midfield. Our game is so narrow it's almost painful to watch. It's many Tests since I've been wowed by a piece of visionary play from an England centre, and still there appears to be a lack of pattern of attack and a lack of consistency of where to attack from. "Changing personnel does not help, but it's the thinking that concerns me, and I really don't see enough creativity coming from that midfield trio. Certainly not enough to keep Kieran Reed and co. up all night worrying about containment!" Winterbottom's last word goes on Australia. A side that lost narrowly to an exceptional British and Irish Lions team in June and July, they seem to have stagnated. Winterbottom believes selection could be an issue: "It's strange to see so much controversy in Australian sport. They have a clean image and many dedicated athletes. Dealing with the Beales and O'Connors of this world is not helping the Wallaby cause. Factor in that McKenzie selects players that are proven performers in one position, and then asks them to do another job completely, and you see that Australia are disjointed and lacking shape. "I think both sides have some way to go if they're going to be able the challenge the best come September 2015." Peter Winterbottom was speaking to James While. A world-class flanker, Peter Winterbottom won 58 caps for England and seven for the British and Irish Lions. An iconic figure in the number seven shirt, his intelligent support play and hard tacking were features of his game. ""

2013-11-06T03:04:40+00:00

Sam

Guest


Hi Scott, I would love to see a video analysis regarding the Wallabies defensive structures. To me they seem to get caught out too often with backs covering the fringes of the ruck and the tight 5 covering the quick men. This has led to many line breaks and a couple of soft tries in the past couple of games.

2013-11-05T23:33:41+00:00

joeb

Guest


Scott, Alexander 2/10. Timani 2/10. Mowen 3/10. Genia 2/10. White 3/10. Ouch. Hmmmmmmmmmm, so considering halfbacks, meaning their 'acceptable performance level' lack thereof, Phibbsie should be starting at Turin... and maybe it's time to call in Frisby - "SOS" - too? Moore 7/10. I'd deduct a whole tenth for blatant 'unsuccessful attempted penalty milking', when he shoulda been solely concentrating on tackling Farrell with the added incentive of imprinting him into the hallowed Twickers turf, guaranteeing to have elicited an audible "Ooooohhh!" around the ground spilling well over into greater ol' London town.

2013-11-05T22:06:44+00:00

Gonzo Jacobs

Roar Rookie


Just so he can turn up late to the ruck.

2013-11-05T20:46:35+00:00

Mike

Guest


What did "JOC do this weekend", apart from play fullback for London Irish?

2013-11-05T18:10:55+00:00

Kibz

Guest


Scott, I like a back-row with Higginbotham (who matured into an abrasive 8),Pocock and Fardy....throw in Pyle at lock with either Horwill/Mcmeniman (if healthy) and that would be a back 5 that work hard all 80 minutes, with some Mongrel and impact at the breakdown. I would love to see Digby back on OZ colors, and we need to see Speight as soon as possible. I think a wing corps of Speight, Ioane, Cummins, Tomane, Beale could do the business. After what JOC did this weekend, i don't see him maturing enough to make it back into the squad. Finally, What are the chances Link reaches out to Giteau who has been clinical in France?

2013-11-05T17:16:46+00:00

Ben.S

Roar Guru


Crockett would struggle to make many European club sides let alone any other team in the world.

2013-11-05T16:04:10+00:00

Brian

Guest


Why not trial Kuridrani at 12 at some stage? He seems to be a sort of Nonu-Lite. He is a big powerful runner who has some ball handling, and defensively sound although Nonu is superior in all of those aspects. This would allow for Folau to come in to 13, and Foley to go to 15. Although Toomua's play lately has been very solid...

2013-11-05T15:27:11+00:00

BlueBlood

Guest


I truly believe that the only 2 players last saturday that played for their country were Moore and Cummins. I don't think its skill, physicality, technique or anything really I truly think that we have a team of guys who have seriously lost the meaning of playing for their country. Will Genia was atrocious and typical Roar everyones come out and said "on his day he's the best 9 in the world" well I've got an answer to that. Last year we beat England with Nick Phipps at halfback. White has been ordinary, Genia worse so why not give Nick a run again? Cooper has grown a lot. There is no way I'd put myself in front of Billy Vulopola but in saying that I counted at least 3 times where Cooper was nothing more than a speed bump. There is 3 times England made the advantage line where if Matt Toomua was in the 10 channel it may have been different. I am a massive Hooper fan but he was quiet in attack, pulled off some big hits but generally we expect a higher level of involvement from him. Im sure he will bounce back this weekend though. Kuridrani is another player who is average at best. Great fend but other than that he is slow, runs far too upright and doesn't add that extra punch that the ball running 13's are meant to. I don't have an answer to fix this problem other than shove AAC back there but I'm not sure we have a suitable winger to cover him. Possible Mitch Inman in the future? The Props should be rotated with Benn and Kepu on. It couldn't make things worse. My final thought goes back to wanting to play for your country. In NZ and SA rugby is a religion. In Australia rugby is perceived as the private school rich kids sport. The long term future in Australian rugby is not performances but it is recreating public interests in our primary schools. We need to have people going to schools everywhere telling kids to play rugby. I miss the days of walla rugby and signing up and getting posters with Bernie and George Smith and putting them on my wall. They were my idols and i can say looking back on my short life that the current group of wallabies doesn't have that same aura that the teams of the early to mid 2000's had. Many might say thats because we won more often but I believe George Smith was onto something when it was quoted in his book that he felt the change when the beers got put in the fridge and not in an eskie

2013-11-05T12:54:53+00:00

Westie

Guest


Rugby taught in schools? That's funny. ...

2013-11-05T12:48:55+00:00

Westie

Guest


Bs rk. Since lions genias been slow. Still think white deserves more time but ffs give Phipps a go if he will speed it up.

2013-11-05T12:41:56+00:00

RobC

Guest


I don't subscribe to economising BD commitment. Its far too critical. Actually, my point is WBs should position more people around the ruck to support and exploit the gaps in the following movement. England went in with numbers intending to bully the WBs. But it didn't happen - even the pom commentators mentioned it. Generally, WB got over the ad line often despite the Pom "onslaught". But England will be more effective in subsequent games. Genia had a bad game, no excuses.

2013-11-05T12:17:58+00:00

expathack

Guest


"English had too many players in the BD and should have been exploited" This kind of thinking is the Wallabies problems in a nutshell. If you don't commit numbers you're going to get poor or no ball. There's zero advantage to be gained having an extra forward or two in an already crowded backline. Particularly when it means there aren't enough men doing the hard yards and protecting the ball. It was the area where England gained most advantage on the weekend. And has been a near constant weakness. Lost count of the number of times they were able to just stroll through the ruck and disrupt Genia, while a bunch of forwards stood around helplessly watching from a distance. The whole "don't commit numbers to the breakdown mentality" is a decade out of date. It worked for a while in the late 90s early 00s, before everyone realised how easy it is to attack a poorly defended ball at the ruck. The rest of the rugby world's moved on, but for some reason Aus haven't. And its absolutely killing us.

2013-11-05T12:05:12+00:00

icky47

Guest


Well Harry, Bob Deans scored the try against Wales in 1905 and a conversation would have won us the game..... but it wasn't allowed ........ so we didn't! "Tough tits" really but a damn good talking point still.

2013-11-05T11:54:18+00:00

icky47

Guest


I think you are pretty spot on Scott, except I would have given AAC 7/10, I think everyone including myself, rate this guy far too low. He is both so dependable and consistent. Any error by him stands out like "Dog's Balls"

2013-11-05T11:43:59+00:00

icky47

Guest


I guess its proving a lot more difficult in reality. "Let's just forget the forwards, and throw the ball out to our brilliant backs, who will then play "the Aussie Way" and score countless tries' Sadly just doesn't cut it, as the English team was happy to prove. They must have said "Let's shut down the half back and first five, this will frustrate the hell out of them!"

2013-11-05T11:36:22+00:00

expathack

Guest


You're right that the boys need a shrink. There seems to be something seriously wrong with the mental state of a fair few players in that team. Don't know if it's lack of confidence or unhappiness at the environment but a lot of them look really disengaged on the field. Like they can't really be bothered. Genia and Horwill would be right at the top of the list.

2013-11-05T11:35:51+00:00

Sprigs

Guest


Are these blokes emigrating here? Is that why they are being mentioned. I think we would have to wait a couple of years before they could apply for the team.

2013-11-05T11:34:09+00:00

expathack

Guest


"But I do disagree with your rating on alexander who I think should be at least a 7. he was the one shining light in that game for mine." This is easily the funniest comment I've read on here. Well done.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar