What we learnt in NCAA College Football Week 10

By Andrew Kitchener / Roar Guru

In Week 10 of NCAA College Football, we learnt that Florida State are very good, Notre Dame are not very good, and Ohio State are good, but not good enough.

Florida State are very good
It’s not all about the Seminoles’ electric freshman quarterback Jameis Winston. Top to bottom, Jimbo Fisher’s squad is among the best in the country. I believe they deserve to be ranked behind only Alabama in the BCS rankings, but that’s another story for another day.

The ‘Noles proved as much against an undefeated Miami-FL outfit on Saturday night. They were tested early by a Hurricanes team who came out of the box with a lot of energy, and put on the back foot by a couple of early interceptions by Winston.

Despite receicing proof that he is something less than superhuman, FSU showed their mettle.

You learn a lot about the makeup of a team when they’re in a pressure situation and Florida State came through with flying colours. They clawed and fought against a plucky Miami unit in the tight first half, and came out after the break, making big plays, offensively and defensively, en route to an impressive victory.

More than any other game this season – even the beat-down of Clemson in Death Valley – the victory over Miami was a signature one.

It was also a statement, because the pressure was higher than it’s been for years in Tallahassee, of how well prepared this football team is. On current form, they will be tough to keep out of that BCS National Championship game.

Notre Dame are not very good
As a USC fan, it pleases me to see Notre Dame having a sub-par season. Was last year’s undefeated regular season run to the BCS National Championship Game a mirage?

Maybe. Certainly, the Irish have suffered at quarterback, with Everett Golson suspended for the season, and backup Tommy Rees has thrown a bunch of ill-timed interceptions at crucial times in games.

Defensively, the rock at linebacker that Manti T’eo had become is missing, and Notre Dame just hasn’t looked the same.

Their inability, for the most part, to deal with Navy’s triple-option offence says a lot about the way the season’s going for Brian Kelly’s team. They’ve squeaked past a few opponents this year in ugly fashion (as they did last year), but the difference between now and then is the lack of a big scalp or two, which the Irish delivered, usually on national television.

Last season, Notre Dame won ugly against Pitt and Stanford and others, but blew out Oklahoma on the road and harassed Michigan into multiple turnovers.

This year, they beat USC, but that doesn’t mean much at the moment. Oklahoma returned the favour, routing the Irish in South Bend, by way of some Blake Bell magic, and Michigan’s on-off signal caller Devin Gardner made the Irish defence look flimsy under lights in Ann Arbor.

That the Wolverines have done little since reflects poorly on Notre Dame. Their 7-2 record is rather flattering.

Things are looking up at USC
Interim head coach Ed Orgeron said he wanted to bring back the fun and energy to the Trojans. Well, I’d say he’s done a pretty good job thus far.

Despite a blemish in South Bend, the raging Cajun has the Men of Troy rolling along, amassing a 3-0 Pac-12 record under his watch. Last week’s victory against Oregon State in Corvallis – where they haven’t won since the high-flying Reggie Bush/Matt Leinart days of 2004 – was their most impressive of the season, and a sign that USC might yet make noise in the Pac-12 race down the stretch.

The sudden turnaround has come thanks to some good defence, which the Trojans admittedly had under Lane Kiffin this year, but mostly by way of vastly improved offence. Gone are the obsessions with receiver screens and passes to the fullback, and in vogue under new play caller Clay Helton are deep shots.

All American/Biletnikoff Award winner WR Marqise Lee, healthy again, has become the weapon we all knew he could be. TE Randal Telfer has been a revelation under Helton’s play-calling watch, as has WR Nelson Agholor.

It’s been rough for those of us who bleed cardinal and gold, but, finally, there’s light at the end of the tunnel.

Orgeron’s ferocious energy reminds me of Pete Carroll’s, and it’s good to see guys in the Trojan uniform walking around with the swagger we all remember from the glory days – when Bush was electric, when Cushing and Clay Matthews were beating guys up.

Whoever the new coach is next year, not retaining Orgeron on staff would be a huge mistake.

Johnny Manziel can and should win another Heisman
The popular theory is that Johnny Manziel won’t win back-to-back Heisman Trophies, and I have a problem with that.

The award for college football’s Most Outstanding Player should go to Manziel because there is no more electric a player at full flight than the Texas A&M quarterback.

Saturday night on ESPN’s telecast, Brock Huard brought up a quote from a scout who said that when Manziel is up and about he ‘glides’ across the field.

That’s true: witness his 49-yard touchdown run, in which he knifed through a bunch of would-be UTEP tacklers. It was breathtaking stuff.

I know he’s lost two games, but Manziel can’t help that the A&M defence is ridiculously porous. That they haven’t lost more than two this year is testament to Manziel’s ridiculous ability.

Oregon’s Marcus Mariota is good. Florida State’s Jameis Winston is good. Baylor’s Lache Seastrunk is good. But none of those players, for all their undeniable talent, comes close to possessing the freakish ability that Manziel has.

You hold your breath when he takes a snap, because there’s a chance on every single play that something magic happens.

Johnny Football is a once-in-a-generation player, whose numbers are trending upwards in comparison to last season, and is by far the most exciting – and, admittedly, polarising – player in America at the moment.

He makes the sort of plays no one else can or does. He deserves a second Heisman. And let me remind you of one thing: Baylor’s Robert Griffin III won the Heisman in 2011 during a multi-loss season.

Ohio State are good, but not good enough
The Achilles heel of the Buckeyes, undefeated for the best part of two years now, is their conference. The Big Ten, aside from underrated Wisconsin and defensive-laden Michigan State, is bad.

No, perhaps ‘bad’ isn’t the right word. In 2013, the Big Ten is horrendously woeful.

Michigan have fallen away, Northwestern have fallen away, Nebraska barely got started, Indiana isn’t ever going to be a national football power and Purdue aren’t much better.

The weak conference suggests that the Buckeyes will be left out in the cold as far as a shot at a National Championship – even if, as expected, they win their final three games,  including the annual showdown with Michigan, this year at the Big House.

The Rose Bowl Game on New Year’s Day isn’t a bad fallback, but the Buckeyes will be wanting more, and likely be disappointed in not going to the Rose Bowl a week later for the National Championship Game.

Worse, they’ll be ruing last year. If they hadn’t self-assessed a post-season ban in Luke Fickell’s interim season after Jim Tressel was fired, the Buckeyes might have played in the BCS National Championship.

Instead, they were levied a year’s post-season ban by the NCAA and their undefeated season was for nought.

The slim chance of Ohio State making the BCS National Championship Game this year depends on three things.

They need a rash of upsets to the teams above them in the BCS rankings, an improved showing by Michigan heading into their showdown on November 30, and a tough battle from Michigan State, OSU’s projected opponent in the Big Ten Championship Game.

I doubt it will all happen, so the Buckeyes, like Auburn in 2003, will miss out on a chance to play for all the marbles.

The Crowd Says:

2013-11-08T05:42:06+00:00

Worlds Biggest

Guest


Stanford for the second straight year end Oregon's National Title hopes. Just shows strong Defence and run game will always trump a video game offence. Well really it is won and lost in the trenches and Oregon got a pizzling in the trenches. Until they develop a physical hard nosed defence they won't win it all. Stanford will be ruing that loss to Utah. Party time tonight in Palo Alto and Talahasse. Bama v Florida State for the Big Dance.

2013-11-06T09:08:04+00:00

Worlds Biggest

Guest


They really need to get it right re the hire. After the Charlie Weiss era I too wanted an A + hire and really wanted Stoops or Meyer but ended up with a B + in Kelly. Admittedly from a coaching perspective USC is a plum job, great resources, cashed up, conveyor belt of talent to recruit , great fan base and no NFL team to compete with. Not to mention a nice part of the World to live in. It's a great job to land. I'd love to know who else is on the hot list.

AUTHOR

2013-11-06T05:45:34+00:00

Andrew Kitchener

Roar Guru


Meant to also say that I don't think they'll go after Sark (much as I'd like to see him back). This will be a real tier-A+ coaching selection, O think. Sark's around A-.

2013-11-06T03:37:40+00:00

Worlds Biggest

Guest


That's interesting, the NFC East is very winnable these days. If he can win in the NFL his price tag will only increase.

AUTHOR

2013-11-06T02:21:31+00:00

Andrew Kitchener

Roar Guru


My eyes and ears in the program suggest Chip Kelly might be a chance. Things aren't going so well in the NFL. Well, up until this week's win, anyway.

2013-11-06T02:16:34+00:00

Worlds Biggest

Guest


Kiffin is a head case and completely made a hash of it at USC.Coach O is a recruiting guru so who ever comes in most definitely will need to keep him. USC will need to break the bank for Sumlin I think. He is doing good things with A & M in the SEC. No doubt it's a coveted job and should be plenty of quality candidates. Would David Shaw leave Stanford, would they target Steve Sarkisian who is a former coordinator or be really audacious and go after Bob Stoops.

AUTHOR

2013-11-06T01:09:19+00:00

Andrew Kitchener

Roar Guru


Yes, you've won two years in a row, but I'd prefer to look at the bigger picture since about 2004! haha Yeah, Brian Kelly's play-calling reminds me of Lane Kiffin's (though without the play card that looks a lot like a Denny's menu) and look what happened to Lane. USC can be good again, and whilst I'm not yet advocating for Coach O to get the head job next year, whomever comes on board would be making significant inroads with the fan base and players if they hire him in some capacity. The guy is a master recruiter: he can sell ice to eskimos. I'd like to see someone along the lines of Kevin Sumlin or Pat Fitzgerald get the job.

2013-11-06T00:45:01+00:00

Worlds Biggest

Guest


Nice piece Andrew, I will start the banter and was stoked we beat USC for the second year running ! As a Notre Dame fan I like where we are heading. Yep no doubt this year hasn't been convincing with too many close games. Brian Kelly has been too cute with his play calling instead of playing to strengths which is the run game. That said we can finish off the season well and IF we beat Stanford we might sneak a BCS bowl game. We get Golson back next year and the offence has the ability to be seriously good. Folson & Bryant in the running game. Troy Niklas is a beast at tight end while Robinson and Daniels have wheels and look good. On defence Jaylon Smith is going to be something special while the defensive backfield is loaded with promising Freshers Cole Luke and USC de committ Max Redfield. As for USC, while you have looked OK the PAC 12 is a lot more competitive than recent years so you have your work cut out for you, the coaching hire will be crucial. Florida State look very good but so do Oregon while Bama are Bama, just keep winning. Agree Ohio State play in a cream puff conference and are racking up cricket scores. I can't take them seriously. As for the Heisman, Johnny Football is putting up big numbers again so could see him backing up. Go Irish !

AUTHOR

2013-11-06T00:19:15+00:00

Andrew Kitchener

Roar Guru


For mine, Baylor's Lache Seastrunk isn't getting enough attention. I know he's somewhat overshadowed by Bryce Petty and the fleet of top-gun receivers they have, but he's cranking out 100-yard games like it's going out of fashion and I have trouble understanding just how Heisman Trophy voters and pundits seem to have Seastrunk as merely an afterthought.

2013-11-05T21:51:08+00:00

Lilly Laguna

Guest


First rate post, Andrew. Your old school star, RB, was the best college running back I ever saw, although not the best pro - that would be Gayle Sayers and Eric Dickenson with AP not that far behind. Reggie's success is partly explained by his speed - he recorded a 10.4 on the track, pretty good for a guy his size. As for the Heisman, people have trouble looking beyond QBs. This year there are 9 QBs out of 14 players in the running. Did I say running? Maybe throwing would be a better verb. College football used to be all about the run but the NFL influence has them chucking the ball a lot these days. Too bad. Oregon/Stanford's the game this Saturday. Tough one to pick.

Read more at The Roar