Why Australia will reclaim the Ashes

By Luke Smyke / Roar Pro

The return Ashes series for 2013/14 promises to be one of the closest fought over the history of duels between the two old enemies.

After three consecutive drubbings, the Australians appear as though they will field their most competent squad since their last series victory in 2007.

The English will no doubt be eager to retain the Ashes for a second time running on Australian shores and their commitment and resolve shouldn’t trammel their aspirations.

This Australian team however, shall come up trumps this time around and reclaim the urn they have so long coveted.

Here is why.

Finally it appears the selectors have been on a steady dose of commonsense pills and are content with fielding the most consistent players available, rather than enduring a futile search for imminent world-beaters.

They have conceded players of the calibre of Shane Warne, Matt Hayden, Glenn McGrath and Adam Gilchrist aren’t churned out on a production line like Uncle Toby’s oats and have ceased with their foolish ploy of experimenting with players who exhibit patches of potential.

Now we have opted for our best current crop of players to take the field in the first Test.

This is most evident in their retention of Nathan Lyon and Brad Haddin; two reliable players who have performed almost without fail for the national team, yet have previously held positions as precarious as a Labor Party leader’s.

Now we have some continuity and, what’s more, a squad with familiarity.

Then there’s the case of Steven Smith. An indisputably talented player, one who has the faculty to become one of his country’s greatest ever players, Smith has long been one of the biggest victims of the transitional phase the Australian team has undergone.

As the selectors went on their irrational spree of handing out baggy greens like they were Fitness First promotional flyers, Smith was given a different set of instructions for just about every series.

For a while he was touted as the new Shane Warne, playing as a frontline spinner who batted a little.

He also fronted as an explosive top order hitter in limited overs formats, a bit-part Test player who was of the Ronnie Irani mould, possessing roles with neither bat or ball that should warrant selection and even as a specialist fielder who bowled a couple of overs and was good for a couple of late innings boundaries.

Now, however, the brains trust have settled on their depiction on Smith and devised a cunning plan.

He will be utilised for his pre-eminent batting skills and hold a key position in the middle order he should make his own for a decade to come.

His role has been established and the man has a clear head. There will be plenty of runs coming off his bat this summer.

A player who has been dealt similar fortune is Shane Watson. While his role hasn’t enjoyed the undulations that Smith’s might have, he could have been forgiven for his indifferent stretches of form due to the expectations placed upon him.

A man whose career has been harshly curtailed by injury, too much was asked of Watson to open the batting and bowl 20 overs an innings in a battling side.

Although one of the few world-class players in the side, his credentials cannot be maximised if such a load is placed upon him.

The extra breathing space afforded to him at first drop should see a highly productive series. If his injuries subside, his wares with the ball will no doubt come to the fore as well.

On that note, it appears Ryan Harris has also seen the worst of his troublesome battles with his hulking body.

A late bloomer, Harris has become the spearhead of the attack and should he and Peter Siddle stride out alongside one another in each and every Test, the English batsmen will have more than their work cut out for them.

Regarding the English side, their attack isn’t as formidable as it has been in the previous three series.

Yes, James Anderson is a class act and proved to us on his last tour of Australia he isn’t just a green track burglar or a master exponent of the Dukes ball, but what will his support be like?

Stuart Broad was arguably England’s best in the most recent Ashes series but he hasn’t completed a Test match in Australia before, in fact he hasn’t even played a one day international match here.

There is no questioning his capabilities with a cricket ball but how long is it going to take him to find his groove in completely foreign conditions?

Furthermore, the English maintain they have a luxury of choosing between three high quality quick bowlers for the third seamer’s position, yet if Chris Tremlett was half the bowler he was last time he came out here then the selectors wouldn’t even need to consider another option.

Then of course there’s the jovial, charismatic Graeme Swann. The world’s best finger spinner over the past five years and a competitor in the ilk Pat Symcox.

His returns weren’t bad last time he toured down under, yet they were hardly superb and his virtues of subtle variation off the surface, moreso than in the air will again be nullified by the harder, truer Australian surfaces.

Viewers worldwide will be fixed to their boxes to enjoy one of sport’s most famous contests. A preponderance of those onlookers will regard the English as firm favourites for their notable consistency this epoch of cricketers has provided them.

The Crowd Says:

2015-02-10T10:35:44+00:00

KOS

Guest


Start eating your words alvey.

2014-01-09T23:35:21+00:00

TimD

Guest


This prediction turned out 100% accurate

2014-01-09T11:17:59+00:00

Tim

Guest


This turned out to be oddly prophetic. Well done.

AUTHOR

2013-12-17T17:25:58+00:00

Luke Smyke

Roar Pro


What style of humour after you after now mr Hookin?

2013-11-20T19:33:13+00:00

Homer Gain

Guest


What's this "faculty" he keeps going on about. Is it the faculty of Philosophy at the Universityof Woolloomooloo?

2013-11-20T18:38:16+00:00

alvey

Guest


Why not practice that yourself Louis? For instance, you (immortally) say that Smith " has the faculty to become one of his country’s greatest ever players...". Ok. So now name the "great" Australian players who have had batting techniques as bad as Smiths. In round numbers that'd be a very round number. Zero. If you aspire to be a sports writer Louis than I'd suggest that you lose the parochialism. Some actual knowledge of your target sport would be helpful too.

2013-11-19T09:33:31+00:00

trev

Guest


Nice article Mrs Smith.

2013-11-17T23:36:42+00:00

Pope Paul VII

Guest


*

2013-11-17T14:34:17+00:00

ChrisUK

Guest


And Root is 22. Your point? I like the look of Smith, but you can't dismiss one and approve of the other on the same basis.

2013-11-17T13:46:11+00:00

Hookin' YT

Guest


Louis keep the hilarious analysis coming throughout the summer. Please?

2013-11-17T13:44:12+00:00

Hookin' YT

Guest


Watson? This is a windup indeed.

2013-11-17T13:42:18+00:00

Hookin' YT

Guest


Missed Root on 9, went on to 180, we lost 2nd Test. Wade isn't a club keeper. Hartley, Paine, Nevill etc

2013-11-17T12:42:32+00:00

Ian Whitchurch

Guest


I'm voting both.

2013-11-17T12:20:35+00:00

peter

Guest


World record for dismissals in England, Wade is worse behind the stumps & hasn't regularly scored runs

2013-11-17T12:11:09+00:00

MervUK

Guest


And an average of 45, with a match winning 180 at lords in his second ashes test.....while Warner is potentially a wonderful player, smith is dire. He scored his hundred in a dead rubber with a second choice attack, and his other score of note he was out 3 times. I'm delighted he's still in the side

2013-11-17T12:04:11+00:00

James

Guest


actually you have to ask what players like shane warne, don bradman, glenn mcgrath had done by the age of 24 because your comments did not compare him to very good english players, you compared him to the greatest players australia has ever produced. and bradman by the age of 24 which was in 1932 had become the youngest player to score a test century, had a 1690 runs at 93.88 in 28/29, 113.28 average in 29/30 including a last man out 124 and first man out after the follow on 225 and against qld in shield game scored 452 not out in only 415 minutes and then played england in 1930 for australia and got 974 at an average of 139.14. at some time in 1930/31 after playing south africa he had an average of 131 after 15 test matches. i could go on but alt tabbing is hard. basically compared to don bradman, a man who it is perfectly acceptable to compare a player who you called potentially one of this country’s greatest ever players smith looks kinda shite.

2013-11-17T11:51:47+00:00

James

Guest


you do realise your argument here louis is that anything england do when they are winning doesnt count and we have to wait for them to start losing before we can make any comments on their players? using this logic ponting is one of australias worst ever batsmen because despite playing well when his team was great he was woeful when they were bad. and what about players like warne or ambrose who pretty much only ever played in teams that were awesome? we must take them out of all record books their stats are useless.

2013-11-17T11:50:06+00:00

Bobbo7

Guest


Watson has done stuff all in test cricket and makes runs when the series is lost. And yes Root is better than Smith and Warner based on performances to date and he is only 22. I hope smith and Warner get it together but on paper the England top 6 are far superior to Australia at the moment.

2013-11-17T11:47:50+00:00

James

Guest


clarke cannot be that skilful a tactician if he loses 3-0 to a side whos batsmen averaged, i cant be bothered spending 5 minutes to look it up but im guessing it was, somewhere around 25ish. and his aggressive captaincy is kind of forced upon him considering that the tactic of telling this australian team to bat out a couple of sessions would be optimism of the highest grade. not that australia cant bat out a couple of sessions they totally can, my point is more concerning the second innings and them being given specific orders to play it slow bat out the day.

2013-11-17T11:42:06+00:00

James

Guest


i fail to see how clarke being willing to sacrifice a guaranteed draw for a potential loss is something that we should admire. there is nothing wrong with a defensive mindset.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar