The third Ashes Test of the summer is set to be a defining one for the legacies of the opposing captains, Michael Clarke and Alastair Cook.
The beginning of the previous series saw ludicrous predictions by some (mainly English) pundits predicting a 10-0 win. It is obvious now that it will take an abrupt form reversal from both sides in order for Australia not to regain the Ashes.
An interesting side note of this battle is how it will define the careers of two of the best players of this generation in Clarke and Cook.
Both are tremendous players, but at this stage their captaincy ability hasn’t lived up to their playing ability.
Sure, both have won Test series before, but it is certain to be this one in which their legacies are measured.
This is the biggest test of Cook’s tenure no doubt. Being 2-0 down in an Ashes series is the biggest challenge imaginable in Test cricket, and not one he would have thought to be possible prior to the series.
What England need to do now is fight. They need to go in with a four- or five-pronged pace attack and fight fire with fire.
Cook will have to be at the heart of this willing his team on at every opportunity. This is his time to stamp his mark on this English side.
Since Cook took over the captaincy from Andrew Strauss the core of the team has stayed together, with the success that Strauss helped create being inherited by Cook.
The best way he can inspire his troops is win the toss and bat first. This will show his team that his is prepared to fight.
From there, the reality is he needs to score a century – and preferably a big one.
England must make 450-plus and really put the onus on the Australians, something that hasn’t happened on this tour to date.
An attack consisting of James Anderson, Stuart Broad, Tim Bresnan and Boyd Rankin need to bend their backs and bowl their hearts out. This needs to be backed up by attacking and inventive field placings by captain Cook.
All the English players need to be at their best, but it all starts with Cook.
On the Australian side of things Michael Clarke knows that if the Aussies win in Perth then it will be his greatest achievement in cricket. How he goes about this will be interesting.
Sure, they are going to intimidate the English led by the fiery Mitchell Johnson. But if England start to play to their potential and apply pressure, something that hasn’t occurred so far this summer, it will be how Clarke reacts that could ensure the reclaiming of the Ashes.
If Johnson has a bad spell – which history shows he’s inclined to have – then does Clarke show faith and chuck him the ball for a second?
If Ryan Harris pulls up with an injury – which history also shows he’s inclined to do – then Clarke rotating his bowlers to ensure they remain relatively fresh will be vital.
These are just hypothetical questions of course but it will be how Michael Clarke handles these variables in Perth that may be the difference between reclaiming the Ashes or not.
Although the pressure appears to firmly be on the shoulders of Alastair Cook and England, there is no doubt still a lot of public expectation and pressure on Michael Clarke and Australia.
How both players handle this pressure in Perth may decide the series and, along with it, their legacies as captains.
Frankie Hughes
Guest
Well if Hussey wasn't so unlucky to be behind Langer and Hayden, he might've played 150 Tests Anything over 50 Tests is a top effort at Test level.
Morgan Popham
Roar Pro
Disagree about Hussey only scored 19 tons. Didn't play enough matches only 79 and retired too early (Clarke's fault if you believe the rumors)
Frankie Hughes
Guest
Well of the modern day greats who already retired Punter Tendulkar Lara Dravid Hayden Hussey Are on my list.
clipper
Guest
Cook being an opener would explain a lower average.
Morgan Popham
Roar Pro
Younis Khan deserves a mention. Interesting list
Frankie Hughes
Guest
Of players still playing. Kallis Amla de Villiers Pup Chanderpaul There are a few on the fringes(averaging mid to high 40s) Graeme Smith Pietersen Cook Bell Ross Taylor I don't consider Sangakkara great as he plunders 80% of his runs on sub continental dead pitches.
Morgan Popham
Roar Pro
Fair call Frankie Hughes. I'd love to hear of all the batsmen playing test cricket which ones do you regards as 'great batsmen of the modern era'?
Frankie Hughes
Guest
As for Cook being the fastest to 7000 Test runs Cook batted 23 times more than Tendulkar, so hardly a true comparison.
Morgan Popham
Roar Pro
I'm sorry last time I checked Bangladesh was a test playing nation?
Frankie Hughes
Guest
Of Pup's 26 Test centuries he has none against Bangladesh. Whereas 2/25 of Cook's are against Bangladesh, thus boosting his average. Cook'a average excluding Bangladesh is closer to 45. Nothing more than a middling career.
Morgan Popham
Roar Pro
'Pup' is in form Cook isn't. That can be enough to sway averages. I guess we need to wait till the end of their careers to compare averages. You are entitled to your opinion though and it's obvious you are a huge Michael Clarke fan.
Frankie Hughes
Guest
Pup averages 52/53 Cook average 46/47. Simply out Pup is great. Cook isn't.
Morgan Popham
Roar Pro
"As I said if you play enough matches, you’ll score enough runs. " That doesn't make any sense, Cook and Clarke have played the same amount of matches, Clarke has 7940 runs and Cook has 7883 runs, pretty similar. Your argument was that 'Pup is on of the great batsman of the modern era Cook isn't' Yet their stats are very similar.
Frankie Hughes
Guest
As I said if you play enough matches, you'll score enough runs. Tendulkar would've scored 10,000 before 30, if India played as many Tests as the Poms do.
Morgan Popham
Roar Pro
If you want to cheerlead for the Aussies by all means but don't let your biased get in the way of one of the great players of this era. Cook is the youngest ever player to pass 7000 runs beating even the immortal Tendulkar. Clarke and Cook have both played 99 tests with Clarke having scored 26 tons and Cook 25. Stats don't lie.
Frankie Hughes
Guest
Pup had played around 50 Tests. Just under 300 runs. 11 hundreds. Average over 50.
Michel
Guest
That's a bit harsh, Cook is definitely very good. Compare his statistics to Clarke's at the same age
Frankie Hughes
Guest
Cook'a record isn't that flash. The Poms plays 10-12 Tests per year. Hence why aged 28 he's already playing his 100th Test. Pup on the other hand is 32 and is finally suing his 100th Test. Pup is one of the great batsman of the modern era. Cook isn't.
Eddy Bramley
Roar Pro
If the captaincy isn't enough to worry about then this current teams age will be. This will probably be players like James Anderson, Ian Bell, Kevin Pietersen, Graeme Swann and Jonathon Trott's (whose already gone home) last Ashes series. There's going to be a big rebuilding phase and Cook will be expected to lead from the front.
Morgan Popham
Roar Pro
I believe he is already in that category. He needs to maintain these statistics for the next 6 or 7 years which could prove difficult, especially if he has the captaincy to worry about.