Argentina's 2013 was horrific, but a brighter future awaits

By Yousef Teclab / Roar Guru

With the year coming to an end there are several rugby teams who can look back on 2013 with pride. Argentina’s Pumas, however, will look on it with disdain, probably wishing it never had happened in the first place.

Out of 12 games played, Argentina lost 10 and have won just twice – against Georgia in June at home and recently against Italy at Rome in November.

Moreover, the Pumas lost every game of the 2013 Rugby Championship, including two heavy defeats – 73-13 to South Africa at Soccer City and a heavy 54-17 loss to Australia in Rosario.

In addition, their winless campaign highlighted divisions among the Argentinean squad, as splits occurred within the team.

Those against the then head coach Santiago Phelan did so because of his methods of coaching, while others in the team backed their coach. This led to Phelan’s resignation as head coach of Argentina just a few weeks before the end of year Tests in November.

Despite going through a less than impressive 2013, the future looks considerably bright for Argentina.

Daniel Hourcade, Santiago Phelan’s replacement as head coach, may be unknown to those outside Argentina but the Argentine Rugby Union (UAR) have made a solid appointment. The UAR have invested their faith in Hourcade, giving him a contract to lead the Pumas till the 2015 World Cup.

“By confirming Hourcade until the World Cup it shows support from the union which is vital,” said Paul Tait, an expert on Argentine rugby. “There were many calls to go for a foreigner but with just two years till a World Cup there is not a lot of time to make radical changes.

“Hourcade is someone well known to the players, with most having played under him at one or more of junior level, A level, Sevens or at the Pampas. He also has much more experience than Santiago Phelan and many in Portugal credit him as the reason the Portuguese qualified for 2007 World Cup.”

Along with a new coach, the UAR have developed a long-term plan to improve Argentina from an emergent top tier nation into one of the world’s best teams. The one thing that can make that a reality is to get a team into Super Rugby.

In an interview with an Argentine newspaper, Pumas scrum-half legend Agustin Pichot seemed to indicate the UAR were looking to install policies that confirm Argentina’s desire to have a team in Super Rugby by 2016.

The first policy that Pichot pointed to was Hourcade’s desire to have 60 to 70 percent of his best players available come the June internationals.

In recent years Argentina had to make do with a second-string squad for their June internationals, with their best players recuperating from the end of a long season in the English Premiership, France’s Top 14 or the Celtic/Italian Pro12.

By playing their June games with a weakened squad the Pumas suffered notable defeats, especially against England last June in two games at Salta and Buenos Aires.

With most of Argentina’s top players back it would allow a competitive Pumas side to contest games with a chance of winning. Moreover, it would help them get back up the world rankings, where they are currently sitting in ninth.

The second policy Pichot talked about was the UAR contracting their top players to the union as Australia and New Zealand do.

Argentina’s top players have been told they have until 2015 to finish their careers at professional clubs in Europe. Hence young Argentine players like Pablo Matera are at European clubs to get a taste of European rugby before the 2015 cut-off point.

Their plans of having a Super Rugby team are added credence with the news, which was confirmed by the UAR’s communications manager Guillermo Quevedo, that the UAR were to meet with the SANZAR nations in March with regards to Super Rugby.

Those plans ultimately depend on whether SANZAR will allow an Argentinean team into Super Rugby. Fellow Roarer John Davidson underlined just how important it was for Argentina to have a team.

“It is very vital,” he said. “Super Rugby is the top club rugby competition in the world. No question. The northern hemisphere countries might disagree but you only need to look at the World Cup records or the recent end of year Tests.

“The Argentineans having their players in France or the UK is good, but playing week in and week out against SANZAR teams would be much better.”

Moreover, the UAR seem to have listened to players’ wishes for improved facilities – certainly Patricio Albacete, whose complaints about lack of facilities at home resulted in the UAR stripping him of the vice captaincy – with the opening of a new high performance centre in Buenos Aires.

Tait acknowledges the importance of this.

“Rugby is a complicated sport which requires a high level of investment in order to succeed. Argentina has been in vital need of finding a means of bridging the gap so that Los Pumas can win Rugby Championship matches instead of coming frustratingly close as in Mendoza, Gold Coast and Perth in 2012 and 2013.

“The heavy defeats in 2013 underlined mental frailty, which Hourcade will look to eradicate, but the physical side requires facilities,” Tait continued. “Argentina has spent large sums of money to have training camps in Pensacola, Florida every year top condition players. They have then returned home where such facilities do not exist and have prepared in amateur locations in Buenos Aires.

“The new High Performance Centre will thus be crucial in enabling Argentina to improve its competitiveness.”

With the UAR implementing contracts from 2015 it means their best players will be available to play for an Argentinean team should they be admitted into Super Rugby. When asked how competitive they can be in Super Rugby, Tait seemed positive.

“When looking at the All Blacks, Springboks and Wallabies many assume that all Super Rugby teams are strong. Many are, but there are numerous cases every year of there being sub-standard sides.

“In Australia, for instance, the success of the Reds and Brumbies has to be measured against the underachieving Waratahs – also the Force and Rebels who are yet to be genuinely competitive on a regular basis.

“Argentina is looking at having one, or possibly two, Super Rugby franchises for the 2016 season. It has been confirmed by Agustín Pichot that 40 players will be contracted for the squad and that they are to be Test players. Put differently, the same players in the Rugby Championship will be playing Super Rugby.

“Pichot has also said that the UAR will replicate the ARU, NZRU and RFU by only selecting players based at home for international duty. In other words, the big name players will return and in virtually all cases players are contracted until the completion of the 2014-2015 season, meaning they can return to Argentina, prepare for the World Cup and then begin their new careers as Argentine Super Rugby contracted players.

“Suggesting that an Argentine Super Rugby side could win matches is therefore not an exaggeration. To the contrary, there is reason to believe that Argentina could be very competitive due to it concentrating its resources into a small pool of franchises.”

Davidson felt an Argentinean team would take longer to become as competitive as the Reds, Brumbies, Bulls or Blues.

“It could take 10 years,” he said. “The aim will be to get one good team, make it successful and then get another.”

Davidson’s analysis highlights Argentina’s growing number of registered rugby players and the expansion of the game in the country. Around 100,000 are registered and half are under the age of 10, showing there is an abundance of players from the next generation.

When asked if Argentineans could play in Super Rugby for the Australian, New Zealand and South African teams (adding to Matias Diaz for the Highlanders and Manuel Carizza for the Stormers), Davidson did not dismiss the idea.

“Generally each SANZAR country doesn’t have a lot of foreigners in their Super Rugby teams but having Argentineans in Australia, New Zealand and South Africa would be beneficial. There needs to be a trailblazer first who could set the standard and prove the benefit.”

Within Argentina there are several players that could be of interest to Super Rugby teams prior to 2016 or even afterwards. Paul Tait added to their younger players within the youth set-up.

“A lot will change before 2016 and for this reason the players will be very different,” Tait explained. “Over the past two to three years Argentina has improved dramatically at the junior level defeating Australia, France, South Africa and others. But there are many players who are likely to play in Super Rugby and have recently broken into the national squad.”

Back-rower Pablo Matera (who could have gone to the Auckland Blues), tighthead prop Matías Díaz and second-rower Tomás Lavanini emerged in the 2013 Rugby Championship and all now have professional contracts.

Of them Díaz will play Super Rugby in 2014 for the Highlanders while Matera is at Leicester and Lavanini at Racing Métro.

Also in France is back-rower Facundo Isa (at Toulon) who is another 20-year-old of note while fullback Santiago Cordero has been linked to Stade Français and is 19. Cordero has a rare talent as a runner from the deep.

Another player of great potential is fly-half Patricio Fernández who is also 19. They were all at the 2013 Junior World Championship and were captained by Santiago Iglesias Valdes, who at 20 was Argentina’s reserve hooker against England, Wales and Italy last month.

Should a Super Rugby team be in need of players for 2014 then Cordero, Fernández and Iglesias Valdes would all be smart choices.

Also of note and on the market are centres Javier Rojas and Matías Moroni, loosehead prop Nahuel Lobo, back-rower Benjamín Macome, second-rower Matías Alemanno and scrum-halves Martín Landajo and Tomás Cubelli.

Whether the Pumas can utilise the mass potential they have is another matter. But should Argentina get a team into Super Rugby it will signal a new but positive dawn for the country.

Two interesting factors have occurred while writing this feature on Argentina’s future prospects. The first is the rumour that the UAR have approached current Toulon head coach and ex-coach of France Bernard Laporte to take charge of Argentina after the 2015 World Cup.

If true then it will be a shrewd appointment for Laporte and Argentina.

The second is far more significant, just showing the benefits of the Pumas being in the Rugby Championship. Since their introduction in 2012 the UAR have amassed profits of $100 million pesos – $15.5 million in US dollars or AUD$17.4 million.

It is a huge sum generated and helps them try to elevate the game in a country that has several sports – football is the main sport but apart from rugby there is also hockey, basketball and tennis.

The profits are mainly generated via strong attendances for their home games outside of the capital in Mendoza, La Plata and Rosario.

Moreover, good TV ratings for Pumas games in Argentina, and decent ratings for games not involving Argentina, have generated revenue. It certainly helps when such sponsors in Argentina include ESPN.

It is a world away from unions such as the ARU who are losing money and struggling for funds – out of their five Super Rugby teams, only the Queensland Reds have been able to generate a profit for 2013.

So although 2013 has been a disastrous year for the Pumas, the future does bode well.

The Crowd Says:

2014-01-04T01:02:45+00:00

Johnno

Guest


Katipo there is now a IRB tournament every year called the America's championship, the last 2 years been in Canada. It's USA A, Canada A, Argentina Jaguars, and the Uruguay Senior Side there best team. 4-nationa tournament in essence devleopmental one. Eventually that is where Argentina's natural home is, the America's. Add in Chile and Brazil too, and there are 6 sides. Child is developing, has a long rugby culture, Brazil is now devleoping quite fast, and 7evens in Rio good start. Brazil's 7even's women's team is equal or world ranked higher than Argentina's women sevens side. Here is the link on the tournament. http://www.irb.com/newsmedia/mediazone/pressrelease/newsid=2066253.html

2014-01-03T19:00:48+00:00

higgik

Guest


This idea would be great for the next level of players, especially as Can has 4 franchises and US is beginning to get around 12 regions, link with top 8 Arg, to give good development competition. The top 30 players in Argentina could play as Pampas maybe out of Aus, but still think it should follow this pattern 1) 30 Arg & 30 PI players added to current teams, including new teams in all 3 conferences, NSW country (Newcastle), Central Districts (Napier), Kings as local players, max of 5 per team. 2) Pampas XV added to SA conference, and PI to NZ conference, New regular season structure implemented 3) Americas conference added to SR, with 2 Can, 2 US and 4 Arg

2014-01-03T09:10:21+00:00

Katipo

Guest


In fact, the more I think about it, its a wonder that the Pumas don't play the USA Eagles & Canada multiple times every year to help build the game in the Americas.

2014-01-03T09:08:11+00:00

Katipo

Guest


The travel logistics work against a super team located in Argentina - or anywhere in America for that matter. It makes more sense to try one these options:- 1) Locate an Argentinian team in South Africa 2) Allow dispensation of Argentinian players to take play as locals in existing Super franchises. 3) Argentina starts its own American tournament with additional franchises in USA, Canada, Uruguay and Brazil. The top teams from that tournament could square off against Super and Euro teams in a 'Super Bowl'. Option 3 is the best for the long term.

2014-01-02T13:16:51+00:00

higgik

Guest


Start by UAR contracting 30 players and share them out among the current SR teams, each team can take a max of 4 players and they do not count as foreigners quota.

2013-12-30T20:33:24+00:00

ScotandProud

Guest


I agree with this 100% When the Pumas drew with the Lions in 2005 they said "we will play in the 6 nations and base oursleves in Spain if we have to, we need to play regular rugby". infinitely preferable for them to play in the Southern Hemisphere either internationally or as part of their provinces in both competitions where they can base themselves from home rather than take their young families to live with them whilst they spend their careers as journeymen in places like cold Glasgow or in the in East Midlands.

2013-12-30T19:42:35+00:00

Nobrain

Guest


IMO there is a growing financial cloud , not clout, is what the UAR is having. The numbers that Yousef mentions are inflated . The only sellout game was against the AB, the game on Rosario it does not count because all unsold tickets (30%) were given away. The game in Mendoza against SA was the worst in the RCH in terms of attendance. I happened to be a at the game against England in Buenos Aires and only 1/3 of the stadium was covered. The main income comes from the IRB . The contract with Nike is not big deal and the one with ESPN is not biggy either. It is true that there is a big part of the money has been placed into the develoment of different centers in the country to develop younger players, however only two or thee players came out big, but to be fair we have to wait a little to see what comes out from this experiment. The participation in the Vodacom cup in SA cost usd 700, 000 a year and the games were poorly covered in Argentina because the TV contracts and viewers werent just there ( time zone and weekdays games have a negative effect) . Coming back to finances, the UAR has not fully explained the wereabouts of the 2,5 millon USD that disapeared in 2012. They have acused the former accountant but nothing else has been said.

2013-12-29T11:47:28+00:00

Ben.S

Roar Guru


I see. Well thanks for clarifying that for me.

2013-12-29T10:34:14+00:00

Nobrain

Guest


I will say no team an bring every posisible player to existing team, the UAR should pay half those players salary. The only problem is that MR. Pichot will not get rich by taking this path, so I do not see it possible. The UAR should also pay part of the salary of the players that are playing in Europe and be considered to represent them in all international competitions. Argentina cannot develop profesional rugby due to economics and culture, so IMO it should put the money in developing players that will become professional, play abroad, represent their country, and later on take back the experience to develop better player. Geographically Argentina is poorly located in terms of the SR comp that it will make a nightmare the travelling. And for last, I will have a non argy coach with international experince, I think the Pumas missed the opportunity for hiring Jake White whom will have fit perfectly for both , Jake and Pumas.

2013-12-29T03:53:57+00:00

CNS

Guest


it is no secrete that there have been made two different classifications on how teams play, either northern way which is slow forward orientated and playing for penalties and the southern way which relies on mobility and speed of play, argies play too much northern style rugby, to beat the big three they need to adopt southern style of play

2013-12-28T20:16:58+00:00

Ben.S

Roar Guru


The New Zealand way, the South Africa way, the Australia way, the Samoa way, the Tonga way or the Fiji way?

2013-12-28T18:34:02+00:00

CNS

Guest


it makes them more competitive because they are playing against the best players on a weekly basis, get into the southern hemisphere style of rugby.

2013-12-28T17:36:42+00:00

Ben.S

Roar Guru


"Also Argentina is a lot stronger rugby nation than Samoa" I'd say that's pretty debatable.

2013-12-28T07:18:07+00:00

kunming tiger

Guest


I think an overlooked factor here is the growing financial clout of the UAR, those numbers should only improve over time and be pumped back into the domestic game. The Rugby economy in Argentina has a long way to go until it reaches the top so a Super side could help drive growth commercially and lift participation rates.

2013-12-28T04:29:39+00:00

Emric

Guest


Tigranes its not enough if that is to happen then they should be given 2 sides to be based in New Zealand and Australia

2013-12-28T03:29:58+00:00

Patrick Hargreaves

Roar Guru


I think it was logistically complicated 10 years ago, but now transport and communication is fairly easy. Also Argentina is a lot stronger rugby nation than Samoa, Japan and US etc. I feel sorry for them becuase they're really strong but so isolated. If they had only 1 team in the Super rugby, they'd be incredibly strong. The SANZAR teams are too diluted.

2013-12-27T23:36:15+00:00

IronAwe

Guest


I'm with you Green Lantern, and I'm a die hard Aussie.

AUTHOR

2013-12-27T22:34:07+00:00

Yousef Teclab

Roar Guru


Well Matias Diaz has signed with the Highlanders on a one year deal. Will be interesting to see how he has done - the same with Carizza with the Stormers. Any guy that can send McCaw tumbling backwards with force is a player worth watching! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bXvP5kx-SUI

2013-12-27T21:04:26+00:00

Jerry

Guest


Jenkins.

2013-12-27T19:39:06+00:00

Tigranes

Guest


I thought the pumas actually didn't play too badly against the all blacks this year, maybe they save their best for when they play the best. Looking at the most recent junior World Cup results, Argentina has beaten Australia a few times, so I think the future is looking good I don't think super rugby teams in Argentina are the way forward. Distance would prohibit it, and to be fair the argentine domestic system isn't doing too bad, even though it's amateur and completely overshadowed by soccer. I would like to see some of the sides sign up some of their forwards, god knows the force and revels could do with a few of the pumas forwards.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar