Ashes: Australia vs England fourth Test - Day 4 cricket live scores

By Suneer Chowdhary / Roar Guru

It has been a match of collapses and Australia need to only avoid one on the fourth day to seal a 4-0 lead over England in the Ashes 2013-14 series at the MCG.

England went from 4/202 to 255 all out in the first innings. This was followed by Australia capitulating from 3/110 to stumble to 9/164 before help came in form of a 40-run stand for the final wicket.

And on the third day, England frittered away another decent start to collapse twice in the innings. At one stage they were 1/86 and stumbled to 4/87.

The recovery came through Kevin Pietersen, who made 49 and a couple of starts for Ben Stokes and Jonny Bairstow, but yet again, they lost wickets in a cluster.

Having gotten themselves to 5/173, an inexplicable range of shots from the rest of the batsmen had them bowled out for 179.

And before you wonder, it is not a pitch that should fill the batsmen with terror.

Unlike Brisbane, this one does not have uneven bounce and swing. And unlike Perth, there are no cracks that the bowlers can take advantage of.

It is touch on the slower side which is an excuse that can be used for slower run-rates, but for both teams to lose their wickets in such a hurry is difficult to comprehend.

The scores have also reduced with each innings. England scored 255 in the first dig before Australia replied with their 204. In the second essay, England made only 179.

Which this near-arithmetic progression does suggest that Australia could be in for a dog-fight going into the fourth day of the game, they are only 201 runs away from achieving the target.

And unless England can come up with their best bowling of this series, they can kiss their chances of remaining in the contest a goodbye.

One theory on why the runs haven’t come on this decent batting pitch is that it’s on the slower side.

This means that once the new ball loses its shine, scoring becomes that much more difficult, especially if the captains set fields not too different from the ones in the middle overs of an ODI – especially before the times of starting with two new balls.

The wickets have come because of the frustration emanating out of going scoreless for long periods of time.

And what seems to have done almost every batsman in has been all the talks of being positive when at the wicket – more than anything, it’s been its interpretation.

For instance, in the Australian first innings, David Warner’s attempt at being positive on this slow pitch to attempt cross-batted strokes very early in the knock.

On the third day, Ian Bell gave himself no time to settle down, he played it straight alright but tried to slam it without getting used to the pace of the pitch and holed out.

There can, obviously, be no fixed formula on how to make the most on this pitch, but unlike Perth or Brisbane, this isn’t one of those in which the batsmen will definitely get one or the other ball that will dismiss you.

If the batsmen have the patience, they can carry on batting for long periods without a lot of fear and that’s what most Australian batsmen – barring someone like Warner – could probably need to do.

The other option will be to look to score as many as possible till the ball remains new and then take it from there but the again it’s a matter of taking that much more risk.

One way or the other, it looks like we could be in for an enthralling contest that would be decided tomorrow.

Join me for the fourth day of the fourth Ashes 2013-14 Test with live scores of this game from 10.30am AEDT.

The Crowd Says:

2014-10-16T00:02:08+00:00

Patrick Effeney

Editor


Interesting

2013-12-29T09:08:14+00:00

Blaze

Guest


Beating a supposedly superior team by 8 wickets isn't getting lucky. Clarke knew what he was doing and it worked.

2013-12-29T08:06:31+00:00

Blaze

Guest


Of course they are justified, but can you imagine Clarke or Warner even suggesting that!? They'd be burnt at the stake!!

2013-12-29T08:00:43+00:00

Stephen

Guest


I get it now Tony. Johnsons 9 from 20 is 45%. throw in his catch and he's at 50%. point taken.

2013-12-29T07:56:49+00:00

Stephen

Guest


40.68% to be precise Tony.

2013-12-29T07:38:35+00:00

Tony Loedi

Roar Guru


Don't stress boys Watson won't get close to breaking any batting records

2013-12-29T07:37:31+00:00

Tony Loedi

Roar Guru


I agree very stiff, but johnson got 8 wickets and a run-out - that's 9 wickets out of 20 - I don't have a calculator Is that more than 41% ???

2013-12-29T07:25:57+00:00

Stephen

Guest


Rogers made 177 runs out of the teams total of 435 over 2 innings. That's a 41% contribution off Rogers bat alone - on a difficult track for scoring. Very stiff not to receive 'man of the match'.!

2013-12-29T06:28:02+00:00

Sahib khan

Guest


England was a best test team but currently they are struggling

2013-12-29T06:25:50+00:00

mocka

Guest


Well done Simoc,I am actually txting this from the back paddock!However I am a little puzzled,why pommy whingers?To my wknowledge,we'v outplayed them totally.But what is it that they'v whinged about?Oh & my comment earlier,was harkening back to a comment you'd made in the 3rd test!That lying & cheating were inherant in poms!Just a bit over the top?

2013-12-29T05:50:37+00:00

Andrew Kitchener

Roar Guru


Honestly, it wasn't as bad as what Sir Richard made it out to be. As has been said many times since, Piers got what he asked for, and he isn't crying poor over it, either. I think that's a sign that there's more smoke than fire here. At least we all know Sir Richard is alive and well. :)

2013-12-29T05:23:43+00:00

Simoc

Guest


Goodness mocked; literature isn't one of your strong points. The peanuts are in the back paddock where you'de fit in nicely.

AUTHOR

2013-12-29T05:21:46+00:00

Suneer Chowdhary

Roar Guru


Yep, true that. Cannot forget how Inzi wept after getting out because he had missed out on the Pakistan record.

2013-12-29T05:20:56+00:00

JGK

Roar Guru


As someone else said on another website - Hadlee is only saying those things because he hasn't met Morgan.

2013-12-29T05:18:45+00:00

JGK

Roar Guru


Just ask the Don or Inzi or Compton - those could be important runs by the end of a career.

2013-12-29T05:13:18+00:00

Sideline Comm.

Guest


Agreed. From that article you'd think Lee was shooting at the bloke's feet. Piers had no issue, he invited the challenge, he was wearing the proper body and head protection: what more do you want. Geez.

2013-12-29T05:02:21+00:00

Matt

Guest


Cry me a river, my god. Piers wanted to get attention so attention he got.

AUTHOR

2013-12-29T04:53:02+00:00

Suneer Chowdhary

Roar Guru


Yep that's the rule. I remember something here, some years ago I was a part of a fantasy cricket competition where the top two users were going neck in neck. In the end, the difference between them was three points and the trailing user had one player which the leading player didn't. Something similar happened, that batsman hit a four with two needed to win but completed two runs before the ball passed the fence. The trailing user thought he had got four runs, which was equivalent to four points, and hence thought he had won. But the updated scorecard gave the batsman only two runs because he had run those before the ball hit the fence and hence the trailing player got only two points and lost the fantasy competition by one point! That was the incident that got me clear on this rule!

2013-12-29T04:47:53+00:00

JGK

Roar Guru


Watto seems to have cost himself 2 Test runs by crossing for the second before the ball hit the boundary on that last shot.

AUTHOR

2013-12-29T04:42:14+00:00

Suneer Chowdhary

Roar Guru


Thanks for following WB!

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar