Australian high flyers are all lame ducks

By Steve Quinn / Roar Rookie

January has arrived and with it come most of the top tennis players for the first major of the year. I say most, because it seems every year a few cannot make it due to not yet having recovered from an off season injury/surgery. February Australian Open anyone?

This time of the year also brings with it the annual ‘stuff an Australian player down the public’s throat’ campaign.

In recent years, as will be the case again this year, the participants are Sam Stosur, Bernard Tomic and Lleyton Hewitt.

Sure Stosur has won a grand slam title and been a runner up in another, Hewitt has two grand slam titles on his resume and has two runner ups thrown in and Tomic, well he won at schoolies.

But does anyone outside of Channel Seven actually believe any of those three are capable of winning this tournament?

Since she won the US Open in 2011, Stosur followed up in 2012 by losing in round one at the Australian Open and round two at the US Open.

In 2013, well the less said about her 2013 form the better, needless to say she won just a few more matches on the tour than I did.

She also suffers from the extremely rare condition of not being able to play well in front of her compatriots, for this there is no cure.

As for Lley Lley, he hasn’t won a Grand Slam tournament since 2002 (yes, that was seven months short of 12 years ago for those counting). And it is fair to say he hasn’t been competing for Grand Slam titles since 2006.

Bernard Tomic has a total of one quarter final appearance at a Slam, but will have as many headlines, promos and articles written about him then anyone over the next few weeks.

But why? It feels awfully similar to the Mark Philippoussis era.

Never truly embraced by the Australian public, questions over his commitment and work ethic, living the so-called ‘party lifestyle’.

The parallels between the two are easy to draw, but the reality is Bernard Tomic is a less talented version of Mark Philippoussis.

Philippousis never won a major (twice a runner up) but I always got the impression if he was healthy he had the ability to win seven matches on the trot.

Maybe I was easily teased by Mark and his talents. Huge serve, power off both wings, capable volley, was a pretty good mover for his size.

Problem was he was rarely healthy or motivated to care enough. What would have happened if he didn’t hurt his knee up a set in a quarter final against Pete Sampras at Wimbledon in 1999, or if he didn’t spend the night drinking and cavorting with New York socialites before his US Open final against Pat Rafter in 1998?

What would have happened if Philippousis had the work ethic of a Rafter or Hewitt, three maybe four majors was not out of the question.

Truth be told we will never know, but I do know Tomic, at this stage at least, is not the naturally and physically gifted player Philippoussis was.

He may not be the party guy that Mark was either, but he is certainly trying.

The Crowd Says:

2014-01-07T17:06:41+00:00

FrozenNorth

Guest


Court is too slow for Raonic.

2014-01-06T09:29:53+00:00

Simoc

Guest


Stosur still talks about what other people say, think. Why does she care?They're all mindless ramblings of nobodies. She needs to forget all that and just concentrate on tennis. She has the tennis ability to win now, the others don't.

2014-01-06T05:09:00+00:00

mushi

Guest


I think Hewitt's mum has paid a non-refundable deposit for a family lunch with him during the quarters

AUTHOR

2014-01-06T05:03:08+00:00

Steve Quinn

Roar Rookie


Not write Hewitt off to win the Australian Open? I credit him for winning Brisbane, but 7 matches, best of 5 sets in Melbourne is a little different.

2014-01-05T08:15:53+00:00

Scot Free

Guest


I wouldn't write Hewitt off completely just yet. The other 2 have no hope.

2014-01-04T11:28:25+00:00

ad

Guest


Despite not having a great time in Slams, Stosur won 2 titles last year and ended the year ranked 18 with a 42-23 record, so she did a hell of a lot better than you gave her credit for. I agree that she struggles at home - I think her biggest issue is when she places massive expectations of herself, which is backed up by her losing semis and finals at the French Open where she was a clear favourite. Tomic will start getting results once he gets his dad out of his life, but I don't know if that'll ever happen. He might not have the same physical gifts that Philippousis did but he's got a lot more variety and game sense generally - it all boils down to when he decides to take things seriously.

2014-01-04T01:00:35+00:00

Salada

Guest


STEVE - Good stuff. Yes, Tomic is a little fragile and Sam, age 29, won't get too far in any more majors. Still has the shots but her head is the problem wherever she plays. Raonic will do damage at the Aussie and on the woman's side I'm looking for Bouchard to bag a big name. She's only 19 and is going to be Top 10. Mark P had the most potential of anybody but when he lived in San Diego he just wanted to surf. One of the players said this about him: "He has a very simple game. He serves and if you can get that back he slams a forehand past you. It's a very simple game he's got."

Read more at The Roar