Narrowing the gap in boarder cross funding

By Ryan Willmott / Roar Guru

After being cancelled the day previous due to bad weather, the men’s boarder cross action finally got under way at Sochi’s Rosa Khutor resort.

The weather conditions were still very marginal at best, with the odd shower and patch of fog drifting in and out of proceedings.

Rain and snow go together like water and oil, and what was once a fast and responsive course for the Women’s event, became a slow, soggy and sticky track for the Men. Even the best wax technicians were going to be up against it with conditions like this.

Australia’s gold medal hopeful Alex “Chumpy” Pullin was the centre of the media spotlight for a number of reasons. Rated as a genuine contender for the boarder cross gold medal, combined with his handsome good looks, shaped Pullin into one of the faces of the Olympic marketing campaign.

Bruce Brockhoff, the father of Pullin’s female boarder cross teammate Belle Brockoff had seized the opportunity to write to the media on the day after his daughter’s competition to complain about the division in the Australian snowboard team funding.

In his letter he directed a lot of anger toward the preferential treatment Pullin was receiving and his need to perform to justify the spending.

While Bruce Brockoff did raise some very valid points, the extra pressure placed on Pullin was very much unwarranted.

As a two time FIS World Cup Champion, Pullin has proved he is capable of beating the Olympic field. It does make sense that he receives a larger percentage of Olympic funding to better his chances for a medal. I’m sure even Belle Brockoff would agree with that much.

The real issue though is the gap in the allocated amount of the budget that is spent on Pullin in comparison.

Figures currently circulating suggest Pullin has received close to $250K in funding per annum in the four years before Sochi, while Brockoff has received just $10K a year. Brockoff finished the Women’s boarder cross event in eighth place, the highest placed Australian boarder cross athlete.

Further reports of coaches restricting second-tier athletes access to training facilities and support staff are disturbing to hear.

Giving preferential treatment and focus on riders with a higher ranking does little for the future medal prospects of the sport. These attitudes have long been ingrained in the coaching structure of the Australian team and really do need to change.

There is no real team unity for Australia’s snowboard athletes at these games and sadly they are caught up in the middle of it all, when they should be focusing on celebrating their achievements. T

here is a clear division and split between the fully funded athletes and the members of team outcast. This was clearly evident in an interview with boarder cross athlete Jarryd Hughes. When asked what he had learnt from fellow teammate Alex Pullin, Jarryd replied “No Comment.”

Like most caring parents would do, Jarryd’s father was quick to issue a press release the next day to calm the fire, so as to not affect his son’s future in the sport.

But the truth had been revealed, the division was there for all to see and the media found out the real motivation for Jarryd to perform well at these games.

As long as there has been Olympic funding for Australian snowboarders there has been disgruntled athletes. Ben Mates, the highest placed Australian male snowboarder in halfpipe at the 2010 Vancouver Olympics, got himself there with little to no Olympic funding.

Having been a part of the funded 2006 team at Torino, Mates was officially dropped from all team funding, as attention shifted to the younger more exciting prospect of Nate Johnstone.

In the lead up to the Vancouver Games, Johnstone broke his ankle in a training mishap. Ben Mates rode strongly, like a man on a mission securing 10th place in the final. All of his own accord. The Australian Olympic PR team was very controlling of what Ben said to the press afterwards.

The public is only hearing about these qualms now, as finally the media is lending snowboarding an ear. For the other three years between Olympics, the media wants nothing to do with winter athletes.

Team outcast has made the most of the media spotlight to bring about change to their sport and what better spokesperson for your cause than the highly profiled Torah Bright.

As she told a press conference at the start of the games: “I would also love to see the development of the younger generations coming up. I am not going to be around for too many more years to come and team outcast is about making sure not just the top ones are taken care of but everyone else coming up too is taken care of.”

Boarder cross is not like the other snowboard disciplines of halfpipe and slopestyle. One’s own talent doesn’t necessarily determine one’s end result.

Whereas a rider can tell if they have the tricks in their run to make the finals in the other judged disciplines, in boarder cross it really is a game of survival.

You may be the strongest rider in the field, but when six of you are trying to squeeze around a berm wide enough for only two, well, it’s just simple mathematics really. Accidental contact between riders often occurs and the sport has had more than its fair share of Steven Bradbury moments.

Alex Pullin was the first rider to be eliminated, making it as far as the first quarter-final. On a tight corner Pullin caught an end in the soggy snow and went down, bringing his campaign to an end.

Had the pressure got to Pullin or was the mistake due to the conditions? Pullin was disappointed with his result and tried to explain the difficulty of the conditions for the viewers at home.

Teenage sensation Jarryd Hughes was the next to bow out in quarter-final three, getting caught up in a three-way collision with some of the other riders.

Hughes was looking confident and strong in all of his races and at only 18 years of age is a definite prospect for the future ahead. Interviewed afterwards he explained that was just how it goes in boarder cross, a message that was reiterated by most of the field.

Former ironman-cum-boarder cross rider, Cam Bolton was the most successful Australian male in the field. Having trained alongside and given the same access as Pullin, Bolton more than proved he had the courage and resolve to match it with the rest of the field.

Out in front is often the safest place to be in boarder cross and Bolton was nailing his starts. Having progressed through to the semifinal Bolton was in second place close on the tail of the race leader when the two collided mid way through the race. Bolton slammed heavily, breaking his wrist in the process.

With only the top three advancing to the final from each semi, Bolton was relegated to the consolation final. Despite having just broken his wrist, he continued on with the pain, getting his wrist taped up just seconds before the race resumed.

The broken wrist hampered Bolton’s efforts to get out of the gates quickly and unlike his other previous races, he found himself in the middle of the pack. Around a mid way corner in the track, Bolton was again taken out by another rider. This time he came down hard on his face and almost knocked himself out.

Bruised, bloodied and battered, Bolton was all smiles when it came time to be interviewed. Officially finishing in 11th place, Bolton was happy with his first Olympic performance and had no ill word to speak of his competitors. “That’s just how it goes in boarder cross” he reiterated.

Perhaps team Australia needs to take this commonly heard line into consideration when it comes to designating the split in funding next time around. There are no definites in boarder cross.

Ryan Willmott is a former editor of Australian/NZ Snowboarder magazine with over 10 years of experience covering winter sport events.

The Crowd Says:

2014-02-23T02:24:04+00:00

Brendon

Guest


No amount of funding can stop Australian Olympic athletes choking. Until that issue is addressed you're arguing about minor details.

2014-02-21T16:27:58+00:00

Gori

Guest


You must be kidding !

2014-02-21T14:59:10+00:00

Gori

Guest


I'm going to scream the next time the I hear a taxpayer funded athlete say " I'M HERE TO HAVE FUN ". Have fun with your own money " sweetie " , not with mine . The problem with "elite " athletes is they do think that they're "elite " . Peter Norman got it right . He questioned why after 50 years his 200m record hadn't b een broken . Yes it wa sets at altitude but it was 50 years ago and in the "amateur " age !! He basically said that many of todays" professionals " are supported , win or lose .

2014-02-20T22:28:33+00:00

MichaelJ.

Guest


They seem to be falling a lot. Maybe their equipment is being sabotaged by the Russians.

2014-02-19T21:16:03+00:00

mushi

Guest


They probably include all resources not just what he got. kind of like the cost per employee of making them functional isn't the same as their salary

2014-02-19T21:14:54+00:00

mushi

Guest


You've just reinforced it - it's a game of chance so why pay at all if there bare minimum standard that is being achieved for 10k.

2014-02-19T20:21:41+00:00

nickoldschool

Roar Guru


Very interesting article Ryan btw. I see AR's point re Australia rather (too?)big contingent. I mean we all know that no Australian had a chance in the alpine skiing disciplines, bobsleigh etc yet I was quite surprised to see a few athletes competing. Nothing against that, I feel its great actually as its very much the spirit of the Olympics to participate rather than win, but at what cost? This is a genuine question and as an aussie tax payer I wouldn't mind knowing how much these Olympics cost us in the past 4 years, overall. But for me the main point as you say in your article is not how much but rather how the money was spread among the athletes. And as former rider said earlier it seems this financial disparity between athletes is also reflected within the team. Nothing worse for an athlete than to feel you're 2nd class compare to your team mate. Also have to say the media are partially responsible for the situation as they had chosen to 'promote' 2 athletes over the whole group. And lets face it Pullin or Bright are/were no Bjoerndalen or Ligety so there was no need to talk them up to this extent before and during the Olympics and forget the other aussie competitors. Lesson learnt, hopefully. (probably not though!)

2014-02-19T20:04:09+00:00

Professor Rosseforp

Guest


"In the world of employment, Who is on the higher salary, Is it the employee that has just graduated from uni and in his first job or one that has years of experience and proven track record of achieving results" -- it's the one with the right connections, the one with the self-belief (often misplaced), the one who is better-looking, and the one who has been anointed by his/her superiors.

2014-02-19T20:01:58+00:00

Professor Rosseforp

Guest


Agreed -- Australian Rules. In a time of economic cutbacks, the economic rationalist approach to improving performance is to trim back the size of the workforce. I also agree that many Australians don't mind seeing kids having fun rolling around in the snow and ice, the notion of a winter "Olympics" is still questionable. If we want value for money, we need to outsource, i.e. spend the money on buying overseas talent that would give us more medals at a lower price. We've done a bit of that in a few sports already.

2014-02-19T19:57:08+00:00

Professor Rosseforp

Guest


Mushi, that's enough common sense -- this is a sports discussion.

2014-02-19T17:59:06+00:00

peeeko

Guest


i dont reckon he got 250k, media reports always inflate figures

2014-02-19T12:59:50+00:00

Acrobat

Guest


Well said snow friend! I couldn't agree more!

2014-02-19T12:57:56+00:00

Acrobat

Guest


All sports funding at the international elite level is based on international ranking and potential to medal at the Olympics. Not just in winter sport but in ALL sports. Regardless of what your national ranking is, does not mean you are competitive on an international level. This is a system not only used in Australian sports but all around the world, and not just in Sports... In the world of employment, Who is on the higher salary, Is it the employee that has just graduated from uni and in his first job or one that has years of experience and proven track record of achieving results. Why is it more expensive to go to a well renowned surgeon then just the local specialist? Why do we pay $4.90 for the good coffee rather then $2.50 for the poor coffee at Starbucks??? WELCOME TO THE REAL WORLD PEOPLE! At the end of the day, it is Olympic competition and in competition anything can happen. Particularly in a sport like boarder cross where it is not just about skill, there is an element of luck involved. I think the team performed amazingly! Perhaps not achieving the results they wanted but yet they all showed great sportsman ship and seemed genuinely happy for those that beat them. A lesson that a lot of parents of athletes at all levels could learn from. To All the Aussie athletes competing at the Winter Olympics, You did our country proud! You all represented us with pride and dignity! Well done to you all and good luck to those yet to compete. Come On Aussie come On, Come On!

2014-02-19T11:30:41+00:00

snow friend

Guest


It saddens me that this has become such an personal attack against an great Australian athlete, Chumpy has worked incredibly hard for many years to become one of the highest ranked male boardercross riders in the world and the hard work and dedication that has gone with this is huge so please lets start by recognizing this............................ a wonderful athlete and ambassador for the sport. Yes if funding needs to be looked over and re considered for the next cames and coming events then aim to make that happen instead of creating a negitive feedback and comments about fellow athletes lets concentrate on making these athletes dreams come true. To all the Australian competitor's good luck, have fun and support each other.

2014-02-19T09:31:36+00:00

Ryan Willmott

Guest


Snowboarders are outspoken individuals that have had to fight for change, recognition and acceptance from day one. Sadly 30 years on these attitudes are still prevalent and you've just reiterated that fact.

2014-02-19T09:29:32+00:00

Ryan Willmott

Guest


It needs to change. The Winning Edge isn't winning us anything.

2014-02-19T09:28:39+00:00

Ryan Willmott

Guest


Couldn't agree more.

2014-02-19T09:26:47+00:00

Ryan Willmott

Guest


This is true to an extent. We did have some competitors who qualified more so because of the number of athletes their country is allowed to enter rather than because they were highly ranked. To participate in any snow activity you need the support of a middle class family as a minimum regardless of tax payer funding. Actually scholarships are available for young pro surfers too.

2014-02-19T09:23:27+00:00

Ryan Willmott

Guest


Well he has been crowned World Champ twice against an Olympics field, but yes hasn't done so well at the last 2 Olympic events.

2014-02-19T09:21:46+00:00

Ryan Willmott

Guest


Not quite. The message is simply to spread around the funding so you have more options in a sport that on its day really is a game of chance.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar