Super Rugby Round 3: Aussie team of the week

By Who Needs Melon / Roar Guru

Seems there were a few controversial picks in my team of the week last round – I’m not setting out to be controversial, honest!

But with this sort of article I can guarantee there will be choices that are unpopular with some and there is no team everyone will agree with.

So without further ado, my Australian team of the week for Round 3 is as follows.

1. Toby Smith
While none of the props had bad games, I was really impressed with Toby Smith.

Benn Robinson had three times as many tackles as the rest (six versus two) but Smith seemed to be in everything, had four runs, beat one defender and made 17 metres (compared to zero for Robinson).

While a running game isn’t the No. 1 criteria for a No. 1, Smith gets the nod because that topped off an all-round performance.

2. Tatafu Polota-Nau
The Rebels hooker Pat Leafa put in a show for hooker of the week with 11 carries for 16 metres, while Stephen Moore was also up there with eight carries and four tackles.

But Polota-Nau gets the nod for the second week in a row with six carries and seven tackles. Probably the main reason was the quality of his tackles – you notice when he chops big men down, and he did it without concussing himself this week which is good.

3. Greg Holmes
This might be a bit of a ‘make-up call’ because Holmes was unlucky to miss out last weekend.

Scrummaging is obviously the key criteria here but I feel that once again none of the tight-heads really stood out. Ben Alexander had five carries, one more than Holmes, but the stats tell me he also missed four tackles, twice as much as the next man.

Against a weak Force offence, that’s not too good.

4. Hugh Pyle
Rob Simmons topped the tackle count in this position and Scott Fardy had a much better game than last week so I found this position tough to call again this week for all the right reasons.

Hugh Pyle just seemed everywhere to me on the night and the stats back this up – 12 runs for 43 metres, one defender beaten, and a clean break and six tackles to top it off.

If I was including 5s to contend for this spot, I might have been tempted to include even more in contention – it was a great week for Aussie second rowers.

5. Sam Carter
I’ll probably get castigated for leaving James Horwill out again but for me the standouts here were Luke Jones and Sam Carter.

Luke Jones seemed to leap out of that pigeonhole called ‘promising’, with 10 runs for 44 metres topped off by seven passes (way more than any other lock) and five tackles.

But although Carter didn’t have quite the running game (8 runs for 23 metres), he made a massive 13 tackles.

6. Sean McMahon
Where did this kid come from? I’m not sure I need to justify this decision too much.

The competition was Stephen Hoiles, Ed Quirk, Chris Alcock and Ben Mowen. All but Quirk had decent games, but welcome to the show Mr McMahon!

7. Michael Hooper
Another easy choice, this one, with eight runs for 26 metres and five turnovers won. Hodgson tackled his heart out. Pocock and Gill both had decent games, but give Mr Hooper the captaincy again – it seemed to agree with him.

8. Scott Higgenbotham
Another easy one that I’m sure doesn’t need too much explanation.

Just to give you some stats though: 12 runs for 63 metres including one try plus 12 passes, one try assist, and two turnovers won. Probably the performance of the round.

9. Luke Burgess
This was a tough decision, as Nic White also had a very good game and I’m happy he bounced back from the shocker of last week.

He was probably the technically better halfback on the weekend and we saw the return of his great kicking game.

In contrast to the other halfbacks who each ran only a couple of times, Burgess ran 15 times for 59 metres. That’s typical Burgess – his failure has never been his running game.

But I thought his passing on the weekend was pretty reasonable too. He still doesn’t have as long or flat a pass as the others, but it didn’t seem to matter to the Rebels.

I’m not a Nick Phipps fan but he also played well on the weekend. Will Genia was solid but just isn’t playing like he did a couple of years ago.

10. Bernard Foley
Matt Toomua was a tackling machine on the weekend. Not only does he pull off some big hits but he tackles a lot. But in terms of other aspects of his game, he was okay without being sensational.

In contrast to Toomua’s 11 tackles, Quade Cooper made two (and missed one). He had a fair game in terms of attack but I thought Foley was better. Foley had the same number of carries as Cooper (six) but made 55 metres versus 32 and beat four defenders as opposed to two.

He has the ability to maintain a cool head while playing up-tempo rugby which is really needed at the Tahs, and I hope he continues to get the nod over Kurtley Beale.

11. Tom English
A tough one this. Nick Cummins was one of the better players for the Force, Robbie Coleman had some good runs including one try, while Peter Betham also bagged a try.

But English made three times as many metres as the next-best left wing. He dropped the pill a few times and made a few errors, but you can’t fault that level of involvement.

12. Kurtley Beale
A few guys made it on here that I picked last week, but Beale is my choice at No. 12 for the second week in a row.

Kyle Godwin, Pat McCabe and Mitch Inman all had good games but Beale does have that (as much as I hate the term) X-factor. He set up two tries and scored one himself.

Assuming everyone stays healthy and form continue as it has, the selection of No. 12 for the Wallabies is going to be a very interesting decision.

Toomua is the incumbent and a great foil for Cooper with his hard tackling and straight running, but he isn’t playing at inside centre and Beale is knocking them out of the park.

On the other hand Beale and Cooper playing alongside each other? Exciting in attack, but in defence…

13. Tevita Kuridrani
Real two-way tussle this between last week’s choice of Adam Ashley-Cooper and Tevita Kuridrani. Tamati Ellison also had a good game but I think I’ll limit this to players eligible for the Wallabies this year.

Although the stats say Kuridrani only made five passes compared to Ashley-Cooper’s four, Kuridrani just gets the nod.

There always seems to be one instance in every game where Ashley-Cooper could have passed but didn’t, instead letting a promising backline movement die. Even so, neck and neck between these two, so a toss of the coin in this one.

14. Henry Speight
Another strong game from Lachie Turner, including a try, but Speight made more metres, beat more defenders and just looks so dangerous even with only a couple of feet of space to work in down the touchline.

15. Israel Folau
All of the fullbacks had good games on the weekend. Two in particular I’ll mention are Jason Woodward, who had more runs and made more metres than all the rest, and Jesse Mogg who, although he didn’t set the world on fire (and got sin-binned!), bounced back from a shocker last week.

What can you say about Folau, though? As good as Woodward was, Izzy’s two tries and sheer presence on the field are going to make it very, very hard for anyone else to get a look-in in this position.

I wonder if, like Mogg last year, some of the others like Woodward or Aidan Toua aren’t more likely to make the Wallabies as utilities or wingers than fullbacks.

So there you have it. I feel it’s not as controversial as last week, but how did I do?

The Crowd Says:

2014-03-03T11:43:08+00:00

CHT

Guest


I'm liking the look of those Rebels locks Tane - thoughts?

2014-03-03T11:41:03+00:00

CHT

Guest


I've seen Hoops numerous times be the first to the breakdown and pilfer, in true Pocock-esque fashion. Not sure this is correct.

2014-03-03T11:38:48+00:00

CHT

Guest


Kuruki - you say the exact consensus memes from this forum: "... problem I see with Hooper at international level is that his game is not complemented by other players around him... Ewen is going to make the mistake of picking HIgginbotham and Hooper in the same trio and Australia are going to suffer from it." All a bunch of bollocks if you ask me.

2014-03-03T10:18:09+00:00

Tane Mahuta

Guest


Speaking of different, Planet Rugby has Woodward as the best fullback in the entire comp last week.

2014-03-03T09:57:03+00:00

Buzzard

Guest


Falou is very very good. Though there are still critics out there saying he is just in the right place at the right time. Isn't that his job? A finisher? Its nearly a year ago I remember a lot people on here and other blogs saying Falou is one of the worst converts ever. Comparing him to Timana Tahu. Where are those people now? He is class.

2014-03-03T09:07:54+00:00

Tane Mahuta

Guest


Oops not Kingston, English :-( I think I originally posted Pyle as lock too. I dont know, its all a blur. All I know for sure is that Folau was good.

AUTHOR

2014-03-03T08:44:10+00:00

Who Needs Melon

Roar Guru


Kingston eh? And Fardy? Vive la différence.

2014-03-03T07:33:20+00:00

Golden

Guest


PeterK, I would go one step further and suggest that you need some good tight 5 workers who don't mind the rough stuff to let the loosies shine. It's hard to go past Moore based on his 2013 season and Fardy should probably fit in there at lock too. You'll need a lineout specialist with good height and some mongrel. I am thinking perhaps Horwill although there are also other contenders for this role? You could toss a coin when selecting props as I don't believe there are any consistently clear front runners in Australian Rugby at the moment but the development line is looking promising with the likes of Scott Sio and Toby Smith showing potential. What do you think?

2014-03-03T05:56:52+00:00

Tane Mahuta

Guest


Robinson Charles Ryan Fardy Jones McMahon Pocock Higginbotham Burgess Foley Kingston Beale AAC Betham Folau was my team but I wasnt aware that Hooper forced 5 turnovers. I actually though TPN was the worst out of the 5 starting hookers.

2014-03-03T05:52:09+00:00

Tane Mahuta

Guest


He overthrew heaps of times and that wasnt the lifters. He also once threw the wrong call and they all just looked at him with "WTF" written on their faces.

2014-03-03T05:43:08+00:00

Tane Mahuta

Guest


I can see where you are coming from Kuruki but imo you should be considering the whole pack and not just the backrow. For example. Slipper Moore Ryan Douglas/Fardy Simmons Higginbotham Hooper Palu would be OK because Palu, Slipper, Simmons, Moore and Douglas/Fardy offer enough off the ball to allow Hooper and Higgers to do their thing. A pack is best with balance but imo thats the pack as a whole. It would also depend on who you are playing and how you yourselves want to play.

2014-03-03T05:00:13+00:00

jutsie

Guest


lol was just thinking that!

2014-03-03T04:45:59+00:00

jameswm

Guest


Where's Jiggles?

2014-03-03T04:45:40+00:00

jameswm

Guest


Weekes? Ryan played well, and Kepu well when he came on. Has to be one of those two.

2014-03-03T04:44:00+00:00

jameswm

Guest


Melon I'm not saying you SHOULD use a notebook. I'm just saying that unless you do, your selections won't be that accurate. Everything is subjective anyway, notebook or not.

2014-03-03T03:10:13+00:00

PeterK

Guest


Mowen will not since he is going O/S and his play is not up to Higgs or Palu. Agree Moore and Pocock. Fardy only if at lock otherwise Higgs will get his spot. Locks will NOT be out of NSW, out of Horwill, Simmons, Fardy, Pyle, Jones. Slipper will be 1 prop as well.

2014-03-03T03:01:02+00:00

Mantis

Roar Guru


Your saying start the Tahs pack at test level? Moore, Fardy, Mowen, and Pocock are all pretty well going to start. As good as Hooper is, Pocock definately starts.

2014-03-03T02:51:54+00:00

Magic Sponge

Guest


Wheres Jiggles side?

2014-03-03T02:15:01+00:00

Blueberry

Guest


McMahon's promising but needs to be managed. A string of bad injuries or too much mental pressure this soon and he'd have a pretty short career. He was brilliant but ran himself into the ground and I hope he gets some rest, gets swapped in and out with Colby Faingaa, etc. No way he's gonna be the next great flanker if he's perpetually overworked and at risk of injury. Especially in light of what's happened to Pocock.

2014-03-03T01:41:42+00:00

nickoldschool

Roar Guru


So what do you suggest kuruki, playing Higgers at 8 (no Palu), Hooper at 7 and a Fardy/MMM type of player at 6? Or get rid of Hooper and play Higgers/Pocock/Palu at 6/7/8? Although I, like most ppl, have been disappointed with higgers at wallabies level, I still think he is a physical enough player to play 6 at international level with Hooper at 7 and Palu at 8. That's if him and Palu have 15 more games like this in 2014 SR. I just think it would be a waste of talent to omit 1. Plus Hooper is growing as a player, getting more and more physical and complete. However, IMO it mostly depends on Palu: a tired Palu doesn't pull his weight and doesn't have the impact a top 8 should have, other backrowers and locks have to defend for him. But the Palu we have seen in the last 2 weeks was at his best, this is why a guy like Hooper did so well. Don't see how it wouldnt work at wallabies level this time around. We just need those 3 to still be fit in a few months time.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar