Let's be careful out there, but learn some bloody road rules!

By John Thompson-Mills / Expert

I was going to write another doping-related column this week, but instead, my mind was changed by some other kinds of dopes – those that get around in cars and a few who ride bikes.

The past few days have been horrible for cyclists in what is always the one-sided argument against cars.

In Adelaide, a 49-year-old woman was killed on Saturday morning when her bike and a car collided in West Lakes.

In Brisbane, a motorist was run down from behind on Friday afternoon as he rode off from some traffic lights.

Amazingly, he escaped with a few cuts and bruises.

In Melbourne, a rider was ‘doored’ on Monday by someone getting out of a taxi in the CBD.

And then there was the weekend crash in Sydney, where six people were knocked down by a four wheel drive, leaving two cyclists with spinal injuries and one facing up to six months in rehab.

The circumstances behind the Sydney and Adelaide crashes are unknown, but one thing can be said for all four of these incidents – they happened in broad daylight.

But some theories can be drawn from the Melbourne bingle, which, for the cyclist at least, doesn’t appear to have resulted in any serious injuries.

I’ll preface my comments by saying I’ve been commuting to work for almost 20 years. I also ride on weekends, but only socially with mates. I’ve never raced.

I’m also just back on my bike after a crash which left me with a dislocated AC joint in my shoulder, which I can’t afford to have operated on because I’ll be completely immobilised for six weeks.

But more about that later. Here’s the video of the rider getting ‘doored’ in Melbourne.

A few things annoy me about this video.

Firstly, the taxi passenger says “no offence” has been committed and questions the rider as to whether she is riding in a bike lane.

Well, Mr whatever your name is, you’re wrong because in Victoria it is an offence to open a door and cause injury to someone.

Here’s the relevant section of the road rules introduced by the Victorian Government two years ago. It is an offence to “cause a hazard to any person or vehicle by opening a door of a vehicle, leaving a door of a vehicle open, or getting off, or out of, a vehicle”.

The on-the-spot fine for opening a car door in the direct path of a cyclist has increased to $352, up from $141. If you go to court, you could be smacked with a $1408 fine, an increase of almost $1000.

There are clearly a lot of people like him, who just see cyclists as always in the wrong and show them no respect. But obviously, he doesn’t know the road rules.

He also doesn’t know that when you injure someone, it’s not wise to leave the scene without giving your details. For him and his fellow passengers to do that is quite sickening.

Clearly, the lady wasn’t in an immediate life-threatening situation, but there was no excuse for him to refuse point blank to take responsibility for what he did, which clearly was accidental.

That said, his “where’s the bike lane” question is relevant, because according to The Age, who ran this story, there isn’t a bike lane in that part of Collins St.

As a cyclist I would ask, why, when knowing how risky CBD riding is, would you ride in that position on the road in the first place?

If that was me, I wouldn’t be riding like that. I would try and sit directly behind the taxi and then if it stopped be looking to go around the outside, not the inside.

‘Dooring’ as an offence or not, riding up the inside like that is asking for trouble.

We have no chance on the road when it comes to collisions with cars, so why invite trouble by putting yourself in such a vulnerable position to begin with?

To me that’s just not sensible riding.

Luckily, most of my ride to work is via bike lanes – most, but not all. So when I am ‘out there’ in and amongst the cars, I try not to ride too close to the gutter.

I feel that only encourages motorists to try and squeeze past you when maybe there isn’t really enough room.

If you look timid on the road because of the position you occupy in the lane, you’re asking for trouble.

I also never try to squeeze past cars on the left when they have stopped. Even at traffic lights.

I also have a little problem with the camera on the bike.

Yes, it’s helped write this story, and it might even help catch someone guilty of an offence, but sometimes I wonder what’s behind the purpose of putting a camera on your commute ride?

Is there a secret hope you might catch a motorist ‘bang to rights’ cutting you off or almost killing you? Does it automatically make you a little more aggressive and tensed up about what might happen? I reckon it does.

I’ve only done half a dozen commute rides since my accident, and there’s no doubt what happened to me back in January has unnerved me.

I was ‘taken out’ by a cyclist riding in my small group as we came down a steep hill. He hadn’t noticed I had stopped to turn right and ploughed into me as I headed off into a side road.

I had no idea the crash was about to happen, so the impact felt like a king-hit.

I’m glad to be riding again, but despite considering myself a good defensive rider, I’m now worried about another impact from behind, especially from my right-hand side.

Listening to music while I ride has never been something I’ve done and it’s not something I’d recommend either. I feel you need every sensory fibre you have to identify potential danger because, as I found out, it can be when you least expect it.

And like that cyclist in Melbourne found out, not everyone is willing to take responsibility for their actions.

The driver in Brisbane did stop and assist the injured cyclist but has not been charged with any offence, despite clearly being at fault for what happened.

To injure six people and sustain so much damage to their car must have meant the Sydney crash occurred at a relatively high speed, but again, in broad daylight, how could you not see a bunch of cyclists in front of you?

So what’s the solution?

Better bike infrastructure is an obvious one, and over time, we’re seeing more of it appearing in our cities. But there needs to be education in how to best use it, not just installation.

Has anyone suggested closing the left lane on multiple lane roads on weekends for bunch riders? Why not try this on popular cycling routes between 5am and 11am on Saturdays and Sundays? Cars can have the one or two lanes on the outside and bike the whole of the inside lane. It surely is worth a try.

Or can the ‘one metre matters’ campaign be legislated and, just as vitally, policed?

Of course, cyclists could just give up on riding on the roads, which would no doubt please many motorists, but it would also increase traffic, and no one wants that.

Clearly, we all have to share the roads, but it seems the reports of incidents like the four I’ve highlighted are increasing exponentially.

The Melbourne accident shows everyone needs to do more to be aware of the dangers, so we start by just taking a little more care out there.

Learning the road rules properly would also be a good start.

Ride safely.

The Crowd Says:

2014-05-06T19:14:10+00:00

Careful Cyclist

Guest


http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=rgWwbZ0fG5Y

2014-03-25T18:26:04+00:00

Cam Baker

Roar Rookie


What I want to know is; What happens when a cyclist in a bike lane comes across a car in the process of turning left? On a strict interpretation of the Road Rules, both may have right of way and yet they both have to give way to each other!

2014-03-21T00:07:40+00:00

Andrew Graham

Roar Rookie


As someone who lives in Sydney's north and rides those roads weekly I must say I've seen very little of this, even at 7am on a Saturday when the big groups (peletons of 50 people) are out riding. Further, those aren't actual designated 'bike lanes' in many places - it's just the shoulder of the road. An important difference, particularly as there are big sections where its too narrow to ride safely (around Mt Colah in particular).

2014-03-20T07:25:25+00:00

Jimbo Jones

Guest


Are you familiar with inner city Melbourne? The same issue arises in multiple places throughout the CBD, some are better than others, it's not as simple as avoiding these parts of the roads. Usually this wouldn't be an issue as people commonly indicate when they pull over and cyclists are careful to moderate their speed. Poor road design and unsafe infrastructure do not excuse the behaviour of any party involved in this accident.

2014-03-20T00:06:39+00:00

sydney cyclist

Guest


yeah i was a bit tired when i wrote that email.

2014-03-19T23:05:53+00:00

TriangleFlatDog

Guest


Well said mate! Also I know you mean't to say "she does not HAVE the basic competency to safely ride within traffic"

2014-03-19T23:04:00+00:00

TriangleFlatDog

Guest


If that is the case then, IMO, that road is not a place where one should be riding a bike...even if it is legal to do so. Again, common sense should have prevailed and an alternative, safer route should have been used by the cyclist

2014-03-19T22:35:38+00:00

Jay (the other one)

Guest


So you've got a small sample size then. Everything you've stated are the same things car drivers are guilty of. Given that's the case do you also argue that drivers should have no road rules to protect them either? If a cyclist breaks the rules, gets injured they are to blame. No one is arguing against this.

2014-03-19T21:56:49+00:00

Jay (the other one)

Guest


It's not selectively quoting. How is it out of context? You posed the question and I believe your rationale is erroneous. If that lady didn't have a camera where would she be now? The person in the wrong (the passenger) would have gotten away scott-free.

2014-03-19T20:42:50+00:00

Statler and Waldorf

Roar Guru


part of the reason is that most people don't see that there is an issue therefore, if there is no issue then there is nothing to fix or change.

2014-03-19T20:08:48+00:00

Statler and Waldorf

Roar Guru


Just commenting on what happens in my suburb. Come and see for yourself , I guarantee I am right.

2014-03-19T17:23:44+00:00

sydney cyclist

Guest


I'm glad you wrote this article. Growing up in Canberra we all went to the police run traffic centre & learned how to ride our bikes on the "road" - it was a circuit with road markings, intersections & signs. The skills I learnt there 30 yrs ago I still use today. The growth of cycling over the last ten years has seen so many riders who probably haven't picked up a bike since they were kids riding around the park who are now riding on roads. So many of these riders ride in their own little world, they are unpredictable, don't assess any immediate risks, fail to engage with their surrounds, listen to an iPod instead of approaching vehicles & think everyone is looking out for them. They have no cycling etiquette. I'm beginning to think there should be some mandatory training people have to attend if they want to ride on the road. Regardless if it was a bike lane or not that woman in Melbourne has demonstrated she does not lack the basic competency to safely ride within traffic. She failed to identify the most likely risk (being doored) & she failed to adjust her riding to the situation. This is the issue. We are allowing people to ride on the road without ensuring they have any level of competency or sufficient awareness of the risks involved. Riding on the road is not like riding around the park. As cyclists we all bang on about a metre matters when cars overtake us. It needs to be a two way concept & cyclists be prepared to give a metre gap to pedestrians & parked cars when they overtake so they don't get doored or hit pedestrians walking along a footpath. I do not condone the behaviour of the taxi passengers towards the cyclist after the incident but I would say from the back seat in the taxi noting the close proximity to the footpath you wouldn't expect a cyclist to be coming up on the inside.

2014-03-19T14:08:49+00:00

DANGEOLEV

Guest


.

2014-03-19T13:12:33+00:00

Jimbo Jones

Guest


Common sense (and the video) would indicate that traffic was banked up. You'll also find there is a railed off tram stop in the centre of the road that leaves no room at all to pass on the right.

2014-03-19T13:09:54+00:00

Jimbo Jones

Guest


When will they implement a _strict_ licensing and registration system for motorised vehicles? I hold several licenses and I consider the effort involved in attaining them to be trivial at best, motorcycle licensing in particular is a joke. The base of this argument is education, it's pretty clear that it's lacking in most road users and as pointed out by Tim Renowden in an earlier post, cars are far more dangerous than bicycles.

2014-03-19T13:04:59+00:00

Jimbo Jones

Guest


I think you'll find that cyclists don't want to be treated like motor vehicles. If that was the case, I'd be out cycling on the highway, expecting you to give way to me in the same manner as you would a car, taking an entire lane at all times, etc etc... There are compromises to allow cyclists to operate on the road as they reduce congestion and generally benefit the community (less noise, less traffic, less road surface wear), hence there are concessions to allow them to operate on the road. I ride a bicycle and a motorcycle and not a day goes by where I don't have some idiot do something illegal that seriously effects my safety. Having a license and registration in no way means you understand, or in fact obey, the law.

AUTHOR

2014-03-19T13:03:58+00:00

John Thompson-Mills

Expert


What would the benefit of a cyclist being registered be to the actual cyclist? Would it mean they are guaranteed a certain level of infrastructure? Would I need a rego for all my bikes? Would it mean cyclists will get more respect from motorists? I was talking to some people today who want all cyclists banned from the Adelaide Hills, primarily because they say we are too slow and therefore too dangerous. They claim hills roads were not built for cyclists and motorists to share. They don't want new infrastructure, just a ban. Not sure they care about a rego. If I had to pay rego for a bike then it would need to be massively expensive because as this article has demonstrated there is often no consistency in cycling infrastructure from street to street let alone city to city. So make me pay rego and I'd expect good stuff for me to ride on, on the roads. I don't want bike tracks unless they run parallel to roads as where I live, they tend to be too meandering. As a bike commuter I want to get to work as safely and quickly as possible, and that means using arterial roads. So my bike lanes need to be constant and well maintained...with no cars parked in them. Face it, cycling is a clean and cheap form of transport, that helps keep people healthy and (accidents notwithstanding) out of doctor's surgeries and hospitals. Cycling is good for the environment too and of course takes cars off the road. Sadly, like some motorists, not everyone acts like they know the road rules, and thus gives a bad name to the rest. Given registration and penalties/punishments for bad driving doesn't stop road trauma, and some absolutely appalling driving,what makes you think registering cyclists will do weed out our "bad apples?"

2014-03-19T12:54:19+00:00

Jimbo Jones

Guest


Pause it again at 0.09 or 0.10 seconds... There is clearly traffic banked up in front of the taxi. Incidentally, Melbourne is not Sydney and has better (albeit lacking on this occasion) cycle markings.

AUTHOR

2014-03-19T12:37:00+00:00

John Thompson-Mills

Expert


It's good that you have read my piece, but if you're going to throw my quotes back at me, please don't selectively do so. It takes things out of context. here is the relevant part in full. "I also have a little problem with the camera on the bike. Yes, it’s helped write this story, and it might even help catch someone guilty of an offence, but sometimes I wonder what’s behind the purpose of putting a camera on your commute ride? Is there a secret hope you might catch a motorist ‘bang to rights’ cutting you off or almost killing you? Does it automatically make you a little more aggressive and tensed up about what might happen? I reckon it does." I fully understand how valuable the camera on a bike can be, but my point was whether it may actually make people a little more willing to put themselves in a vulnerable position so that they may catch a motorist out. Almost like they go looking for trouble. I can see some people with this attitude, rather than just a "this camera is for my protection" attitude.

AUTHOR

2014-03-19T12:24:10+00:00

John Thompson-Mills

Expert


I'm glad you were treated so well by the people that caused your accident. Not everyone is so lucky. I see the guy in Melbourne who "doored" the cyclist has apologised for his disrespectful behaviour.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar