SPIRO: We are set for terrific Super Rugby finals series

By Spiro Zavos / Expert

At 5.23 am (AEST) SANZAR sent out the Super Rugby final series schedule to the media. The Brumbies play the Chiefs at Canberra on Saturday night and the Sharks play the Highlanders at Durban on 1.05 Sunday morning (AEST).

If the scores are level at full time in these qualifying finals there will be extra time played in two periods of 10 minutes. If the scores are still level, there will be a sudden death extra time period of up to 10 minutes.

If the scores are still level, there will be a kicking competition featuring five players from each team until the deadlock is resolved.

The media release noted that in the pool rounds of the 2014 Super Rugby tournament the Brumbies defeated the Chiefs 41-23 and the Sharks were defeated by the Highlanders at Durban 31-18.

The past history of wins and losses, either in total or against one another, are wiped out of the equation at kick-off. However, the home ground advantage remains as a bonus for the side that performed the best throughout the tournament, and teams should be rewarded for doing the hard yards throughout the tournament with the home ground advantage.

The finals line-up is a good reflection on the performance of the leading teams. The Waratahs won 12 matches, the Crusaders won 11 matches. Both these teams get automatic home matches for the semi-finals.

The Sharks and Brumbies, both with home qualifying finals, won 10 matches. The bottom two teams, the Chiefs and the Highlanders, won eight matches and are destined to play all their matches away if they progress.

The Brumbies were most impressive on Friday night in the way they smashed through the Western Force 47-25. Matt Toomua, coming back from an injury, was in tremendous form as he scored twice early on to set the Brumbies up for a bonus-point win and a home qualifying final.

In the end the Brumbies scored seven tries and conceded three. Their wingers, especially Henry Speight, were in devastating form. If the Brumbies carry this sort of rugby into the match against the Chiefs they will be hard to beat.

But it is a big if. The Brumbies started kicking early. But as soon as Toomua showed that the Force could not cope with a running game the Brumbies, to their credit, adjusted and ran rampant for the rest of the match. Will this spirit to run the ball be there next Saturday night? Or will the inclination for most of this season to play Jakeball prevail?

The Chiefs are a better side in every respect than the Force. They toughed out a hard victory at Eden Park, in appalling conditions, against the Blues. This was the first defeat for the Blues at Eden Park in over a year.

In the opening 20 minutes, the Chiefs were virtually entrenched near their own try line as the big Blues forwards smashed away at them. But the Chiefs displayed great resilience and force, especially in the forwards, to repel the Blues. The wet and cold conditions favoured the Chiefs, there was no way they could have matched the Blues try for try on a dry, windless night.

The main weakness in the Chiefs is a lack of power and size in the backs. This almost told against them in last year’s Super Rugby final, when tiredness from a torrid travelling itinerary got to the Brumbies in the last 20 minutes and the Chiefs were able to snatch a victory.

Sonny Bill Williams is coming back and there is talk, too, of Richard Kahui reviving his Chiefs career after a stint in Japan. One or both of them would make this two-time champions side a real contender this season. But, of course, this won’t happen until next year.

This time, the Brumbies will have a home ground advantage when they play the Chiefs. I would expect them to be too good all over the field, especially with their big outside backs, for the smaller and tenacious Chiefs. There is one proviso to be made here, however. The Chiefs are a good travelling side. And they are a good side at winning knock-out rugby. In fact, their record in the last two years has been the best of any of the teams in the finals.

The Highlanders defeated the Sharks in the round robin part of the tournament, at Durban. But I wouldn’t expect them to repeat this achievement in the qualifying final.

In the past two weekend, the Highlanders have been blasted off the park by the Waratahs and then the Crusaders. Both times it was a case of the Highlanders forwards not being able to get any parity in any sphere with the opposition pack.

The Crusaders, for instance, scored two rolling maul tries against the Highlanders and you would expect the Sharks to do rolling maul after rolling maul next weekend at Durban to break down the resistance of the Highlanders. This side needs the tough old man Brad Thorn to provide some steel in the forwards, but Thorn is out for the season with an arm injury.

There is some terrific break-out speed and flair in the Highlanders’ backs, especially if Ben Smith plays. But trying to win big matches off snatches of possession, with an inadequate scrum and lineout, is not a recipe for success.

It is not that the Sharks have been overly impressive, but they have a no-risks game that is hard to break down. This game relies a lot on winning penalties, which happened last weekend, with Jaco Peyper dishing them out to the Sharks early on, especially.

The thing is that the Sharks actually have a number of very fast outside backs. But the Jakeball game allows for the pace and flair of these back to be exploited only when the opposition has been put to the sword with attritional forward and kicking play. So even with the territorial advantages and penalty advantages, the Sharks never really looked like scoring the four tries and a 35-point winning margin they needed to take second place in the tournament.

There was an interesting article in Planet Rugby written by Ross Hastie, titled “‘Template rugby’ is poison for SA“.

By template rugby, the author means the Jake White template, “The game is planned to a template. Kick from here, run from here, maul from here etc.”

I have called this Jakeball. Hastie says this the template “has been detrimental to South African rugby on a number of levels”.

He pointed out that up to the weekend matches, the South African teams had produced only 10 bonus points to the 25 produced by the New Zealand teams and the 19 in Australia. Of all the teams in the Super Rugby tournament, only the Bulls and the Lions had scored fewer tries than the Sharks.

These three SA teams, too, are on the bottom of the table in the clean break statistics. And not a “single SA side is to be found in the top six in off-load numbers”.

I have expressed this a number of times on The Roar – much to the disgust of most South African rugby supporters – this is not winning rugby right now.

Teams are much better under the high ball than they were in 2007. The way the catch is being ruled, too, with the catcher being a protected player is defusing the bombs. Attack, especially from broken play, is much better than it was in 2007, mainly because the referees are tougher (as they should be) in requiring tacklers to release and roll away.

Anyway, Jake White is a smart coach. The Sharks playing Jakeball should demolish the Highlanders at Durban. But White will know that more attack will be needed to defeat their likely semi-finals opponents the Crusaders at Christchurch.

I expect the Brumbies, too, to be too strong especially out wide for the Chiefs. If this happens, we have the enticing prospect of the Brumbies playing the Waratahs in the second semi-final.

There is one further point I’d make about the 2014 Super Rugby tournament and the coming finals. This relates to the niggling, nasty and endlessly confrontational league played during the recent State of Origin series. Even after the dire first match, surely the worst game of rugby (league) ever inflicted on anyone, there were league tragics saying that it was no worse than, say, the the second Wallabies versus France Test this year.

What bull!

This reflex by league commentators to somehow justify boring matches with false comparisons with rugby matches needs to stop. It doesn’t hold up, as we saw with the enthralling Waratahs versus Reds match at the weekend.

The Reds threw everything at the Waratahs in the great tradition of a rugby rivalry that goes back to 1882. The Waratahs responded with some tremendous tries, with Kurtley Beale making spectacular break-outs, as Greg Inglis could be if he were playing rugby instead of league.

The Waratahs, even without Israel Folau, produced their biggest win ever in Super Rugby against the Reds, and in doing so established their credentials as the team to beat to win the tournament.

The Crowd Says:

2014-07-16T20:48:07+00:00

etienne marais

Guest


In other words the Sharks take the trophy ?

2014-07-16T20:20:37+00:00

etienne marais

Guest


No, it was just the relentless pressure put on by the Sharks, often illegal stuff, particularly from Bismarck & Alberts. And they managed to do this from around the 20th minute right through to the end. It was only in the 64th minute that the ref reached into his pocket again for another card, which reduced the Sharks to 13 men. I reckon the very early red card, in a perverse way, gave the Sharks license to go illegal. What was Rohan Hoffman going to do? Send off another player in the 20th minute? Slim chane. And the Sharkie on-field "brains-trust" realised this; and made the off-side line theirs. In the 64th minute Hoffman, after a dozen warning, could take no more, and he took the unavoidable sanction. Again, the Sharks continued to flirt with barely legal tactics. They did play like Trojans though. (Watch their last game against the Stormers; more of the same stuff) Stalingrad Sharks.

2014-07-15T22:01:02+00:00

Buk

Guest


I saw that game, and got the same sort of impression - the Crusaders seemed to go real sloppy with a heap of dropped passes or spills with the line in sight. But then the other way to look at it is the Sharks kept the pressure on in defence for the full 80 minutes, and managed to break down the Crusaders composure and execution by that pressure.

2014-07-15T21:58:51+00:00

Jerry

Guest


Oh yeah, that'd be hugely unlikely. The Sharks win ended a 50 match unbeaten streak for the Crusaders at home to overseas teams - before that the previous one was in something like 2001.

2014-07-15T21:51:01+00:00

Buk

Guest


Sorry, was not that clear there - I meant an overseas team coming here and beating both the Blues and Crusaders; I don't think any SA or Australian team has ever done that before.

2014-07-15T11:46:53+00:00

Captain Obvious

Guest


Kiwis have plenty of trophies in the sheds, so who is sooking?

2014-07-15T11:46:00+00:00

Captain Obvious

Guest


Walsh is also happy to make up laws as he sees fit so that he inevitably ends up favouring one team over the other.

2014-07-15T11:37:27+00:00

44bottles

Roar Guru


Haven't been to an All Blacks test for a while, so haven't noticed.

2014-07-15T11:35:32+00:00

44bottles

Roar Guru


*Care to suggest a better logical option.

2014-07-15T10:53:14+00:00


Keep making accusations and turning a blind eye to your countrymen PeterK. We will each sit on our side of the fence.

2014-07-15T10:20:45+00:00

PeterK

Guest


BB - Come off it. When there was the hooha re the lions game, multiple sa posters were saying to suck it up, after all we get it far worse, about time you know how it feels etc. That is justifying it, it is being called an apologist for it. Also you seem to take personal pot shots at me and I have not against you so please refrain from it even if you dislike my views. You should reread what you have posted and retract some of your comments. I have not perpetuated myths and untruths. I back a study that shows refs are biased towards their home countries. I have been a long time advocate of neutral refs. I have been very direct and non pc saying that some sa refs (never ever stated joubert) have been very biased ie Lions Reds game for one. What victim attitude. I have never read any aussie claim a SA (or any other nationality ref) was biased against oz teams when playing nz teams , or vica versa. This is the victim attitude of many sa fans ie they are victimised and that neutral (by definition since they are from another country) refs are not. The exception being fans from everywhere say refs favour the ab's.

2014-07-15T10:09:17+00:00

Firstxv

Guest


oh is it? I went off the SANZAR rugby site where it said Friday...fair enough then...thats better...

2014-07-15T09:39:00+00:00

soapit

Guest


you might have to try using more than 4 words jerry. i've got no problem with kaplan which seems to be what ur implying.

2014-07-15T08:58:40+00:00

soapit

Guest


hardly being able to pay your own bills doesnt really scream elite.

2014-07-15T08:57:23+00:00

soapit

Guest


its accurate, players have more to think about in rugby than just running hard into the line so they're not gonna commit to the run as often as in league. try not to be defensive and consider it and you'll see its the case. as i said above i think there is scope for them to back themselves into contact more (including the requisite agression level) which is part of the attitude cheikia has instilled at the tahs.

2014-07-15T08:53:51+00:00

soapit

Guest


fittlers not a dyed in the wool leagiue, he's said plenty of times he enjoyed his few games in rugby (10's i believe). in any case fittler made the comment as to why kurtley would succeed in league. he wasnt saying what rugby players should do while playing rugby. however it must be said that aussie rugby players dont back themselves into contact like the kiwis do (something cheika has improved no end with the tahs) peter after watching folau do you really think the current top league players lack skill?

2014-07-15T08:28:50+00:00


Again you perpetuate myths and untruths. I have not seen South African supporters "defend" or "justify" their referees in regards to being biased or not. Most SA supporters here defend the fact that perception is only created one way. Suggestions on this board over the past season was always damning towards SA referees and very little if any comment made in regards to New Zealand and Australian referees. Ike you said in your first paragraph, home bias exists amongst all referees, yet the bellowing sound of biased SA referees is still echoing as far as the Andes. The victim attitude you speak of so healthy in South African supporters is alive and well in just about every rugby supporter on the other side of the India Ocean. You just need to go through a few live blogs to confirm that. ;)

2014-07-15T08:17:25+00:00

Jerry

Guest


Technically they beat the Blues on the North Shore. The Canes won in Auckland & Chch in 2012.

2014-07-15T07:53:06+00:00

PeterK

Guest


FirstXV - You are incorrect as far as the schedule is concerned. The Crusaders match is listed for SATURDAY 7.30 pm local time (5.30pm AEST) NOT Friday.

2014-07-15T07:47:28+00:00

PeterK

Guest


BB - If you read through my posts I have always been positive about Joubert. It is some other SA refs that are deplorable. As to bias I have frequently said ALL refs have been shown to have bias towards their own country, I have never said it was just SA refs. It just so happens SA refs get more home games. I have always been an advocate for neutral refs. What gets me is the attitude of SA fans who justify the bias of their refs AND claim Aus refs and NZ refs are not neutral when their own country is not onvolved, as if they have a specific agenda against SA as opposed to bias for their own country, that is a real paranoid victim attitude.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar