NRC update part 3: All systems go for launch

By Brett McKay / Expert

Last week’s two-part update on the progress of the nine National Rugby Championship clubs fulfilled the whole purpose of undertaking the project in the first place: the dissemination of information.

(Read all about the NRC – part 1 dealt with Queensland, Perth, Melbourne and Canberra, and part 2 with NSW Country and the Sydney teams.)

Whether spreading NRC news was our responsibility is neither here nor there; the point is we all know more as a result.

Moreover, the dissemination of information has been useful on other fronts, too, as my ESPNscrum colleague, Greg Growden, wrote in his ‘Ruck and Maul’ column last Friday, “This issue was raised at a recent meeting of the Sydney [NRC] clubs, with officials saying they were now relying on reports on rugby internet websites to find out what was going on with the NRC.”

You’re welcome, Sydney clubs.

To complete the series, I spoke to General Manager, National Teams and Rugby Operations for the ARU, Andrew Fagan, again over the weekend to get the competition update on a number of fronts.

Through a combination of subjects I wanted to discuss, and other topics brought up in comments under the first two parts last week, I’ve covered the major areas of interest.

Fagan and I spoke on these topics for the best part of 40 minutes, so rest assured I’m not going to bombard you with detailed quotes and explanations. Instead, I’ll provide a concise summary of the main areas we covered, and provide more detail where possible in comments as they come up.

The draw
The big news here is that the full NRC draw has been confirmed, broadcast details and venues finalised, and all will be revealed tomorrow. We’ll have a full summary of the draw once released on the site tomorrow afternoon.

My extrapolated draw for the first round last week proved to be on the money. Iain Payten reported the same in his Daily Telegraph column on Friday. The interesting development is the news that NSW Country will play their first home game of the season at Coogee Oval in Sydney on Sunday 24 August.

Whether this is because of an inability to secure a regional venue, or reward for partner club Randwick’s involvement is still uncertain. Both are perfectly reasonable explanations.

Broadcast details
The working model of Fox Sports broadcasting one game live per week – on Thursday nights, following an ITM Cup game, and leading into their RugbyHQ program – remains the case. Fagan indicated that Fox Sports will monitor how the competition starts, and will have the option of increasing the number of games they cover each week.

Simply put, if the numbers are good enough, more live games each week are possible.

Fagan confirmed that Foxtel and Fox Sports were the first and only broadcast partner the ARU approached, and “they showed significant interest from the outset, and obviously invested a significant amount of money into the competition itself”.

Indeed, the reported figure of $1.5 Million in cash, plus production costs of live matches (the number of which is not limited, as mentioned above) is indeed a “significant investment”. Free-to-air television networks, including the ABC and SBS, were not approached.

The live streaming of other games is still very much on the agenda is being worked on in conjunction with Fox, as per the terms of their exclusivity arrangements. It’s unclear as yet whether these games would be streamed through the Fox Sports website, or through a dedicated NRC site, or both. All details, including production elements are currently being worked on.

Fagan confirmed that the digital rights sit with Fox as part of their NRC broadcast rights deal.

The big news on this front though, is that these streamed games will be available for free.

“Whichever [streaming] option we go with, it will be free access,” Fagan said. “The core objective of this competition is to provide high level rugby in a very accessible way, whether that’s the ticket prices for the matches themselves, or for streaming for those who don’t have Fox Sports.”

Other details, including geo-blocking issues that may or may not arise, and the ability to watch full game replays – which is a “good concept” that the ARU have discussed internally, and something they would like to make happen – is also part of the ongoing discussion currently in progress.

Competition launch
A launch date for the competition has been bedded down, but isn’t being publicised yet. However, it will almost certainly be in and around the various premier rugby finals series around the country, which could coincide with the Waratahs’ home Super Rugby finals.

The draw coming out tomorrow will mark something of a soft launch of the competition. Several corporate partners are likely to be announced, including the reported news Sydney-based construction company Buildcorp will be naming rights sponsor for the NRC’s next three years. As I mentioned last week, Sydney and Brisbane club rugby people will know the Buildcorp name from the front of the Sydney University and University of Queensland jerseys.

“Between [tomorrow] and the start of the competition, details will be released around squad lists, the allocation of Wallabies for marketing and promotional purposes to the teams, the law innovations that will be brought into the competition… will all launch itself,” Fagan told me. The ARU’s marketing campaign for the competition will also become apparent as the competition start date nears.

Web and social media channels
While careful to keep his powder dry for the actual competition launch, Fagan confirmed that there will be a concerted web and social media presence for the NRC in the lead-up, and particularly once the competition starts properly.

Twitter users may well have already found @NRC_Rugby, and the official competition Facebook page and other social media channels are said to be coming soon.

An NRC site – either as a standalone or more likely attached to www.rugby.com.au – will also launch in the coming weeks.

Ticketing and memberships
All ticketing structures and membership programs will be run by the clubs individually, but Fagan confirmed that all clubs are of a similar thinking in terms of ensuring the games are not outrageously priced.

The clubs have varying models for ticket pricing and memberships, and partnerships with universities and charity organisations exist throughout and will almost certainly be utilised for promotional activities.

Happily, ticket prices are going to be competitive. A number of you suggested in comments last week that somewhere in same ballpark as what you pay to watch premier rugby around the country would be appropriate, and it sounds like $15 to $20 is a common price point.

“That appears to be a consistent price that people are looking at at the moment, in and around that price for a Shute Shield game in Sydney,” Fagan said. He also suggested that the NRC clubs are working on various special pricing and discount programs for existing members and supporters of affiliated Super Rugby sides, and/or partner clubs.

Crowd expectations
ARU CEO Bill Pulver said on the day the NRC was announced that the budgeting and the financial model was already such that massive crowds were not paramount for the competition and the clubs to be financially viable. That certainly remains the case, with Fagan confirming that all clubs have been “relatively conservative” in their forecasts and financials to date.

Revenue streams related to the gate have also been set low, but obviously, they have greater expectations for actual attendance at their home games, and that’s fair. Everyone wants NRC crowds to be as healthy as possible.

The Australian Rugby Championship averaged around 3000-4000 per game in 2007, and Fagan said “I’d be rapt” if that was repeated in the first year of the NRC.

Venues
I asked whether Fox’s desire to minimise production costs dictated that only games in Brisbane, Sydney, and Melbourne would be broadcast, but it turns out that wasn’t the case. Fox are happy to broadcast from all around the country, but the choice of venues by some clubs won’t allow that.

That said, the country clubs, Canberra, and Perth were happy with the outcome, and as I suggested last week, all nine clubs will feature in Fox Sports games within the first five weeks of the competition.

Also, the Queensland Country home game as a curtain raiser to the September 13 Wallabies versus Argentina game on the Gold Coast will almost certainly go ahead, and a Brisbane City home game before the third Bledisloe on October 18 is also a strong chance.

In the release of the draw, we’ll also see Perth Spirit playing a home game in Adelaide. Fagan told me South Australia lodged a “solid tender” in the initial intake, and Adelaide remains an area of genuine interest if and when the NRC looks to add more teams.

Law innovations
You’ll recall in May and early June, the ARU called for and then shortlisted a number of law innovations to be taken to the IRB for approval for use in the NRC. A dozen suggestions were shortlisted, ranging from how bonus points were handed out, to time limits on forming scrums, to a ‘mark’ being claimed anywhere on the field for a kick caught on the full.

Fagan hinted that not all 12 on the shortlist were put forward to the IRB for approval, but he said that things were progressing well, and that all had been received positively. The expectation is all will be implemented, with the underlying theme “all about removing frustrations” from the game.

The ones they really want to introduce will be implemented anyway, regardless of formal sign-off from Dublin. For example, if the IRB won’t approve the suggestion where crooked lineout throws are not pulled up if uncontested, local competition refereeing interpretations can be tweaked to allow this. It’s probably even easier.

The Crowd Says:

2014-07-16T14:24:53+00:00

Av

Guest


+1 @bernie, and thanks Brett. Just spent 2 hours reading through your articles, and the long threads of comments and have to say I have changed my tune somewhat re 'not getting any info until now.' I underestimated the planning involved (by many organisations), and the need to focus on core objectives and stay LEAN. Nevertheless, an update of that kind would have sufficed. The silence was deafening. Cheers Brett, really appreciated your efforts to bring us up to speed. I am now excited. Really excited. Keen for sitting on the Brooky hill to watch some footy, take my 4yo along, meet up with old mates and their 4yo's....and cheer the Rays home!

2014-07-16T09:11:24+00:00

In Brief

Guest


Absolute rubbish. There has been strident criticism of the laws from all quarters. You might have read some of Brian Moore's comments on the scrum laws. You might have read the manager of the Lions last year state that the scrum had become nothing more than a lottery. Yes rugby is doing well overseas, but don't let that blind you to some of the obvious issues.

2014-07-16T01:58:26+00:00

Crazy Horse

Guest


There is some serious talent in Perth's Premier Grade Clubs. The Perth Rugby community expects that some of the local boys will get a spot.

2014-07-15T13:35:37+00:00

Midfielder

Guest


Having a re think ... I live a punk kick away from TGM and the Woodies have always been my side .. [as an aside I gotta say the Rats V Manly game last week was the best I have seen in along time] ... so was going were Eastwood was going .. but they pulled out and I am spending more time on the Central Coast so where is the CC / Hunter side ... On balance Greater Sydney Rams

2014-07-15T12:57:39+00:00

Redbull

Guest


Yeah, agree it was one of the few law variations that didn't seem unreasonable. As you say, it is a gimme for a driving maul or the defending team have to decide to defend the maul or keep the throw honest. If at least one jumper goes up then it is declared a contest?

2014-07-15T12:52:05+00:00

Redbull

Guest


It started in NRL about 10 years ago. They have even put red chalk from the try line to 20m line. Don't watch much NFL. Hadn't noticed it on the few games I have seen.

2014-07-15T12:44:27+00:00

Simon Bedard

Roar Pro


Hey Nick, You make some good points here. I agree on ticket pricing, and the timing of the games.. I also think the Adelaide decision is a bit strange, and sounds like a very small bridge being rebuilt with the rejected SA bid for a team. But region WA would seem to make more sense. I am not sure I am on the same page with the curtain raisers, and pathways though. The NRC was designed to be the third tier to provIde a better pathway for development. Many of the NRC teams are intrinsically linked to a super rugby side (Perth, Melb, Canberra, & all QLD teams). Furthermore, the NSW based NRC teams are made up from local club sides, and also will no doubt forms stronger ties with the Tahs. So I don't see any reason why my young fella can't play for the Rats, Rays, Tahs then Wallabies....I just might have to wait a while. :-)

2014-07-15T12:37:52+00:00

Simon Bedard

Roar Pro


I think the timing is excellent. SR will be over, many sports will be finished or finishing....so many sport loving people will not have much in the way of footy to watch. Not to mention the weather will be getting warmer, and afternoon games will be fantastic. Yep...there is risk in a venture like this. But nothing ventured, nothing gained.

2014-07-15T12:33:27+00:00

Simon Bedard

Roar Pro


And I think that is quite reasonable. It is a new comp and we need to set objectives that we can achieve. Let's take the first step and go from there.

2014-07-15T12:31:16+00:00

Simon Bedard

Roar Pro


Love it.....

2014-07-15T12:30:35+00:00

Simon Bedard

Roar Pro


I think this is the point. Like scrums are used in league to pull the forwards together, so too the contesting of the line out will commit resources. There are lots of tactics you can run off the back of this, so this is one of the law variations I am in favour of. Although there will likely be different interpretations on what minimal contesting is.

2014-07-15T12:27:12+00:00

Simon Bedard

Roar Pro


This is a reasonable question Cantab...I am not sure country based clubs could lure players to the regional areas either. But I do know that a lot of talent comes from the regional areas, and for the most part are forced to move to the cities. I guess this gives them better representation and a sense of belonging to a team...not to mention a clearer pathway for development. But how they make up the numbers could be difficult.

2014-07-15T12:23:39+00:00

Simon Bedard

Roar Pro


Nice one Warren....but I think your cutting yourself short on the chips and beer. :-)

2014-07-15T12:21:43+00:00

Simon Bedard

Roar Pro


Ditto

2014-07-15T12:19:50+00:00

Simon Bedard

Roar Pro


Pretty tough call here Sheek. What may seem tacky to one, may be appealing to others. I personally don't care too much about the name of the club. I will be going for the North Harbour Rays because they represent my local area, and the key clubs I have always grown up with, and I am excited to get out there with some friends and family to watch the local games. Hopefully my kids grow up loving the Rays and boom tradition is born. Nothing is ever going to be perfect, and you can never please everyone....so I respect your opinion. But for the love of the game we have to get on board at some point and support the structure in place.

2014-07-15T12:12:48+00:00

Simon Bedard

Roar Pro


I like it....my North Harbour Rays are already flying under the radar.

2014-07-15T12:10:15+00:00

Simon Bedard

Roar Pro


I have bothered....but I get your point about the crappy overpriced food. Always a disappointment. Although I will say that the butter chicken at The Cauldron at ANZ is awesome (for stadium food)...no I have no affiliation. :-) But you do raise a good point on the split of the revenues. I still think more needs to be done to provide entertainment, and drive attendance numbers. I still don't get why we don't give free tickets to school kids (& accompanying parent/s) when we know the stadium will be half empty. You could basically put it out to a few schools (randomly selected or on a secret rotation) that they will get in free if they arrive by a certain time...I.e. In time to see the curtain raiser. They will likely spend more on food etc anyway.

2014-07-15T10:15:43+00:00

Bakkies

Guest


Ignore him Brett.

2014-07-15T10:10:17+00:00

AndyS

Guest


I assume they'd use Hindmarsh for the controllability and perhaps the broadcasting facilities (given both clubs will be away) - I've watched a game there before, so it is certainly doable. But the Falcons seem to use Gleneagles Reserve for the ARS, so who knows...we'll maybe find out tomorrow.

2014-07-15T10:09:37+00:00

Bakkies

Guest


You also don't need a nickname. They can be generated over time. Leinster tried the Lions monniker for a couple of years and it didn't work. Worcester Warriors, Exeter Chiefs, Sales Sharks, etc are good examples of why they aren't necessary. Hasn't exactly worked in Wales as there is now the same problem as Super Rugby as teams are called out by their nickname so there is no geographical attachment to them. Hence the poor crowds.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar