Tinkoff-Saxo - the best team at the 2014 Tour de France

By Kate Smart / Expert

Vincenzo Nibali has proven a worthy winner of the 2014 Tour de France. He was clearly the best rider over the three weeks. No one was able to stick with him, either on the cobbles or over the mountains.

The departure of Chris Froome and Alberto Contador may have robbed us of some exciting attacks over the course of this three-week sojourn through France, but there is little doubt Nibali is a deserving winner.

The best team of the Tour, though was not Astana nor was it AG2R, although they won the teams classification and had an excellent showing with Jean-Christophe Peraud and Romain Bardet.

The team that performed the best at this year’s Tour de France was clearly, Tinkoff-Saxo. Perhaps their fluro yellow wasn’t a highlight and obviously the abandonment of their leader, Alberto Contador was another low point, but this team did what their closest rival Team Sky could not. They successfully reinvented themselves.

Tinkoff-Saxo went to the Tour de France with one plan and that plan was to put Alberto Contador into a nicer yellow jersey than any other Tinkoff rider. Who honestly would have thought that this was not a done deal after Contador’s closest rival, Chris Froome crashed out on Stage 5, before he even found the cobbles.

Sure, Bertie had lost a fair bit of time over the dreaded cobbles, but it would only have been a matter of time before the Spaniard electrified the peloton over the mountains with one of his classic attacks.

The wonderful thing about Grand Tours is that they are so unpredictable and in a strange turn of events, Contador found himself hitting the deck, battling on with his team trying to pull him back to the peloton, all the while in the rain with a broken shin bone.

The sight of Bertie putting his arm around Mick Rogers and telling him that his Tour was over will not be forgotten by many Australian fans anytime soon.

Tinkoff-Saxo would turn this calamity into success. Writing in the Irish Times, Nicolas Roche spoke about the team’s lack of a Plan B. Their leader was out. Long live the leader.

What Tinkoff-Saxo did for the remainder of the Tour was nothing short of a brilliant display of teamwork and camaraderie.

They showed their class and experience through Australian Michael Rogers and Irishman, Nicolas Roche and they showed fight, grit and determination through Rafal Majka.

They did everything that Sky couldn’t.

The masterstroke by Tinkoff-Saxo was of course their response to Contador’s abandonment on Stage 10. Wisely, the remaining team members ensured that they rolled in to La Planche des Belles Filles within the time limit but so far behind that they would be of no bother to any teams with eyes on the GC.

This is not to say, that Sky were necessarily wrong in looking to Ritchie Porte as Plan B leader. But what it says, is that Tinkoff-Saxo developed a Plan B based on their realistic chances for success.

Porte was supposed to be Sky’s man for the Giro but illness forced him out. We’ll never know sitting in our lounge rooms on the other side of the earth, just how healthy Porte was going into the Tour de France, but we do know that to win the Tour you need to be very well prepared.

You need to have built your whole year around this race. After all, this is the formula that has brought the British team success over the last two editions.

Seeing Porte win a Tour de France is definitely top of most Aussie cycling fans’ bucket lists, including mine. But that win will come from the same level of preparation that Nibali put into wining this year’s and the same level of preparation the previous winners have put into their victories.

The Tour is not a race that you can just roll up to and hope to win. Sky should know that. Tinkoff-Saxo did.

That’s why they played a better game of poker and once their hand went from a Royal Flush to not even holding a pair of twos they came out on top.

Tinkoff-Saxo finished the Tour with three stage wins, two to Rafal Majka and one to Michael Rogers. Majka would also go on to the win the King of the Mountains.

Stage 11, their first full stage without Alberto also saw Nicolas Roche awarded the most combative rider for his breakaway exploits.

Tinkoff-Saxo also made a statement about leadership within the team. Contador is their leader. He is their leader whether he is on the bike travelling the roads of France with his team or whether he is sitting in a hospital bed in Madrid. That was never questioned.

Leadership at Sky seems to be something that is raffled, divvied up. Most of Froome’s teammates were nowhere to be seen when he came a cropper on Stage 5. Once he was gone, they found a quick replacement that worked for a bit but once it fell apart, they too fell apart.

In watching Tinkoff-Saxo at this year’s Tour de France it is clear that the wise words of Douglas Adams’s Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy, “Don’t Panic” must have been engraved somewhere in the team’s mind.

There is little doubt that the team that performed the best at this year’s Tour de France was Tinkoff-Saxo, even without their illustrious leader.

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2014-07-29T07:40:54+00:00

Kate Smart

Expert


Hi delbeato, long time no hear. I hope you're well. I agree with you about Ritchie. I think the point is that you really need to be so well prepared for a Grand Tour and I think he was thrown into a really tough situation, which he handled well. But winning the TdF requires the TdF being your whole goal for the season. Like every else, I really want to see him win a GT and I hope this setback is just a minor one.

2014-07-29T07:18:26+00:00

delbeato

Roar Guru


I think you make some excellent points on Saxo, Kate - Bjarne Riis is widely regarded as a master sports director. It helps to have riders with the calibre of Rogers, Roche and Majka though. However, I think you're being harsh on Richie Porte. It's true we don't know for sure what his true condition would have been over 3 weeks, but he was looking pretty strong up until he got sick. Getting sick can be due to poor preparation (i.e. cramming too much training in leading up to the Tour), but it can also just be bad luck. I'd prefer to give Richie the benefit of the doubt on that. He was looking very strong up until then.

AUTHOR

2014-07-29T06:51:15+00:00

Kate Smart

Expert


HaHa! Well, as you know, Tim I haven't written anything for a while, so why not come back with a bang. I do agree that Giant were great, but I think that article should be about the fabulous performance of the Germans across multiple teams. We're they all great! I agree Bretagne were the most disappointing and Sky failed to deliver. It seems that Sky is under permanent attack though, aren't they? I still maintain that Tinkoff did the best job of salvaging something from nothing, but yes, I may have been a little cheeky!

2014-07-29T06:42:50+00:00

Tim Renowden

Expert


Geez, Kate! Way to throw down some controversy :) I reckon Giant-Shimano might also have something to say about this, after nabbing four stages. OPQS got three as well, so there's another team that's got just as much success as Tinkoff-Saxo, despite losing their Cavendish 'Plan A'. Who wants to write the "Worst Team of the Tour" piece? (I reckon it was Bretagne in absolute terms, but for expectations being unmet it was Team Sky).

AUTHOR

2014-07-29T06:40:00+00:00

Kate Smart

Expert


Thanks maglia cutty for the comment. Sadly I think we've had a break down in communication: judging by your comment I don't think you've understood my point. The article is not suggesting that AG2R or Nibali don't deserve their placings in this TdF. The article is about how Tinkoff salvaged their tour and they did a better job of it than Sky. I do, however, take your point that I obviously haven't made this clear enough. Perhaps jump on my profile and take a look at some of my other articles for my stance on doping. Once you've done this I think you'll see how you've jumped to quite a number of wrong conclusions! Thanks again for your comment.

2014-07-29T06:12:48+00:00

magila cutty

Guest


You are kidding, aren't you? AG2R LaMondiale were clearly superior riding brilliantly, attacking, taking stage wins and the team event. Astana too were better doing all his Nibs needed to win. The druggy squad, tinkoff, got a few wins but so too did others. A team guided by Riis and featuring the Clenbuterol twins, Contodor and Rogers should not have even been in the race. When he abandoned Contodor was two and a half minutes adrift and given how well Nibali was climbing i doubt Contodor could have taken time from him. He's never been quite the same since his bust so maybe heis riding clean now and Rogers wins one stage in 350 after testing positive smacks of too little too late. No, the results are correct with the best performers winning all catagories. A great tour.

Read more at The Roar