Can the Lakeshow make a quick return to the top?

By Nick Butler / Roar Guru

Since 1999 the Staples Centre has provided the people of Los Angeles with a stage from which the likes of Shaquille O’Neal and Kobe Bryant have dazzled, producing consistent play-off finishes and championship sides.

But for the first time in years the LA Lakers have been put in the shade by their little brothers the LA Clippers, with Chris Paul and Blake Griffin likely to provide Hollywood with its highlights reel in 2014/15.

Since the championship winning 2010 season the Lakers have been in freefall, with Mike Brown and Mike D’Antoni both dumped as head coach during the past two years and numerous poor decisions made by the Lakers front office.

While fans have always loved the showtime aspect of their teams, they know that defence wins championships. The D’Antoni appointment was baffling considering his lack of interest in defensive play and a fast-paced offence was his key to bringing back the good times. Oh, how wrong he was.

Opposing teams began putting up huge numbers and the fears were finally realised this year, when the Lakers hit rock bottom and missed the playoffs for the first time since 2005.

This, coupled with the disastrous Dwight Howard deal and overly loyal contracts given out to Steve Nash and Bryant (though many would argue deservedly so), along with holding onto Pau Gasol too long, has had a huge impact on their available playing stocks.

But the strength of a team can be a season to season proposition – as the Cavs have shown this off-season – and the Lakers can turn this around very quickly, but if that’s the case then who stays and who goes?

This off-season has seen some player movement but certainly nothing that will transform the Lakers into a powerhouse again. Gasol moved onto greener pastures in the hunt for another ring and his direct replacement Carlos Boozer is a questionable signing.

Boozer is on low wages and may provide some offensive help to Bryant but he hates defending and fans will know early on whether this move is a straight out bust. Jeremy Lin may end up working with Bryant in the back court but his passing and shooting can be erratic, and though the draft picks are a sweetener I would have preferred Kendall Marshall to stay.

Marshall seemed a reasonable decision maker and at 22 certainly had upside, but three didn’t go into two and Marshall packed his bags and headed to the Milwaukee. The best off-season signing was that of Byron Scott as head coach returning to where he played for more than a decade. He is an experienced hand who has dealt with pressure before, but must be given time to bring along a very raw and under-developed squad.

Surplus to requirements and the biggest elephant in the room down at La-La Land is the 40-year-old oft-injured point guard Steve Nash. He is set to suck up almost $10 million of salary cap space this coming season and with his best behind him the front office need this deal to expire. This will clear even more room for the Lakers and allow them to go hard at free agency.

Jordan Hill and Lin both take up about $9 million each, and whether they survive more than one or two years in the purple and gold will be down to immediate individual output. It’s hard to see either player being granted much leniency, and in particular Lin will be hoping to recapture his Madison Square Garden form. The remaining starter Nick Young finds himself as the only Lakers players on a long-term deal and will hold down the small forward role, but at $5 million a season it is a solid signing.

Following the disastrous 2013-14 season it was a show of faith that the likes of Ryan Kelly, Wesley Johnson and Xavier Henry were all offered short-term deals. Each received greater minutes last year and showed that while they are not of starting quality they could potentially perform serviceable roles off the bench in years to come.

Kelly and Henry, at 23, have huge upside for little risk while Johnson, a former first round selection, will keep Young on his toes. Again, keeping each to one or two year deals will ensure they stay hungry and allow the Lakers to move them on should they not progress.

They will battle the likes of Ed Davis and Robert Sacre to see who makes the grade. In reality only two or three of these players will be wearing a Lakers jersey past this season but it is likely each will be given their chance to shine.

Finally to Julius Randle. The first round selection from the recent draft will vie with Boozer for the starting role as power forward and hopefully once he finds his feet he is given the opportunity to start. While he will come up against an array of power forward stars in the Western Conference the experience will be invaluable and help develop his game quickly.

Lin, Boozer and Hill are more stop-gap solutions to keep the team quasi-competitive in the short term to ensure Scott and the front office is afforded time to put together a winning line-up for the 2015-16 season and beyond.

But if the Lakers can put up with some short-term pain then there is no reason why they can’t take another high first round pick in next season and look to land that big fish during free agency to give Bryant one last shot at another title.

The Crowd Says:

2014-08-08T03:58:32+00:00

mushi

Guest


I thought it was the opposite I thought he'd said he will opt out at the end of this season and essentially give them the nod to take a max contract.

2014-08-08T03:57:33+00:00

mushi

Guest


whilst it is clear he's just trolling becuase Johnno's lies ahve been refuted before I would hate for someone to read a Johnno post and think yep the bulls did better without Jordan. 92-93 with jordan (their worst of 6 seasons during the threepeats): 57 wins, a championship and an average margin of 6.3 93-94 sans jordan (their best of the two baseball years): 55 wins (please note 55 is a smaller number then, ie worse than, 57), bundled out in the second round (note this is considered worse than winning the championship) and an average margin of 3.1 (note this 3.1 is a smaller number than, ie worse than, 6.3)

2014-08-08T03:27:19+00:00

Jayme Markus

Roar Guru


I agree, part of the trade to Cleveland will require him to opt in for his final season.

2014-08-08T01:51:56+00:00

astro

Guest


That's it...he's definitely not a real person! ha!

2014-08-08T01:29:45+00:00

Johnno

Guest


The 94 Bulls never declined with Scottie Pippen running the show,and there record was as good if not better. https://au.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100212155306AAcB95X

2014-08-08T01:09:14+00:00

mushi

Guest


He had the "bulls had a better record without Jordan" comments a few years back

2014-08-08T00:20:17+00:00

astro

Guest


Johnno, the Lakers were the most profitable franchise in the NBA last year... Please read: http://www.latimes.com/sports/lakers/lakersnow/la-sp-ln-lakers-most-profitable-nba-franchise-20140705-story.html

2014-08-08T00:19:04+00:00

astro

Guest


Its all well and good for Laker fans to say things are OK and in a couple of years they'll have stacks of money to sign huge free agents and be back at the top, but scratch the surface, and the Lakers are in a massive hole. Firstly, Jerry Buss was a bigger loss than anyone expected, and irreplaceable. The fact that the future of this franchise lies in the hands of Jim Buss should be a major concern for Laker fans...his handling of Phil Jackson is a prime example. Secondly, can we please accept that fact that Kobe will never be Kobe again??? The guy is 35 and coming back from two major surgeries. Kobe will never be the same player he was, so its not as if the Lakers just need the right player or two around Kobe to be a contender...they need an entirely new roster. And finally, this year, the Lakers missed out on every big name player available. They even missed out on every second tier player available. They even struggled to find a top coach who wanted to take this team on! Their biggest off-season move was picking up the amnestied Boozer. How then can anyone have any confidence that all these great free agents in 2016 will want to sign with them? They have inept management, poor coach, an over the hill superstar and essentially empty roster...

2014-08-07T23:35:05+00:00

Squidward

Roar Rookie


I heard that they recoup his contract in all the jersey sales they make from lakers24. In saying that. Sales don't win games

2014-08-07T23:18:36+00:00

astro

Guest


Highly doubt Kevin Love will be a free agent in 15/16!

2014-08-07T23:18:00+00:00

astro

Guest


The Lakers being "broke" might be one of my all time favourite Johnno comments.

2014-08-07T07:21:39+00:00

mushi

Guest


He broke both of us Joe. I'm convinced Johnno can only be a professional troll

2014-08-07T07:19:52+00:00

Jayme Markus

Roar Guru


The Lakers are happy to tread water for the next two years. They are paying Kobe huge sums to stick around for the next two years to keep Time Warner and the court side seats happy. They will go hard for the two Kevin's (Durant & Love) after the 15/16 season when they both come out of contract.

2014-08-07T07:16:02+00:00

mushi

Guest


Yep to 18,828 down from a capacity crowd of 18,997 still good for 7th in the league oh and they have a local network team specific TV deal worth 200m per annum up until 2031

2014-08-07T07:03:38+00:00

mushi

Guest


Stuck in the 80's they've won 5 titles this millenium

2014-08-07T06:52:51+00:00

mushi

Guest


Not getting drawn in to it by a guy who thinks a stadium built in 99 is still stuck in the 80s

2014-08-07T06:27:04+00:00

Johnno

Guest


Boozer have the Lakers evolved, and moved with the times or are they stuck in the 80's and showtime, and there culture and style of basketball has it moved with the times, or stuck in the past.

2014-08-07T06:10:29+00:00

Boozer

Guest


The Lakers is a great organization that values royalty, tributes, and life time accomplishment. Its not surprising they pay tribute to Kobe.

2014-08-07T05:41:08+00:00

Johnno

Guest


Lakers crowds are down you can't deny it.

2014-08-07T05:38:10+00:00

Joe

Guest


I dont think the Lakers are going to return as legit title contenders in the next few years but someof your comments are ridiculous. You refer to Staples Center as 'so 80's, not like modern NBA venue's'..Staples Center was opened in late 99 or early 2000, its 14 yrs old! I was there in May for an LA Kings game the venue & the adjacent entertainment area is great. Im not sure where youre getting outdated from? The old Forum is certainly outdated but Staples is still a top notch arena. You mentioned the Lakers are broke & may fold soon.Are you stoned or just joking around? With the new TV deal the Lakers signed with Time Warner recently it guarantees them approx $200 million per year just for local TV rights.Thats not including any other advertising revenue ticket sales merchandise etc etc I don't really care if the Lakers are good again or not, it makes no difference to me.They'll still make money & the players will still get millions more than I'm making each year, but if you're gonna post a comment at least get some facts in order.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar