Chanderpaul the evergreen continues to dispel age myth

By Gareth Kidd / Roar Guru

They say age is no barrier, which sounds wonderful, but if that was the case, Glenn McGrath would still be bowling at Sachin, with Rod Marsh keeping wicket.

Truth is that for sportspeople, cricketers included, age does simply catch up with you.

It’s not like the life of a businessman, who in his older years can claim experience and sit behind a large mahogany desk.

Eventually, the rigors of sport reel you in, and while some hang on longer than others time, time ever so slowly holts all aspirations.

Today, Shivnarine Chanderpaul joined a rare and illustrious group; batsmen to have scored a Test ton over the age of 40.

Let that stat sink in.

Over the 120-odd years of international Test cricket, only 19 players have managed to keep their batting prowess ticking past their 30s.

It’s often hard enough to remain part of an International XI over the age of 35 as younger, fitter players begin snapping at your heels. Accordingly, Chanderpaul playing on into his 40s is quite an achievement in itself.

Not even the great Sachin Tendulkar, while playing his last Test past the age of 40, could not snare that last elusive ton.

In fact, Tendulkar was clean bowled more often towards the end of his career, a clear example of age catching up.

Yet Shiv has bagged one, and now sits in the history books alongside great names such as Jack Hobbs, Bob Simpson, and countryman Clive Lloyd, as players who just continued to reach triple figures – disregarding the social construct that age inhibits performance.

Yes, Shiv plays for the Windies, and possibly doesn’t face as much competition for his spot as some other international batsmen.

Yes, this Test was against Bangladesh, who aren’t the most vicious bowling outfit on the market. Irrespective, this is a feat which hasn’t occurred since Graham Gooch racked up his 20th century more than two decades ago.

Remarkably, his form has also shown no sign of waning.

Since 2010, Chanders has averaged over 70 in Test cricket, plundering runs around the globe, against all opposition.

He has also attracted the odd bit of negativity from some cricket followers who tout the belief that he can score too slowly, and occasionally doesn’t protect the tail like a senior player should.

He has the most ‘not outs’ of any member of the 10,000 club, often asking the question of whether or not he’s batting two low in the order at five and six.

Yet it’s fair to say, that those criticisms are more of a representation of the soft naught-like top order of the West Indies side in its Post-Lara stage.

In fact, his ability to accumulate runs slowly, yet consistently, is one of the reasons he’s become one of the West Indies greatest batsmen.

It’s not just his longevity, or his batting average of around 53 that brings adulation Chanderpaul’s way – he has three of the most recognisable traits in international cricket.

The first is his crabby, two-eyed stance that makes Simon Katich’s technique look like handbook quality, yet both managed to cream fours through cover like a conventional player.

Shiv also has a unique way of taking guard, now adopted by some other younger West Indian players. He removes one of the bails, and uses his bat handle to bash in a mark on pitch for off and middle stump.

For those seeing it for the first time, it looks a strange ritual.

Yet Shiv’s more recognisable trait is indeed his eye makeup.

In a strategy straight out of NFL and Major League Baseball, Chanders dons the black eyeliner to his cheeks, in an attempt to reduce sunlight glare.

Irrespective of whether it’s something in the water, the Caribbean lifestyle, or perhaps the fact that he hasn’t played an ODI in three years, Shiv continues to stay at the top of his game.

He’s a crowd favourite both through the West Indies, and internationally, despite not being the swash-buckling batsman that seem to be all the rage these days.

The real question however, is for how much longer.

His current form would suggest he’s still peaking, and I’m sure there’s no one in World Cricket, except perhaps some angry bowlers, who doesn’t want to see Chanders continue to turn out for the Windies.

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2014-09-28T14:05:43+00:00

Gareth Kidd

Roar Guru


The fact he doesn't bat higher is my biggest criticism of Chanders. He should be at three, four at the least. Michael Clarke answered the same call as he used to love the number 5 position.

2014-09-26T12:41:39+00:00

Evan Askew

Guest


The last relic from a period when the Windies were still the worlds best. He wasn't in the side that came out to Australia in 92-93 but was in the side that lost the Frank Worrell trophy to Australia in 94-95. That side included Haynes, Simmonds, Riachardson, Lara, Hooper, Adams and Chanderpaul as well as Bishop, Walsh and the incomparable Ambrose. The tragic thing is that the Windies have had the talent when at full strength to deliver a more respectable performance. With access potentially at one point in time to Lara, CHanderpaul, Hooper, Sarwan and Gayle they could've done better.

2014-09-19T23:57:21+00:00

Cantab

Guest


A true great of the game, drives me nuts he won't bat up the order, but still one of my favourite players.

2014-09-18T12:28:22+00:00

Silver Sovereign

Guest


Chanderpaul's average has gone up over the last few years, unbelievably. I think 10 years ago it was around mid to high 40s, now its over 53. Sure he isn't flashy, but once he is set, he is very hard to dislodge. As for Rogers, since he has over 1200 runs in his current county season with 4 hundreds to bring his career tally to an insane 70 first class hundreds, I can see Chris going for another few years. He is in great shape and as we saw in the ashes, moves around in the field like a much younger player. It always bothers me how his record hasn't really changed since he was picked for his first test years ago, so its no like he has got better. Rogers has always been this good. Add to that Jacques, who should have gotten picked earlier. Jacqyes and Rogers could have been one of the best opening partnerships in Aussie history. Once Jacques got injured, Katich could have partnered Rogers. Its just unbelievable that Rogers wasn't picked for like 5 or 6 years. I did hear that he didn't get on with some in the test team at the time. He should have played 40 or 50 tests by now

AUTHOR

2014-09-18T06:16:08+00:00

Gareth Kidd

Roar Guru


He also managed to score a ton against the Aussies, despite copping a Brett Lee specail to the back of his head. Champ.

2014-09-18T03:53:27+00:00

ChrisB

Guest


Hugely underrated champion. Lived in Lara's shadow for too long. Especially when you think he's played on tubbish teams except for his first few years. Remember some Enhlish commentator saying on their last tour there it felt like England were playing him alone, and that he always seemed to be batting

2014-09-18T03:06:54+00:00

Tom from Perth

Roar Rookie


Great article. This bloke is an inspiration and a reason why I believe Rogers will play the next Ashes. It must be a great drive for the senior batsmen out there to see this bloke plundering runs aged 40.

2014-09-18T02:17:42+00:00

Clark

Guest


He is one of the best batters of this era, his scores always seem that much more impressive considering he has done most of it whilst batting with pretty much no support, saving face more often than not.

2014-09-18T01:59:51+00:00

Pottsy

Guest


Wonder if Rogers will go beyond 40? Cannot understand why there are critics who want to discard him. His calm style meant I was not surprised to learn he's been a good captain of Middlesex.

2014-09-17T23:45:44+00:00

JohnB

Guest


Now has 30 test hundreds - an exclusive club of 11 members only - and inching towards 100 test scores of 50 or more (currently 95 - behind only, I think, Tendulkar, Ponting, Kallis and Dravid).

2014-09-17T23:09:24+00:00

Sideline Comm.

Guest


I know I've said it before, but I love the bloke. He is one of the most underrated players of he modern era, plugging away in an increasingly average team. Good on him.

Read more at The Roar