Why English clubs should dominate the Europa League

By Evan Morgan Grahame / Expert

The Spanish, English and German leagues rank as the top-three European leagues by their UEFA coefficient.

As such, each are awarded four Champions League spots – three of them automatic – and one through which a team must qualify via a two-legged play off tie.

As the three strongest leagues, they are deservedly rewarded, with the slightly weaker leagues from Italy, Portugal and Russia given three spots, France, Ukraine and the Netherlands given two, and so on down the line.

Recently, the Champions League has been dominated by teams from Spain and Germany. Since the all-English final in 2008, only one of the next six winners has been English, Chelsea in 2012. Even then, the circumstances of their victory might be considered, if not undeserved, then certainly lucky – beating Bayern Munich on penalties in their home stadium.

But in Chelsea, Manchester City, Arsenal, Liverpool and Manchester United (though not this season) the Premier League has the greatest number of teams that could realistically challenge for the title.

The gap between England’s clubs and clubs like Real Madrid, Barcelona, Borussia Dortmund, Bayern and Atletico Madrid has been exposed in the last few seasons. However, the price that the Spanish and German leagues pay for the privilege of having fewer, but more dominant, Champions League level clubs, is that often the domestic season can descend into a one or two-horse race.

These super-clubs tend also to suck up any talent that the lesser clubs manage to unearth, making the chasm between the haves and the have-nots extremely difficult to close. In Spain, this isn’t helped by the fact that Real and Barca can negotiate their own television money, meaning they get vastly more income that the other clubs.

Last season was the first time a club that wasn’t Real or Barca won La Liga, when Atleti clinched a heart-stopping race for the title. Still though, the addition of Atleti as title challengers was refreshing, the gap between the title contenders and the also-rans was as big as ever.

Fourth-placed Athletic Bilbao finished with 17 fewer points than Real in third, and a goal difference that was 39 goals worse. The season before, the gap between first and third was 24 points and 54 goals. In Germany, last season Bayern finished 19 points in front of second placed Dortmund, and 26 in front of third placed Schalke.

Bayern lost two matches all season in the league, both after they had all but sewn up the title.

Competitiveness is something the a lot of English football fans pride the Premier League on. Last season, first and seventh were separated by 22 points in the Premier League, as opposed to 31 in Spain and 37 in Germany. The impression is that there are fewer forgone conclusions when the big teams line up against the smaller teams in England, that the depth of strength of the Premier League is second to none.

So it seems like such a waste that English teams regard the Europa League, the second tier European competition seemingly catered directly to the strengths of the Premier League, as a waste of time. Tottenham and Everton stand as this year’s second tier European contenders, and as Chelsea showed in 2013 when they took the competition seriously and triumphed, the competition can be worthwhile one.

The problem facing these second tier clubs, is that the chance of meeting a quality Champions League team that finished third in their group and drops down is a likely one.

This fear might not be an entirely rational one however, as only 4 of the last 10 Europa League champions have been Champions League drop outs. More often than not, it’s the teams that have competed from the beginning that are holding the trophy at the end.

Juventus had the chance to win the Europa League last season but were less than interested in pursuing it, such was their mope after they crashed out of the Champions League group stages. This is often the case with the drop outs.

Tottenham have opened their Europa League campaign with a gritty 0-0 draw away against Partizan Belgrade, whose fans showed their social modernity by unfurling an anti-Semitic banner during the match – this is two years after Danny Rose was racially abused during an England U-21 match in Serbia.

It was a stoic performance in an incredibly hostile environment, and Spurs will feel confident they can qualify in first place after the other two teams in the group endured a goalless stalemate as well. That’s if they care to. Pochettinno has the squad to cope with the extra fixtures, and the quality to get to the latter stages. All he needs now is the desire.

One sign that isn’t particularly encouraging is that the team that faced Partizan was almost completely different from the line up that faced Sunderland on the weekend.

Everton began their campaign with a resounding 4-1 victory over Wolfsburg, a team who only missed out on a Champions League spot by a single point last season.

Ruthless in their finishing and showing spirited desire to capitalise on any defensive error, Roberto Martinez’s side made the first European tie at Goodison Park for five seasons a delight for the fans.

Winning so emphatically ought to breathe confidence through the team, and gives credence to the belief that Martinez, always willing to challenge for silverware -which his FA Cup victory with Wigan can testify – is keen to excel in the competition.

Everton only barely missed out on a Champions League spot, something they looked like they’d finally snatch for the second time after they thrashed Arsenal at the end of last season. Only a few lapses against lesser teams foiled them, and allowed Arsenal to clinch fourth place, relatively easily in the end.

But perhaps most crucially, the big, juicy carrot hanging in front of Spurs and Everton, one that until this season hadn’t existed, is that the winner of the Europa League gets a spot in the next season’s Champions League.

With Manchester United much stronger this season, and Chelsea, Arsenal and City all improved, this might actually be the best chance for either team to qualify for the big boy’s table next year.

With Europa League popularity dwindling, UEFA have thrown a meaty bone their way, and now the main upside of taking the competition seriously is a thoroughly convincing one. No Everton or Tottenham fan would object to making a genuine challenge for the Europa League now that this is on the table.

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2014-09-21T00:59:10+00:00

Evan Morgan Grahame

Expert


That's astounding, that Sevilla get less for winning than Celtic get for losing immediately. Makes you wonder why they haven't offered a CL place as a reward for winning the EL before this season.

2014-09-20T18:58:09+00:00

Adrian none

Roar Rookie


Eden, here official report http://www.uefa.com/MultimediaFiles/Download/OfficialDocument/uefaorg/Finance/02/11/95/44/2119544_DOWNLOAD.pdf Participation bonus groub stage Champ League 8.6mil euro Europa League 1.3mil euro Sevilla FC got 14.6m in total in group and knock out stage to win win Europe League , where Celtic FC got 17.5mil in being knock out in Champ league group stage

2014-09-20T06:53:38+00:00

Woodo

Guest


Italian football doesn't even fall in the shadow of German football these days. Once upon a time Serie A was elite. It isn't anymore.

2014-09-20T06:45:34+00:00

Eden

Guest


Martinez is all class, and it's awesome to have him at everton, though I'm already resigned to the fact that in 5 years he will be coaching one of the very big clubs in Europe. Just hope he delivers an era of success while at the club. Out if interest, does anyone in the know have info on the financial bonus/burden of Europa? And compared to the CL?

2014-09-20T04:40:05+00:00

nickoldschool

Roar Guru


You arent completely wrong evan as the coefficients are updated after every game played, its like an instant photography. So as of today france is behind russia but it doesnt mean this will be the case at the end of the season, it still very much up for grabs. Having said that, considering results french clubs got this week, its fair to say it will be tough to keep the 3rd club (am like you, I always consider that a nation has 2+1 spots rather than 3 when the 3rd club has to qualify first. )

2014-09-20T02:35:27+00:00

Sm6

Guest


The ranking of the domestic leagues are done using the uefa coefficient not a writer on roar.com.Serie A is undoubtedly one of Europe's giant football leagues but the ranking are based on rack league's performance in the last few years not on history.I can't see why France should be any higher as historically the French domestic league has never really achieved much in Europe.The Portuguese league is punching well above its weight at fifth considering that as a country they are atleast a quarter smaller than any of the other top 8 and has the smallest economy in Western Europe.The Italian league will make a comeback but right now they're rightfully ranked 4th on recent results & achievements.

AUTHOR

2014-09-20T02:30:35+00:00

Evan Morgan Grahame

Expert


It's sad to see the decline of Italian football, but it's not just me who rate them worse than Germany, it's UEFA too. I shouldn't think that Juve, Inter, Napoli or Milan would beat Bayern or Dortmund as it stands.

2014-09-20T00:58:19+00:00

Tom

Guest


Don't know how you rate the Italian Serie A lower than the German Bundesliga. In history the Italians won the Champions League 12 times compared to Germany 7 times. In the past 10 years Italy won it twice and Germany once. Maybe in recent years it seems like Italian Football isn't up to the standard, because crowd numbers are rubbish, similar to France. That's because the French and Italians ditch their Football quickly when life is tough (politically) and the they rather go and protest and organize strike actions ;)

AUTHOR

2014-09-20T00:51:42+00:00

Evan Morgan Grahame

Expert


That's the thing isn't it, it's hard to tell how well the English clubs can do, such is the disinterest with which they generally approach the competition. Finally a manager who will be there from the beginning of the tournament seems actually interested in fighting for it. On the Guardian's football weekly podcast, Iain Macintosh said he interviewed Martinez and asked him about whether he felt the Europa League would be a hassle this season, and Martinez looked at him slightly baffled, almost disgusted, and replied "you work so hard all season to qualify for Europe, why would you waste the chance?" The more I hear things like that about Martinez, the more I really like him.

2014-09-20T00:42:12+00:00

Alex Chisholm

Roar Pro


Oh ok no worries Evan was just going off this years, interesting to know Russia have gone ahead of France there! Going back a few years you would have never picked that. Sorry mate hate doing that to people, hopefully you'll forgive me. It is always an interesting debate this one about English clubs in the Europa league. I still think they don't take it too seriously, although Everton seemed to have disproved this theory with their performance against Wolfsburg.

2014-09-20T00:41:33+00:00

AZ_RBB

Guest


No doubt that has been in the case in the past in Europe but I have a feeling Everton is capable of changing that perception under Martinez. Of course its too early to tell but they look the goods.

AUTHOR

2014-09-20T00:38:53+00:00

Evan Morgan Grahame

Expert


Cheers Alex, though according to the UEFA coefficient wikipedia, which says it's up to date as of this month, France have just dropped below Russia, and now only have 2 CL spots and a EL spot. You're right in that this didn't affect this year's competition as Lille were there but didn't make it through the playoffs. And you're also right about the La Liga champions thing, a mistype from me, it should have said "first time in a decade".

2014-09-20T00:22:28+00:00

fadida

Guest


I expect by the knockout rounds the English Europa entrants will be doing what they always do; running around in circles trying to get a touch of the ball, while their less "known" opponents, operating one 50% of their budget show them up technically (see Man U v Bilbao) There is often a mistaken belief that budget equals quality. English teams pay transfers well above realistic prices, and wages to boot, masking a lack of quality We see people quoting Jedinak's transfer value as a sign of supposed quality. The English market is unrealistic. High costs for poor technical players, found out v better, cheaper players.

2014-09-20T00:11:16+00:00

Alex Chisholm

Roar Pro


Sorry Evan, just a couple of mistakes that I picked up in your article mate: France are actually given three UCL spots, the third team has to qualify much the same as the forth placed team in the EPL. Before Atleti won the La Liga last year Valencia did it a whole decade before under the guidance of Rafa Benitez, Atleti previously won La Liga in '96 I believe with Simeone as a player. Also when Chelsea won the Europa League in 2013 they had finished third in their Champions League pool due to Roberto Di Matteo's poor run as head manager rather than caretaker. Rafa Benitez came in, rotated the squad and won it because he DID take Europa League seriously which is the point you are making and it's very true. Still looks as if Spurs rate this competition as highly as the League Cup, which they shouldn't because as you rightly point out a spot in the UCL is up for grabs which they will find more difficult cracking the top 4 in the EPL this season. Good article though mate!

2014-09-20T00:06:38+00:00

Steve

Guest


That's certainly a fair comment. There is no excuse for them to treat the tournament with disrespect. Perhaps they simply aren't good enough though.

AUTHOR

2014-09-19T23:49:34+00:00

Evan Morgan Grahame

Expert


Again, I gotta say the title that the site chose for this article isn't really fitting. It's not about why English clubs like Spurs and Everton should dominate the Europa League. It's about why they should be doing better then they have been doing and why, now that a Champions League spot is up for grabs, they should be valuing the opportunity more.

2014-09-19T22:56:01+00:00

Evan askew

Guest


C ' Mon. Feeyenoord with all its history,prestige and European success has to be bigger and better than west boom?

2014-09-19T20:46:47+00:00

Steve

Guest


I'm sorry, but Arsenal or Liverpool don't have much of a chance of winning the UCL. City have also not really looked likely the past few years. The reason why the gap between 1st and 7th in La Liga and Bundesliga is larger than the EPL is not because the 7th placed EPL team is stronger, but because the best Barca, Real, Atletico, Bayern and sometimes Dortmund are that much better than the top EPL clubs. Just because no one had heard of Rakitic before last season doesn't mean that the overrated Everton and Tottenham midfielders are better. Plenty of top quality players in Atheltic Bilbao, La Real, Sevilla and Valencia.

2014-09-19T18:16:55+00:00

Adrian none

Roar Rookie


the gap between EPL team is getting smaller, because the top EPL are not as strong ... this is best web site to help you find what level a team is in UK compare to other teams in Europe http://clubelo.com/All/Ranking.html a EPL like West Brom or Crystal Palace are not even in top 100 clubs in Europe (on elo rantings) also show a player like Luke Wilkshire who played at Dinamo Moskva (45th) last year, but now move to Feyenoord (106th) is now playing at a team about the same stranded as Jason Davidson at West Brom (107th) Mathew Ryan at Club Brugge (109th) Mile Jedinak at Crystal Palace (111th)

Read more at The Roar