Reds and Victory draw as action is forced out wide

By Evan Morgan Grahame / Expert

Taken as a fact on its own, having a crowd of 33,126 to play in front of can’t be anything other than a good thing.

A crowd of that size, energised and raucous, creates a super atmosphere, whipping up a thunderous storm of smouldering noise that careers around the stadium, filling the very hearts of the players.

Our voices are strong when united and they can raise our team to victory, if not the dead along with them.

Unfortunately, such a crowd can be neutered by the venue they congregate in, and their battle cries can, like the ball, slide off the slippery pitch and trail away, now barely a whimper, into the night.

Adelaide United hosted the Melbourne Victory at the Adelaide Oval on Friday night and such was the scene. The grass was short, the ball greased and the atmosphere more impotent than a… well, perhaps best not to finish that metaphor.

But, let’s turn away from the acoustic failings of the Adelaide Oval and swivel neatly to look at what happened on the pitch. The play was so frantic, and both teams seemed utterly unwilling to funnel the ball through the middle because of the difficulty the playing surface created.

As soon as the ball was kicked with any potency, it hit the pitch and slipped off faster than a bride’s nightie. Even if they’d wanted to, or had the perfect technique required to control the ball under the circumstances, neither team were able to pass successfully through the midfield.

Inevitably, the ball was forced out to wider areas, and the use of longer passes, pinged up the touchline to wingers running behind the fullbacks, became the method through which both teams prospered for most of the match. In fact, that was exactly how the opening goal was fashioned.

The first half saw Craig Goodwin enjoying relative success on the left for Adelaide, attacking the Melbourne fullback using direct, jet-heeled pace. Similarly, Kosta Barbarouses was also finding life fine on the same side of the pitch for Melbourne, and was the Victory’s main attacking threat.

With the passing through the midfield haphazard at best, and balls over the top a non-starter due to the quick surface, the flanks were, almost by default, the best and least costly way to move the ball with any purpose.

Goodwin swung in a whistling cross around half an hour into the match, struck sweetly with his left foot, that was only barely cleared by the desperate Victory defence. Earlier, Barbarouses had collected the ball out wide, and danced infield, niftily creating a shooting opportunity for Gui Finkler, whose volley was slightly wayward.

But, with both goalkeepers very alert to passes in behind, and thus ready to sweep away with swiftness and commitment, chances were few. Adelaide had the best of the pittance on offer, but were still limited to a couple of odd shooting opportunities, and some more presentable ones from set pieces.

One such moment should have resulted in the opening goal, but Sergio Cirio couldn’t put his diving header outside of the clawing grasp of Nathan Coe. What became incredibly clear quite quickly was that such flank-centric play and slippery turf was not conducive for the talents of Victory striker Besart Berisha.

The Albanian isn’t blessed with prodigious pace, though he has a powerful stride and a sort of neck-clenching, head-banging, vigourous inertia when he runs. One flitting Barbarouses dribble in the first half saw Berisha barely even attempt a run to the near post, and throughout the evening he was denied any sort of delivery to feet up the middle.

Crowded and often uncontrolled, his was a disappointing night, and he will not look forward to playing on pitches as hard and slick as this one again.

The game aged, grew testy, and became more bedraggled. Cirio gave the contest, which had been heading towards an embittered stalemate, a Vincent Vega-style dart of adrenaline to the sternum when he was released via a sliding pass, out of defence, down the left hand side.

The Spaniard had switched flanks, and was immediately running clear. Mark Milligan, back from international duty for the Victory, was tracking back to cover, but was bamboozled by Cirio’s high-octane, full-speed nutmeg and was removed from the equation rather embarrassingly.

Cirio then smacked a perfect bending shot into the far corner. It looked, for all intents and purposes, that Cirio’s goal would be the match-winner.

But the Victory, who had been under a lot of pressure earlier in the match from a handful of Adelaide set-pieces, equalised a minute or two later through a corner of their own. A desperate, bargy rumble in the box allowed Finkler’s clipped cross to drop all the way down to foot level right in the middle of the area, and Fahid Ben Khalfallah speared first time into the top of the net.

1-1 and parity was breathlessly and suddenly restored. The game then shifted uncomfortably until the final whistle.

The state of the pitch was a talking point post-match. Hard pitches, with deadly quick surfaces, are not uncommon in Australia, which means that pacy, scurrying wingers can be major assets, as they were in this match. You can see why Ange Postecoglou is fostering a highly dynamic, wing-oriented style at national level, with Mathew Leckie and Tommy Oar haring around manically.

Selecting heavily, as Postecoglu plans to do, from the A-League means selecting players who have been nurtured in this environment. One worries, however, that pace and directness will be too heavily valued as a result, to the neglect of more considered, pitch-central skills. Playing on hard pitches will not allow midfield intricacy to flourish.

The match, patronised heartily but sterilised by the stands’ distance from the pitch, should have been an awesome spectacle. But, in the end, what we got was a fairly scrappy match of few clean, satisfying moments, the opening goal aside.

A draw flattered the Victory, who had created few chances, and Adelaide will be annoyed they couldn’t hold on to the lead for the last few minutes. Like a roast chicken, the juiciest bits were on the wings, and both teams remain unbeaten after two rounds.

The Crowd Says:

2014-10-20T04:30:38+00:00

Carl

Roar Rookie


I don't disagree, that wasn't supposed to be some snarky swipe at your previous comment but there in lies the problem of determining tone from text. However, I do think there is a need to stage these kind of events from time to time (obviously not too frequently) until the AEG's proposed expansion of Hindmarsh and the players should be good enough to adapt.

2014-10-19T21:21:34+00:00

Kasey

Guest


I'm just saying the club should remember that we have a significant home advantage at Hindmarsh and should do all they can to ensure we can use it. Look at the WSW they could have taken their ACL game to the cavernous Olympic Stadium but they listened to their fans and I reckon even if they don't win they'll reap the rewards of showing that they are listening to their fans.

2014-10-19T12:33:58+00:00

Carl

Roar Rookie


"The club needs every thing we can control to be in our favour come finals time given our appalling record in finals games:(" Maybe we should just go all Tonya Harding on the opposition next time, might actually get us back to the GF again lol.

2014-10-19T10:54:11+00:00

Kasey

Guest


I understand the reason behind it, but I'll be happy if it just becomes an annual one off game deal. One of the common retorts to Sokkah fans when we ask for better facilities at Hindmarsh has been, start selling out Hindmarsh first then we'll maybe talk. Friday night showed that there are fans of football and United who don't or won't go to Hindmarsh. Some of that is perception on ease of access. Some of it is facilities. Who wants to get a melanoma sitting in the GA on the Manton st side? Not me. At least now that the cricket pitch has gone in, we'll only be back at AO if we host a GF. I hope the club puts their foot down if FFA try to shift any old finals game from Hindmarsh. The club needs every thing we can control to be in our favour come finals time given our appalling record in finals games:(

2014-10-19T04:30:06+00:00

Carl

Roar Rookie


Well you can be at ease that we won't play at AO again bar finals if you thought it was that bad friday night, I was there as well as previously stated and I didn't, and there have been games at Hindmarsh (even against the Victory) where the atmosphere was poor. Atmosphere comes from the fans and fans can create a great atmosphere in any stadium no matter how far from the pitch they are, the Rome derby springs instantly to mind as well as many South American ones. Also it has been shown at times in the past the a raucous crowd, even at Hindmarsh, can feed the Victory players just as well and inspire them to get one over us so I'm not sure the result would have been any different. I think Adelaide were the better team overall during the match but a draw was probably a fair result given the number of good chances both teams had As for satisfying the number counters, in this case it is a good thing as it shows our appetite for football is greater than the confines of Hindmarsh stadium's 16-17k, if we can get bumper crowds for most of the rest of the season it may well convince AEG (the group that owns Hindmarsh) to bring forward the plans for renovation of the stadium.

2014-10-18T23:29:34+00:00

Kasey

Guest


I was there. The atmosphere did suffer because of the venue. The distance between the pitch and the fans as well as the distance between the two sets of fans is detrimental to creating a brilliant football atmosphere similar to what we saw at the SFS last night. It was nice to be there and be a part of the record crowd, but I can't help but think that if we'd played the game at Hindmarsh, the raucous home crowd in that little venue with a surface more conducive to our gameplay would have been better from a football point of view. The crowd being right next to the players in our intimate home venue might just have egged on the home team more and helped my reds focus for the final 10 minutes to come away with the full 3 points. I f we hold true to the aim to win silverware, we need to keep as many cards in our favour as we can. I'm not a big fan of trading a distinct home advantage for the crowd-counting Johnson-measuring code warriors to be happy for a moment. Barring a Grand Final, which the FFA schedule and organise. I hope we don't set foot in AO again and thanks to cricket season, I think well be right on that front for the rest of the season. I'm very much looking forward to hosting Perth Glory at Hindmarsh next Sunday. The crowd will be smaller of course, but I expect the game to be better. Hoping for a better result too:)

2014-10-18T18:47:44+00:00

Carl

Roar Rookie


I think you're stretching to say the atmosphere suffered because the game was at Adelaide Oval, the place provides great acoustics for the crowd to make themselves heard, the steep high stands trap the noise in and even smaller crowds can become amplified as I experienced during the SANFL finals series and friday night as well (not that I'm implying that crowd was small). The only problem was the Red Army being at the open northern end which I'll grant does let the sound out easier, meaning the Victory fans occasionally sounded louder than our boys even though we weren't sitting too far away. And besides its not everyone's style to sing and dance the whole way through, some prefer a more organic style of support, cheering and reacting to events on the pitch as they happen. Being closer to the action is great but its not necessary to create atmosphere, some of the most famous and revered stadiums around the world have huge distances between the fans and the pitch. I love Hindmarsh, some of the most memorable and exciting sporting experiences I've had have been there but I for one believe it was a good choice to play this game at the Oval for the "prestige" of the fixture as it says to the average SA sports fan who might not follow the A-League (yet) that this is something special and worth seeing, plus on a week night its far easier for many to get to the Oval than to Hindmarsh which was surely a contributing factor as to why you saw a record crowd for the fixture. The hard pitch argument is rubbish. Yeah the pitch was hard, so what? Its the same for both teams, and you are professional footballers, adapt your game.

Read more at The Roar