What did we learn from season 2014?

By Gecko / Roar Pro

It’s late October and I’m still thinking about footy. It’s tragic, but let’s face it – so are you.

Season 2014 might be done and dusted, but a brief analysis of September-October 2014 will give us a head start for 2015.

Swans need their Mummy
The Swans’ midfield struggles against bigger bodied midfields. We glimpsed this in the Swans’ semi-final last year against the Dockers, but it took until the 2014 grand final for this weakness to become glaring.

With Shaun Burgoyne, Luke Hodge, Sam Mitchell and Jordan Lewis hacking through packs in the grand final, the Swans were in need of genuine aggression. Mike Pyke is decent at contesting in the air but when a heavy body is needed to lay crunching tackles or blocks, he’s not Shane Mumford.

In retrospect, when making room for Buddy Franklin twelve months ago, the Swans may have been better placed pushing one or two of their many midfielders out of their salary cap instead of losing Mumford.

Hannebery-Christensen types are better value outside the square
Still on the topic of clearances, Hawthorn’s back-to-back premierships have shown you don’t need a speedy midfielder to win a premiership. Instead, you need big-bodied desperados. The pace can come from outside the centre square, from blokes like Bradley Hill and Isaac Smith.

The Swans went into the 2014 grand final with too many under-sized midfielders: Harry Cunningham, Dan Hannebery, Ben McGlynn and Kieran Jack range in weight from only 75–81 kilos.

Without protection from Mumford, they were mince-meat.

Geelong’s experiment with pace since the departures of Paul Chapman, Joel Corey and Cameron Ling has failed. A midfield stacked with ‘outside’ players like Allen Christensen, Jordan Murdoch, Matt Stokes, Steven Motlop and Mitch Duncan has left them struggling against more aggressive midfields.

‘Outside’ players like Hannebery and Christensen can still ‘pinch-hit’ in the midfield, but their main position should be a wing, half back or forward flank.

Bombers are in kamikaze mode
The Bombers give the impression they are angling for a premiership in the next two years. Why else would they keep Dustin Fletcher and recruit Paul Chapman, Adam Cooney, Jonathan Giles and Brendon Goddard?

With the departure of Paddy Ryder, that dream is now in tatters. Good ruckmen take years to develop, and good ruckmen who can also pinch-hit up forward are rare indeed. Tom Bellchambers and Giles are plodders. The bombers’ clearance capacity in 2015 will go backwards while younger midfields like GWS, Brisbane and Gold Coast surge past them.

The Bombers’ misplaced ambitions for 2015-2016 will rule them out of premiership contention for the next five years as they replace their oldies with a new fleet and inject experience into them. Speaking of injections, if their players end up with bans in 2015 or 2016, their current wayward trajectory will turn into a nose-dive.

List-building through ‘development’ has become more risky
A few years ago, we realised that using high draft picks on ‘up-and-coming’ rucks was high risk. Generally, you’d have to develop them through their first four seasons before you even knew if they’d be any good. Better to snatch a late bloomer like Ivan Maric or Stephan Martin from another club than to put so much time into a young ruck.

In 2014, we’ve realised that planning for a few ‘development’ years for any young player is increasingly risky because the chances of the player leaving you in a few years’ time seem to have increased.

Indeed, the Tom Boyd deal shows even players on contracts can pressure their club to release them early.

As ‘developing’ your young players becomes more risky, the stronger clubs are increasingly interested in recruiting players who are cherry ripe to play seniors. That means more recruiting of mature-age players and more recruiting from other clubs.

Media pressure has little influence over coach longevity
During the season, there was media pressure for the sacking of Nathan Buckley, Damien Hardwick and James Hird. Some were even calling for Mick Malthouse’s head. Guess what?

They’re all still in the driver’s seat. There was no media pressure for the sacking of Brendan McCartney, Guy McKenna and Brenton Sanderson, yet they’re now gone. It’s internal dynamics that determine a coach’s longevity, and in 2014 these dynamics seem to have been well hidden from the media.

AFL coaching contract processes are still far from professional
In 2013, club mismanagement of coaching appointments was exposed. Hird’s mistakes, and his board’s acquiescence in those mistakes, were exposed.

The folly of promoting assistant coaches like Scott Watters and Mark Neeld – who had weaknesses in communication – were exposed. The folly of appointing coaches on long term contracts without a performance-based ‘out’ clause were exposed, as clubs offered big pay-outs to sacked coaches.

Well in 2014, these follies are still being repeated. Essendon’s board has continued its blind support for Hird. If Sanderson and McCartney had communication problems, surely these were evident by the end of the 2013 season.

So why were they both offered two-year contract extensions at the end of 2013? With Buckley struggling to communicate with senior players at Collingwood, why was he given a two-year contract extension in March 2014?

Perhaps Travis Cloke and dane Swan might have played better in 2014 and Dayne Beams and Heritier Lumumba might have stayed at the club if Buckley’s contract had not been extended.

When clubs stuff up their coaching appointments, the club members foot the bill and the club management continues on merrily with little accountability.

AFL footy is still going strong
Some of the observations above might seem a bit critical, but I still love the game as much as ever. In fact, the game seems as strong as ever if crowd figures are anything to go by.

Total annual crowd attendance topped 5 million in 1995 and has never looked back. It topped 6.2 million in 2005 and has never looked back.

Despite our various whinges about one-sided games, drugs and COLA scandals, frequent rule changes and unfair scheduling, AFL footy still attracted a healthy total attendance of 6.4 million people in 2014.

And we’re all looking forward to 2015.

The Crowd Says:

2014-10-26T12:03:57+00:00

Pumping Dougie

Guest


North definitely won't want Higgins on the half-back flank. Tried him there at the Doggies for most of this season with the view to replacing Bob Murphy long term, but he was way too soft and insipid when required and people don't realise that his disposal is only classy when he's in the clear. But he's dangerous up forward.

AUTHOR

2014-10-24T10:56:27+00:00

Gecko

Roar Pro


Dougie, just following up a couple of your comments. Not sure an astute lawyer is needed to make sure a coaching contract includes "clauses that specified a termination payout amount if termination was made early". Basic business sense or common sense should be enough. Whatever was needed, Essendon's management didn't have it when they organised Hird's contract. Anyway, good for the Bulldogs members that their management were better prepared. McCartney must be looking across at Hird and spitting chips. Regarding "how Sydney perform after the next couple of years", I dunno whether the COLA is being phased out or cut suddenly but either way, I'm surprised that the Swans managed to hang on to so many midfielders during the trade period. If you were Brandon Jack, Tom Mitchell, Zak Jones, Harry Cunningham or even any of the more experienced midfielders, you could be excused for seeking more money or an easier spot in a starting 22 at another club. And Swans management could have been excused for offering some up as trade bait to find a replacement rebounder for Malceski and the ageing Shaw, but they didn't do that either. Not sure if that's blind loyalty or blind confidence. As for Buddy, he turns 28 next January and seems to be getting better with age, so let's back him for at least 4 more years of top footy. It might even be lights out for the Bulldogs, Demons or Saints before it's lights out for Lance!

2014-10-24T07:34:30+00:00

Shouts Chen

Guest


The loss of Brendon McCartney has impacted the Bulldogs. Bulldogs have lost many games to Fremantle, West Coast, Carlton, Hawthorn, the Cats, the Bombers, the Swans and the Port Adelaide Power.

2014-10-24T05:58:56+00:00

Brian

Guest


I can't see it myself. Hawthorn, Sydney & Port seem a long way ahead. Geelong & Freo are better sides. Geelong got to within a goal having played without Stevie J or a ruckman. Then there's Gold Coast, Richmond, Essendon, Collingwood, West Coast & Brisbane who all seem around the North mark.

AUTHOR

2014-10-24T05:24:26+00:00

Gecko

Roar Pro


Perry thanks for your detailed analysis of North Melbourne. I actually think North came out of the trade period badly. I was dubious about North recruiting Del Santo last year, given they already had Wells and Harvey as less physical types in the midfield. Now they've also recruited Higgins, who's another less physical midfielder and they were even considering Cooney, who'd be a fifth less physical midfielder. Hard to fathom. I still think if they wanna threaten for a premiership in 2015 or 2016, they can only have one non-physical midfielder at most in their midfield at any one time, plus two other more physical types. Swallow and Ziebell provide good physicality but you need a third in-and-under player for rotations and to cover for injuries. Levi Greenwood was the best candidate for the third in-and-under midfielder but you've tragically lost him, so it'll probably come down to Bastinac or Adams. You might be better off quickly grooming one of these two, or someone else, to be a tagger. Wells, Higgins or Del Santo could easily slot into a half back flank (or both half back flanks), where they could give you 'Hawthorn-like' rebounding power. But I still don't think you'll win enough clearances in the big games. With smarter recruitment/ trading, North could have had a dangerous midfield. Instead, they've ended up with too much skill and not enough physicality.

2014-10-24T04:28:52+00:00

Jim

Guest


Swans should be helped by gettign tom mitchell in there, in terms of being a true 'in and under' midfielder. But they really need some more agressino, so they don't get bullied again like they did on GF day. Zak Jones moving into the team might help on that front, and Heeney, if he turns out as good as Eddie thinks he is, has never been one to shy away from a bit of rough and tumble either. The Swans need to find that true aggressive streak to finish their overall product - the call made about missing Mummy is a very good one, and probably was their biggest mistake in getting Buddy.

AUTHOR

2014-10-24T04:18:28+00:00

Gecko

Roar Pro


Winston most Swans midfielders are actually not that heavy by AFL standards (see the weights above). I think the strength of the Swans midfield in 2014 was not their physical size but the number of good midfielders pressuring for a spot in there. This contributed to a high level of consistency from Swans midfielders throughout the year because if they weren't consistent, there'd be Brandon Jack, Tom Mitchell, Ryan O'Keefe etc ready to replace them. Even to have Craig Bird in the green vest and Jared McVeigh at half back in the GF shows how many good midfielders the Swans had available. I agree there are other midfields that are less physical than the Swans (the bottom two thirds of the ladder is full of them). But in 2015, the Swans will come up against the Power, Hawks and Dockers, all of whom have a more physical midfield presence. If these midfields can block the Swans' supply to Buddy and Tippett, the Swans will once again struggle to win a premiership. There are high expectations for Brisbane's midfield in 2015 but I think they'll be a bit too reliant on Rockliffe when the going gets physical in the midfield. Zorko, Beams and Rich rely more on skill than physicality, and I dunno what's happening with Brent Moloney. Regarding Essendon, I agree Watson's absences in 2014 cost them games, but the absences also helped Heppell take on more responsibility, so now they've got two physical presences, plus Hocking as a big-bodied tagger. Not bad but in 2015 they'll struggle in the ruck dept.

2014-10-24T04:12:42+00:00

AR

Guest


"And yes I know its all about the money". Actually, its about ground availability more than anything else. Football shares ovals with cricket around Australia, making an earlier start seemingly impossible - though the AFL/MCC are working on that with Vic cricket. Also, the Players Assoc are campaigning for less games, not more. I sure if there were no barriers, the AFL would conduct a 34 round competition with 3 byes, but it can't.

2014-10-24T04:08:44+00:00

AR

Guest


Cheers for the response. Maybe they're closer than I thought, but the losses to lesser opponents, for me, suggested the group still has a way to go. Ever the enigma is North Melbourne.

2014-10-24T04:01:14+00:00

Franko

Guest


Two really astute points here: "List-building through ‘development’ has become more risky" "Media pressure has little influence over coach longevity" This has mostly come about due to the expansion sides who took the building a young side mantra to extremes. It also raises an interesting point about draft tampering. Yesterday we had Nakia Cockatoo heading in to the draft saying he wants to go to Port Adelaide, well they don't have a pick in the first two rounds, so clubs run the risk of drafting that lad and him walking away when his development years are concluding The media pressure one says a lot about the clubs boards being able to accurately assess where the playing list is at and where it is going. It's clear that at some clubs, the board has no idea.

2014-10-24T03:37:38+00:00

Pope Paul VII

Guest


Richmond finished 12th in 2012 so not sure why they are exhibit A? North will go in next year knowing they are good enough to get top 2.

2014-10-24T02:48:37+00:00

Brian

Guest


When you lose games to the bottom sides it does say something. Remember in 2012 Richmond beat Hawthorn & Sydney comfortably, In 2013 they thrashed Hawthorn again and in fact are currently the last team to do so. However your not that good if your not beating the also-rans.

2014-10-24T02:39:40+00:00

Winston

Guest


On the big bodied midfielder point, I agree with you in principle, but it's odd that you use the Swans midfield as an example. Throughout the year their midfield was praised exactly for having big bodied players in there. I would have thought a better example would be Essendon where once Watson was out of the side they just got bullied in there.

2014-10-24T01:49:34+00:00

Radelaide

Guest


I tend to think if there was a conference system they would put all the Victorian teams in one and their conference would be bought down by the small clubs to the point where the finalists would get bashed by the other finalists from the other conference.

2014-10-24T01:34:55+00:00

slane

Guest


Basically all American sports do it. Baseball, Basketball, NFL, anything with conferences. I'm for conferences in Aus too, it only makes sense in such a large country.

2014-10-24T00:56:55+00:00

Damo

Guest


My biggest gripe is the fixtures. I honestly don't know of any other elite competition in the world where you might play some teams more than others in a regular season (unles there's different divisions - American Baseball??). To me personally, it's just impossible to get my head around. And yes I know its all about the money :)

2014-10-24T00:43:35+00:00

Pope Paul VII

Guest


That's true Rad although at finals time Ziebell, Cunnington found a bit

2014-10-24T00:22:12+00:00

Radelaide

Guest


My theory Pope is that their best wins are on the back of their older players (Harvey, Petrie etc) and it is hard for them to keep the consistency up week in week out and therefore drop easy one's (although to be fair it was the Carlton one that was the biggest surprise loss) since GC were good before Ablett got injured and Brisbane got it together at home for Browny's farewell game and Collingwood dropped off at the end of the season.

2014-10-24T00:14:26+00:00

vocans

Guest


Development was bound to collide with free agency as it is now written. Perhaps this could be countered by starting eligibility period to qualify for free agency to begin only after you've played an AFL game. Then, if you were developing a player you'd make sure your second team (VFL, SANFL, WAFL what have you) was very strong, and I'd keep them there. Something would have to be done for players who were not making progress at a club to move on - perhaps a set period of 5 or so years (most would be 23 or so)? I do think this is going to be an increasing issue.

2014-10-24T00:10:51+00:00

Radelaide

Guest


I don't think Essendon's recruitment is so much to do with thinking they are in a premiership window but more about having a competitive team if a whole lot of them get suspended.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar