Hamstrung Clarke may miss entire series against India

By Justin Chadwick / Wire

It started off as a little tweak, but Michael Clarke’s hamstring woes are threatening to create a worrying void in the Australian Test team.

Clarke’s summer plans are up in the air after he re-injured his left hamstring during last week’s one-day win over South Africa – his third such setback since August.

Early scans have been inconclusive, with the 33-year-old to visit more specialists this week to determine the best course of action to take.

Speaking to the Nine Network, Clarke admitted experts were still working out the extent of the injury.

“My scans are complicated because you can obviously see where I have had damage in the past so they are trying to work out what’s damage from the past and what’s new damage,” Clarke said.

“If it takes them a day, if it takes them a week – I’ll just be guided by their expertise.”

Cricket Australia boss Pat Howard says surgery remains an option for Clarke, while an extended period of rest and rehabilitation is another avenue the star batsman will explore.

With next year’s World Cup and an Ashes series in England the priorities, Clarke appears increasingly likely to miss the entire four-Test series against India, starting in Brisbane on December 4.

While there were suggestions he could give up the 50-over game to prolong his career, Clarke made it clear it wasn’t an option for him at this stage saying he intended “to play every game I can for Australia in both forms of the game.”

Clarke’s potential absence against India would heap huge pressure on a batting line-up that failed dismally during a 2-0 Test series drubbing to Pakistan in the UAE.

Opener Chris Rogers enters the summer calendar struggling for form, the No.3 spot remains up for grabs after Alex Doolan and Glenn Maxwell couldn’t grasp their chance in the UAE, while all-rounder Mitch Marsh is new to the scene and still finding his feet.

Fitness permitting, wicketkeeper Brad Haddin will assume the captaincy for the first Test against India.

But Clarke’s astute leadership will be sorely missed, with his likely absence having the potential to destabilise a Test team still striving for consistency.

Coach Darren Lehmann was keen to make some decisions as soon as possible.

“I just want to know whether he’s in or he’s out,” Lehmann said.

“For us it’s a case of making sure we get him back playing as quick as he can, and fully fit.

“At the moment, he’s captain of Australia and if he’s fit to play and gets through the next little bit, then hopefully he’ll front up in the first Test.”

Haddin hasn’t played since injuring his shoulder during the recent Test series loss to Pakistan, but the 37-year-old is on track to make his return in NSW’s Sheffield Shield clash with South Australia in Sydney, starting November 25.

One-day vice-captain George Bailey is desperate for Clarke to return to 100 per cent fitness in time for next year’s World Cup.

“I’ll be there to massage him, I’ll get him through,” Bailey said with a laugh.

“It’s big shoes to fill (if he’s not there). He’s one of the best batsmen in the world.”

Lehmann dismissed any concerns rising star Mitchell Marsh had re-injured a hamstring during his valiant knock of 67 in Sunday’s one-day loss to South Africa.

The Crowd Says:

2014-11-18T05:06:55+00:00

Dan Ced

Roar Rookie


I don't get this "top order" or "middle order" pidgeonholing.. Surely it's all superficial. If they can bat, they can bat! Middle order batsman eventually get fired upon by the strike bowler when a new ball is called for, if they last long enough.

2014-11-18T01:37:01+00:00

Sideline Comm.

Guest


I really hope they don't pick Hughes for Clarke. He's an opener. Please please, selectors, pick a middle order batsmen to play in the middle order.

2014-11-18T01:07:45+00:00

Mondays'Expert

Guest


If Clarke is out of the series I can't see Haddin (unless he's an absolute failure) being given the punt even though I think his time is up. Smith to captain for mine with Hughes or Khawaja brought into the side. I think Warner is seen as too much of a larrikin to get the captaincy.

2014-11-18T00:53:20+00:00

Dan Ced

Roar Rookie


I was on the Rogers hatewagon after UAE but you can't argue with his shield ton yesterday, he has to stay. I'm sold... for the moment :P He has the form and the recent international exposure that Hughes doesn't have. Given how lazy the selectors are Hughes will probably just slot into Clarke's position. Given how predictable the selectors are Siddle will be dropped for Hazelwood but the rest of the bowlers will stay the same (Starc injury dependant). As always a Klinger, Burns, Ferguson, or Cooper would do great in this spot and I'd probably pick all of those ahead of Hughes as they have been playing (and in form) the whole time Hughes has been a spectator on tours of SAF and UAE.

2014-11-18T00:06:34+00:00

Sideline Comm.

Guest


This is everything that is wrong with Australian selections. You think we should drop Rogers, a seasoned player with 71 first class centuries (and 4 test centuries in 16 games) who has just scored a ton for Victoria? Dropping experienced players (Katich?) for young ones without just cause cripples our team. We need a mix of youth and experience, and Rogers is vital to the stability of our top order. Even if he's just scoring 30-50 off 100 balls, he is still doing the job of an opener by blunting the attack and seeing off the new ball.

2014-11-17T22:42:16+00:00

twodogs

Guest


The most authoritive batsman available is Warner. Who in Clarkes absence should be no.3. Watson to open with the pensioner Rogers (if even selected) or Hughes who deserves a (possibly last) chance to impress. The time to omit Rogers is now- a medium term selection must start immediately. It's fair to say India will find it tough to overcome us and that may present a problem in masking the cracks in our armor so if longer term changes are not made the problems will magnify somewhere down the road. An interim captain? Sounds crazy- Warner for mine. Or at least V.C. Though smith would be 1st choice if Haddin unavailable or 'tapped on the shoulder' which I reckon is highly likely.

2014-11-17T19:00:45+00:00

Larney

Guest


I would prefer him to be ruled out than put in and break down again in the middle of a test. That would be a disaster. Of course we need him, but not unless he is 100% and I don't see how that is possible with less than 3 weeks to go.

2014-11-17T15:33:39+00:00

ajay

Guest


clrake is champion and we need him in wc bailey is poor odi skipper even smith is miles better then bailey?

Read more at The Roar