Nebraska firing Bo Pelini is a mistake

By Andrew Kitchener / Roar Guru

Poor old Bo Pelini! The guy has done nothing but rack up nine or ten-win seasons (with winning conference records, too) and a 67-27 overall record in his seven-year tenure at Nebraska, split between the Big XII and the Big Ten conferences.

However, that’s apparently not enough to keep his job in Lincoln, and I firmly believe that being fired off the back of a fairly-impressive 9-3 season isn’t just a strange move, but also, I think, a bad move by the powers-that-be overseeing the Cornhuskers program.

I’m going to put it out there and say that Nebraska fans, who certainly pushed hard for Pelini to be ousted, are living in the past. They’re stuck in the late 1990s/early 2000s when the Cornhuskers were legitimate National Title contenders.

I don’t think that’s the case anymore, and it’ll be many years – if at all – before Nebraska returns to those giddy heights. It’s okay to want to have a coach come in and rack up wins and titles like they’re Vince Lombardi, but you’ve also gotta be a realist.

The knock on Pelini in Lincoln was that despite his impressive record, he didn’t win a conference championship. Oh, he came close. Remember the 13-12 loss to Texas in the Big XII title game a few years back?

The Huskers were one strange play away from recording a memorable 12-10 win over a red-hot Texas squad that had weapons everywhere, starting with Colt McCoy at quarterback and Jordan Shipley as his star receiver.

Then there was the Big Ten championship game of 2011, in which Nebraska were favoured to win over a five-loss Wisconsin team who limped their way into the conference title game pretty much because everyone else in the division shot themselves in the foot again and again.

But the Badgers made the Huskers look horrible, gashing them in a 70-31 blow-out that no one saw coming.

Similar in tone was this year’s Nebraska versus Wisconsin contest, where Badger running back Melvin Gordon embarrassed a school where solid, shut-down defence is a badge of honour, rushing for a then-NCAA single game record of 408 yards. The score line wasn’t quite as brutal, but the yardage given up hurt more.

It’s hard to explain away such results, and those twin failures are obviously fresh in the minds of Nebraska fans and the school’s athletic department.

They’re losses that’re made more shocking because of Pelini’s pedigree. Here was a guy who came in with the reputation of being a defensive mastermind. He was part of Urban Meyer’s championship-winning squad with Florida, and their D was lights out.

Coaching defence was part of what secured Pelini the Nebraska job in the first place.

Too often, the Huskers have been embarrassed like that.

The proud Blackshirt tradition of defensive excellence on the field at Memorial Stadium, sold out for more than 300 consecutive games, was being tarnished, and the school obviously decided they wouldn’t stand for it.

The other contributing factor had to be that Pelini, in seven seasons, didn’t deliver his school a conference championship or a major Bowl win.

Sure, he was better than the disastrous Bill Callahan, but fans in Lincoln are still clamouring for a return to the days of Osborne and Bob Devaney, and they’re not happy with seasons that don’t end with major hardware.

Of course that’s understandable, but the times have changed. The fact that Pelini delivered as many wins as he has in a state that doesn’t produce much in the way of A-grade prospects should be applauded.

Look at traditional college powers – USC, Alabama, Texas, Florida and others – and you see that they come from states where football talent pretty is pretty much in the water. Nebraska doesn’t have that same sort of ready-and-waiting talent to scoop up and put on the football field. So they’ll always be at a disadvantage.

Despite what folks in the state of Nebraska will tell you, the Cornhuskers job isn’t an elite one at the moment, which means that it won’t attract the very cream of the coaching crop.

Yes, the school had a good run for a while, but competing against the Ohio State’s and Michigan State’s of the world, as they are in the Big Ten, is a different kettle of fish.

Those two schools have outgrown Nebraska. And most of the rest of the conference, too. The divide between the have’s and the have not’s in the Big Ten has never been bigger. Nebraska? Well, they’re somewhere in between.

Let’s face it, Nebraska will, for the foreseeable future, be a middle-of-the-conference program in the Big Ten and might occasionally be elevated with the recruitment of one of those players who is a once-in-a-generation type.

The Nebraska fans won’t be happy to hear that, but it’s the truth. The landscape has shifted under their feet.

Pelini’s firing smacks of a fan-led revolt. They didn’t like that he wasn’t winning National Championships like Osborne and Devaney, so they did their best to tip him out of his seat, and succeeded.

Sure, Pelini was prickly, irascible and controversial at times, but the fact remains that he was also a damned good football coach.

Nebraska will be lucky to find someone just as good to replace him, and whoever does will always have one eye on newspaper, television and social media. Hard to coach football with one eye on the outside world, right?

Let’s hope that a rabid fan-base with their eye on glory days of the past haven’t doomed their school to more seasons of mediocrity. As for Pelini, he’ll walk into another defensive gig and might end up having the last laugh, too.

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2014-12-03T20:58:17+00:00

Andrew Kitchener

Roar Guru


Nice to read a positive post, thank you. Didn't think I was too far off :)

2014-12-03T17:45:47+00:00

Richard Hand

Guest


Andrew, I think your analysis of Nebraska's "conditions" are right on and I too think that firing Pelini was a BIG mistake. Times and conditions have changed since the Osborne years and Osborne retired right when the new scholarship limit was kicking in going from 95 to 85. This change did seem to have the effect of leveling the playing fileld for many of the "have nots" but I think it also ended up hurting teams like Nebraska who needed those extra scholarhips in hopes of picking up top talent walk ons. Pulling in top recruits to Nebraska has always been more of a challenge that that faced by schools located in higher concentrations of top high school football talent but the cutting down on the "pool" of scholarship players for NU hurt them much worse than say schools like Ohio State who have any number of four and even five star athletes within the state of OHIO to recruit from. So, bottom line, as much a I hate to admit it, I think Nebraska's chances of winning a national championshiip has been really hurt . I think Bo Pelini was slowly getting the Nebraska program back to competing but that is a slow process and even moreso when you have to hunt nationally for most of your top recruits. PLUS....you don't fire two coaches in a row who have 9-3 records and end up putting yourself on a list of places that potential coaches want to visit.. I hate it that they have done this.....and , by the way , they didn't improve when they fired Solich and hired Callahan and I am VERY CONCERNED that we're going to see all of Pelini's work go down the drain with this firing.

AUTHOR

2014-12-03T04:03:22+00:00

Andrew Kitchener

Roar Guru


YES!! If you haven't already, @fauxpelini's response to the real Pelini's dismissal is amazingly funny!

2014-12-03T03:29:48+00:00

King Of Swing

Guest


Not the first time Nebraska has fired a coach with a winning percentage of over 70%. Frank Solich coached for six years in the immediate aftermath of the mid 90s Tom Osborne-lead juggernaut. Despite an overall record of 58-19 he was canned in 2003 after a 9-3 season, same as Pelini. Admittedly the situations are not the same this time around. Nebraska appeared in the 2001 national championship game and were only only a few years removed from winning a Big 12 title while Pelini struggled to ever build a team that came close to competing for national titles but both dismissals prove the point that Nebraska are clearly living in the past. While there's certainly nothing wrong with a major university being ambitious and setting lofty goals for itself they need to remember that the balance of power in college football over the past decade has almost irreversibly shifted to the SEC and firing a coach who continually churns out 9 win seasons in Nebraska maybe isnt a great idea. Especially considering the disastrous four year reign of Bill Callahan that followed Solich's departure. That isn't to say that Pelini was perfect by any measure. With his inability to win big games, lack of any conference championships, volatile and explosive sideline outbursts and rocky relationship with the fanbase, it is easy to see why the university eventually decided to pull the plug after seven seasons. All I'm saying is that Nebraska better have a reliable contingency plan and a good idea of who they hire to be the next head coach. I don't think Husker fans could handle another four years of Callahan-like ineptitude. P.S - I'm more concerned about what's going to happen with the hilarious @FauxPelini parody Twitter account. It'll be a damn shame to see that go.

AUTHOR

2014-12-03T02:59:27+00:00

Andrew Kitchener

Roar Guru


Yeah, no kidding. I wouldn't mind being fired with that sort of payout. He'll effectively be paid twice if/when he picks up a new gig.

2014-12-03T02:28:31+00:00

Joe

Guest


Pelini has already had the last laugh,its called the contract buyout. Nebraska has to pay out the full amount on the contract.Bo Pelini will receive $150,000 a month from Nebraska for the next 52 months. Coaches getting fired is the best financial move they can make.You do a lousy job,the university fires you & has to pay you out the full amount remaining on your deal Will Muschamp was also fired this week & walks away eith $6.8 million from Florida. Great work if you can get it

AUTHOR

2014-12-02T20:34:59+00:00

Andrew Kitchener

Roar Guru


Yeah, I doubt he'll get another head coaching gig, but someone's gonna lap him up as a DC. Like Lane Kiffin didn't have a struggle getting a nice gig as an offensive coordinator.

AUTHOR

2014-12-02T20:33:52+00:00

Andrew Kitchener

Roar Guru


Brian Kelly at Notre Dame will always give anyone a run for being volatile. :) Nice call on Kirk Ferentz. Nicest dude in the sport.

2014-12-02T17:38:03+00:00

Como te llamas?

Guest


Pelini's teams won easy games that they should win (most of the time). Against softer opponents, they could win. However, as you point out, they were dominated against better teams. In many cases, they weren't even competitive. Pelini is a defensive coordinator, not a head coach. I'd be really surprised if his next stop is an HC gig.

2014-12-02T16:11:59+00:00

Allan Armbruster

Guest


Nebraska fans can accept a loss and are known for applauding the opposing team win or lose. Nationally, Nebraska football may or may not continue to be irrelevant. But have no doubt if Bo continued as our coach, Nebraska would have been No. 1 in every conversation concerning who had craziest, most volatile coach. Iowa's coach probably should be fired but manages to keep his job because he is a class act. That will never be Bo's reputation. Having read your article, I have to wonder how well you think Bo can recruit student athletes. Did you pay any attention to the 90 second chewing out Pelini gave Davie on national television? It's not the first time Bo has embarrassed himself, his players and his university. A prominent commentator said a year ago that if he had a son, he wouldn't let him play football for Bo Pelini. College football is more than x's and o's.

2014-12-02T14:59:02+00:00

Eddie

Guest


Are you wrong all the time or just this time? Please answer, since I don't have time to read your other stuff.

Read more at The Roar