How does 15 go into 11? Picking Australia's World Cup XI

By Lachlan McKirdy / Roar Rookie

After a summer of cricket that has seen many players throw their hat into the ring for World Cup selection, the announced 15-man squad throws up no real surprises, but also has the appearance of a team that could go all the way to lift the trophy.

Australia’s Cricket World Cup squad: Michael Clarke (c), George Bailey (vc), Pat Cummins, Xavier Doherty, James Faulkner, Aaron Finch, Brad Haddin, Josh Hazlewood, Mitchell Johnson, Mitchell Marsh, Glenn Maxwell, Steve Smith, Mitchell Starc, David Warner, Shane Watson.

While the squad gives pundits a better idea of what sort of side Australia are going to put out at the MCG against England, there are still a couple of different possibilities of teams the hosts will play.

Possibility #1: Standard 6-1-4 squad
Warner, Finch, Watson, Clarke (c), Smith, Bailey (vc), Haddin (wk), Johnson, Starc, Hazlewood, Doherty

This squad gives Australia an all-rounded team, capable of batting deep (we saw the prowess of Johnson, Starc, Hazlewood in the Gabba Test last month) with four main-line bowlers, plus Watson as an all-rounder and Smith as a bit-part spinner.

There is some good leadership in this team with Clarke, Smith and Bailey then also the fireworks of opening pair Warner and Finch. Of course this team is dependent on Clarke’s fitness and also the form of Watson in the upcoming tri-series, but expect to see this team against Bangladesh at the Gabba or maybe even Afghanistan at the WACA.

Possibility #2: The all-rounder squad
Warner, Finch, Watson, Smith (vc), Bailey (c), Marsh/Faulkner, Haddin (wk), Maxwell, Johnson, Starc/Cummins, Hazlewood

This squad could pose a few more risks for the Aussies, as it features a few jack of all trades, masters of none. With Watson, Marsh/Faulkner and Maxwell, you need them in them team to contribute with both bat and ball, and it leaves the team exposed if they don’t.

For example if Watson fails at the top of the order, and Mitch Marsh and Maxwell get out cheaply, it leaves the batting order compromised. The Marsh/Faulkner and Starc/Cummins selections are dependent on each other, as the Aussies will want to go with two right-arm bowlers and two lefties. So it would either be Marsh and Starc or Faulkner and Cummins as I don’t see Johnson or Hazlewood leaving the squad in their current form. Here, Glenn Maxwell almost plays as the selected spinner, with his off-breaks and its a role he can definitely play.

Don’t be surprised to see this squad for game one especially if Clarke is not fit.

Possibility #3: The slower wicket squad
Warner, Finch, Maxwell, Smith (vc), Bailey (c), Marsh, Haddin (wk), Johnson, Starc, Hazlewood, Doherty

The main features of this squad are two spinners, four quicks, but also a really aggressive batting line-up. If a Warner, Finch and Maxwell top-three fires, then scores of 350-plus are always on the cards. Having two spinners, especially one going into the right hander and one away, can not only place a lot of pressure on the batsmen to read deliveries, but it can get through 20 overs very quickly, something that Maxwell and Doherty are both magnificent at.

Having Mitch Marsh at six can give you some great lower-order hitting, but like possibility two don’t be surprised to see Faulkner and Cummins instead, as Faulkner has some better variation in his repertoire.

Possibility #4: The form squad
Warner, Finch, Maxwell, Clarke (c), Smith (vc), Faulkner, Haddin (wk), Johnson, Starc, Hazlewood, Cummins

This squad is a mixture of form and picking players suited to our Australian conditions. Doherty is not a wicket taker, whereas having the four quicks will definitely find you some wickets, especially throwing in Maxwell and Faulkner. It isn’t as strong a batting line-up but as long as one of the top five can get an 80-plus score the rest have the ability to chip in.

The dependence on fast bowlers is a concern, so Starc may come out for Doherty. The other major omission from this squad is George Bailey, which is highly unlikely, especially given he is the vice-captain, but he is known to have down patches in form and may be rotated around.

Possibility #5: The rotation squad
Haddin (wk), Finch, Watson (vc), Bailey (c), Marsh, Maxwell, Faulkner, Starc, Hazlewood, Cummins, Doherty

The importance of this squad is that it gives Warner, Smith, Clarke and Johnson – probably Australia’s four most important players – a rest. Haddin can be more aggressive at the top of the order, while Watson, Bailey, Marsh, Maxwell and Faulkner can all score quickly. Don’t be surprised to see this type of squad against Afghanistan or Scotland, particularly Scotland, the last game before the knockout stages.

The tri-series against England and India could prove crucial to Test some of these combinations but from what we have seen here, there are seven or eight players who have to be in every squad (besides the ‘rotation’ squad).

Definite players to be picked
1. David Warner
2. Aaron Finch
3. ?
4. Michael Clarke (if fit)
5. Steve Smith
6. ?
7. Haddin
8. Johnson
9. Starc
10. Hazlewood
11. ?

This leaves three (maybe four if you include the Starc versus Cummins position) spots between six players. There’s a battle between Watson and Maxwell for first drop, then Bailey and Faulkner/Marsh and finally Doherty and Maxwell/Faulkner/Marsh.

The importance of Warner and Finch is beyond measure, and a fit Michael Clarke would provide great experience. The pace attack must take wickets, and a lot will ride on the form of Johnson, Hazlewood, Starc and Cummins to get early breakthroughs in each innings.

The other big question is who will take the place of Michael Clarke if he is not fit by the game against Bangladesh. The general consensus is that it has to be a outright batsman, so don’t be surprised to see Shaun Marsh thrown into the team, but the other option is Cameron White, who has great pedigree in the Australian team and would bring some great experience.

Can’t wait for the World Cup to start and honestly believe that the Aussies can go all the way.

An Australia versus New Zealand final is a great chance, but don’t be surprised to see India, Sri Lanka and South Africa all there or thereabouts at the end of the tournament.

The Crowd Says:

2015-01-14T12:51:38+00:00

Tom from Perth

Roar Rookie


That's true. See Maxwell got a ton in the PM's XI match? Some decent shots in there.

2015-01-14T12:50:39+00:00

Tom from Perth

Roar Rookie


Yeah fair points man. Haha cheers mate. I've been distracted the last few weeks...

2015-01-13T14:08:34+00:00

Nudge

Guest


As I've said above Tom, I rate Faulkner, but until the recent one day series late 2014 against SouthAfrica, Faulkners form had been pretty poor in the past 9 months

2015-01-13T14:03:32+00:00

Nudge

Guest


I really rate him too Tom. I'm just really keen to play 3 blokes who bowl at 145 plus. I can see the opposition being 4 for 50 off 15, with the two white balls. Also think it's really important to have a spinner and Maxwell's bowling is very underestimated. So if we play 3 quicks, Maxwell and Faulkner it means Maxwell has to bat 6 Haddin 7 and Faulkner 8 and I really don't like Maxwell at 6 in case we lose some early wickets. Great to see you back mate

2015-01-13T13:52:35+00:00

Tom from Perth

Roar Rookie


"I think Faulkiner should be one of the first three blokes picked in every scenario, along with Johnson and Warner (and I guess Haddin by default as the only wicketkeeper). Faulkiner’s consistently brilliant form in ODI’s in the past 18 months makes him one of the most dangerous players in the world in this format." Completely agree.

2015-01-13T13:52:10+00:00

Tom from Perth

Roar Rookie


By the way, what the hell are Sandhu and Richardson doing in the ODI squad before Behrendorff? Can't be any of this too many lefties rubbish when Pat Cummins and Josh Hazlewood are both righties. Anyway, the Scorchers can use him, no worries.

2015-01-13T13:45:56+00:00

Tom from Perth

Roar Rookie


Not bad Nudge, but Faulkner is a must for mine. He's one of my first picked. He's won more ODIs for Australia than anyone else in recent memory. That's who you need in a World Cup winning team. I'd drop Maxwell for Faulkner. Or if Maxie gets back into form (he did get a 50 the other day in the BBL), maybe look at replacing M Marsh if Marsh has a poor start to the competition.

2015-01-13T13:44:57+00:00

Tom from Perth

Roar Rookie


Pretty sure you're grossly overestimating Hazlewood's form. He's not Jason Behrendorff, come on man.

2015-01-13T13:18:24+00:00

Nudge

Guest


Happy with that team Jammel. That's my second favourite team. The only thing I don't like about that team is that if we lost some early wickets, say 3 for 60 off 15, I'm not sure I'd like Maxwell in next, followed by Haddin. If we had Marsh 6 maxwell 7 Haddin 8, I'd still feel comfortable enough digging ourselves out of trouble.

2015-01-13T12:20:27+00:00

ajay

Guest


defintely mate best player without any doubt especially good avz with awesome st/rate.

2015-01-13T10:59:07+00:00

jammel

Guest


Agree Nudge - Australia should play to our strengths and select 3 specialist quicks not 'all rounders' (I've said before on this site that MMarsh might be vulnerable to losing his spot in the starting XI). I disagree with the author though who listed above Hazlewood as a definite. It might be Johnson + Starc + Cummins! I'd list Watto as a definite at #3. I'd try and make room for Faulkner though as he is a titan; he's in form too and is ice cool at the death. I think the selectors are looking at doing all of the above - and will hope to use Maxi as the 'spinner'. I.e.: 1Warner 2Finch 3Watson 4Smith 5ClarkeC 6Maxwell 7Haddin+ 8Faulkner 9Johnson 10Starc 11Cummins

2015-01-13T08:54:30+00:00

Sam

Guest


Perhaps a little controversial but I wouldn't have Watson - they'll definitely pick him irrespective but I don't think his form warrants selection. His bowling is great but his batting is just not good enough to be picked in the top order for a World Cup. I wouldn't pick Clarke because it's not worth the potential damage to his back. If he were the best ODI player in the world then things would be different, but we're spoilt for choice at the moment in the upper/middle order so I don't think he needs to play a part. 1. Warner 2. Finch 3. Smith (c) 4. Bailey (vc) 5. M. Marsh 6. Maxwell 7. Faulkner 8. Haddin 9. Johnson 10. Cummins 11. Hazlewood

2015-01-13T08:05:02+00:00

Larney

Guest


Whoever it is, is not going to get any ODI practice in before the world cup are they?

2015-01-13T07:16:29+00:00

matt bowyer

Roar Rookie


Warner, Finch, Watson, Smith (VC), Clarke (C), Faulkner, Haddin, Johnson, Cummins, Lyon, Hazlewood. Warner and Finch are both explosive players who can set up a win for Australia in the first 20 overs if they get going. One-day cricket is where Shane Watson is best suited - it forces him to attack more as a batsman and gives him an opportunity to contribute with the ball. Smith and Clarke need no introduction. Faulkner warrants his spot at number 6 ahead of Haddin due to his significantly higher average (45 compared with Haddin's 31) and strike rate (109 compared to 82). Haddin is Australia's best wicketkeeper/batsman in this format so there should be no doubts about his position, nor Johnson's for that matter. Cummins and Hazlewood are both young, quick and accurate bowlers with huge futures and thoroughly deserve their positions in this team. Finally, Nathan Lyon needs to be in this team. He is an attacking spinner (Doherty certainly is not) who took 10 wickets in his 6 matches throughout 2014 at an average of 2014. Doherty took 5 poles in 6 matches for 45. End of story.

2015-01-13T05:27:54+00:00

Pumping Dougie

Guest


Ajay I agree. He's just about the best ODI player in the world at the moment, behind only the South African captain, batsman/keeper, AB De Villiers.

2015-01-13T05:22:17+00:00

eee

Guest


Warner Finch Watson Bailey Smith Marsh at Waca and Gabba Faulkner otherwise Maxwell Haddin Johnson Starc Hazelwood

AUTHOR

2015-01-13T04:50:45+00:00

Lachlan McKirdy

Roar Rookie


As we have seen this Summer top order frailties were a bit of an issue for Australia with batting deep saving us a few times. Very rarely do you see teams take 10 wickets in an ODI these days, so having a solid top 6 should be the priority, and let the bowling line up pick it selves

2015-01-13T04:35:18+00:00

matth

Guest


Warner Finch Watson Smith Clarke/Bailey (Depending on fitness) Maxwell/Marsh (If spinning pitch, then funnily enough Marsh, as we should bring in Doherty) Haddin Faulkner Johnson Starc Cummins/Hazlewood/Doherty (Doherty if it's a spinning pitch) So on a fast pitch Maxwell provides some change of pace, on a slower pitch we bring in Doherty And we have six decent bowlers by playing four specialists + Watto + Maxwell/Marsh

2015-01-13T04:29:46+00:00

matth

Guest


So who is your captain?

2015-01-13T04:22:25+00:00

ajay

Guest


hhahhaa you just can't drop james finisher ? man avz 30 with the ball and more 44 (44! with the bat with st/rate 110 110 110 better then clarke ?) he is lock in my playing x1

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar