Maxwell and Starc learn to surf Australia’s World Cup wave

By Geoff Lemon / Expert

More than any other Australian cricketers in this World Cup, Glenn Maxwell and Mitchell Starc have shown they can ride a wave.

The match-up with Sri Lanka at the Sydney Cricket Ground on Sunday had an elemental force. Australia surged to 375 before Sri Lanka swept the other way. Twice their tide peaked, then receded: with Kumar Sangakkara and Tillakaratne Dilshan; then with Dinesh Chandimal and Angelo Mathews.

With 105 needed from 10 overs, the latter pair were a chance to swamp Australia until Chandimal’s hamstring sank their hopes.

The Australians were better able to harness the swell than their opponents.

Michael Clarke did, when an inevitable twinge in his own hamstring threatened to stem the slow flooding that he and Steve Smith had engineered. Hampered between the wickets, Australia’s captain looked for boundaries.

Like a free-verse poet challenged to write in formal structure, constraints can see creativity flourish in new ways. Clarke bashed the last part of an innings that began with dabs, getting 68 at a run a ball before he was done.

Shane Watson used the energy of first being removed from the team, then rushed back into a different position. No longer caught cack-handed between responsibility and assertiveness at No. 3, Watson played freely down the order and looked like he was enjoying himself at the crease for the first time in a long while. His 67 from 41 was just reward.

But it was Maxwell who most audaciously surfed the movement of the innings, his own batting a wave in itself that becomes unstoppable once it gathers force. In recent weeks he has reached king tide: England copped his 95 from 98 balls in Perth, then 66 from 40 in Melbourne; the 88 from 39 against Afghanistan led to 102 from 53 here.

His maiden ODI century, and the fastest by an Australian, beating James Faulkner’s mark from the 2013 series in India by an over.

He has no compunction, no decorum, no hesitation, no fear. He has learnt to give himself a sighter, but attacks from his second or third ball. He plays shots that shouldn’t be possible to balls that don’t deserve them.

He is making himself into the player that bowlers don’t want to face; he’s a more probable cause of humiliation than reward. Coming in at 175/3, the tide was going Australia’s way. Maxwell used it, added to it, and its movement gathered unstoppably beneath him. There was nothing Sri Lanka could do. Fifty balls and he had ripped the game away.

Sometimes Maxwell’s approach will fail: see 16 single-figure dismissals from 43 innings. Some have called his approach selfish, but it’s unquestionably what the team wants.

Four times in ODIs and five in domestic Twenty20s he has been out between 82 and 95, each time going full steam ahead. That proximate milestones don’t change his method only shows the selflessness of his play.

Today he did slow briefly before his century, probably to avoid the risk of a primate taking up residence between his shoulder blades. But his effort on 99 was testament to his character, as Lasith Malinga thudded a ball off his pad and the crowd applauded Maxwell’s dash to the other end.

When Maxwell didn’t salute, umpire Ian Gould asked whether he’d hit the ball. Maxwell said no and Gould belatedly signalled a leg bye. Surely any batsman would accept extras given as runs? But Maxwell wanted a hundred on his terms, and the next over he had one.

Starc’s contribution with the ball has been as spectacular. Eight of his twelve wickets this World Cup have been bowled. The defining image of his tournament is a blaze of LED lights and flying stumps. Half his career wickets are bowled or lbw. This tells you plenty about his swing, his yorker, the sense of threat he engenders.

Starc’s career bowling average has dipped below 20, his strike rate below 24. He has regularly touched 150 kilometres per hour in this tournament, and pipped Mitchell Johnson for the fastest ball of the day.

Against Sri Lanka, when his team went for over 300 in 46 overs, Starc’s 50 deliveries returned 2/29. Early in the innings while other bowlers were targeted his overs conceded a run here, a couple there.

As Dilshan took six boundaries from a Johnson over, the ground buzzed – this was one-day cricket at its best. Next over he and Sangakkara then looted 14 from Watson.

Starc quickly came back, was driven for four, then sent down five scoreless deliveries. One hit Sangakkara in the ribs, winding him. Another swung and dipped and was a centimetre from his edge and his stump. He conceded only one other boundary all day.

Against New Zealand in Auckland, Starc rode along with their batting implosion and almost pulled off an absurd win. Here he resisted Sri Lanka’s momentum that carried everyone else before it. He found a way to tack back against the current. Had his overs gone for another 20 or 30 runs, we would have been in for a far tighter finale.

But Starc would contain, not be dictated to. Aside from the rising run rate, Sri Lanka’s big hitting before the 40th over was driven by the knowledge that Starc had overs in hand, and they needed to compensate from anyone else available.

The quarter-finalists in this World Cup are evenly matched. All have their flaws, none are rank outsiders to knock off any other. We’ve seen Pakistan beat South Africa, West Indies beat Pakistan, Ireland beat West Indies.

So much will come down to which individuals can go with their team’s momentum and carry matches away with them. Maxwell and Starc have proved to be two of the best at surfing those waves.

This article was first published on Wisden India.

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2015-03-16T03:34:28+00:00

Geoff Lemon

Expert


Hi Digger, I wouldn't claim to be an expert on fast bowling technique, but I suspect it's just that the games are so different. The tactics that will bring you success in one don't apply in the other. Philander bowls a perfect regulation line and length in Tests that can be taken apart in one-dayers as the batsmen move and attack. Starc attacks the batsman a lot in ODIs and comes into the game because they have to play shots in return. Most of his clean-bowled wickets for instance have been against batsmen playing scoring shots rather than defending. He could bowl those yorkers in a Test but they'd be blocked out, he would get tired, and then he'd start to give away balls they could score from. Test bowling is much more an endurance thing of settling into a rhythm and drawing a mistake. He doesn't necessarily have that endurance, patience and consistency yet. For ODIs he's been told to get right after the batsman as hard as he can, because he only has to bowl three short spells for the day. That's how I figure it, anyway.

2015-03-10T08:17:40+00:00

Digby

Roar Guru


Hi Geoff, Thank you for the article. My question is regarding Starc and is why can he perform so well with the White ball vs the Red? I appreciate that some players are just better at one form versus the other but I find Starc puzzling. If I think of MaClenigan over here as an example, he is quick and aggressive enough to get wickets in ODI because batsmen will be challenged to force runs against him but I feel he would struggle in tests to get batsman out. Starc gets batsmen out. Why is he not as successful in Tests?

2015-03-10T08:11:29+00:00

Clark

Guest


Nz hasn't had to do any death bowling because they are just rolling sides so easily.

AUTHOR

2015-03-10T07:58:32+00:00

Geoff Lemon

Expert


Testiness has hardly been a one-way street, my friend. Let's get back to being our cheerful old selves from here on. (The score was in the quoted paragraph, between all the other bits you said were missing.)

AUTHOR

2015-03-10T04:11:21+00:00

Geoff Lemon

Expert


I must have missed the rule that every article has to include all of the information all of the time. Some of us choose different things to focus on than others. Life's rich tapestry. For what it's worth, most of this article is about a Victorian.

2015-03-10T03:59:27+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


The score? You have previously claimed to have done some work with him on the ABC...saying he was a lovely bloke. Geoff, if you don't like a personal riposte, don't so precious when you are vehemently challenged by others...many on this thread. It is the nature of this forum. Yes, it is usually quite light hearted with you normally but you've become quite testy on this one.

AUTHOR

2015-03-10T03:57:22+00:00

Geoff Lemon

Expert


Sangakkara has opened 21 times in 402 games.

AUTHOR

2015-03-10T03:46:23+00:00

Geoff Lemon

Expert


Sorry Don, I didn't realise I had to transcribe the entire 50 overs. Here goes. Maxwell: “Here’s Malinga, rushing up, bowls to Warner, Warner drives, he’s caught at cover. Change of pace and he’s chipped the ball away straight to cover, and he's out for 9. It's 1 for 19. No control there, deceived by Malinga's change of pace." Lawson: "That's just beautifully bowled, that really is. It's one of the skills that Malinga has... [carries on about bowling for a while] ... It's a gorgeous piece of limited-overs bowling from a veteran and a master." Maxwell: "And it gets Prasanna into the game, he was at cover, simple catch lobbed to him." Was there anything else?

AUTHOR

2015-03-10T03:27:32+00:00

Geoff Lemon

Expert


Don Freo - apparently you're no longer just telling me who I hate and why I write each article, but who my friends are as well. We've never met. You don't know anything about me. We talk on the internet. Previously it's been fun but recently there's a nasty edge. Please cut the personal commentary.

2015-03-10T03:09:34+00:00

Clark

Guest


The crowd behind him loved him giving it back though. He would have copped plenty.

2015-03-10T03:04:01+00:00

Clark

Guest


To be fair Sri Lanka did score over 300

2015-03-10T03:01:37+00:00

Clark

Guest


Australia have play all but one game in Australia and that is where Starc got all his wickets. Why do People always sulk when they have to play away, especially Australia and India, it's just pathetic.

2015-03-10T00:00:10+00:00

Perry Bridge

Guest


All part of the ABC budget constraints. The ABC can't afford to keep giving out the score, also - Players names over 5 characters more often will be replaced with the shorter and more generic 'he'. 'Ball' is relatively safe however when phrased as 'the ball' might be the next one - such that "Change of pace and he's chipped IT straight to cover." Only a matter of time I'd suggest.

2015-03-09T15:29:22+00:00

raz

Guest


Thanks for calling it out Geoff.

2015-03-09T14:47:07+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


Do you know what I am referring to here?

2015-03-09T14:42:40+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


He just played on while defending in NZ. Nothing horrible. Horrible is what Finch, Watto and Clarke did.

2015-03-09T14:40:41+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


I think you'll find Maxi already has a better strike rate than Symonds. Roy was never a "regular wicket taker".

2015-03-09T14:31:16+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


Most of them Joel (probably 250 to 300 of them as opener). He hardly ever batted at #6.

2015-03-09T14:29:06+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


And Watto doesn't get to play against Zimbabwe, Bangladesh and the West Indies as often as AB does.

2015-03-09T13:53:16+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


Maxwell's commentary became the subject of a TalkBack session on ABC afternoon radio in Perth today. "Just give the bloody score!" Began the conversation... Don't think, Geoff, that we are all making this up. It is a thing. If you are a colleague, send him these threads. If he is the professional you claim he is, he'll adjust. I don't think he will though...

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar