India the kings of cricket, and not just on the field

By Tim / Roar Rookie

The governing body of international cricket is the International Cricket Council (ICC) but it can be argued that ICC instead stands for the Indian Cricket Council.

India is the largest participant of cricket, with billions of Indians passionately playing and following the sport around the world.

This popularity brings with it obvious financial success, with Indian cricket the richest in the world. While the International Cricket Council is made up of members from the participating nations, the 10 main Test playing nations make up the higher levels of the Council.

But it has become apparent, especially in recent years that the financial success of cricket in India has flowed into their influence on the game through the ICC. While it may be going too far to say that India control cricket, it is certainly fair to say that they have far more influence on the game than they fairly should.

While the structure of the ICC could also be questioned, that’s an issue for another day. Instead let’s examine the influence that India have on the game.

That influence can best be described as “controlling” and “negative”.

The clearest example of this is the Decision Review System (DRS), India question the accuracy of the technology so they refuse to use it. While the ICC letting India control whether the DRS is used in its matches is bad, what’s worse is it has a flow on effect. In a recent Tri Series between Australia, England and India the DRS was not used, but not just for games involving India, but also for the games between England and Australia, two countries that happily use the technology in all other matches.

The problem with India’s dominance of the ICC is not just that they get to make decisions for themselves on how they want the game to be played, but also that this flows on to other countries and affects how they play cricket as well.

The solution is simple: The ICC must take control and set rules for all teams. But unfortunately while India have such a position of dominance off the field, no consistency, clarity and fairness looks likely any time soon.

The Crowd Says:

2015-03-14T01:20:36+00:00

Sanga Manga

Guest


The BCCI is an indifferent King. Previous generations of England and Australian boards were bad kings as they institutionalised the racism and prejudice towards non-whites. For most of the 20th century they failed in growing the game and left the ICC penniless. Thank God India runs cricket now. Atleast now cricket has its place in the modern sporting world.

2015-03-13T01:58:58+00:00

JMW

Guest


I played competition cricket for 20 years. During that time I was a voracious cricket follower. I recall being very frustrated by the poor coverage of Test tours in the 70s, 80s and 90s when Australia toured away. I was particularly fascinated with Test cricket. The one day stuff was something you watched while drinking with your mates. The saturation of the restricted formats has left me cold. The screaming, the hysterical commentary, the rubbish techniques that better resemble baseball. I am also very disillusioned with the ICCs failure to ensure a level playing field with the test nations and the corruption, stemming predominantly from the sub-continent has sickened me to the core. I am less interested today and less interested every day with the game I once loved. I can not stand the way India and to a lesser extent Pakistan have diluted the integrity of the game.

2015-03-11T16:31:41+00:00

VL98

Guest


You didn't get a thing of what i said. Your comment is completely irrelevant to mine. I am talking about the quality of pitches in cricket. Pitches in Australia, England, WI, S.Africa lack quality. They are no more what they used to be 70 or 80 years ago.

2015-03-11T16:22:56+00:00

VL98

Guest


Yes, with todays pitches, it turns on 5th day, but watching cricket of first 4 days is extremely dull & boring. By green top, i don't mean what we call green tops today. I mean really thick grass like olden days. These days, in a test match, for first few overs(like 10 or so), there is pace with swing & seam. But after that, its just a childs play ground. Those days, there were better batsmen, due to the life in the pitch(thick green tops), the bowl used to seam, swing & bounce at a real high pace. Hence team totals never crossed 150. Test match will not last more than 3 to 4 days. That kind of contest keeps the cricket alive, more people would want to see, more people will turn up at the grounds, tv viewers will increase. Slowly, Power will shift into the hands of the boards who play quality cricket.

2015-03-11T15:18:42+00:00

Alex L

Roar Rookie


WACA and GABBA still have their character very much intact, Adelaide Oval is pretty close too now they've worked out how to get the drop ins displaying some personality, MCG has been a bit variable but it kind of always was, the SCG is the only real change but I'm honestly not sure if that's not down to Sydney becoming a bit more tropical in recent years.

2015-03-11T14:39:47+00:00

Rob

Guest


I accepted a long time ago that the BCC holds all the cards... I don't like it though. At the time of bidding for the 2011 World Cup Australia and NZ were the only bidders. Yet it was hosted on the sub continent. India didn't like the format for the 2007 World Cup because they lost their first two games and were effectively eliminated. Format changed for next World Cup. India don't like the minnows improving. A late reprieve for this World Cup but their excluded from the next - effectively hindering development of associate members. DRS, lights, the monkey incident, poor sportsmanship not just from the team but THE ENTIRE BCC when things don't go their way. Their like a kid that caught mummy having an affair - all they have to do is have a sook and the ICC bend over backwards to keep them happy and shut them up. Sad thing is even a lot of Indians I've spoken too arn't happy with the full control the board has or the way they carry on.

2015-03-11T11:24:22+00:00

Trev

Guest


India are still at least producing some turning Test wickets, Australia has lost all the old character that each wicket used too have.

2015-03-11T11:23:00+00:00

Sanga Manga

Guest


Don't we love to bash Indian cricket on this forum.

2015-03-10T23:29:25+00:00

Vikram

Guest


Dream dream dream as we are witnessing in this world cup, india and nz are the teams ... For odi's Since last 2 years india has more away wins then any other teams including great aus and rsa this year indian domestic cricket has provided some green toooooops, score's like 50/5 100/10 0r near to 150 are quite common even the qtr and semi final if the trend continues ............. so bare in mind THE BCCI knows that might happen

2015-03-10T22:51:30+00:00

pjm

Roar Rookie


Wouldn't the pitch hold together quite well if it's a green top? My favourite time of a test is day 5 and the pitch looks like an earthquake has gone through it.

2015-03-10T20:04:31+00:00

VL98

Guest


Since leaving out India is not practical, atleast the other nations must play on full green top pitches(thick grass) exactly like in 1930s 40s. This will give a killer contest between the batting team & bowling team. They will get out for very low scores initially since the quality of batsmen today is not good. A rare six would be more fun then than watching the raining 6s of today. There will be much more drama and thrill in watching wickets falling. Slowly with time(series by series) teams will become tough and better, batsman too will become better in quality. After a while, a team score of 200 would be possible. Indians will virtually get all out for 50 while playing overseas on green tops. BCCI will be embarassed and will become a joke. Teams like Australia, SA, England, WI will occupy top 4 positions. The power will shift from BCCI to these boards.TV broadcasters worldwide will focus on matches of Australia, SA, England, WI than India. If people see some old videos, they will understand the difference and they will crave for that type of contest in cricket. This is the only solution.

2015-03-10T19:47:31+00:00

VL98

Guest


Don't know the years exactly. I have seen some very old black/white images, and some documentaries. They are very old. I assumed that they are from back then. Seen a documentary of bradman too. He's from that era.

2015-03-10T17:00:39+00:00

Jarijari

Guest


Green tops in the 1930s and 40s. That you can watch on video. Give us a break China.

2015-03-10T13:59:05+00:00

VL98

Guest


You said "The ICC must take control." What is ICC? Its BCCIs puppet. Who's the chairman of ICC? The person who controls Indian cricket. The solution is something else altogether. The other nations must unite & leave india on its own. They can play IPL or any other thing they want. This way, alteast, the quality of cricket will increase. Cricket will be popular than ever. Yes, the money will be less than what they get at present. But Hey, they won't die of hunger. They will be good. Cricket & players survived with less money & without Indian money for over a century. A green top cricket pitch is the heart of cricket. All the other teams can convince TV broadcasters by saying the brand of cricket will be twice as popular if there is quality just like old times.

2015-03-10T13:52:31+00:00

Johnno

Guest


Cricket reminds me alot of where Rugby union and Tennis were. Both used to be amatuer sports, and guarded by monopoly ways, with the powers that be. Rugby was totally dominated by the hime unions at the IRB, still is in alot of ways but less so now. It is expanding and opening up more and more, with the expansion of the world cup in the pro era etc. Tennis also went pro by 1970, opening up the sport to globalisation. The ICC or BCCI it seems, are not, there trying to consolidate there power amongst the Big 3. The way to put them out of business and force them to reform, is boycott matches don't bother tune in. But until the regular brainwashed Indian cricket fan takes action, and stops watching meaningless best of 7 ODI series matches, then Houston we got a problem. As it seems the regular bandwagon Indian cricket fan loves to have India dominating and haveing a monopoly on the game, and is happy to play the same teams over and over again. The Indian average cricket fan doesn't have a global expansion vision for cricket unlike soccer, and same with many of the common rugby fans in the NH still seem to love the 6Nations as there heart and soul, and stuff expansion. it's a numbers game and the BCCI and ICC have the advantage as Indian cricket fans the regular bandwagon fans are satisfied. Until they dissent, India will control cricket's direction unfortunatley.

2015-03-10T13:31:56+00:00

VL98

Guest


BCCI (india) is a bad king. Like a Hiltler. A bad king is one who destroys what he is supposed to protect. BCCI is one of the major reasons for the detriment of cricket. Just like germans or any other blame their ruler for their demise, BCCI will be blamed for the demise of cricket. When i watch old videos of 1930's 40's, i notice that they played on full green top, just like the outfield grass you see today in india. There was a contest between bat and ball back then. There was quality. Slowly, people will be fed up with these raining sixes. I don't know how its all going to end. Media is doing its best by exaggarating ("low quality matches" as "great matches") and "low quality batting" as "great batting". How long this will go on. Scoring 200s by indiciduals will become a routine. Soon, people will not feel anything even if they witness 6 sixes in an over. Yes, BCCI is a king (the bad one).

Read more at The Roar