Could Manchester United's 'blip' become something bigger?

By Steven McBain / Roar Guru

Growing up in the UK in the 1980s, one constant in life was that Maggie Thatcher was in charge and ruled with an iron fist.

For a younger generation of EPL fans it has been a similar tale, Sir Alex Ferguson’s United seeing off all comers and utterly dominating since the Premiership inception.

Offering yet more symmetry, David Moyes did a fine impression of John Major in attempting the impossible by following Fergie. United did not even qualify for Europe last season.

It was, however, a blip we were assured. A £150 million summer spending spree (with Juan Mata being added the previous January) and the arrival of a heavyweight manager in Louis van Gaal would see the Reds head back toward the summit.

The names were impressive, Angel Di Maria and Radamel Falcao as well as exciting young talents such as Ander Herrera and Luke Shaw.

Now on many levels, United’s season is as expected. They are in a Champions League slot, while not good enough to challenge for the title – this was a transitional season after all.

But two things are quite striking when looking at the Old Trafford outfit now. The first thing is that the long-term planning has entirely departed the scene: a prime example being the sale of Danny Wellbeck for £16 million, paying for a single season of the entirely underwhelming Falcao.

Wellbeck didn’t pull up any trees at United but was the type that Ferguson held on to for some time, even if ultimately he moved on, such as a Nicky Butt or a Phil Neville. Fergie understood the need for the squad to have a certain identity and character.

That identity of the club has entirely changed, and worse, the aura has gone.

Van Gaal, we were told, would re-assert that swagger, Old Trafford would become a fortress once more. In that respect, Monday’s FA Cup capitulation was highly telling.

Over the past two decades, United have held the wood over Arsenal, no question. There have been blips but the thrashings were handed out by United and the bulk of the silverware sits in Manchester.

Arsenal’s character has been called into question many times and that is why Monday’s result – United’s last chance of silverware – is so representative of the wider issue. People no longer fear United.

United’s decline can of course be traced back to a race horse named ‘Rock Of Gibraltar’. It was Ferguson’s courtroom row with major shareholders John Magnier and JP McManus that ultimately led to the arrival of the Glazers.

On the face of it the Glazers have done OK for United, but the outflows of money are massive. United are no longer shopping in Harrods for players (we can attribute this Summer’s spree to them simply protecting their asset, and who can blame them?).

Ferguson’s sheer force of will coupled with brilliant man management ensured the trophies kept coming.

He married the talents of a younger Cristiano Ronaldo and Wayne Rooney with the axis of Edwin Van Der Sar, Nemanja Vidic and Rio Ferdinand, which he then allied to the remainder of the old guard.

United’s squads however bore no resemblance in terms of quality to previous vintages and had Arsenal not had to finance the Emirates, the Reds could have already been empty-handed for some time.

At this point it is worth considering the team United supplanted back in the ’90s and who are the team most likely to replace the Reds in the top four this season: Liverpool.

In the pre-United era, it would have been absurd for a football fan to imagine the Anfield outfit going over 20 years without a league title. But the end of their own ‘boot room’ era in many ways parallels the end of the Ferguson era.

Football is of course a different game nowadays. United’s revenues are extraordinary, they almost more than anyone (given commercial, stadium and Premiership TV revenue) are equipped to deal with missing out on Champions League money.

But the interesting part is it does close the gap to the other clubs if United miss out again. Arsenal’s match-day revenue outstrips United. Given Arsenal’s London location and what looks like Champions League participation again, are they now a more attractive destination for players?

Since dropping out of the top four, Liverpool have suffered from that lost income, coupled with limited match-day revenue from an antiquated and small stadium. Liverpool remain a huge draw and United will of course remain so.

It may also be that United will finish in the top four and the prospect of Champions League football, Louis van Gaal and the fact that it is Manchester United will ensure that the very top players still come. United may yet kick on again, rendering this piece moot.

There is already a plethora of talk regarding transfers and the Red Devils’ continued rebuilding this Summer. Gareth Bale is rumoured to be coming to Old Trafford yet, would he swap the Bernabeu to return to a club only challenging for a Champions League spot? That was why he left Spurs.

Real have of course been able to cherrypick the very top players and while David De Gea would command a great fee, entire defences are built on keepers such as he, and the dangers of selling one star player to rebuild squads have been shown amply by Spurs and Liverpool in the past two seasons.

The rebuilding required by United could also be substantial. Rooney’s wages render him un-transferable, and have we seen the best of him? Probably.

Likewise it seems apparent we have seen the best of Robin van Persie and Falcao, most of the defence is not fit for purpose, and United badly need one or maybe two top class additions in central midfield. None of that will come cheap and these players are even harder to source if you are not going to be hearing the Champions League theme tune on a Tuesday or a Wednesday night.

By not finishing in the top four for a second season, it means that the blip is possibly something more, and in opening up the Champions League revenue to other teams, United’s dominant financial position can be challenged, or at least bridged.

It seems unthinkable that United could fade from anything other than perennial title challengers, and football is very different from the early 90s – the big teams are more dominant than ever. But as a young football fan watching John Barnes, Ian Rush and Peter Beardsley in their pomp, I couldn’t imagine Liverpool fading either.

It’s certainly at least worth a thought.

The Crowd Says:

2015-03-16T03:38:28+00:00

AZ_RBB

Guest


Huge improvement this morning v Tottenham. Arguably the performance of the season. But they have a very tough run home with City, Chelsea, Arsenal, Liverpool and Everton still to come. This would be a good time to hit some form.

2015-03-16T03:28:31+00:00

Punter

Guest


He won at Porto & Inter, He reached 3 consecutive semis with Real Madrid, he was in the semis 4 times with Chelsea in 6 attempts. What a poor record.

2015-03-16T02:31:38+00:00

Chris

Guest


that barca team was a beast, fergie didnt do well enough against them but if not for that team united could have had a couple more champions league titles. we dont so that point is moot, i only say it because when you start bringing in luck or hypotheticals into wins you also have to bring it into losses aswell. john terry tripping and the 2 goals in stoppage time were once in blue moon happenings absolutely but the years of being in the finals or semi finals before the chelsea game and the brilliance of the 98/99 champions league run were too right down to brilliant managing. man uniteds run to the final that year was against everyone good.

2015-03-16T02:28:05+00:00

Chris

Guest


mourinho has a pretty good euro record haha

2015-03-16T02:27:11+00:00

Chris

Guest


i think you are stretching it a little to claim that united's decline can of course be traced to fergies row over the horse. i hate how the glazers levereged united but there has never been any complaint from fergie or now van gaal or moyes when it came to them releasing funds for players. they have been model owners when it comes to the united team itself, they never interfered and by all accounts have had an open check book for the manager. and any manager would have sold danny welbeck, he was good but a truly terrible finisher for years. im happy he is doing well at arsenal but cant have any complaints about selling him. united wont fall as far as liverpool, they just have too much money. the team is not great but van gaal has the support of the team which is huge and he seems to have a plan. he has another season to not challenge and then i think united will be back to winning ways. especially with financial fair play coming in, united are one of the best positioned clubs with this with huge revenue so will be one of the few clubs able to shop at harrods all year round.

2015-03-15T04:39:07+00:00

balotelli

Guest


Johno...in all honesty trying to trivialise Fergie's 2 well earned Champions League titles renders this assessment biased... Do you know in all those titles they were coupled with a League title and 1 with even a famous trebble.. Are you trying to tell us that in that season Chelsea where the better team when Man U even won the league title also? Thats ridiculous

AUTHOR

2015-03-12T12:20:36+00:00

Steven McBain

Roar Guru


Cheers Nick, I didn't see the PSG game last night but I heard Verratti was excellent!? I think if anyone wants to criticise Fergie for anything then letting Pogba get so hacked off and leave must be the biggest blunder towards the end. He was always so wonderful at giving young players a chance yet he's let an absolute weapon of a midfielder leave there...........

2015-03-12T07:04:52+00:00

nickoldschool

Guest


Great piece Steven! Perso I think man u fans need a new Keane, giggs or canto, someone young to fall in love with and bring back the swagger you mention. The more I see verratti the more I think he us the type of guys rich owners should build their team around. Or a pogba perhaps. But falcao was never going to be the pillar of a new man u.

AUTHOR

2015-03-12T06:33:36+00:00

Steven McBain

Roar Guru


I think with Mourinho, he's obviously won the CL twice and in fairness to him with pretty unfashionable teams in Porto and Inter when the Italian clubs were already seemingly on the wane. With Chelsea and Real he has struggled a bit in Europe since and I feel with him that he's lost a bit of an edge in European terms. His tactics were working wonderfully for him for a while but teams are fathoming it out now and fighting fire with fire. If 'Nickoldschool' reads this I'd love to know what he thought about PSG winning last night, am sure he's delighted! I didn't see it but sounds like they turned it into a scrap and came out on top. Mourinho's made a career on destroying and stopping teams play but now PSG and Atletico last season have sussed that out. He needs to adapt if Chelsea are going to challenge in the CL again.........

2015-03-12T04:39:41+00:00

Johnno

Guest


Steve That's a good point, Euro record vs Domestic record. Van Gaal, has a very good Euro record, but seems a bit average domestically. Some managers, are good domestic, but not strong in Europe. Im not sure Morinho has a good Euro record.

AUTHOR

2015-03-12T04:32:55+00:00

Steven McBain

Roar Guru


Johnno completely agree with you on Fergie and his European record. But for 2 mad minutes against Bayern and a John Terry slip, he'd have never won the CL, completely agree mate. If you look at the two CLs he won, I don't think anyone could say United were the best team in the tournament that year, or at least never the dominant one in the same way that a Barca or AC or a Bayern has done it. 100% agree with you. Domestically I think however he without parallel. That to me was far more about buying the right players and motivating them and giving them the platform and freedom to act. I think you do have a point in that as his transfer budget reduced he bought his fair share of turkeys later on.

2015-03-12T04:07:30+00:00

Johnno

Guest


Ferguson, tried and tried but couldn't beat Barcelona in Barca's golden generation when it counted.He was smoked twice by Barca in the champion's league final. Also AC Milan and Carlo Anceloti sorted out Fergie in 2007 with sublime football,amongst the best I've seen, complletely out tacting him, in the semi's, beating him 3-0 in the 2nd leg. And Fergie beat Chelsea on penalties in Moscow, in the rain. John Terry slipping at the penalty box,in pouring rain can't be attributed to good managering. Ferguson is great no doubt, and clealry what he did in Scotland was massive, and re-building Man U. The point at Man U, was he had cash to work with, I'm not sure he could of done that at Spurs or Villa. Wimbledon FC, now there's a club who turned it on with limited resources.

AUTHOR

2015-03-12T03:31:17+00:00

Steven McBain

Roar Guru


Johnno cheers for the read mate. The point I was trying to make about the transfers was that United have been spending relatively less (until last Summer) versus their revenues - because more money is flowing out of the club. With FFP, United should still be well placed as the criteria for FFP dictates the status quo. City have been fined and penalised for breaking those rules as an example, as were PSG. United pre the Glazers regularly broke the British transfer record but even with the Ronaldo money they rarely seriously splashed the cash after buying Rooney. Obviously last Summer was different after the shock of not making the CL. I don't think United's situation is Van Gaal's fault at all (and don't think or at least hope I said that!?) but I do think he's doing a slightly 'odd' job with the team tactically. I think in Ferguson's latter years he was simply papering over cracks. The Glazers gave him an entirely free reign and in return he made do with what he could. To me, the purchase of RVP was an entirely selfish one by Ferguson however. He spent 24M to ensure he went out on a high and with City not on top. Yes they won the league but he broke one of his cardinal rules of buying a player with no resale value in the latter stages of his career. I can't say I agree with you about Ferguson not necessarily doing well with a lesser club. At Aberdeen he destroyed the Glaswegian duopoly and won a European trophy. United whilst rich were a mess when he took over and I don't think anyone can say he didn't do magnificently. Redknapp I feel is an absolute charlatan. Spurs tripped over their shoelaces so many times when he was there and they finished pretty much where they do every year under whichever manager. Spurs had sold Berbatov a month before Redknapp showed up also. Again, cheers for the read though, good to have a proper debate!

2015-03-11T16:45:38+00:00

Johnno

Guest


Maybe it's not Van Gaal's fault, and Fergie had more of a monopoly on the money. Now so many teams have rich billionaires bankrolling them. And United have less money than before and more competition for silverware than Fergie's time. And the German and Spanish teams are catching up, with big revenue. If Van Gaal had the same climate as Fergie did in the 90's and 2000's(2000-2010) he may of done better. And if Fergie was coaching say Villa or Newcastle he wouldn't have had the same success. Harry Rednknapp did well at Spurs with a lot less talent at his disposal, and he got the best out of Berbatov.

Read more at The Roar