Bulldogs snatch defeat from jaws of victory

By Cameron Mee / Roar Guru

For 70 minutes I was almost certain this article would be about how both the Eels and Bulldogs have established a blueprint to beat the defending premiers. And then the match exploded.

The Rabbitohs received a marginal penalty with just over five minutes to go to tie the match. They then absolutely butchered the ensuing kickoff and Trent Hodkinson kicked a go-ahead field goal.

After a perfect set of six, the Bulldogs pinned the Rabbitohs deep in their own half and proceeded to stop tackling, allowing South Sydney to march into the Bulldogs half before Adam Reynolds attempted a game-tying field goal from 45 metres out.

You know what happened next.

The Bulldogs did build on the Eels’ framework from last week however. To beat South Sydney it is now clear, you need to win the forwards battle. Both Parramatta and the Bulldogs did that.

Next you need to play direct, the Eels did that last week and the Bulldogs did this to varying degrees on Friday.

Finally you have to make the most of your opportunities. The Eels did so last week, the Bulldogs did not. And they paid the price.

This match always seems to produce plenty of controversy. Last year it was Rabbitohs fans who (wrongfully) thought they were robbed. This year it’s Bulldogs fans.

Let’s start with the contentious Issac Luke eight-point try. Luke darted from dummy half, dummied the football and lunged for the line. Four Bulldogs players went for him, and it appeared as though something dislodged the football before he could ground it. The on-field referee’s decision was no try. Conclusive evidence was needed to overturn this call.

As usual, we proceeded to watch replay after replay. While it was unclear whether Luke grounded the football, it was clear Sam Kasiano’s knees came into contact with the back of Luke’s head, and Josh Morris had come flying in with his foot, but missed Luke and connected with Kasiano.

Therefore the decision should have been a penalty try to the Rabbitohs, an easy six points.

Instead, the video referee concluded that Luke did ground the football on the line and that Morris kicked him in the head. I’m not sure how he came up with this decision and I guess we’ll never know, because referees do not speak to the media and the players and coaches aren’t able to even mention the Voldemorts.

As a result, the Rabbitohs received an eight-point try and the score line was 10-8 at halftime. The Rabbitohs received an extra two points that they probably should not have, not because the decision to award the penalty was wrong, but because the on-field referee’s decision couldn’t be conclusively overturned.

That brings us to the most controversial moment of the match: James Graham’s failed charge down of Adam Reynolds’ potentially game-tying field goal.

Graham charged at Reynolds, arms up, attempting to charge the ball down, then slipped and went flying straight into Reynolds’ legs. It was purely accidental and incredibly difficult to avoid.

It was also completely different to Felise Kaufusi’s shot on Benji Marshall, in which Kaufusi intentionally ploughed into Marshall’s plant leg. It was dangerous, it was reckless and it was intentional. There was no attempt to charge the football down.

Graham’s is different because a) he was attempting a charge down and b) he slipped over. Despite this fact, by the letter of the law, he should have been penalised. He took out a kicking players legs and you’re not allowed to do that. But, and there is always a but, the referees should also probably have shown some discretion in making their decision.

The field goal attempt landed nowhere near the goal posts. Graham’s contact had absolutely no bearing on the outcome of the kick. His pressure certainly did, but the contact came after the kick had been attempted. Referees usually put their whistles in their pockets in the final five minutes of matches; this is an instance where they probably should have.

However, before Bulldogs fans start blaming the referees on the loss, they need to look at their own team. Did the penalty have a profound impact on the outcome of the game? Yes. Did the penalty cost the Bulldogs the game? No. They should never have let the game get to this point.

The Bulldogs were by far the better team. They had a number of opportunities throughout the second half to put the Rabbitohs to bed and but instead they turned the ball over repeatedly, attacked laterally, and they had a number of poor kicks.

The primary offender for the two latter crimes was returning five-eighth Josh Reynolds. It’s a miracle he was able to play on Friday and he looked very rusty as a result. He spent way too much time running across field and his kicking game was very poor. A lot of the time on the fifth tackle he was playing extremely flat, putting himself under significant pressure while attempting to get a kick away.

Furthermore, the Bulldogs could easily have prevented the Rabbitohs from getting into scoring position. When Luke scored the eight-point try the Rabbitohs only had the ball in attacking position because the Bulldogs turned it over. Kasiano had been tackled and instead of waiting until the Souths players were off him he attempted to play the ball with multiple players lying on him. Consequently he dropped it and South Sydney capitalised on his error.

The Bulldogs were again their own worst enemy leading up to Reynolds’ field-goal disaster. The set of six after Hodkinson’s field goal was absolutely perfect. It started with a number of excellent runs from their big forwards that got them into the Rabbitohs’ half of the field, before Hodkinson drilled the ball into touch five metres out from the Rabbitohs’ line.

With three minutes remaining the Bulldogs just had to maintain their composure, not give away any stupid penalties and get up off the line and prevent the Rabbitohs from picking up any cheap metres.

Instead, we saw the most passive defensive set of six from the Bulldogs for the entire game.

It was terrible. The line speed was non-existent; they allowed the big Souths forwards to run towards them and gave up 10 to 15 metres every play. This allowed the Rabbitohs to put Reynolds in a position to attempt a field goal.

If the Bulldogs defend this set like they had the rest of the match, Reynolds would never have attempted the decisive field goal.

The Crowd Says:

2015-04-05T09:57:59+00:00

Steve

Guest


Non e of which Graham had done. Graham wasn't even attempting a tackle. he was attempting to charge the ball down. He was facing the opposite way to the kicker in case he copped the ball in his face. Its called a charge down.

2015-04-05T09:51:07+00:00

Steve

Guest


I disagree that both decisions were correct. The Issac Luke try didn't have anything in it to reverse the on field refs call. Luke looked like he had a loose carry on the video and thats what the ref saw. Morris missed with his foot so there should not have been a penalty let alone a penalty try. That 8 points made a big difference to the game. We wouldn't be talking about any charge down by Graham because it would have come down to a field goal. That decision probably added to the frustration of the players in the end. After the the ref had once again penalized the Dogs for Grahams charge down in what they thought was another dubious call which was going to cost them the game some completely lost it. But I agree with the Graham penalty as any hit on the legs of a player kicking the ball even if its an accident should be a penalty. Though I have seen some clashes with charge downs or contesting a ball that go un penalized as both are going for the ball and not the player. If Graham blocks the ball he's a hero so its a fine line. But with the dogs leading the entire game on what was a big replay game with high emotions the ref did contribute to the frustration with wrong calls. There is no excuse for any thuggery by players or fans. Graham had every right to question the ref as captain but went a little to far. But that is Grahams style as well and I can understand his frustration with the entire game on the line with what had been a second suspect ref call. He is passionate and expresses himself with animation. Then many have conveniently overlook the push in the back on Morris to take him out from Dogs possibly getting the ball back from the quick kick off. That would have 1) given the dogs the ball with a minute to go and chance of a field goal or 2) given the dogs a penalty which the dogs could have had a kick at goal. It seem the ref was hesitant to blow his whistle in that last minute. If he had done who know the Souths fans may have rioted and he probably wanted to avoid that.

2015-04-05T08:23:02+00:00

Jay C

Roar Guru


29 now

2015-04-05T08:21:11+00:00

Jay C

Roar Guru


You counted my posts? Cheers.

2015-04-05T08:04:46+00:00

LukeT

Guest


28 posts from this guy - really? My point well and truly proved.

2015-04-05T07:40:38+00:00

tim

Guest


I'm more embarrassed that a kick to the head is not considered a send-off offense.

2015-04-05T01:26:25+00:00

Bulldog

Guest


How is the JT scenario different??? Just because he did not get hurt?? If JT breaks a rib when Scott hits him late.. Is that different? If JT break his neck when Scott and Houston drop him on his head. Is that different. If JT gets his cheek bone broken when Smith knees him in the head is that different?? You my friend are being hypocrite.

2015-04-04T23:37:25+00:00

savva

Guest


or the time scummitoh supporters threw bottles at Todd carney. short memories and what not

2015-04-04T11:00:13+00:00

Muzz

Guest


Dissent is currently outta control!

2015-04-04T08:32:26+00:00

Jay C

Roar Guru


I reckon he will get time off for dissent actually.

2015-04-04T08:23:36+00:00

Jono

Guest


Yes gobbler, have you? Btw, I'm not the one saying something is the rule when I can't actually prove it.

2015-04-04T08:20:32+00:00

Muzz

Guest


I get what your saying Jay. All i'm saying is that Graham has a case and don't be surprised if he's playing next week.

2015-04-04T08:04:29+00:00

Jay C

Roar Guru


You can't do it Muzz. It has been a penalty for years. It is a penalty and it is a deserved penalty. You can quote whatever you like but the fact is. The ref said it was a penalty. The NRL said it was a penalty. Hasler said it was a penalty. Harrigan said it was a penalty. The majority of pundits say it was a penalty. It was a penalty. And I support it being a penalty because, yes. I would prefer a team, even my team, not having the opportunity to dive carelessly at the legs of the opposition, in the manner Graham did, than having playmakers seasons and possibly careers destroyed. To me this is a no brainer. Ask Maguire if he would prefer the two points or a functioning half back.

2015-04-04T07:53:27+00:00

Muzz

Guest


Page 39 Jay. There's even a little diagram for you. http://www.playnrl.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/ARL-Rules-book-2015.pdf

2015-04-04T07:34:46+00:00

Adam

Guest


im no fan of Graham, but that wasn't a tackle. Nothing about the position of his arms or head suggest he was making a tackle. He was clearly attacking the ball.

2015-04-04T07:26:55+00:00

Jay C

Roar Guru


I reckon the worst part is my opponent had Graham and he didn't get marched. Had a respectable score at the end!

2015-04-04T07:25:10+00:00

Jay C

Roar Guru


How is Barba going?

2015-04-04T07:25:04+00:00

Drew

Guest


Section 15 under player misconduct 1. A player is guilty of misconduct if he: (m) forcefully spears at the legs of a player in possession, exposing him to unnecessary risk of injury. I think this law is primarily enforced when a player in possession of the ball is being held up and another defender attacks his legs. However, it can also be applied to situations where the defender attacks the kicker's legs

2015-04-04T07:23:39+00:00

Jay C

Roar Guru


What do I constantly make up? How is 'Lofty Standards" making something up. You have a MASSIVE chip on your shoulder for anything green and red. Much like me and Gallen.

2015-04-04T07:22:28+00:00

Jay C

Roar Guru


It makes no difference Muzz. A) A kick does not begin when the boot touches the ball, but when the ball leaves the hands. It wouldn't matter if the ball never even reached the boot. B) It wasn't late. I am not arguing about intention. Whether Graham thought it was a kick or he was just going to drop the ball and then grab it again and run. You cannot attack the legs of a kicker. For reasons that should be painfully obvious. In case they aren't. It is because it is very dangerous. It could result in players being seriously injured.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar