The Kevin Pietersen conundrum

By Josh Conway / Roar Rookie

Kevin Pietersen never wanted to be like anyone else. He was always his own man. It is why he felt aggrieved at the quota system in his homeland of South Africa and duly fled to greener pastures.

It is why his Nottinghamshire captain threw Pietersen’s kitbag over the dressing room balcony in 2003, after voicing opinions nobody else dared to say.

It is why he sent texts to South African opponents about how to bowl to his teammates, and called his captain, Andrew Strauss, an idiot in Afrikaans.

But the best are often the most divisive. Don Bradman wasn’t very well liked, neither was Geoffrey Boycott. Stretching to other sports, Michael Jordan wasn’t adored inside the dressing room, and John McEnroe rolled to the beat of his own, very loud drum.

But Pietersen thrives it’s ‘KP versus the world’. Think of the 149 at Headingly after ‘textgate’. Think of his 186 in Mumbai in 2012 on a raging turner soon after his regeneration, when his teammates and public’s eyes were focused squarely on him. Think too, the 158 in the Ashes decider of ’05, when he flat batted a 150kmph Brett Lee with utter disdain.

His resilient individualism and epic self-belief acted as a giant score he had to settle with the world.

You can now add the 355* for Surrey this week, when the olive branch of an English return was dangled by a refreshed board. Or so he thought.

Pietersen was told by incoming chairman Colin Graves, to find a county and make runs. How does 335 sound, Colin?

Pieteren’s meeting with Strauss and ECB director Tom Harrison delivered him the dreaded news. No more England. No more KP.

KP was misled. He was annoying, dropped, recalled, sacked, a hopeful and now, nothing. The ECB has sold him down the river, apparently due to a lack of trust.

But as the man himself noted in his newspaper column, is it him or the ECB with the trust issues? The English public has fallen out of love with their cricket team. A team seemingly stuck in the past when others move forward. A Test team which is just OK, and two limited overs sides that can be knocked over by the minnows. And they are without a coach; a rudderless, misguided ship.

And now, the great white hope, the chance to re-enchant a disillusioned public, and still in many eyes the nation’s best player even at 34, is no more. All because he’s too hard to manage.

Surely, surely, you can find a way to accommodate 13,000 international runs.

At least give it a chance.

Maybe having an even more polarising figure in Piers Morgan as your verbal mouthpiece isn’t the best way to win back trust, but this is Kevin Pietersen. High maintenance, yes, but utterly, utterly brilliant at what he does – playing cricket. And being denied that chance one last time is quite possibly the biggest issue of them all.

The Crowd Says:

2015-05-14T07:32:36+00:00

JimmyB

Guest


Completely agree gentlemen. It's been quite amusing reading a good many Aussies work themselves into a lather all over KP and his banishment from the England team.

2015-05-14T07:17:09+00:00

Disco

Guest


He wouldn't have called him a 'c'. Learnt his lesson the hard way on that score...

2015-05-14T07:13:15+00:00

Disco

Guest


And his fielding? It would likely to have been ridiculed by those now suggesting the ECB has erred. I find all this new-found respect for Pietersen quite amusing.

2015-05-14T05:50:03+00:00

Damo

Guest


Ridiculous situation but KP is just at fault here as everyone else. Texting the opposition on how to get your teammates out as well as calling the captain an idiot is about as sacrilegious as it gets in cricket. Of course this was always going to come back to bite him the A. There's a reason that KP has problems with every first class team he's ever been in, from South Africa to County cricket to the National team. Karma was always going to bite back.

2015-05-14T03:19:24+00:00

ken oldman

Guest


James ,the most sensible line written by all the general cricket fans is the one written by you. Lehman would have sorted K.P. out if he was an Aussie...100% agree. ...

2015-05-14T00:27:23+00:00

Jameswm

Guest


They bring in a guy as Director of cricket who was playing only a few years ago, and has a history with some of the players? Smart. Lehman would have sorted KP out if he was an Aussie. "trust issues". Strauss was just looking for an excuse to keep KP out. Sort the trust issues out, because surely the side is stronger with KP in it.

2015-05-13T23:02:35+00:00

Sideline Comm.

Guest


Absolutely. Disagree wholeheartedly with this article. He's not the great player that he was, and a one off 300 in a second division English county team (as impressive as that is) is not the be all and end all. Pietersen was never going to save England from anything when the rest of the team don't want to have him there. It's a bloody circus and it's for the best that he has been shown the door permanently. I get as Australians we feel more inclined towards him now he's out of the England team, and we love presenting them as bad guys, but I don't see were all this KP love is coming from. He's made his own bed by being a tool, and now he has to sleep in it.

2015-05-13T19:26:52+00:00

Jarijari

Guest


This is a disgrace, idiotic, they shouldn't have Strauss making any decisions. If 355 not out isn't enough, what the bloody hell is?

2015-05-13T17:24:49+00:00

Frederick

Guest


His Test average was in decline for a long time before England got shot of him. Yesterday's man.

Read more at The Roar