Amateur cricketer in unique dismissal

By The Crowd / Roar Guru

An amateur cricketer from England is believed to be the first batsman to have been given out for handling a no-ball, British newspaper The Times reported on Wednesday.

Bryn Darbyshire, 35, was batting for Lymington in Hampshire, southern England when the bowler overstepped the crease and the umpire declared a no-ball.

In attempting a shot, Darbyshire only clipped the ball, but when he then picked it up and threw it to a fielder, the fielding team appealed and he was given out.

According to Law 33 of rule-making body the Marylebone Cricket Club’s (MCC) Laws of Cricket, Darbyshire should have asked a fielder for permission to handle the ball.

While a batsman cannot be bowled, caught or given leg before wicket on a no-ball, he can be dismissed for handling the ball, hitting the ball twice, obstructing the field or being run out.

Mark Williams, the MCC’s laws of cricket adviser, told The Times that it was possibly the first time that a player had fallen victim to clause 16 of Law 24 (No-ball).

“The law is there so that a batsman can’t touch the ball deliberately while the fielding team is trying to run him out,” Williams said. “The fielding team were perfectly justified in appealing.”

Darbyshire complained: “I don’t think the umpire did anything wrong, but I think it was bad sportsmanship on the part of our opponents.

“I had hit the same bowler for six off my second ball and was taking him apart. They probably wanted to see the back of me.”

Darbyshire’s side went on to lose the match by 58 runs.

The Crowd Says:

2015-05-21T03:30:30+00:00

Jameswm

Guest


If you were killing them Mr Batsman, why did you pick up the ball? Never give them a chance. Having said that, poor spirit. No one on the fielding team had the sense to say "Skipper, let's call him back".

2015-05-21T02:40:29+00:00

Pope Paul VII

Guest


Maybe they need to look at the spirit of this law? Clearly this one, much like the infamous Andy Hilditch/Sarfraz Nawaz one, was not a case of a batsman gaining anything and not a case of the fielding team earning it. But thems the law. Therefore: Surely a batsmann swiping with the bat, or kicking away, a live ball they've already had a stab at, that is now heading for the pegs, should be given out for interference?

2015-05-21T00:31:58+00:00

Johno

Guest


I am a cricket umpire and I have this happen to me on two occasions one was followed through with you get this often in grand finals.As batsman has no right to touch the ball

Read more at The Roar