Djokovic primed to seize immortality

By Bandy / Roar Guru

While journeyman, young guns, and everyone in between battle their way through the qualifying rounds of Roland Garros today, the focus and chatter around the grounds will rest firmly on the subject of Novak Djokovic.

The superhuman Serb has enjoyed the lion’s share of the spoils this year with a Grand Slam win in Australia and Masters 1000 wins in Indian Wells, Miami, Monte Carlo and Rome – and it’s still only May.

With clay court titles in Monte Carlo and Rome providing him with clinical wins over Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal, Djokovic has ensured the favourite tag rests solely on his shoulders as this year’s second grand slam gets underway.

It’s no secret that the Serb desires the Coupe des Mousquetaires more than any other silverware the game has to offer. Indeed there is little else missing from his illustrious trophy cabinet.

However, there’s been a little problem winning the men’s title for the last decade, a big problem actually, with big biceps. Rafael Nadal has romped to the title on nine occasions in the last decade, and Djokovic has been his victim in six of those campaigns.

Try as he might to fight fire with fire, Djokovic has not found a way to out-grind Nadal and deny him the spoils of Paris. Year after year the Serb has been cast as the likely successor and year after year Nadal has buried his hopes beneath the clay of Philippe-Chatrier.

Despite a decline in his domination of clay over the past four years, Nadal has managed to rise to the occasion when it matters most, as he has done throughout his career.

Since 2011 Djokovic has enjoyed a 13-7 record against his main rival, with five of those wins coming on clay in Masters 1000 tournaments, the big lead-up events to the grand slams.

It must have been awfully frustrating for Novak these past three years especially, looking across the net at a man who just doesn’t know when to quit, who gets knocked down again and again, only to pick himself up off the dirt and triumph on the biggest stage.

Nadal stumbles into Roland Garros this year without a European clay title to his name, the first time he will do so in a decade. He admits he is low on confidence and isn’t the player he once was. On top of that, his low ranking of seven will open the possibility of facing a ‘Big Four’ member as early as the quarter-finals.

All this means little, though, once the tournament gets underway. Nadal has made a career out of comebacks against doubters and you’d be brave to write him off before seeing his early round form.

If anything, this year’s woes of Nadal and feats of Djokovic only serve to heap more pressure on the Serb’s shoulders. A loss, especially to Nadal, would be crushing. Indeed anything but the title will be utter failure for the formidable number one.

But that’s how it should be for a man wanting tennis immortality. Triumph and disaster are two imposters that require the making of greatness, and Djokovic will be leaving no stone unturned on the eve of his history-making attempt.

However it pans out, this French Open has some mouth-watering stories brewing, and a grand headline it will read whoever takes home the title.

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2015-05-27T01:04:09+00:00

Bandy

Roar Guru


Interesting list Johnno. Don't be so quick to write of Sampras because he never won the French, the playing conditions were much more polarising in the 90s compared to today. Statistics of the big 4 are skewed in their favour slightly as they have less variation in conditions and playing styles to contend with. It does, in fact make Agassi look all the more remarkable given he did manage to win all 4. 9 of Rafa's 14 slams have come on clay and he has benefited more than anyone from slow, bouncy modern conditions. Not many tennis pundits would bet Rafa would have had a shot on quick grass from 2003 and earlier.

2015-05-24T23:55:27+00:00

clipper

Guest


My point exactly mastermind5991. I don't consider Sampras in the same class as Federer or Nadal as he had a significant flaw of not being able to handle clay, when there wasn't one dominant clay court player.

2015-05-22T10:59:05+00:00

Avatar

Roar Guru


Good question. I'm more into the Tests, especially the Ashes, but one-day and T20 can be exciting.

2015-05-22T09:39:39+00:00

Johnno

Guest


Funny Agassi won all 4 slams on the different surfaces but very few fans thought Agassi was better than Sampras, but if Djokovic wins the French many will say he's better than Pete. I think Novak is the fittest player I ever seen most endurance and that includes Nadal, Novak is the real deal. Take out clay I reckon he's better than Nadal on grass/hardcourt, and that includes Rafa in his prime.

2015-05-22T09:37:23+00:00

Johnno

Guest


mastermind I had a look on your resume and you cover cricket occasionaly, are you into what form of cricket the most, T20/ODI/Tests, or just one format and don't like the others, I'm trying to work out what type of cricket fan you are.

2015-05-22T06:22:28+00:00

Avatar

Roar Guru


Sampras never reached a French Open final, his best result was a semi-final in 1996.

2015-05-22T02:03:40+00:00

clipper

Guest


How many FO finals did Sampras make? He didn't even have to contend with the greatest clay courter of all time. I would swap the first two at present, but may change. Lendl and Becker perhaps higher, but not a bad top 10.

2015-05-21T16:00:14+00:00

Johnno

Guest


Best players ever 1985-2015 1)Nadal 2)Fed 3)Sampras 4)Novak . If Novak can win the French I reckon he can overtake,Sampras. Sampras only had Agassi on his tail,and Courier,Novak has had Fed/Nadal to deal with. This Big 4 thing annoys me, I think it's Big 3, Murray hasn't proven to be consistently in this Big 3 class in his generation. 5)Agassi 6)Edberg 7)Mats 8)Boris Becker 9)Lendl 10)Andy Murray

2015-05-20T21:54:41+00:00

Eden

Guest


Joker actually has a real chance to do the calendar slam if he wins Roland garros. With nadal burnt out and federer too old he doesn't have too many roadblocks.

Read more at The Roar