SPIRO: England's Twickers stink travels across to France

By Spiro Zavos / Expert

Sir Clive Woodward calls the Twickenham crowd “England’s 16th player”. One of the reasons, up until now, that many of the experts are predicting an England triumph in the 2015 Rugby World Cup is because Twickenham is a fortress for the home side.

The purpose-built stadium is gladiatorial in design and atmosphere. The crowd is replete with Essex man types who behave like verbal bullyboys towards the opposition and to any referee.

Swelling choruses of “Swing low, sweet char-iiiot…” resound around the ground when England march forward with their smash-through method of achieving victory.

The pitch is generally on the slow side, with longish grass and a slightly muddy surface, all designed to help England’s methodical, slow-plod, set piece-obsessed game.

Officials running the ground and the television coverage have been known to help the home side with cunning replays and, as happened to the Wallabies some years ago, the apparent ‘unexplained’ loss of video footage that would have led to the disallowance of a winning England try.

It will be interesting to see if the World Rugby committee running the World Cup will be able to encourage the officials in charge of the Twickenham operation to be less partisan in their approach and methods than in the past.

Will a fast pitch be prepared at Twickenham to encourage the more free-wheeling, faster game played by England’s rivals, Fiji, Wales and Australia, in what The Guardian is calling “the lake of death”?

And will Twickenham officials recognise that England is not the ‘home’ side in England’s Rugby World Cup. Officially, the home side, even for matches at Twickenham, is discovered through the toss of a coin.

This means, in effect, that the Wallabies could be playing out of England’s traditional dressing room at their Twickenham match.

It means, too, that the ARU chairman Michael Hawker and CEO Bill Pulver will have to be vigilant in protecting the interests of the Wallabies against the inevitable try-ons World Rugby and the RFU (England’s Rugby Football Union) will subject the Wallabies to throughout the tournament.

There is one other disadvantage playing at Twickenham, which fortunately (or unfortunately, more accurately) applies to both sides. The 534-hectare Mogden Sewage Treatment Works, the second largest in England, is quite near the ground. The stink from the works is overpowering, apparently.

Recently, despite the fact that $300 million has been spent on an upgrade, the stench which has been eye-watering in the past has reached record levels of obnoxiousness.

Whether to play with or against the wind takes on a whole new meaning from this news.

Two weeks ago, England defeated France at Twickenham 19-14. Perhaps the England players are becoming conditioned to the wafting odours, in the manner of an ‘ill wind that blows no good’.

Whatever, when France got their chance to play England last week at Paris, they were a totally different team. Their forwards, particularly, monstered the England pack in the scrums, lineouts and in the ruck and mauls.

The England backs made no headway against a tough French defensive line. By contrast, France made a number of incisive breaks created through the deft play of Frédéric Michalak (I know this is hard to believe).

Johnny May, usually a dynamic winger who torched Conrad Smith two years ago at Twickenham, ran 9 metres in 63 minutes at Paris. In 17 minutes, his replacement Danny Cipriani ran 38 metres.

The England pack plodded even more slowly than usual. They were penalised frequently (and correctly) for illegal play at the ruck and maul. Dan Cole was an inveterate offender and why he wasn’t given a yellow card (he was warned) is probably due to the fact that, in theory at least, this was a so-called friendly Test.

South African Jaco Peyper is not my favourite referee but he was excellent in all facets of the game. He was accurate in his decisions and when France or England (in over-time) tried to play attacking rugby, they were able to use quick ball against a defensive line that was kept on-side.

It will be interesting to see if the Rugby World Cup officials give Peyper one of England’s matches to referee.

“It is not a time to panic,” Sir Clive Woodward told The Daily Mail. But he outlined a number of actions that England’s coach Stuart Lancaster has to do to get his team on track for the World Cup.

Is it me? A number of these must-dos smack of panic, in my opinion.

1. Announce England’s 31-man squad immediately
Sir Clive’s argument here is that the players are becoming anxious about whether they will make the cut, or not. This is affecting them personally and, therefore, their performances.

But if Lancaster does this now what happens if one of the selected players (say Danny Cipriani who came on at Paris and was England’s best back) has a shocker?

2. Double-check the fitness regime
“England were flat, heavy-footed and fatigued and had the look of a team that had been overdoing it in training,” Sir Clive notes.

Because they were slow around the field, England gave away a number of penalties at the rucks. Overweight, hefty England No.8 Billy Vunipola conceded four penalties all by himself.

I agree with Sir Clive on this point. England looked like a team that had been training too hard to build up muscle and power and had overlooked their pace and skills training.

Incidentally, this is something that Michael Cheika might note. There are media claims that he intends to split his Wallabies squad into two sides that will tear into each other at training before the USA match, late next week.

I have never been able to understand why rugby players who have been training for months need to be flogged with more hard training towards the end of their season. The All Blacks, who tend to be smarter now in these matters than they were in 2007, have given their players plenty of time off this time around to recuperate following on from Super Rugby and the Rugby Championship.

Sir Clive has the same approach, as it happens. He has warned Lancaster from having a “full-scale internal practice match, which I have seen reported”.

3. Get that mighty scrum working again
Sir Clive makes the valid point that “packs win World Cups”. He advises the England pack to go away and “get things sorted out”. They conceded too many points from collapsed scrums. They also lost four of their 13 lineout throws.

France scored 18 points from a possible 21 from penalties. France conceded only three kickable penalties, with England converting two of them.

4. Lack of pace in back row
England’s problem with the lack of pace in their back row is that their captain, Chris Robshaw, is also their No.7, their openside flanker. In any other country, in my opinion, Robshaw would be a No.6, the blindside flanker.

Sir Clive makes the point that England’s two major opponents in their pool – Wales and Australia – are “running gifted opensides in their back rows”.

Without offering much insight into the problem of England’s lack of pace in their pack, Sir Clive suggests, “England simply must find ways of being more competitive in this area”.

5. No.10 must run the show
George Ford, a standout for England last year at No.10, simply was innocuous and ineffective at Paris. Should Lancaster stay with him? Or should Owen Farrell come back into consideration? Or should England emulate France, with the revival of Michalak, and bring back Cipriani?

These are not the sort of questions that should still be unanswered only weeks before the World Cup begins.

6. More clarity of thought
“Clarity” was a key word used by Graham Henry in preparing the All Blacks to win the 2011 Rugby World Cup. Clarity comes when a huge amount of information has been burnt down into an essential few truths. Every part of the World Cup operation, including the selection of players and the roles each player is expected to play, needs this clarifying process.

Sir Clive points out that Lancaster has suggested his best centre combination is Jonathan Joseph and Brad Barritt. But they have never played together in a Test. “That’s extraordinary,” Sir Clive claims.

7. Up the intensity against Ireland
Sir Clive reckons that Lancaster should tell everyone (including his players) that England must defeat Ireland at Twickenham at the weekend or “the chances of us winning the World Cup are zero”.

And in a reference Fortress Twickenham: “England need to set the tone with their performance and the crowd needs to be animated because they remain England’s 16th man. Home advantage can cover up a few crack in World Cups, witness New Zealand’s victory in 2011.”

What England are looking for, presumably, is another case of ‘fair sets the wind for England!’

Last week I suggested that Greg Martin’s call that Fiji and the Wallabies would emerge the winners from the pool of death as a “silly” prediction.

Martin has now been supported by the legendary George Smith, who was unimpressed with England at Paris and impressed with Fiji’s coach John McKee, who has coached in Sydney.

I have now upgraded the Martin/Smith call to first class status and will now refer to it as a “fearless prediction”.

The Crowd Says:

2015-08-28T11:25:25+00:00

Birdy

Guest


Excellent, Jibba Jabba. As a pom my biggest dream is that the Wallabies stroll out at Twickenham with the same arrogance and certainty that they strolled out in Marseilles in 2007. Now, which one of them is going to repeat the Lote Tuquri wink to camera?

2015-08-28T02:37:41+00:00

Jibba Jabba

Guest


And now i have seen the England team selection even more so :) Good luck

2015-08-28T02:21:33+00:00

Hertryk

Guest


Lets all just get a drink and toast.... May the best team win... nuff said :)

2015-08-28T02:06:00+00:00

Hertryk

Guest


Come on Wallabies, come on Boks, come on NZ, come on anyone, except England! Hear! Hear!

2015-08-27T22:32:34+00:00

JimmyB

Guest


Wilful ignorance.

2015-08-27T15:36:41+00:00

Degsy

Guest


yaaaaaaaawwwwwn

2015-08-27T13:20:01+00:00

Birdy

Guest


Oh, he's been there a lot, JimmyB. So if it isn't ignorance it must be..............

2015-08-27T13:14:53+00:00

Birdy

Guest


You seem to be pulling a lot of different things together, here, Kirko which is beginning to create some doubts in me about you, mate. TV replays seems to show that Brown's foot had touched the line and it should have been a lineout. The assistant ref missed it. It happens. There was no interruption in the game which continued with Brown trucking it up. Therefore, the first opportunity to show a replay would have been much later after far too many phases had elapsed for the TMO to do anything about it even if he had wanted to. It wasn't some conspiracy against you poor Aussies. Instead of just saying that your 'English mates' couldn't believe what was coming out of the loudspeaker could you provide some evidence of your initial claim that the stadium announcers were encouraging England fans to boo when Australia were kicking and be quiet when England were? I'm afraid I still don't believe you. Your 'cricket ball' point is beyond pathetic. How is it an intrinsic advantage to England that the Duke swings more? I can see the bowlers being happy but why the batsman? You'll also find, I bet, that a great many more nations will use the Duke once the Kookaburra contracts run out because it produces better cricket.

2015-08-27T12:50:40+00:00

JimmyB

Guest


Dear god man, go and see someone.

2015-08-27T08:05:55+00:00

Kirko

Guest


it happened the same game in 2013 where they refused to show a replay of the kick of Cooper's that "didn't find touch" when Australia should have had a line out on England 5 meter, when instead Brown caught the ball (in touch) & England went 95 meters to score. I was there, heard it & turned to my English mates that I was with who had stunned expressions on their faces - they are rugby boys & were shocked by what was coming out of the speakers at the ground. This is the country that uses a different cricket ball to the rest of the world because it swings more...

2015-08-27T05:27:49+00:00

Neil Back

Guest


I'm absolutely positive they see it exactly as you do. Absolutely positive.

2015-08-27T04:44:45+00:00

JimmyB

Guest


The funny thing is that the way he writes makes you wonder if he's ever been there at all.

2015-08-27T04:39:50+00:00

JimmyB

Guest


Cheers Buk, you seem like a reasonable fella so like Birdy, I'm happy to agree to disagree.

2015-08-27T04:35:32+00:00

Birdy

Guest


Squad being named today, Dan.

2015-08-27T04:33:19+00:00

Birdy

Guest


Sorry, Clarko, hit send by accident and it won't let me edit. Just to finish; England were stopped at the advantage line. But, again, I think this was more a combination of attitude and tiredness. Those same players haven't struggled to get over the advantage line against that same French team before. To sum-up. Terrible English performance, but suspect that's as far from the English performance you'll see come the Fiji match as possible. Quite glad there's a bit of writing England off as 'nothing to worry about' from Aussies. It's beginning to feel like 1995, 2007 and the run-up to the Ashes.

2015-08-27T04:26:36+00:00

Birdy

Guest


It was a dreadful performance, Clarko, but a few mitigating points. 1. That was the first game of rugby of any sort that 14 of the England team had played for 4 months. 2. They've been beasting themselves in fitness training and looked heavy-legged and knackered. 3. The attitude of the players suggested this was a bigger game for France than England. However, there are things to worry about as an England fan: 1. The lineout. England had the best lineout, statistically, in the world in the last international year. But, that was with Hartley throwing in. His absence looms large. 2. The scrum. The French are always big scrummagers, and the pitch was a disgrace for an international game, but the scrum did come under pressure. I'm less worried about this than the lineout as I think it will be OK by the RWC. 3. Getting over the gainline England

2015-08-27T04:20:15+00:00

Birdy

Guest


We've all got our prejudices, Buk, and write things we re-read and think to ourselves, 'I probably don't believe that but I lost my temper a bit or fancy winding someone up'. However, I'd like to think that if I was a professional journalist that has time to draft, re-draft and consider my articles before publication, I'd be able to cut out the childish, repetitive click bait and write something new, fresh and interesting. Particularly as we are only a few days away from an eagerly anticipated RWC.

2015-08-27T03:35:28+00:00

dan in devon

Guest


Sir Clive said the team should be named because England have no further matches between now and the deadline date (Cipriani will not be able to have a shocker before the deadline). He now wants England to focus on rugby rather than selection issues.

2015-08-27T00:40:08+00:00

ohtani's jacket

Guest


England vs. Australia is looming as a cash of two teams that aren't properly prepared.

2015-08-27T00:24:04+00:00

Steve

Guest


Poms as usual will either be very good and hard to beat, or mostly useless so take your pick?? Top eight in all pools except pool A are easy, semi finals will be very interesting games.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar