Comparing the Lions, Cats and Hawks - who's the best?

By Jamie Radford / Roar Pro

Hawthorn’s 46-point demolition of West Coast in Saturday’s grand final gave them their third premiership in as many years, joining Brisbane as the only two sides to have achieved the feat this century.

Between the Lion’s third premiership in 2003 and Hawthorn’s first in 2013, Geelong also won three premierships. Although theirs were not consecutive, taking five seasons to complete between their first in 2007, and most recent in 2011.

During those years the Cats also lost another grand final in 2008, while both Hawthorn and Brisbane were defeated in grand finals prior to and after their respective hat-tricks.

Given the similarities between the success of the three sides and how comparatively recent that success was, it is only natural that comparisons between them will be made, and the inevitable question of who is the best will be asked.

Comparing the three teams may be a fruitless exercise. One that will no doubt be the cause of many an argument over the coming years, as indisputable evidence is brought forth to back up or refute any given opinion. Particularly by supporters of the three teams involved.

Being a supporter of none of these teams and with equal admiration for them all, it is difficult to split the three as they all were, or in the case of Hawthorn are, magnificent sides.

Games records
Total points scored by the three over their most successful five consecutive seasons shows just how close they are. Between 2000 and 2004 Brisbane scored 14,058 points, while Geelong amassed 14,217 from 2007 to 2011, and Hawthorn 14,054 from 2011 to 2015.

Over each club’s respective five-year period they each played 110 home-and-away games. Brisbane won 76 of theirs, giving them a winning percentage of 69 per cent. Geelong won 93 at 84.5 per cent, and Hawthorn 87 at 79 per cent.

Both Brisbane and Geelong have a win rate of 80 per cent in finals, winning 12 of their 15 post-season appearances, while Hawthorn have played 16, for 12 wins at 75 per cent.

This gives Brisbane a total winning percentage of 70.4 per cent from 125 games, Geelong 84 per cent from the same amount of appearances, and Hawthorn 78.5 per cent from 126 matches.

Depending on how much emphasis one places on the home-and-away season, it could easily be argued the Geelong has by far the best overall record, so therefore is the superior side.

However there would be few neutral supporters who could recall who won the minor premiership in any given year. Team success in the AFL is ultimately gained by how far any team progresses in September.

Many consider the home-and-away season just a prelude to finals, and in terms of post-season success very little separates the three sides.

They have all won 12 finals – albeit the Hawks from one more appearance. Geelong and Hawthorn also both made it through to preliminary finals in the one season they did not play in a grand final, while Brisbane lost a semi-final in the only year they did not make it to last Saturday in September.

Key statistics
From a statistical perspective Geelong are the best performed side, ranking in the top three in each of the key statistical areas over their five seasons. The Cats were ranked first in handballs, disposals, contested possessions and disposal efficiency. Second in kicks and clearances, and third in tackles and marks.

Brisbane were ranked in the top three of all but one category over their five-year period. The Lions were ranked first in handballs, disposals, contested possession and clearances, second in kicks and third in marks and tackles.

Over the last five years Hawthorn has only been ranked first in two categories – total disposals and disposal efficiency. The Hawks have been ranked first in efficiency in four campaigns of their five-season period, and second in the other, however they ranked poorly compared to the other two sides in contested possession, clearances and tackles.

While any comparison cannot be made on statistics alone, they do provide somewhat of a guide to each side’s strengths and weaknesses. A cursory glance suggests both Brisbane and Geelong relied heavily on contested possession and winning clearances, while Hawthorn’s greatest strength is their efficiency with the ball.

Individual player honours
Given the three sides’ dominance in each of their respective periods of success, it is to be expected that a number of players within each side would earn individual honours.

Between them the Lions, Cats and Hawks have had 58 players selected in All-Australian sides during their respective five-year periods. Geelong is the most represented with 28, followed by Brisbane 17 and Hawthorn 13.

Gary Ablett Jr, Corey Enright and Matthew Scarlett from Geelong, and Brisbane’s Nigel Lappin were each selected four times, while another five players made the All-Australian side three times. Three of those came from Brisbane, and one each from Geelong and Hawthorn.

Both Brisbane and Geelong had two Brownlow Medallists each. For the Lions, Jason Akermanis won in 2001, with Simon Black emulating him the following year. Geelong’s Jimmy Bartel and Gary Ablett Jr took the award home in 2007 and 2009 respectively.

Overall Geelong polled 511 Brownlow votes over their five seasons. Brisbane were next with 461, just ahead of Hawthorn with 460.

Gary Ablett Jr was also named the AFL Players’ Association MVP three times in 2007, 2008 and 2009. Brisbane Captain Michael Voss won the award in 2002 and 2003.

Although not producing either a Brownlow Medallist or AFLPA MVP over the last five years, Hawthorn are the only side of the three to have a Coleman Medallist – and have done so twice. Lance Franklin in 2011 and Jarryd Roughead in 2013.

The Hawks have also had three Norm Smith Medallists. Brian Lake in 2013, Luke Hodge 2014, and Cyril Rioli this year. As do Geelong with Steve Johnson winning in 2007, Jimmy Bartel in 2009, and Paul Chapman in 2011. Brisbane only had two medallists – Shaun Hart in 2001 and Simon Black in 2003.

Opposition
Ranking the opposition of each team is as conjectural as comparing the three to each other, and would probably cause just as much debate. However looking at each side’s grand final opponents on paper, it could be argued the Lions won theirs against slightly lesser quality sides than Hawthorn and Geelong.

Brisbane defeated defending premiers Essendon in 2001, before consecutive wins against Collingwood in the 2002 and 2003 deciders. The following season they lost to Port Adelaide, and have only played in one finals series since – finishing sixth in 2009.

Geelong’s first premiership in 2007 was also against Port Adelaide. This was followed by a loss to Hawthorn in the 2008 grand final, and another premiership against St Kilda in 2009. In 2011 the Cats collected their third against Collingwood, who had beaten the Saints in 2010.

After narrowly losing to Collingwood in a preliminary final in 2011, Hawthorn were defeated by Sydney in the 2012 decider, before defeating Fremantle in 2013 to claim the first of their three premierships.

In 2013 they reversed the result of two years previously by easily defeating the Swans, followed by this season’s comfortable win over West Coast.

Brisbane’s first grand final win over Essendon was against quality opposition. The Bombers were defending premiers, and had easily been the best performed team over the three previous seasons. The loss to the Lions in the decider was only their fourth during that time.

Their next two premierships in 2002 and 2003 were against Collingwood sides that could legitimately be called solid at best. Although the side included some very good players such as Chris Tarrant, Alan Didak and Scott Burns, the only bonafide A-grader in the team was skipper Nathan Buckley.

The Lions’ fourth grand final appearance was a 40-point loss to Port Adelaide. After finishing in third place in 2001, the Power had finished the home-and-away season on top of the ladder in 2002, 2003 and 2004. This was to be Port Adelaide’s first, and so far only premiership.

The first of Geelong’s four premierships in 2007 was also against Port Adelaide, although the side was not of the same calibre as the 2004 premiers. After narrowly defeating Collingwood by five points in their preliminary final, the Cats went on to defeat Port by a record 119 points.

In 2008 Geelong went into the grand final as firm favourites against Hawthorn after winning all but one game during the season, only to go down by 26 points in front of the first 100,000-plus crowd since 1986.

On an aside (and because it involves two of the teams in discussion), this was the match that instigated the infamous ‘Kennett’s Curse’, named after former Victorian Premier and Hawthorn president at the time Jeff Kennett.

In the lead-up to the 2009 season Kennett publicly questioned Geelong’s ability to match it mentally with the Hawks.

“What they don’t have, I think, is the quality of some of our players; they don’t have the psychological drive we have,” he said.

“We’ve beaten Geelong when it matters.”

It is history now that the Geelong players made a pact to never be beaten by Hawthorn again, and lived up to it at least for a while, winning the next 11 meetings between the two sides. It was not until the 2013 preliminary final that the curse was finally lifted.

In 2009 Geelong appeared in their third consecutive grand final against St Kilda in what many consider to be one of the great grand finals of recent times. In a hard fought and skilful contest, Geelong won by 12 points.

The following year Geelong lost a preliminary final to Collingwood, who went on to defeat St Kilda in a replay after the first grand final ended in a draw.

In 2011, Geelong went into their fourth decider in five years against a Collingwood side that had finished on top of the home-and-away ladder after dropping only two games throughout the season – both to the Cats. After a tight first three quarters, Geelong kicked away in the last to win by 38 points.

After narrowly losing a preliminary final to Collingwood the previous year, Hawthorn went into the 2012 grand final as favourites against Sydney. However, just as the Hawks did to Geelong in 2008, the Swans won in a 10-point upset.

The following year Hawthorn finished the season on top of the ladder, and met third placed Fremantle in the grand final. It was the Dockers’ first appearance at the MCG in the final game of the season, and although they acquitted themselves well, they didn’t make the most of their opportunities, with the Hawks taking out the first of three consecutive premierships by 15 points.

The Hawks finished the 2014 season second behind Sydney on percentage, and the two went on to meet in the decider for the second time in three seasons. This time the Swans went into the game as favourites, but had unfortunately saved their worst game of the year for the grand final, and were soundly beaten by 63 points.

After being touted as almost unbeatable at times throughout 2015, and written off to a degree at others, Hawthorn cemented their place in football history with a comfortable 46-point victory over West Coast, to claim their third consecutive flag.

As was mentioned above, of the three sides Brisbane arguably had the easiest opposition. While both Essendon and Port were very good teams, the Collingwood sides of 2002 and 2003 was not of the same quality as the 2010-2011 Magpies.

Geelong’s first win against Port Adelaide was by a record margin, and although the side contained some great players, the majority of those were either in their final years or just starting out.

Although Hawthorn won the 2014 grand final easily, it was against a very good side that just happened to have a very poor day. However, their win this season was against a young and up-and-coming team in West Coast, who appeared overawed by the occasion, unable to compete equally with such a seasoned side.

Verdict
Despite being the only one of the sides not to win their three premierships in succession, at least on paper the Cats come out on top.

Although the three sides’ finals records cannot be split, Geelong’s overall win rate of 84 per cent over their five seasons is far better than that of either Hawthorn (78.5%), or Brisbane (70.4%).

The Cats had the best of both the Lions and Hawks in the key statistical areas, while also having the most All-Australian representatives with 28, compared to 17 for the Lions, and 13 for the Hawks.

Geelong also polled the most Brownlow votes, collecting 511 over their five seasons, 50 more than Brisbane who claimed 461, while Hawthorn had 460.

Arguments about the quality of each team’s respective opposition will always be made. However going by the conclusions drawn above, the teams the Cats faced from 2007 to 2011 were at least the equal of, if not better than that of the Lions or Hawks in their successful eras.

While it is impossible to truly compare the three given there are so many variables involved, speculation on which side is the best will continue for some time. Unless of course Hawthorn win the next one or two premierships to firmly settle the debate once and for all.

The Crowd Says:

2017-04-20T23:49:06+00:00

GA O'SLOANES

Guest


Great write up Jammie. Would love to know how Collingwood's 3 Premierships this century compares to Brisbane, Geelong & Hawthorn's below? Oh wait.

2015-10-12T01:00:21+00:00

DeanM

Guest


If the comparison is only made over each teams best 5 year period than potentially the Hawks still have 2 more years to improve on it. It's a bit selective to only recognise 6 players remaining from the 08 Premeirship when you were looking at the Hawks window been from 2011-2015. I'm sure there were still plenty more than 6 players that overlapped the 08 Premiership and 2011-2013. Hawks have also beaten teams with an overall better win loss record and percentage in their Grand Final wins compared with Brisbane.

2015-10-11T23:52:13+00:00

andyl12

Guest


There were four other '08 players who were part of our 2013 flag, and the backbone of all four premiership teams was the same. Understand that you limited your analysis to five years but my point is that you shouldn't have, since the best sides are at the top for longer than that. Saying '08 is irrelevant due to player changes is like saying Geelong's 2011 flag is irrelevant because they changed coach, changed captain and changed their game plan that year.

AUTHOR

2015-10-11T22:59:53+00:00

Jamie Radford

Roar Pro


Only 6 players from the 08 side are still playing, so it is a different side, and why the comparison was made over consecutive 5 year periods. I had no preconceptions or cared about who was best going into it.

2015-10-11T21:41:34+00:00

andyl12

Guest


The simple fact is, four premierships is more than three and therefore better than three. If anyone's going to try and use roundabout theories to prove that three is better than four, then we may as well also start arguing that two, one or zero are also better than four.

2015-10-11T21:40:10+00:00

andyl12

Guest


"Hawks only had to beat interstate witches hats while the Cats atleast had to be beat 2 strong Victorian teams on the day….." Oh Mark, I'm so sorry that no Victorian team other than Hawthorn was good enough to qualify for the Grand Final the last three years. I'm so sorry that other club's failures left us in a position where we had to win our three straight premierships against non-Victorian sides who are so clearly out of their depth playing on the MCG. I guess we just accept that our threepeat means nothing because we were by far and away the best Victorian team for three years running.

AUTHOR

2015-10-11T12:13:12+00:00

Jamie Radford

Roar Pro


"Being a supporter of none of these teams and with equal admiration for them all, it is difficult to split the three as they all were, or in the case of Hawthorn are, magnificent sides."

2015-10-11T10:58:01+00:00

DeanM

Guest


Lions had access to all of QLD, NT and heaps of zones in Victoria. Along with the merger that was proven to be extremely beneficial, extra roster spots, salary cap. Demetriou intended to purchase a GF for the Lions I doubt he intended to create the monster he did. Here another scenario for you to help you understand as this is what the Demetriou Lions got. The Hawks finished 3rd in 2011, let's assume they had first pick of extensive zones and entire States on the cheap for A few years prior to that 2011 prelim final loss. In the off season the Hawks merge with the bottom team on the ladder. The merger allows them to pick over the bones of the bottom team and take who they want, trade who they want and gain an additional 8 roster spots. Then throw in the extra salary cap and possibly a marque player allowance. What then do you have? Hawks winning every year from 2012-2017 perhaps. Wouldn't that be a joke.

2015-10-11T10:50:31+00:00

DeanM

Guest


If Hawks took that opportunity it would be equally tainted if it resulted in the same outcome, along with extensive draft and an open cheque book. Hawks didn't and the rest is history. History say the Hawks have won the most Premierships since the time they entered the VFL, History shows the Hawks have won the most AFL premierships. History also showed the Hawks belted the Eagles last weekend, beyond any doubt of who was the better team on the day regardless of where it was played. Would you like the Eagles to merge with another team and change their name, colours?? Don't worry it will never be a possibility they are lucky enough to enjoy perpetual wealth regardless of ladder position and they don't compete with 9 other teams in their state.

2015-10-11T10:40:57+00:00

DeanM

Guest


Your not adding context, your adding a touch of Don Freo class sour grapes. Eagles got smoked beyond home ground advantage just as the Hawks got theirs in the QF. Home ground did not create that result. Hawks played 3 games a domain for 2 wins and 1 loss. Hawks wouldn't blame the venue for getting outclassed easily. Maybe you would have an argument if it was a few goals. Refer my formula in comments above its rock solid.

2015-10-11T10:30:01+00:00

DeanM

Guest


Hawks had massive injuries especially in 2009 and again slightly less so in 2010. Hawks problem then was they didn't have depth in their squad to win games consistently with up to 10 first am choice players out. Also their game plan was figured out after snatching an early GF in 2008 against a team that had a better season than any of the teams in this comparison. Hawks 4 the others 3.

2015-10-11T10:25:37+00:00

DeanM

Guest


You do realise this past season was the first time the Hawks played Gold Coast twice as they were expected to be a higher ranked team. In the period you have mentioned the Hawks have never played GWS, Melbourne or any team expected to be at or near the bottom twice in a season. Different scenario for the northern based teams if they are a top team they are fixtures to have a middle of the run draw (swans 2013)

2015-10-11T10:20:58+00:00

DeanM

Guest


Difference is the Hawks don't blame a 32 point loss on the home ground advantage. The Hawks except that the Eagles were excellent and they were a bit off. I have come up with a formula for you. Hawks won 1 game against Eagles at Domain this year by 14 points from memory and lost 1 by 32 points. Let's just say the Eagles were a little off 1 night and the Hawks the same in the QF. 32 - 14 equals 18. So home ground advantage is worth 3 goals. I will give the Eagles 1 extra goal as you have sand in your vagiina. 46 - 24 equals 22. So Eagles lost the Grand final fair and square by 22 points. I'm glad we have now resolved the home ground issue.

2015-10-11T10:11:31+00:00

DeanM

Guest


Burgoyne injured assumed past his best, Hale unwanted by North Melbourne playing VFL, Lake unwanted from Bulldogs, injuries, Old, poor form and attitude. Lions given first pick at all talent in QLD, NT and plenty of zones in Victoria. AFL funded success.

2015-10-11T10:06:06+00:00

DeanM

Guest


Wow.......... How about you Look at who they gained for free( afl built team called Demetriou Lions). Hawks have lost 5 players now and counting through free agency and only gained 1. Franklin was 1 loss for the Hawks worth more than all the players you mentioned combined. Wow the lions beat a team that went all but 1 game undefeated the previous season..... Wow. Hawks beat Geelong in the very same season they went all but 1 game undefeated. Hawks 4 vs Demetriou Lions 3 Clear cut. Water is wet, the sun is hot and the AFL purchased success for the merger lions.

2015-10-11T09:09:54+00:00

WhereIsGene

Guest


Only one statistic matters in this sport - PREMIERSHIPS WON. The rest is fluff people talk about to keep themselves entertained, but it will all be forgotten 20 years from now and only the premierships will be remembered. Hawthorn 4, including a 3 peat. Geelong 3, couldn't even score back to backs. Hawthorn by so far it isn't even funny. Only a one-eyed Geelong supporter would possibly think otherwise.

2015-10-11T09:01:50+00:00

Wayne

Guest


Wow - don't let history stand in the way- Brisbane drafted players who either refused to turn up (Jarman), moaned and went home (Headland) or stayed the bare minimum (Fvckley) - and a player has to move wholeass bowlass to Brisbane - not just hop across the Yarra as they can in Melbourne - its also a non-afl state so the same outside of club opportunities don't exist - During their AFL assisted COLA years they still had players like Hilton and O'Bree who were their first round picks on other clubs lists - Essendon had a chance to father-son Brown and didn't - He was a ruck/forward in juniors and developed into a forward at Brisbane. Molloy and Michael were swapped - 1st wrong assumption. Pike was delisted by North - 2nd wrong assumption. In 1999 the Lions would have won but for a Voss injury meaning he missed the prelim and Black being hatcheted by Martin (which he got away with) and Keating being hatcheted by McCartney (which he didn't). The Lions had access to QLD talent - same as WCE had access to WA talent - if you think that either WCE or Brisbane concessions matched GWS then you are on the special sauce And the hawks have benefitted very richly from the money it cost Brisbane, Freo and WCE to join the comp

2015-10-11T07:46:27+00:00

Wayne

Guest


AFL changed the home finals rules after Brisbane were clearly disadvantaged - trades to Hawks - Burgoyne, Hale, Lake

2015-10-11T07:44:49+00:00

Wayne

Guest


Brisbane lost at least two players every year - they lost #1 draft picks with alarming regularity - Rory Hilton, Des Headland, Shae O'Bree anyone. They also beat the Essendon side that were one game off undefeated the year before

2015-10-10T05:00:26+00:00

DeanM

Guest


So is making up stories about Hawks success with Free agency classy when you know otherwise? Is blaming 10 goal loses and what could of easily been a 12 goal loss for the Eagles been humble. Best you refer to the Dictionary.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar