Peter Handscomb should be in the Australian limited-overs squad

By Brett McKay / Expert

If you’ve ever liked the look of a young player, and watched their game develop over time to the point where, as far as you’re concerned, they’re the single best player on the face of the earth, then you might find parts of this column ring very familiar.

For me, the player in question is 24-year-old Victorian batsman-wicketkeeper Peter Handscomb.

And I had a bit of a moment the other night during the second leg of the Big Bash League Melbourne Derby, when halfway through yet another tweet espousing the clear and obvious brilliance of this kid, I realised that just maybe it was possible to go on about someone too much.

I’d already earlier in the game mentioned how well I thought he was keeping. I may have even remastered John Lennon’s famous line about Ringo Starr, and suggested that Matthew Wade wasn’t even the best keeper in Victoria, let alone Australia.

And Handscomb had kept very well; it wasn’t at all undeserved praise. He took two really good quality catches – the first one a full-length dive to his right, to catch Tom Cooper with one hand, in front of David Hussey at a very wide, almost second slip position – and his glovework throughout the game was really tidy.

But it goes back earlier this summer than that even. Tasmanian keeper Tom Triffitt played in the Melbourne Stars’ third game of the tournament, their five-wicket win over the Sydney Sixers at the SCG just after Christmas, and with Kevin Pietersen flying back home for Christmas and the birth of his second child, Handscomb played as a batsman.

It was out of necessity, but to me the Stars looked unbalanced and a bowler short, and I wrote only a few days later, “I can’t help but wonder if they might be shooting themselves in the foot by playing keeper Tom Triffitt, when perhaps they’d be better served by Handscomb keeping and picking another bowler?”

Triffitt was left out of the following game, the first Melbourne Derby, with Pietersen and all-rounder John Hastings returning and Handscomb resuming with the gloves. Indeed, he hasn’t played since and the Stars have now won three on the trot.

I reckon I first laid eyes on Handscomb four seasons ago. Quite probably in whatever the state one-day comp was called back then, but definitely in the BBL. With Wade in the Australian one-day set-up, Handscomb was the Stars’ second keeping option.

He didn’t do a whole lot with the bat – he didn’t have to bat a whole lot, with the Stars again one of the dominant sides in what was the second season of the BBL – but his keeping was really impressive.

Good, safe hands, and really tidy footwork. I remember thinking here was this young guy, not quite 21, with not a lot of state-level keeping experience, and he was easily as good a gloveman as his more fancied state teammate who was now regarded as the best white-ball keeper in the country.

He might have already surpassed Wade as a batsman back then, too, but then Wade’s batting – even if it was the main reason for his national selection – has always been a bit hit and miss.

Nevertheless, when discussion inevitably moved toward the naming of the first Australian one-day squad of the summer in recent weeks, there was healthy deliberation centering on who should be the wicket-keeper, with the natural assumption that whoever was selected would be in the box seat to go to the World Twenty20 in India in March and April.

Wade won the spot for the first three ODIs, starting this week. But how many of us are convinced he should be the gloveman for the T20 side, never mind whether he should go to India or not?

The form keeper-batsman of the BBL is probably Tim Paine, and it’s hard to disagree with Ronan O’Connell’s point on Monday that Paine should probably get the nod.

But if there’s been a weakness to Paine’s batting this summer, it’s been when facing the spinners. Paine has been undone by spin in four of his last five innings, and teams are now opening up with spin against Hobart, presumably for that very reason.

Wade’s tally hasn’t cracked 80 runs for the tournament in five innings as a top order bat, and you wouldn’t say he’s at home when facing the tweakers, either.

Handscomb, on the other hand, is one of the best young players of spin in the country.

This time last summer, when writing a magazine feature on Glenn Maxwell, I spoke to then-Victorian coach Greg Shipperd and mentioned that Maxwell, along with Steve Smith and Michael Clarke, was one of few players around the country who were prepared to use their feet properly to spin. Shipperd certainly agreed, and went on to liken Maxwell with Dean Jones, but very quickly got talking about another player.

“We’re blessed with two here in Victoria [who use their feet and the crease], ‘Maxy’ and the other one is Peter Handscomb,” Shipperd told me.

“Like Maxwell, Handscomb has the ability of playing that balanced game where he’s thinking offside, on-side, staying in his crease, moving down the wicket; he’s got all of those options at his disposal, and it’s just about the application of those options.

“Whereas guys like Cameron White and David Hussey will use width on their crease and their shot selection to play the shot that’s needed, Handscomb will come miles down the wicket. He’s a freak, he’s a wonderful player of spin.”

That’s certainly been on show in the BBL this summer, but his shot selection and ability to find gaps, in general, has been from the top draw. Pietersen got all the plaudits for the run chase in the second derby on Saturday night, but Handscomb being able to come in two wickets down and get himself ‘in’ so quickly allowed Pietersen to put the foot down in the 13th over and turn what might have been a tight chase into a pretty comfortable one.

And I’d say it’s worth nothing the praise Pietersen heaped on Handscomb, but the reality is ‘KP’ thinks all his Stars teammates should be in the Australian squad.

The big thing for me is that of all the keeper-batsmen or batting-keepers getting around in the BBL, none of them have the ability to really bat well down the order.

Paine’s been opening, so has Tim Ludemann, Jimmy Peirson and Ben Dunk (who hasn’t been keeping). Wade is the incumbent Twenty20 keeper, but he’s been largely ineffective batting down the order for Australia. Handscomb hasn’t batted above number four this season for the Stars.

We know spin is going to be a major factor for the WT20 in India, so surely it would make sense to pick the players best equipped to deal with what’s likely to be served up? What do they say about doing the same thing repeatedly and expecting different results?

Anyway, I’ve said enough about Handscomb over time. Watch him yourself and see what I’ve been going on about. Hopefully, the Australian selectors are seeing it too.

The Crowd Says:

2016-01-13T10:06:50+00:00

Craig Swanson

Guest


Spot on about Paine's weakness against spin. T20 world cup is played in India so that leaves Tim out for mine. Pete Handscomb is a very impressive batsman, in particular against spin. But is his keeping up to international standard? Paine's certainly is. Pity Sam Whiteman has been injured. He would have been on my short list.

2016-01-13T09:38:18+00:00

Jake

Guest


Quit commenting with the big boys about the adult stuff, champ. Never kept, haha.

2016-01-13T09:06:03+00:00

Armchair Expert

Guest


AB De Villiers.

2016-01-12T23:26:14+00:00

SLIM

Guest


C'mon, Gilly batted 7 in tests, Flower was playing for Zim as a pure batsman and AB complained of too much a workload as a batsman/keeper in the top 6. Facts are all blurred boys,,,smarten up! In a lifetime, maybe one comes along as a quality batsman/keeper in tests. In one dayers, maybe teams get away with this a lot more, also, Kalu from Sri Lanka was excellent too, but could not open and keep in tests. Even Jeff Dujon went to 7 when he took over with the gloves.

AUTHOR

2016-01-12T19:16:07+00:00

Brett McKay

Expert


Andy, you and Anwar and Andrew and Stephen and Amith should all meet up and learn about context together. Then you'll all know that I mentioned Maxwell and Clarke in relation to Handscomb, you know, the player this article is all about? There is still just no context in which you trolls can bring Khawaja into this discussion; there just isn't. Anyway, you'll all be able to save yourself trolling articles that don't mentioned Khawaja today, because he's been called into the Australian squad for the next two ODIs in place of Warner. I suspect that will get a mention somewhere..

AUTHOR

2016-01-12T19:10:30+00:00

Brett McKay

Expert


Mick, the metric we're using is Slim's "The only keeper/batsman in my lifetime I can remember that could do [bat and wicketkeep] at a high standard was Kumar Sanga", and which Slim below agrees Flower is another..

AUTHOR

2016-01-12T19:07:53+00:00

Brett McKay

Expert


Flower 'kept in 55 of his 63 Tests, taking 142 of his 151 Test catches and all nine stumpings! http://stats.espncricinfo.com/ci/engine/player/55427.html?class=1;filter=advanced;keeper=1;orderby=start;template=results;type=allround;view=match

2016-01-12T15:50:43+00:00

Jarijari

Guest


Gidday Brett, always interesting to here your calls. I like Tim Payne, but if he's not keeping all the time then it's to protect a badly broken finger that kept him out for so long. Timmy's an outstanding opener as well, one of our best one-day players. Ludemann's a good hitter, sound keeper, Handscomb goes alright, but are they better than Wade? Mate I'd like Payne, if he's he's fit, ahead of Ludemann. Tough call chief.

2016-01-12T15:08:39+00:00

Nova

Guest


Flower never kept in Tests.

2016-01-12T12:12:37+00:00

Andy

Guest


Brett you make mention of maxwell and Clarke in your article so it's ok to talk about other batsman, please don't try to bully others so they only talk about what you want

2016-01-12T10:28:05+00:00

Andy Hill

Roar Pro


As a Victorian, I would not be happy to see Handscomb take the gloves full time for our Shield team, in the fear of that being to the detriment of his batting form. He is in such a rich vein of form with the bat and, along with Stoinis, is really forming the backbone of a very solid batting line up. Having Stoinis at 3 and Handscomb at 4, and then Wade coming in at 7- what a bonus. I'd love to see Handcomb take Voges position in the test team at No. 5 sometime in the next year or so when Voges retires/ loses form. As for Wade- his keeping can't be that bad if he continues to get a gig for both Victoria in all forms and Australia in the short forms. I sometimes get the impression that he is picked on by arm-chair commentators because of his portrayal in the media as being arrogant and not the best "team man". Would be interested to hear from someone who actually knows the guy and/ or has watched his keeping up close and over a long period (someone like a selector- oh, hang on, we know their opinion because they keep picking him).

2016-01-12T08:45:20+00:00

bigmick01

Guest


"Andy Flower probably pips Sangakkara, too" Um, no. And it is not even close. Flower is a great player but Sanga is one of the top 5 cricketers in history. There is no comparison between the two. Pick any metric you want. Sanga 12000+ test runs at 57+. 200+ dismissals. Top 5 greatest cricketers ever.

2016-01-12T07:02:34+00:00

SLIM

Guest


Your right, Gilly, Flower, not sold on Dhoni at 6. I hope the likes of Handscomb are more of a 100-150 guy and not a Watson- 30-75 runs kind of guy, at this level. I hold onto the 3 Chappel, 4 Hughes, 5 Hookes and 6 Border at 6-system of the past, where an allrounder is often a jack of all trades, but master of none, then all of a sudden, you get a Stokes innings. Will Stokes get 5 ordinary scores now till he follows up with 45-65. M Marsh can't get out of the blocks too. In one dayers, I guess we can get away with it for 50 overs.

2016-01-12T06:51:00+00:00

bryan

Guest


I'm sure if you offered a Green cap and said, heres the gloves, every young player would jump at it. I imagine the Conversation would go: Peter, Junior here.... Do you know how to keep? Hey Mark, yes I do. Great mate, jump on a plane to Perth. Hey Mark.... Any chance you have Ian Healy or Adam Gilchrist phone numbers?

2016-01-12T06:50:03+00:00

bryan

Guest


Your point about Keepers opening is interesting... very rarely happens in tests, and although Marsh did open, Gilly pretty much changed the limited overs game that almost every Keeper now opens in limited overs and just has a slog. But if you look at the Aussie team with Finch, Warner, Smith, Lynn, there is no need for it, and a more "defensive" keeper might be needed.

2016-01-12T05:29:14+00:00

Anwar

Guest


I agree, get UTK in the side, the man is the most in form batsman in the country

AUTHOR

2016-01-12T04:34:46+00:00

Brett McKay

Expert


Stephen, I'll say the same thing I've said for years now. I am a big Usman Khawaja fan. But I am not so fanatical that I must mention him in every article I write on any subject. Furthermore, at no point have I ever suggested in any way that I don't rate him - this is a point that the Khawaja fans seem to have conveniently dreamt up. Additionally, I'd be more than happy to discuss Khawaja's claims to the limited overs side with Amith or you or anyone. But in the correct context. You tell me, in what context to a discussion on wicketkeepers, and specifically, a discussion on why I think Peter Handscomb should be that wicketkeeper, does Khawaja fit? This article is not that context, and if we're honest, bringing up an irrelevant point or person in a discussion that doesn't concern that person is the very definition of trolling, isn't it.

2016-01-12T04:07:30+00:00

Stephen

Guest


Brett for a few years now i have noticed that you are not a khawaja fan and simply just push his claims aside. I agree that Handscombe is a very good young player but rather then shut off people like Amith how about we just discuss facts with him. He has put up correct statistics on Khawaja and i also tend to lean towards getting him in the ODI side and potentially the T20 side, and not get so worked up because he refuses to just talk only about Handscombe. Its easy to see you don't like Khawaja, but don't just shove Amith away simply because he makes a good point on Khawaja and that is that he should be in the current ODI team

AUTHOR

2016-01-12T03:06:36+00:00

Brett McKay

Expert


Christo, you are not helping! And I stand by the Lennon reference to Ringo Wade's 'keeping!!

AUTHOR

2016-01-12T03:05:06+00:00

Brett McKay

Expert


Amith, I will indeed correct you. It would be perfectly normal to bring up Khawaja in a discussion about wicketkeeping options, if Khawaja was a wicketkeeper. But he's not a wicketkepper, and thus I didn't mention him, and nor does any subsequent mention of him by you carry any context. Usman Khawaja and his batting form and you wanting to mention his batting form all have one thing in common in the context of wicketkeeping: irrelevance. There is also nothing about Khawaja himself that gets me worked up, only the long-held fasciation of people like yourself who want to bring him up at any given opportunity, regardless of the context! Did you bring up Khawaja's batting during spin bowling discussions last week? Have you raised Khawaja's batting form under the news about the Essendon players being suspended?

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar