Bellator's Shamrock-Gracie bout is a circus

By Justin Faux / Expert

This Saturday, California-based fight promotion Bellator present a circus attraction disguised as an MMA event, headlined by a bout between UFC Hall of Famers Ken Shamrock and Royce Gracie – two men with a combined age of 101.

Shamrock, a beefy 52-year-old with a helmet of graying hair and arms bigger than his opponent’s legs, has only won two fights over the past decade, and after one of those he flunked a drug test.

His opponent, three-time UFC tournament champion Gracie, hasn’t fought since a 2007 win over battle-tested Japanese fighter Kazushi Sakuraba, which was later overturned when he also failed a drug test.

It seems like some kind of sick joke for these ex-athletes who are well past their expiration date to compete in a 400-metre foot race, let alone a sanctioned cage fight, but that’s precisely what Bellator president Scott Coker is presenting on Saturday afternoon.

In some ways, you have to admire Coker’s hustle. More than even before, the UFC houses the overwhelming majority of elite fighters, making it increasingly hard to present a comparable product.

Basically, Coker is handcuffed. But instead of matching UFC talent-for-talent, the seasoned carnival barker is banking on nostalgia, bringing in dated acts and bizarre spectacles to draw eyeballs to their broadcast home on Spike TV in the United States.

And it has worked. Last year, the Bellator president presented Shamrock against famous web brawler Kevin ‘Kimbo Slice’ Ferguson. The fight was abysmal, so poor that many fans speculated that it was fixed. Despite that, it was a ratings bonanza, peaking with 2.1 million viewers and averaging 1.58 million for the three-hour broadcast.

The Viacom-owned Bellator company has discovered that presenting high-quality championship fights between lesser names delivers a fraction of the audience as these freak-show fights.

Under it’s initial leadership from founder Bjorn Rebney, Bellator was a league that focused on securing a foothold as more of a sports than entertainment property.

Fighters were never gifted major fights due to marketability or a grudge with the champion – the only way to earn a title shot was by going through a grueling three-month tournament.

Rebney’s formula for MMA with more of a sporting edge than the star-driven UFC was intriguing, yet ultimately flawed, and failed to develop into anything beyond a mild ratings success for Viacom.

Since the formative years of prizefighting in every form, promoters have sold the combination of art, entertainment, skill and spectacle to ticket buyers, television viewers and, eventually, pay-per-view consumers.

Coker, the new Bellator president, understands this better than most. Since taking command of the fledgling promotion, they have shattered personal-best records for both television ratings and live attendance.

There’s no mistaking that the former Strikeforce boss is getting results by pushing the envelope but is heading into unchartered and quite frankly, dangerous territory by scheduling a fight between Shamrock and Gracie. They are two broken-down, beaten-up old fighters who had their prime years when some of Bellator’s most loyal viewers were still in nappies.

By preying on the morbid curiosity of channel flippers, the fight is expected to be a major hit – on par with their previous effort for Shamrock versus Ferguson, if not greater.

And even though I and many others have objections over either man strapping on a pair of fingerless MMA gloves to compete in 2016, Coker and company aren’t breaking any rules or employing nefarious business practices. Both Shamrock and Gracie have passed their physicals and have been licensed to fight in the state of Texas.

The key word there being Texas, an athletic commission that has developed a reputation as an anything-goes regulatory body.

The Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation (TDLR), the agency in charge of making sure rules and regulations are followed in the state, is the same outfit that employed Dr Hector Oscar Molina. This was both before and after he confessed to injecting hulking heavyweight MMA fighter Alistair Overeem with a four-drug cocktail that contained testosterone.

In 2010, the commission even gave boxer Antonio Margarito the green light to compete in a lucrative bout with Manny Pacquiao after he served his one-year suspension in California for attempting to wrap plaster inserts into his gloves during a fight with Shane Mosely.

Both California and Nevada denied the American-born Mexican fighter’s license attempt, and the Association of Boxing Commissions (ABC) advised state regulatory agencies to order Margarito to appear in person before applying for a license to plead his case and explain his actions. He didn’t, but was still cleared to compete in the fight that netted $64 million in pay-per-view revenue alone.

Whether more respected regulatory bodies like Nevada, New Jersey or California would green light Shamrock versus Gracie III in 2016 is unclear, but if I were a betting man I would wager against it.

The Crowd Says:

2016-02-19T22:35:46+00:00

Viv

Roar Pro


Bellator is an asset to Viacom.. Viacom stock dropped 15% last week.. As much of a circus it is and us hardocres don't like it.. It still has us talking about it... Event will no doubt do great ratings... Unfortunately it's what Bellator has to do... Look at the ratings Daley did on the last event as the main-event for Bellator... Didn't even crack 700k... Viacom needs all the assets they can get right now... Their networks aren't as strong and they made zero majorly profitable movies last year... Their still not on life support by any means don't get me wrong.. But they are certainly in the position where they have to protect their assets... Unfortunately for bellator it's creating a freak show lol With that being said Frank by tko and Kimbo by the same

2016-02-19T22:00:17+00:00

J Lafleur

Roar Rookie


Great stuff as usual, Justin. I'd love for you to check out my take on the event, "Party Like it's 1993!" on roar. Maybe you could leave a couple costume ideas in the comments. Thanks

AUTHOR

2016-02-19T10:11:32+00:00

Justin Faux

Expert


I agree entirely Alex. Admittedly I generalised there. Thanks for calling me on that one.

2016-02-19T08:07:16+00:00

Trebla

Guest


Actors make pathetic movies for money, cricketers play in obscure 20/20 tournaments for money, why shouldn't aged fighters be able to make a buck? Ali fought Antonio Inoki, which was a farce, for money. There is a 95 percent chance that the fight will be a let down, a waste of time. But if people want to pay to see them so be it. They were both good in the 90s, but MMA has evolved extensively since then.

2016-02-19T07:35:43+00:00

Alex L

Roar Rookie


K-1 didn't just die because of booking wacky fights, in fact I can think of at least 3 bigger factors. 1. The lost generation in the Japanese economy. 2. The lack of quality Japanese fighters after Musashi begun to decline in the mid 2000s and Masato retired in 2008. 3. The failure to value promotion of the sport and events outside of Japan -- this coupling with the first two is a pretty major factor.

AUTHOR

2016-02-19T02:58:31+00:00

Justin Faux

Expert


The problem with freak show fights is that they're not sustainable. Every promotion that has gone all-in on featuring spectacles has crashed and burned in spectacular fashion. Perhaps the best example ist K-1 the kickboxing company. They thrived for over a decade as an outstanding fight promotion who centred their promotion around these chaotic one-night tournaments. Eventually, they began to start booking wacky fights on the back of huge TV ratings success promoting Bob Sapp fights, and it ultimately killed them.

2016-02-18T22:46:02+00:00

pjm

Roar Rookie


The UFC was built on 'freak show fights'. It's what people want to see. The purists might not like it, but screw them.

Read more at The Roar