Six hit ups: Soward not so bad for State of Origin

By Ryan O'Connell / Expert

A big round of NRL football generated a number of talking points over the Easter weekend. So much, in fact, that my patented ‘five talking points’ simply wasn’t going to get the job done.

Besides, that format jumped the shark ages ago. Any time that hacks like Brett McKay and Paddy Effeney are stealing it, I know it’s overdue for me to evolve.

So, instead, it’s time for a scintillating six hit ups…

1. Do Souths have enough depth?
Granted, it’s early in the season and the Bunnies are missing a few key players, but I have some serious concerns over their depth.

In the off-season, the Rabbitohs said goodbye to Issac Luke, Glenn Stewart, Tim Grant, Chris McQueen and Dylan Walker. While already this season, they’ve sustained injuries to key players Adam Reynolds, John Sutton and now Sam Burgess – though the big forward is due back next round.

All that roster unrest ensured that the team the Bunnies rolled out against the Bulldogs on Good Friday was a little underwhelming on paper, and incredibly underwhelming on the field.

Let’s not mince words: Souths were very poor against Canterbury.

However, every team is allowed one stinker per season; it happens. What is of greater concern for Souths is whether or not they have the depth to compete for the premiership this year, knowing that injuries play a role in every team’s fortunes.

When fully fit, they’re still one of the teams to beat, but with a lack of quality across the park, it’s evident they’ll need to stay even healthier than most teams, and they’re not off to a great start in that department.

2. The NSW Blues could do worse than pick Jamie Soward
Injuries, suspensions and a lack of form make the NSW team for State of Origin 1 an absolute lottery. If you canvased 100 people for their Blues team today, I’m confident you’d get 100 different teams; such is the lack of automatic selections for Laurie Daley and the selectors.

No positions on the field are more uncertain than the halves.

The incumbents are Trent Hodkinson and Mitchell Pearce. One is horribly out of form, and the other isn’t even playing yet. There’s also the small point that NSW lost 52-6 in the last game with that pair ‘controlling’ proceedings.

From the other candidates, Blake Austin, Adam Reynolds and Adam Sezer are all currently injured, while Josh Reynolds, James Maloney, Luke Brooks, Luke Keary, and anyone else up for nomination, all come with question marks the size of Uluru.

As such, the Blues could do worse than picking Jamie Soward.

His tactical kicking game remains one of the best in the NRL, and though not a flashy player, he’s extremely adept at executing a gameplan.

As crazy as it sounds, there may be plenty of merit in the first player NSW picking being Soward, and then building the Blues around his abilities.

3. Bunker blunder
It’s one thing to get a decision wrong – even with the benefit of watching a video replay – but to compound an error by failing to admit you got it incorrect is just plain embarrassing.

Yet NRL referees boss Tony Archer is refusing to back down from his assertion that the referees got it right in not awarding the Roosters’ Latrell Mitchell a try in the dying seconds of their match against Manly.

Archer said: “The bunker viewed all the available angles and there was insufficient evidence to overturn the decision. For Mitchell Aubusson to be onside, both of his feet needed to be behind the ball.”

There’s just one problem with that statement: Aubusson was behind the ball. It couldn’t be clearer on the replay. It’s utterly baffling that anyone could suggest otherwise.

Not a great weekend for the NRL’s new Bunker.

4. Hoppa’s a no-show on Sundays
Over the weekend, it was announced that Will Hopoate would not play or train on Sundays this year, due to his Mormon faith.

I respect and admire his dedication. I think it shows tremendous strength of character.

There was some predictable backlash to the announcement, especially after Hopoate said that if the Bulldogs make the grand final – a game that is obviously played on a Sunday – he may still play in it.

Many felt this was hypocritical, but as Hopoate himself explained, Sundays for Mormons are “…a holy day reserved for holy activities like attending church and studying the scriptures. Also, where possible, we abstain from work and recreation.”

He’s not being ‘half faithful’ by saying he may play in the grand final, as has some have suggested. “Where possible” are the key words in his statement.

Case closed. Pitchforks away people.

Just one last comment on this topic: I do wonder, though, if it’s only fair that Hopoate pay back to the club a percentage of his salary for the Sunday games he’ll miss?

5. Broncos versus Cowboys lives up to the hype
How often does a much-hyped game fail to live up to the expectations?

Whether it’s a battle between two teams that hate each other, a top of the table clash, State of Origin, or a grand final, many eagerly anticipated games fail to live up to the buildup.

That certainly didn’t happen in last year’s grand final, as the Broncos and Cowboys provided us with a thrilling, exciting and brilliant game, which even went to extra-time. It was the best grand final ever.

So what were the chances the two teams could deliver all that again on Saturday night? Hindsight would say the correct answer is ‘very high’.

Great play, drama, golden point extra-time, a one-point victory. It all happened yet again between the two Queensland sides, with the Broncos winning this time, in what was easily the best game of the year so far.

Kudos to both teams, and please sir, can we have some more?

6. Time for a concussion interchange
The NRL’s crackdown on not allowing concussed players back on the field is to be commended.

Given what we are learning about brain damage and the potential long-term effects of concussions, the new due diligence in caring for the welfare of players is a welcome change.

It has, however, been mentioned by a number of pundits that an 18th man should be added to game day rosters, so that concussed players can be replaced outside of the eight interchanges currently allowed.

Given how strict the game now is on concussion, I think it makes sense. In particular, if a player is concussed from an illegal tackle.

I think the NRL needs to look at this immediately.

The Crowd Says:

2016-03-30T12:01:01+00:00

JayBob

Guest


Dogs are missing their Fullback and Hooker atm. The scary thing about Souths is they played extremely well with all those players missing except Surgess. There's way too much of a reliance on him, it's like the rest of the team just gives up when he's out. You could even compare 2014 to 2015. From a Premiereship to not even making a noise.

2016-03-30T10:53:12+00:00

Sleiman Azizi

Roar Guru


It's a scary sign when denial becomes the norm in any organisation. It won't be long (if it hasn't yet alreadY) before the NRL will be seen to be Big Brother.

2016-03-30T10:45:03+00:00

Sleiman Azizi

Roar Guru


Have to disagree Scott. Josh Reynolds is made for Origin. Given the right guidance he could be a NSW legend with his passion and never say die attitude. He can also play and the only time NSW ever looked threatening in my eyes was when he was running the ball. I'll never forget his from the bench cameo where he was doing just that. Finally for NSW space and room to attack with Jennings, Morris etc. And then Daley takes him off...

AUTHOR

2016-03-30T10:20:58+00:00

Ryan O'Connell

Expert


Um, they often admit they have made a mistake?! Archer even admitted the bunker made a mistake THIS round! http://m.smh.com.au/rugby-league/league-news/referees-boss-tony-archer-admits-to-nrl-bunkers-first-error-20160326-gnrmbu.html

2016-03-30T10:13:00+00:00

bear54


They will admit their errors to each other but that's it. And rightly so because were they to do so this would be the whip used to lash them forever: "Remember when you admitted you stuffed up X? Well why is this incident different?" "How can we trust the system when you admit you made X mistake?" "You make a mistake for team X but you won't admit it when it's team Y?"

2016-03-30T09:39:55+00:00

Rod

Guest


I'm not sure any team has sufficent depth to cover 3 out of 4 of your best players on the side line ,in our S Burgess, AReynolds and Sutton. Plus we were missing T burgess, Alex Johnston. We also missing new players such as Musgrove and Chrichton who are the new breed coming through. I would not be surprised if the side we had against the dogs was the least experienced in the NRL . I'm pretty certain if we took Graham , Jackson , klemmer and Reynolds out the dogs side it would be pretty average

2016-03-30T09:05:55+00:00

Muzz

Guest


1) Sou ffs vs Broncos GF If Channel 9 has anything to do with it. Broncos Premiers. 2) Let's Start with 8 forwards and see how we go. 3) Archer is a carne. 4) zzzzzzzzzzzz 5) Great game! Watched it twice. Would all games be as entertaining if we reduced the number of teams? 6)I miss the shoulder charge.

2016-03-30T09:05:09+00:00

Gavin

Guest


I watched the dragons at win stadium on the weekend and something you wouldn't have seen on tv is how utterly lazy soward is. Please no.

AUTHOR

2016-03-30T08:24:32+00:00

Ryan O'Connell

Expert


You've completely missed the point on number 3. I'm not expecting a perfect system. I am expecting the referees boss to admit when they get it wrong. So I'm not sure how they will 'learn and improve' if they don't admit their mistakes.

2016-03-30T07:07:44+00:00

Steve C

Guest


Great article. My 2 cents worth: 1. Souths - Im a fan.......... but there is something wrong at the club despite the losses of key players, they weren't just out played they were out enthused in every fact of the first half. Bad signs. 2. Writer makes comment "the NSW team for State of Origin 1 an absolute lottery" - that's on the basis that Daley doesn't stand by his comments that he is going to be loyal to the 17 who had 50+ put on them in game 3. We need some different thinking. 3.Refs - at least they are trying 4. Hoppa's views should be respected 5. The Broncs/ Boys play the best footy of all the teams - the lack of wrestle is noticeable 6. ?

2016-03-30T06:57:00+00:00

bear54


1. Do Souths have enough depth? Clearly not but take out the equivilant players from 15 other clubs and watch what happens? 2. The NSW Blues could do worse than pick Jamie Soward Yes we could, we could pick Mitchell Pearce......again! But pending availability I'd go with A. Reynolds and J.Reynolds. 3. Bunker blunder Does anyone really expect a trully infalable system? Mistakes will happen. They will learn and it will improve. 4. Hoppa’s a no-show on Sundays Good luck to him and the Bulldogs. Personally my religion is Jedi so I choose not to play on May the Fourth. 5. Broncos versus Cowboys lives up to the hype The best teams play the best games. 6. Time for a concussion interchange Does anyone remember back when they introduced the "Head Bin" back in 1987? (This was before the era of interchange kids) Do you also recall how Bob Fulton rorted it all year giving Ron Gibbes a free 10 minute rest in each half using the head bin as an excuse???? This is why it won't be brought back in..... and another reason I hate Bob Fulton and Manly.

AUTHOR

2016-03-30T04:52:49+00:00

Ryan O'Connell

Expert


Don't get me wrong - Soward is far from a perfect solution, and his cons would have to be weighed up with his pros. But considering the options, he's not the worst selection idea.

2016-03-30T04:41:47+00:00

Alex L

Roar Rookie


Shark Park has never been easy, but for mine the Storm game (for which I was at the ground) was as much a case of Melbourne looking like they didn't want to be there as anything -- not much talk, not much attitude in defense, and uncharacteristically loose in the middle of the field. I'd love to have been a fly on the wall to hear what I can only assume was an almighty post-game spray from Bellamy.

2016-03-30T04:36:37+00:00

Alex L

Roar Rookie


Regarding point 2, Soward is an excellent player at club level, however there are consequences for picking him in Origin that need to be considered -- for example putting him on the left side in defense will see Thaiday run at him and earn QLD quick ball (and penalties) all night. This isn't to say he can't be picked, the idea of Soward and Austin if both are fit and firing actually seems pretty appealing.

AUTHOR

2016-03-30T03:54:56+00:00

Ryan O'Connell

Expert


Boom tish!

AUTHOR

2016-03-30T03:53:46+00:00

Ryan O'Connell

Expert


'May' have got it wrong? There is no way Aubusson was in front, or even in line, with the kicker. He was clearly behind. I have no issue with the refs making a mistake. It happens. My issue is with Archer continuing to say they got it right, when the evidence clearly shows they didn't.

AUTHOR

2016-03-30T03:50:21+00:00

Ryan O'Connell

Expert


If no one has proved their fitness, I'd have no issue with Soward at 7.

2016-03-30T03:43:08+00:00

Chris Martin

Guest


Tamou overrated Tolman has been better player for the last 4 years. I will give you Bird over Mortimer, much better choice Would go Fensom over Merrin Farah has been good but has been a reason we lost a few games i.e. The bad pass to Dugan not Hodkingson who would have kickthe field goal to win game one

2016-03-30T03:38:22+00:00

Pure Aussie

Guest


That is an infinitely better team Parrafan. Except Scott - he has to go I reckon. I don't know about Bird either. Mortimer! hahahahhaa Oh that is Gold! Chris, please enlighten us with your reasoning for that one.. Tolman, Peats, Toupou? Ignoring Tedesco? The mind boggles.

2016-03-30T03:35:01+00:00

Charles NSW

Guest


I have been saying for a long time Soward should be chosen for SOO His skills is one of the best and he plans his moves ahead which is what NSW needs to organise A lot of people say his defence is poor but I have seen him do many good things in defence Adam Reynolds should be the 1/2 back and probably Soward or Blake Austin would be our best fit

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar