Can Fremantle avoid a rebuild?

By Steven Paice / Roar Guru

The early parts of the AFL season have seen plenty of unexpected results, but none come close to seeing the Fremantle Dockers holding up the ladder after five rounds as the AFL’s only winless side.

Following yesterday’s incomprehensible home loss to Carlton, it might seem like the time for panic but a look at the facts makes for interesting reading and the best next steps may be controversial, but seem logical.

This is the side that won the minor premiership last season and has lost only 24 regular season games in four years under Ross Lyon. This is a club that has put together a list with the goal of winning a flag, and nothing less.

While their history is littered with failures, disappointments and under-performing there was nothing suggesting they would be in such dire straits after Round 5.

So why has it gone that way? Can it be fixed quickly? Or does the club so close to premiership glory in recent times need to start again and rebuild from the ground up? Let’s take a look at the problems and whether they can be easily fixed.

Injuries
They have key players Aaron Sandilands, David Mundy and Harley Bennell unavailable, but outside of those three they were missing no other key players before yesterday’s catastrophic loss.

Today they have had terrible news with reigning Brownlow medallist Nat Fyfe re-fracturing his fibula and likely being unavailable for a majority of the season.

The Dockers would benefit from holding him out for as long as possible and getting some games into their younger players, but to lose arguably the game’s best player is a telling blow for a team already reeling.

The coach
Lyon is not a coach who is familiar with rebuilding or failure, never having won less than 11 games in a season nor having had to build a team from the bottom-up. The perception is that he got everything he could out of a St.Kilda side far less talented than this current Dockers side, and was quickly out the back door when the premiership window closed.

Long considered a tactical master, he is now faced with having a list that he carefully constructed for a game style that is simply no longer relevant. The slow, methodical, defensive grind that has characterised Lyon’s coaching has been very successful.

However the way the game is being played in 2016 is a long way away from what Lyon knows, and what this current Dockers list is built for.

The veterans
Of the current list, it could be argued that their four oldest players (Matthew Pavlich, Mundy, Sandilands and Michael Johnson) are still among their best and most important players.

For a side with premiership expectations, this list profile seems logical but given Fremantle’s poor start those four stalwarts are likely to be nearing the end.

This group has among it the greatest ever Docker, the current club captain, a fantastic defender as well as one of the game’s better basic tap ruckman so their loss would not be inconsequential but remains a near-certainty that must be addressed.

The others
Take a look at the bracket of players who are 25-30 years of age and there are concerns at every turn. Most of these players can be categorised into two groups – those who have previously been effective but are no longer players the Dockers can rely on, and those who still seem effective but do not play with the consistency.

The first group includes Zac Dawson, Tendai Mzungu, Danyle Pearce, Matt DeBoer, Clancee Pearce, Alex Silvagni and Nic Suban.

The second group includes Michael Barlow, Garrick Ibbotson, Chris Mayne, Jonathan Griffin, Zac Clarke and Hayden Ballantyne.

No players in the first group look like having a future at AFL level and are facing careers at the crossroads, at best. Of the second group, fans and supporters would do well to ask whether selecting any of them over a youngster is of any benefit for the remainder of the season.

None of these players will improve, nor do they provide anything beyond serviceable consistency.

The other players in this age bracket who are still providing Fremantle with what they need include Stephen Hill, Lee Spurr, Michael Walters and Cameron Sutcliffe. Walters is a star and one who should be a player Fremantle build around, and Hill has the potential to be an elite midfielder while Sutcliffe and Spurr fill roles that every side needs.

All that being said, the number of experienced players on whom Fremantle can rely seems far too low for a side who came into the season with aspirations of success.

The kids
Lachie Neale has matured into a quality midfielder while Alex Pearce and Lachie Weller look to be players on whom the Dockers can rely, but the remainder are unknown or known, but unimpressive.

Matt Taberner might be a big body, and everyone knows they take longer to develop, but he looks a player devoid of confidence and talent.

As long as he is on the list, he should continue to be played but at some stage the ineffectiveness and inconsistency of his game will become too great a headache for Fremantle.

Jack Hannath has underwhelmed in his 17 games, which is a shame given he has a golden opportunity to make himself the preferred option to lead the ruck and swing forward post-Sandilands.

Ed Langdon, Brady Grey and Darcy Tucker have shown signs of promise in limited opportunities and must be given the chance to play for the remainder of the season. When put against the likes of Suban, DeBoer, Mzungu and Danyle Pearce they must be thrown into AFL football for a sustained period of time and be allowed to develop.

The playing list is limited and subsequently the Dockers are devoid of foot speed and have far too many under skilled players, a fact that has been masked by their recent regular season success with a defensive gameplan.

That has worked through a consistent period of finals appearances but will no longer be the case. They rank 17th in effective disposal percentage and 14th in clangers, and rank last in inside 50s. Not only are they poor with the ball, they are not even giving themselves a fighter’s chance by getting it into their forward line.

The recruiting
Recruiting has been something the Dockers have done atrociously of recent times, with the Colin Sylvia debacle sending a chill down the spines of anyone associated with the purple and Bennell looks to be headed that way.

Granted, he has been injured but he has come with a ‘buyer beware’ label and while he came cheap, that is shaping as a positive for Fremantle as his season will not get off the ground.

The benefit of being in such a short-term hole is that Fremantle can start to recruit properly and not look for shortcut options. Cale Hooker is widely reported as being on Fremantle’s radar, as is Jesse Hogan.

Both would be huge additions and the Dockers should be doing everything possible to get them in the next 12-18 months. Everything possible includes putting Neale on the trade table – everyone apart from Fyfe must be used in trade discussions.

The idea of trading Neale may seem illogical, but Fremantle have poor key position depth and fixing that must be a priority.

The answer
Fremantle have an opportunity to use the remainder of this season to change the gameplan and re-train their players; the onus must be on Lyon to change his approach and move away from the game style he has modelled his success on, as it simply cannot be effective in today’s competition

The loss of Fyfe for most of the season is a telling blow but one that may be a blessing in disguise for the long-term future of this club. Lyon has signed until 2020 and would be best using the remainder of 2017 and 2018 to complete a rebuild of this list with the focus being on getting proven, talented big men on whom they can rely when they are ready to move back up the AFL ladder.

Teams like the Western Bulldogs, Adelaide and West Coast have proven that things can turn around very quickly and there is no reason that Fremantle cannot become relevant again and return to success. It will only happen if they change the gameplan, turnover a significant amount of the list and take a more measured approach to trading.

This season is a write-off and Fremantle must have the courage and boldness to go down the rebuild track, sacrifice results in 2017 and look to a return to premiership calculations in 2018.

The Crowd Says:

2016-04-30T00:57:01+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


I'm not defending Mitchell. I think he is past it.

2016-04-30T00:15:11+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


I've never used the term and haven't made a comment about the Swans in these terms. They are impressive (but with a slightly shaky defence). You seem to have a fixation with me, which can be flattering, but it is just silly. "Flat track bullies" is a term only non-thinkers use. It doesn't belong in sporting discussion.

2016-04-29T23:47:37+00:00

Mark

Guest


That's right Don, keep defending the biggest spud of the last 10 years. You're absolutely clueless.

2016-04-29T23:44:13+00:00

Mark

Guest


But Don says we're flat track bullies. And he's always right.

2016-04-28T03:04:21+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


Do you need permission from BT and Bruce before you can use a word? I'm older than them. They needn't dictate to me.

2016-04-28T00:50:17+00:00

Nifty

Guest


Lets face it Dawson is a chump and if he was at a stronger club hed be playing vfl at best he continually gives away free kicks and gets reported,hes lucky freo are struggling at the moment

2016-04-28T00:32:01+00:00

Nifty

Guest


Super elite mmm thats a new catergory don havent heard that one before ,hes played well in 3 games this season but Not best on ground as you suggest he was poor against the eagles And i certainly dont see him at the same level as pendalbury hanerbury or boak ,dont get me wrong don hes a good player but realistically thats where it stops certainly not elite I cant remember any of the footy gurus ever using the word super elite

2016-04-28T00:21:37+00:00

Macca

Guest


Don - - Yes Spoils to advantage do create a clear advantage - but how many is Dawson doing?Right now all we no is that Dawson has a significant amount of 1%ers, of which we assume a significant amount are spoils - we have no idea how many actually go to advantage beyond your assertion. He can spoil perfectly, hit the ball exactly where he wants to and it simply be better read by the opposing crumber and not only is it not to advantage but results in a goal against. However you mark the ball and you have complete control - unless of course you are Zac Dawson and 1/3 of your possessions end up in clangers and then you only have 2/3's control. And only in Don Freo world is a person contributing more to their team by being a greater liability with ball in hand. Look at the commentary of the game last Sunday and you will hear "They really don't want Zac Dawson kicking the ball" "this season Mitchell has averaged a touch more than 15 metres gained per possession"

2016-04-27T23:18:45+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


A spoil to advantage results in a clearance. "Advantage". Less clangers than Mitchell's is way better. Mitchell's chief trumpet is that he is meant to use the ball. His other 155 possession usually just go sideways to Gibson and back into trouble.

2016-04-27T23:03:44+00:00

Macca

Guest


Don - "Sam Mitchell has had 22 clangers already this season. Zac only 17." Sam Mitchell has had 177 disposals while Dawson has had 49 - so 12% of Mitchell's possessions have been clangers compared with 35% for Dawson - which is better? On spoils to advantage, I am sure champion data has that stat locked away somewhere only to be used by commentators but in general statistics spoils fall under the 1% banner, with other things like smothers etc. So far this year Dawson has 49 1%ers, Carlton's Jacob Weitering only has 24, but Weitering has 9 contested marks to Dawsons 2 - spoiling to advantage might be good but taking clean possession yourself is better.

2016-04-27T22:55:59+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


He is a regular best on field. Again last week he was a star. A couple of Glendinnings. You definitely are missing a lot. Super elite like Ablett and Fyfe sometimes are unable to lift their sides to victory...but they play well. That happens to Pendlebury, Hannebery, Neale or Boak. Elite players don't always have wins.

2016-04-27T20:20:22+00:00

Nifty

Guest


"Your missing something " that's becoming a favorite of yours don Elite players are able to lift sides when theyre struggling and swing a game ,whilst hes a good player i just don't think hes there as yet Even walters who i rate as their most important player (excluding fyfe) is struggling to lift them atm

2016-04-27T14:20:06+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


Oh...he's a B grader now? Watch the clubs have a different reading. You are missing something Nifty.

2016-04-27T13:39:03+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


Interesting that you mention clangers. Sam Mitchell has had 22 clangers already this season. Zac only 17. Now show me the stat that details how many times Zac spoils and the ground ball goes to his team's advantage. It is an art but assists, for some reason, are only ever ascribed in the forward line and related to scores. Make up a new stat of spoils to advantage and Zac is the GOAT. You are judging Zac's performance using midfielder's criteria. Of course, a frees against comparison with a Hawk would not apply because Frees Against rarely speak about footballers...it is a comment about umpires. Umpires don't penalise Hawthorn.

2016-04-27T11:52:06+00:00

Nifty

Guest


mmmm maybe that's the problem with the dockers And their supporters Don they class some of their b graders as elite and that's why they are struggling today , given they do have some elite players that are injured at the moment their b grade depth is failing them ,even their better players on the field aren't playing with confidence at the moment Freo are a proud club I'm sure they will turn it around soon

2016-04-27T11:35:04+00:00

Giddy

Guest


Fair enough. That's why I asked the question. Just looked at his stats though, and 17 changers from 49 possessions for the year is probably why Ive noticed it. 9 frees against from a key defender is pretty awful too. I doubt he'd be winning the b & f. He has done a lot of 1 percenters though

2016-04-27T04:05:49+00:00

Macca

Guest


Don Freo - "You might need to wonder what the club sees in him to keep him listed." You do realise Freo delisted him this year and just put him back on the rookie list? And he wasn't on the bench much in that St Kilda game where he got 4 possessions. You might want to ask yourself why he was dropped the next week!

2016-04-27T03:38:34+00:00

Don Freo

Guest


Oh he did. He certainly didn't when he was on the bench...but when he took that jacket off, he was most impressive. I still remember the roar of the crowd. Stats don't tell you that. Stats might tell you that Morabito is no good because he didn't get a kick on the bench. You might need to wonder what the club sees in him to keep him listed. Maybe your stats don't cover that.

2016-04-27T02:43:23+00:00

Macca

Guest


Don - of those 3 games Morabito was the sub in2 and played 36% and 37% game time for 8 and 15 possessions but the first was a 63 point win over Melbourne and the second was a 76 point win over GWS - not exactly performing when the whips are cracking. In his third game a 58 point loss to St Kilda he got 4 possessions in 75% game time before getting dropped the next week - I would say that constitutes hardly setting the world on fire.

2016-04-27T01:57:38+00:00

Macca

Guest


In 1 of 3 games he played well for a quarter when coming on fresher than his opponents - hardly what I would call setting the world on fire.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar