Channel Nine: Please broadcast the Jillaroos live

By Mary Konstantopoulos / Expert

On Friday night, rugby league fans were treated to a double-header to kick off the representative round. The first match began at 5:30pm and saw the Australian Jillaroos take on the Kiwi Ferns.

This was followed by the Australian Kangaroos taking on the New Zealand Kiwis.

Do not underestimate the power of words. Significantly, the evening was billed as a double-header. For the first time, instead of the Jillaroos being called the ‘curtain-raiser’ or ‘pre-cursor’ to the men’s game, both fixtures were seen on equal footing, each worthy of being considered the main event.

By calling the fixtures a double-header, the NRL sent a strong message about its continued commitment to the promotion and development of the women’s game.

But they say actions speak louder than words and it was certainly true on Friday night, because while rugby league fans were treated to a double-header, the games were shown in the wrong order.

Instead of televising the Jillaroos match live from 5:30pm, Channel Nine decided to show it on delay. The match didn’t even begin after the conclusion of the men’s game, fans had to wait at least 20 minutes for post-match interviews and celebrations.

The Jillaroos game did not begin until well after 10pm and ended past midnight, meaning reduced exposure.

This was not the only error Channel Nine made on the night. Not only was the match shown on delay, but commentary of the men’s game began with Ray Warren announcing what an exciting contest the women’s game had been and revealed the result, despite many people avoiding social media to watch the match later that evening.

Then, to add to my frustration, the morning after saw The Daily Telegraph decide it would be more appropriate to include three full pages on the men’s result and only a short column on the result of the women’s game, despite the Jillaroos game being a far more exciting contest.

Don’t get me wrong, I see how far we have come. I recognise what an important step it was to have the match televised at all and the importance of coverage (no matter how small) of the women’s game in print media. But the weekend’s events demonstrated to me that we still have a long way to go.

When it comes to women’s sport, I have heard all the excuses about its lack of coverage – there is no money in women’s sport and women are not as strong, fit or capable as men. My favourite though has always been that people do not have any interest in women’s sport.

People will not have any interest in women’s sport until they are exposed to it, and showing the game so late on a Friday evening (after Rabs had revealed the result) shows a lack of commitment to the women’s code.

Despite this, I was so encouraged on Friday night to see my Twitter feed alive with discussion about why Channel Nine had decided not to televise the game live. Fans wanted the opportunity to see the Jillaroos take on the Kiwi Ferns live. This absolutely flies in the face of the myth that people do not have any interest in women’s sport.

There is a growing appetite for the women’s game among the fan-base and I am hopeful that this growing appetite will encourage the broadcasters to have the courage to take a chance. The reality is, without exposure we cannot expect the game to grow.

If Friday night’s game was anything to go by, should our broadcasters take a chance on the women’s game, the audience will follow. Those who tuned into the game, whether live via the NRL’s digital pass or on delay, were treated to a fantastic match.

While there was discussion surrounding the quality of the men’s game and the ageing Kangaroos team, there was no such disappointment about the women’s game.

Despite losing to the Kiwi Ferns 26-16, the game was extremely entertaining. With eight tries scored, the match was dynamic and full of tremendous displays of attacking prowess, while the New Zealanders, in particular, showed real commitment in defence.

Standouts for the Kiwi Ferns included young five-eighth Georgia Hale, whose constant involvement was critical to her side’s attacking success. Winger Atawhai Tupaea scored a double and helped her team go into the halftime break with a 12-6 lead, despite trailing early after Jillaroo Maddie Studdon scored in the seventh minute.

For the Jillaroos, captain Ruan Sims was inspirational from the front. She put her body on the line over and over again, to the extent that she fronted the post-match media conference with a swollen eye. Karina Brown scored a double and Sammy Bremner, our speedy fullback, was full of gusto as she zipped around the field.

In the end, the Jillaroos were outmuscled by a stronger Kiwi Ferns pack, but with young talent like Kezie Apps and Studdon, the future certainly bodes well.

While I may have been left tired and disappointed due to the delay, I am still hopeful about the future and look forward to a time when I have the opportunity to purchase a Jillaroos jersey and cheer my team on live. I’ll then wake up the next morning to a photo of Apps in the paper celebrating a Karina Brown try with her teammates.

When this happens, we will be one step closer to having players like Kezie Apps, Maddie Studdon, Sammy Bremner and Ruan Sims become household names, just like Corey Parker, Johnathan Thurston and Semi Radradra.

This is @mary__kaye from @ladieswholeague.

The Crowd Says:

2016-05-18T02:30:31+00:00

McNaulty

Guest


I like the way the women play league because it is not all about strength and power though these elements are there as well. But as the womens game develops I hope it is ball skills they improve on and not 'muscle' and athleticism. Get it on Fox or Gem for sure. In terms of a national league or state league I would rather the women have their own clubs rather than play under the NRL club names (as the A-League does) which to me seems to cheapen it.

2016-05-10T10:28:46+00:00

EastsFootyFan

Roar Guru


We won't know until they try. If it can work with the Big Bash I don't see why it wouldn't with the NRL

2016-05-10T07:39:16+00:00

Max

Guest


They would never put Womens league on instead of the News....

2016-05-10T07:17:17+00:00

Lester

Guest


Yes.

2016-05-10T06:42:00+00:00

Gurudoright

Guest


?????

2016-05-10T06:41:30+00:00

Gurudoright

Guest


I'm yet to see evidence that the Friday's women's game would have out rated Gilmore Girls prior to Friday's game. I dare say the executives at channel 9 didn't either.

2016-05-10T06:39:11+00:00

Birdy

Guest


I naturally thought that after the success of the nines the test would have been live on Friday night. To my complete surprise it wasn't even on gem or fox . Talk about a massive let down.missed those great tries , offloads and high quality defence carried on from the nines. Stil havnt seen the replay, will be real upset if I missed them swapping jerseys.

2016-05-10T06:19:48+00:00

rebel

Guest


Some of the players play for both.

2016-05-10T05:16:20+00:00

Squirrel

Guest


I'm a bit sexiest and don't really like women's sports but that league game was unreal, I would definitely watch it , they should have a mandatory women's side with every nrl club. It would be great .

2016-05-10T04:23:50+00:00

rjr

Guest


I was at my local club here in Christchurch and more people were watching the ladies league( we got it live) than super rugby Great game

2016-05-10T04:23:44+00:00

jamesb

Guest


Guru Maybe Friends should do a reunion episode titled "the one with the Jillaroos"

AUTHOR

2016-05-10T04:00:37+00:00

Mary Konstantopoulos

Expert


This is a great idea!!!

2016-05-10T03:40:48+00:00

bigJ

Guest


Glad I could brighten up your day. And with Alex L point, why not just put on a replay of the girls after the main game, friday nights you use to get a double header, now you get one game and some crap movie (thanks thursday night footy), they could of easily play it after the main game. But the Nrl has no clear direction at the moment so you knows??? with the change of guard hapenning more freqently that at the royal gates, who knows they might end up giving me the job, hahaha

2016-05-10T03:38:29+00:00

Onside

Guest


No its not a quality issue Mary. Quality is subjective. Firstly I need to be interested in the sport, and secondly, I prefer an even competition. I can enjoy a 'graceful' game of womens tennis. But the contestants could not hope to compete with men. I enjoy some women golf , but even though they don't play on the mens circuit, it doesn't mean a contest is any less riveting. The Olympic games demonstrate just how watchable womens sport can be. I cant imagine the blokes at the pub saying, 'we 're not going to watch a bunch of sheilas swimming'. It's all sport. And so it goes

AUTHOR

2016-05-10T03:37:55+00:00

Mary Konstantopoulos

Expert


I've seen no evidence that re-runs of Gilmore Girls is a higher generating program.

AUTHOR

2016-05-10T03:37:12+00:00

Mary Konstantopoulos

Expert


The Barry, I completely hear this point. I watched both games on Friday night and went to the Pacific Tests on Sat, but still saw this weekend as a welcome break from tipping, SuperCoach and the several games that I normally watch...

AUTHOR

2016-05-10T03:36:00+00:00

Mary Konstantopoulos

Expert


So just so I understand the point - you are saying that women's sport is not as popular as men's sport, because women have not chosen to watch it in numbers?

2016-05-10T03:28:46+00:00

SVB

Guest


"I think the NRL needs to do something with the ‘rep round’. It’s becoming more a chance to have a break from the footy and spend some time with the family than essential viewing." I don't think it is such a bad thing. It gives you a break in the week to week grind of club games, and puts something different on for people to enjoy. The games at Parramatta between the Island nations was certainly different and interesting. You don't get that type of passion in NRL games. You'd think rugby league would want to promote that type of thing. Maybe you have used it as an excuse for yourself to have a break, but I am pretty sure the games were well watched and attended by others.

2016-05-10T03:17:25+00:00

Alex L

Roar Rookie


Can't edit my comment but following on, I'm a firm believer that if you're going to have a double header, day games work better.

2016-05-10T03:16:10+00:00

Alex L

Roar Rookie


On a Saturday it might still be better to show it on delay, the block between about 17:30 and 19:30 tends to be a sporting dead zone in broadcasting, I believe due to sports being a more visual and less of a background program (news and current affairs type shows being more sound based can be on in the background while people do other things). No doubt some people will have have continued watching the coverage, whether that number exceeds those who turned off and went to do something else is another matter (and how many of either of those groups would've watched a non-delayed game), it's plausible that the delayed coverage did get a larger number of views than live would have. I'd be interested to see what kind of numbers back to back games on Sunday would manage.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar