How did the Wallaby changes work out?

By Nicholas Bishop / Expert

It is a given that in any series of matches between the same opponents, the team which has greater consistency of selection wins.

England only made three changes in the course of the recent series, and two of those (Luther Burrell and Teimana Harrison) only lasted half an hour before they were hooked.

Australia made seven as they struggled to find their optimal combinations across the field.

It’s a chicken-and-egg situation of course – you lose the first game and start looking for changes in personnel as a way to improve – but ideally, a head coach in any sport wants to keep the same group of players together to allow an understanding and a blend to develop.

Nowhere has this been truer for Michael Cheika than in the second row, an area where England were perceived to present a big challenge before the series began. Cheika ended up using all seven of the locks originally picked in his wider, 39-man playing group, plus an eighth (Scott Fardy) from the back row. The starting combinations have been different for every game.

Cheika will have been looking for some tasty ‘sausage’ (substance) beneath the ‘sizzle’ (promise or tantalising aroma of substance) from the men he picked in this area of the team.

Rory Arnold already offered a little a bit of both in the first two Tests. The question is, how much did Will Skelton and Adam Coleman offer at Sydney? Let’s take a look at what happened in various departments of the game.

Aerial combat – lineout and restarts
Rob Simmons proved that he is worth his spot simply as a lineout caller. Despite only lasting for 28 minutes at Brisbane (injury) and 40 minutes at Sydney (subbed off for Coleman), Australia won 6/6 throws or 100 per cent of their lineout ball before he left the field.

In both the first and third Tests, the Wallabies suffered at lineout after Simmons departed, losing 2 out of 6 throws (or 33%) under their replacement lineout captains – James Horwill at Brisbane and Adam Coleman at Sydney.

Coleman’s two lost calls occurred in the six minutes after the half-time break and cost Australia ten points:

Although Chris Robshaw failed to ground the ball in the first example, England scored from a no.8 pick from the ensuing scrum. In the second, they were able to develop a driving maul off Courtney Lawes’ steal which drew the penalty for side entry on Will Skelton, with Owen Farrell kicking the three points.

In both examples, the English jumpers seem to know the target zone for the throw and are able to mount a contest. Adam Coleman’s rather deliberate ‘big step’ shuffle down the line both reduces his hang-time in the air and gives Maro Itoje an easy read.

To his credit, Coleman came back from these two mini-disasters to win his next four throws, although the potential targets in the Wallaby lineout had been reduced to just two – either Coleman himself or Scott Fardy.

The background weakness to the Wallaby third Test lineout was the presence of Will Skelton at #4. Skelton won no ball on Australian throw and was a peripheral figure in their defensive lineout package:

Here there are two Wallaby pods jacked up with Skelton isolated as the end defender, a situation an intelligent first phase attack (like the All Blacks’) would be looking to exploit.

The weakness was compounded by the targeting of Will Skelton from England kick-offs. England won all of their first three restarts by the simple expedient of lining up their best high ball chaser (Anthony Watson) over Skelton at every kick-off:

In the first two examples Skelton is the inside receiver near the junction of the 15m and 40m lines, and Watson wins both the first touches against him. In the third example, Rob Simmons (Australia’s best KO receiver for a number of years) swaps over with Skelton to plug the gap – so Watson stays wide to maintain the mismatch against Skelton’s deep/outside pod. This scenario yielded a penalty to England which could easily have been interpreted as yellow card on another day, by another referee. It was also one of three penalties Skelton gave up in the match as a whole.

Defence
One of the statistics which defensive coaches use as a key performance indicator to the success of the systems they put in place, is the number of tackles made by the tight five forwards.

At Sydney, Rob Simmons, Will Skelton and Adam Coleman are credited with a similar number of tackles by the Opta stats (Simmons 5/6, Skelton 6/6 and Coleman 5/5), with Simmons’ miss an important one on Mako Vunipola in the build-up to England first try by Dan Cole.

But on this occasion the stats do not come close to representing the real situation out on the field:

The England lineout win at the tail is the beginning of a long minute and a half sequence leading to a try by England full-back Mike Brown.

Let’s take a look at the movements of the Wallaby tight five forwards on defence during this period.

• Starting positions (28:15). As Chris Robshaw wins the ball at the back, 3 Sekope Kepu is the nearest defender, with 4 Will Skelton ‘next door’ in between the 5m and 15m lines. 1 James Slipper, 5 Rob Simmons and 2 Stephen Moore are all either near or in the 5m corridor and furthest away from the ball.

• First ruck (28:25). At the first point of contact – won by the Wallabies – both Simmons and Slipper have run past Skelton and Kepu to become Guard (Simmons) and first defender (Slipper) at the first ruck on the far side. When the camera shot widens at 28:34 that situation is still the same, with Skelton (at third defender) and Kepu (at fifth defender) having run the shortest ‘distance from home’ from the site of the lineout.

• Skelton’s first dominant tackle (28:35). With Australia having won the first two bits of contact, Skelton is set up to make a big defensive impact on Mako Vunipola. Assisted by Slipper, Skelton wrestles the England loose-head back five metres in the collision.

• Fourth phase (28:47). Despite some average passing among the England backs after the ruck over Vunipola, there is an attractive situation presented to the England 9 Ben Youngs on fourth phase. The Wallaby forwards get their interior spacings wrong, with Kepu well away from the ruck perimeter at Guard and 8 Sean McMahon also loose outside him. Simmons has again run past all the other tight forwards to get into third defender. Youngs is able to break inside Kepu rather easily to get the England offence back on track.

• Skelton’s second dominant tackle (28:59). Having only had to run 10 metres from the spot of his previous hit, Will Skelton is able to make his second dominant tackle of the sequence (again with the assistance of Slipper) when George Ford passes to his hooker Dylan Hartley on the next phase. Skelton crushes the England hooker and he loses the ball.

At this stage of the sequence it is a conclusive Wallaby ‘win’, but what happens next illustrates the subtle negatives ready and waiting to emerge from behind the cloak of the obvious!

After yet another in a series of unconvincing exits at 29:08 (Australia’s kicking game did not improve from Melbourne), England are back in the driving seat on Jack Nowell’s kick return at 29:24.

• Poor right-side kick-chase (29:11). The Wallaby tight five are all in a roughly even line on the Australian 22 as Bernard Foley makes the kick at 29:11. At 29:16, Simmons and Moore in midfield are 10 metres ahead of Skelton on the right side.

• Poor decision-making at the first ruck (29:21). Tevita Kuridrani mistakenly anticipates an England open-side attack at 29:21, and to compound the error Michael Hooper starts pushing first Skelton, then Kepu around the corner at 29:24. England regularly come back to the short side in these situations, but are handed a gift 4-2 overlap with Mike Brown returning to that side at 29:28.

• Poor recovery after the kick ahead (29:31). The wide pass gets Anthony Watson into space, and his kick ahead for Mike Brown demands that Australia scramble back furiously. Among the tight forwards in the danger zone, only Kepu and Simmons oblige at 29:32. Will Skelton can only manage a slow trot.

The sequence as a whole is a perfect illustration of Jekyll and Hyde nature of Will Skelton’s selection. He can be a dominant physical force in contact when the play is funnelled towards him in the middle of the field.

On the flip side of the coin, he runs the fewest metres of any of the Australian tight five to get into position on defence, which in turn means that the forwards with greater aerobic capacity (Rob Simmons, James Slipper and Stephen Moore) have to do that running for him, often without achieving the satisfaction of a meaningful involvement at the end of it.

The lack of physical conditioning also is also reflected in his mental fitness. He is pushed around the corner by Hooper without appearing to have the energy to make his own decision about where he should defend.

Ball-carrying
Once again the Opta stats don’t reveal the essence of the situation by themselves: 5 carries for 18 metres for Adam Coleman with one clean break and three turnovers, 6-for-8 for Rob Simmons with one turnover, 7 for zero metres for Will Skelton with no turnovers.

Most of Coleman’s metres were achieved on one startling clean break after half-time, but his carries were spoiled by some rash offloads and presentations:

On the other hand, Will Skelton’s stats don’t do him justice. I counted at least three carries where his ability to fall forward in the tackle and present the ball quickly produced attacking opportunities for the Wallabies:

It may not look like Skelton is doing anything spectacular in any of these three examples, but in all he is winning the collision, enabling his support players to drive forward into contact and produce a 1-2′ delivery for Nick Phipps without using up more than two ‘cleaners’.

In Stephen Larkham’s attacking structure, there are typically two pods of forwards split between the two 15 metre lines – one with the two second rows plus either 6 or 8, the other with the three front-rowers all grouped together. It is usually the second row pod which has to carry from the hardest place on the field – the phase where the ball comes back in from touch, with the D only having to worry about defending one side of the field. That is where Will Skelton comes into his own…

Australia scored two tries and one clean break from the situations above, and Skelton’s carries were the acorns that grew into mighty scoring ‘oaks’!

Summary
Rob Simmons has proven – as much by his absence as his presence during the England series – that he is still the best lineout captain and restart receiver in Australia. It appears Adam Coleman should be groomed to fulfil that role in future, although he is not yet ready for the role on a full-time basis.

Will Skelton is the Jekyll and Hyde of Australian professional rugby. He is probably the most powerful ball-carrier and forward defender in a straight line in the country. But his ability to play in the air or run in space is significantly lacking. Right now, the Wallabies cannot afford to carry a passenger in either the lineout, restarts or in defence.

Kane Douglas will return to contest a starting berth, but in the meantime, most hope should be invested in the two rookies who have had their first taste of international rugby against England: Rory Arnold and Adam Coleman.

The Crowd Says:

2016-07-01T00:59:17+00:00

Who?

Guest


He got low and attempted to bind. Technically, tackling, rucking and scrummaging all look pretty similar, on the condition that you attempt to tackle low and that your opponent isn't pushing back. If there was a penalty, it was charging the ruck, not tackling a player without the ball, as Itoje had been standing in the gate. But he didn't tackle a player without the ball (an offence generally paid against a defensive player, not the attacking team), and he didn't clean out past the breakdown (because it was Itoje who retreated, not Fardy who went past the breakdown). But as I tried to explain, the point of it wasn't to take out Itoje, it was to create that ruck to create the offside line, to help continue to provide front foot ball. And it's a very common sight in ball running teams (especially Cheika teams). And, in all honesty, I've got less of an issue with that non-penalty (you can't stand in the gate as the first opposition player and not expect to face contact - it happens countless times every game - at least Fardy came through the gate - that often doesn't happen in that situation, for both teams) than I have with Owens pinging Phipps for attacking the half, when the half hadn't come through the gate, looked to be entering the ruck (rather than collecting the ball), and Phipps didn't have hands on. Phipps had come through the gate and was over the ball - he had all the rights. But it certainly didn't cost the Wallabies the game - England were worthy winners.

2016-06-30T12:24:01+00:00

Bakkies

Guest


Deans had similar arguments with McKenzie in regards to Cooper's tackling and defending out of the line. McKenzie said Cooper's tackling was fine and happy to have him drop back. I was with Deans on that one.

2016-06-30T11:45:38+00:00

Fin

Guest


'Hated' is a strong word to use, but MC cannot stand it when players cut corners and Higgers cuts plenty of corners at training apparently. Angus Scott-Young (yes, the son of Sam) is an interesting prospect for the future just emerging through Australian under age ranks. He's also no dummy and was Dux of his school (the same Brisbane school that poey, quade, and karmichael hunt attended). Can you beleive that? As both Sam and Angus say he inherited his academic genes from his mothers' side!

2016-06-30T11:45:27+00:00

ClarkeG

Guest


He tackled him without the ball. If that is legal then we are now playing American Football.

AUTHOR

2016-06-30T10:59:19+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


We'll see what kind of effort they make to get SH back at the end of his Japan contract eh? That will tell the tale.

2016-06-30T10:52:03+00:00

Who?

Guest


Fardy's attempt to clean out Itoje is a very common thing, and one I'm loathe to see penalized. He didn't clean out past the breakdown. He didn't take someone out who wasn't there. Itoje entered the breakdown, saw he couldn't slow the ball, and chose to find the defensive line. But by that point Fardy had committed. And Fardy committed because he needed to form a ruck. It's a major advantage to a defending team to form a ruck, and create that offside line. If Itoje is considered to have been tackled outside the breakdown, rather than part of the formation of a ruck, then there's no offside line, and Itoje and his team mates are not required to get behind the breakdown. So, in the last 5 years, since the Reds, All Blacks and other teams recognized the advantages of selecting when to avoid creating a ruck, we've seen a lot of teams - especially lots of running teams (I.e. Michael Cheika teams) forced to scrap hard to create a ruck by binding onto players not actually looking to contest. Because running teams need that offside line.

AUTHOR

2016-06-30T10:48:11+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Haven't seen enough of him as yet Digger - but I'll take an interest from now on. You just have so many great 7's coming out of ITM and Super Rugby... Brendon O'Connor (who preceded Gibson at the Blues) was a middle-ranker in NZ but he's mentioned in a lot of England 7 debates over here. Matt Todd could easily start for Italy, France, Ireland, Scotland and possibly even England right now. Then you have Shane Christie and Dan Pryor at the Highlanders, while Lachlan Boshier looked good for the Chiefs against Wales. I'll try to have a look at Gibson over the weekend.

2016-06-30T10:42:06+00:00

RobC

Roar Guru


Haha. Forget the Rebs backrow. Focus on Timani ;) Higgers over Holloway, anyday - even Timani. So... what other reason would there be to drop him so suddenly? Nah, only kidding, hate is such a strong word.

AUTHOR

2016-06-30T10:41:24+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Hi Who? Yes I'd accept Coleman as Simmons' partner at lock as long there's another lineout caller somewhere in the 23. He has great physical attributes although the technical detail of his work in contact and at lineout needs a lot of work. I agree entirely with your last four paras. As you say, a lot of the guys who didn't quite make it as players, or even come close to making it, become the best coaches. In the NFL, the coach with the most outstanding record is Bill Belichick. He stopped playing Gridiron at High School level. He was never an All-American at college and he never played Pro football.

2016-06-30T10:34:56+00:00

Digby

Roar Guru


What is your take on Gibson Nick?

2016-06-30T10:30:56+00:00

Who?

Guest


Another excellent article Nick. But one of these days you'll learn that Simmons is just a useless powderpuff! Don't worry that his gain line stats were better than Skelton's (whilst also providing good quick ball, for the most part). Also worth noting that Simmons' one turnover came from the massive tackle put on by Vunipola and Lawes on unison, both attacking the one shoulder (the trailing, ball carrying shoulder - a truly awesome, athletic tackle), which was injured in the tackle and was the reason he was subbed off. And he's missing for the Reds this week due to that injury. I don't for a minute think that Cheika intended for Fardy to play at lock. I was very pleased with Coleman's debut. I can't help but think it would've been even better if he'd been alongside Simmons. Meaning, if he hadn't had to call his first few international lineouts, with only two jumpers, and his first one hadn't been a defensive lineout on his own 5m line. The #8 issue? They could've tried Lopeti Timani a couple of years ago... He's still on the go. But he wears the wrong colour blue (and I'm not a Rebels/Force fan - but Coleman's selection was a surprise, even though Dwyer's been spruiking him for 2 years now). An independent selection panel would be interesting. But I think it can only work if you've got clear roles. Baseball's not a team tactical sport in the same way that Rugby is. So running a team in that manner only works if your selectors understand the game plan that the coach intends to operate. I do, however, think outside, non-contact analysis, as provided by Eddie Jones for the Boks in 2007, and undoubtedly by yourself and others at various times for other teams, is crucial. I also question picking top former players as coaches. Guys who've made it to that level often haven't had to work things out as much as the lesser talented guys... Stephen Larkham was an excellent 10. But I'd argue that, whilst Bernie's extremely intelligent, his greater physical gifts (in spite of his tendency to be mistaken for a mummy on the field for much of his career) compared to Kafer meant that Kafer needed to be a stronger analyst and theoretician to reach the same levels. I don't agree with all Kafe says, but he's clearly had to think about the game a lot. Similarly, Eddie Jones and Rod Macqueen didn't make the top level - neither even played for their state! Link was an exception, but he was a prop (a position where a player doesn't necessarily get to express their full creative instincts). With that in mind, Slipper will be a very interesting coach when he retires (hopefully many moons from now). I think the guys who live and breathe rugby without the talent to necessarily get to the top level but get the absolute maximum out of themselves are likely to be better coaches - especially technical and tactical coaches - than guys who were naturals.

AUTHOR

2016-06-30T10:25:48+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Yep indeed. On second thoughts, I take it back.... GO Digger!

AUTHOR

2016-06-30T10:25:05+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


OUCH!

2016-06-30T10:11:31+00:00

Digby

Roar Guru


Whhhaaaaaaaaaaaaaattttt? How does one enjoy themselves too much?

AUTHOR

2016-06-30T09:55:00+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


You don't mince your words do you Rob? :D Are you sure Higgers is really "Hated by Cheik? He did select him in the opening round of TRC last year after all. I'll certainly be taking a look at the Rebels back row this weekend, whether it turns out to be the most prominent feature of the SR weekend we'll have to wait and see!

2016-06-30T09:37:54+00:00

Jibba Jabba

Guest


Food poisoning is good - i usually lose about 5kg on those unfortunate occasions - best instigator appears to be Chilli Chicken...

2016-06-30T09:27:23+00:00

RobC

Roar Guru


Im guessing you'll be comparing the fake 8s (Poey and SeanMc)? :)

2016-06-30T09:24:58+00:00

RobC

Roar Guru


Yeah, instead they've stolen a young man from Emerald (Qld). Repped Qld in NRC and developed by QRU, and waiting for him to return from injury. He's Jonah Lomu's nephew. Instead he's going to Brums. Sigh. Looking forward to your 8 expose, starring Lopeti. Would be cool to get comparisons with Jed H, Houston. And the other Rebel 8, who pushed Timani out of his position. Tall guy. Queenslander. Now in Japan, initials SHB (ie Someone Hated By check :D ) Finally the makeshift 8 for the Reds. Young fella, doing the deed. Ex Aussie U20 captain, his grandfather was a Wallaby.

AUTHOR

2016-06-30T07:51:38+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


Fin Hooper is a 7/12 hybrid, so you could continue with Timani at 6, Pocock at 8 and Hooper at 7. No reason why Timani could not be shifted to 8 for 5 metre scrums in the red zone, for example.

AUTHOR

2016-06-30T07:44:13+00:00

Nicholas Bishop

Expert


I think the same would also apply to Grant Fox too TWAS. What interests me is that some ex-players are clearly capable of updating their rugby intellects are keen to do so - a little like applying updates to your PC. Others tend to stay within the range of the opinions and assessments they learned as a player and never move on. So the trick is finding one who belongs to the first group, not the second.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar