Why England's next manager can't possibly be English

By apaway / Roar Guru

Now that Euro 2016 is over, attention will soon turn to the resumption of the major European leagues and also the next round of World Cup qualifiers.

The English Premier League season kicks off on August 13th. The English team plays the first of their final qualifying group games on September the fourth against Slovakia.

These two dates are significant because at the moment the job described as “impossible”, and “more important than the Prime Minister” – the job of England football manager – is vacant. England FA officials and the media are in rare lockstep about the need to appoint an Englishman.

But who? A check of current managers in the Premier League reveals only five who are English-born. They are Steve Bruce (Hull City), Eddie Howe (Bournemouth), Sean Dyche (Burnley), Alan Pardew (Crystal Palace) and Sam Allardyce (Sunderland).

Of these, Bruce and Dyche are returning to the top flight after guiding their teams to promotion from the Championship last season. It seems remotely unlikely that the FA will dip into the lower leagues to find a coach for the Three Lions.

The only English-born manager of a national team that I can come up with at the moment is Harry Rednapp, who is in charge of Jordan, and also a consultant for A-League club Central Coast Mariners.

And so this candidacy of six includes five managers whose clubs are all at short odds to be fighting relegation in the upcoming season, and a controversial 69 year old who is on petro-dollars to guide Jordan for the next two World Cup campaigns.

The youngest is Eddie Howe, although he is, surprisingly, the third-longest serving current manager in the EPL, having guided Bournemouth since October 2012. he is surpassed only by Bruce who has been in charge of Hull City for three months longer and Arsene Wenger.

Howe would seem to be the best choice if the FA are serious about the job going to an Englishman, though it would be an appointment that would be in itself controversial. He has performed miracles at AFC Bournemouth, taking the comparatively tiny club out of the Championship and into reasonably comfortable Premier League survival in their first season.

He fashioned a team that played with no little style as well, and was able to adapt when his side were leaking goals in the middle stages of the last campaign and looking likely to fall straight back down the expensive Premier League trapdoor.

It would be a meteoric rise for the young manager, who rescued his current club from Football League oblivion in 2009. A stint at Burnley preceded a return to Bournemouth and two promotions in three seasons to their current lofty position.

However, the notoriously conservative English FA may be reticent to anoint such a young and relatively inexperienced man to the job. Which leaves Sam Allardyce as the other logical choice of the five.

He is a man who has never experienced relegation from the Premier League is nonetheless viewed as a dinosaur to many in football. That’s probably unfair but there is the whiff of the staid in Allardyce.

Vastly experienced yet never a leader of a ‘big’ club with designs on titles, ‘Big Sam’ is the antithesis appointment to that of Howe, a manager at the other end of the age and style coaching bell curve.

With that list, it begs the question as to why the FA are not looking further afield. Perhaps the country whose political and economic ambitions have gazed inwardly of late are destined to view their football team the same way.

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2016-07-29T07:52:14+00:00

apaway

Roar Guru


And you were eventually proved right, Mark. Sorry!

2016-07-16T03:29:09+00:00

yo

Guest


The highest paid coach of the Euros 16 was the biggest failure... Perhaps England should sign a part time dentist, like Iceland did.... Would save England almost 5 million Euros too...

2016-07-14T07:01:34+00:00

Mark Haywood

Roar Pro


I can guarantee it’ll be Allardyce – because I’m a Sunderland fan, and with a fair bit of optimism having been around the place, this is just how the universe works!

2016-07-14T06:26:12+00:00

j binnie

Guest


Apaway - The biggest problem in English Premier League is a "prob;em" we'd all love to have and it is the amount of money floating around the organisation.This money enables the top clubs to participate in the bidding for those who are regarded as "the best" and there are countless examples of how this is not always a guarantee of success in fact too many for me to start and itemise in this forum. Louis Van Gaal is the latest example, a "hiring " that only 20 months ago we were being inundated with media comment that this was to be the "great leap forward" into former glory for Man Utd. who,less a $400millions spending spree,saw the team finish just marginally higher than they had under the "British" manager Moyes. This season we have yet again seen these "high money" appointments made,Conte at Chelsea,Guardiola at Man .City and across that city, United have again opened the purse strings to lure the "Chosen One" to Old Trafford. Now you and I both know there is only one "championship" to be won and these 3 men,all classed as "super coaches",cannot all win the coveted prize, so the one guarantee we have is that at least one of them is going to cop flak in the coming season,when their team is NOT sitting top of the heap. Relating back to the "absence of good English managers" ,is it really so surprising as year after year we see the top club managerial appointments made,usually at the behest of the all powerful media, from countries outside of the English mainland. If we stretch the imagination a bit the managers who dominated English football for 50 of last 70 years were only born some 200 miles north of the English border. Busby and Fergie!!!!!! Cheers jb

AUTHOR

2016-07-14T05:00:05+00:00

apaway

Roar Guru


Osama, I think the English FA have fallen into another trap - that of, "We tried a foreign coach and it didn't work." Yet the results of Erikson and Capelli stack up well against those of the English managers before and after them. There is also the misconception that only English managers understand the English "system" but at club level, who was the last English manager to win the Premier League. The startling answer is - there hasn't been one! Howard Wilkinson was the last English-born manager to guide a team to a top-flight title, with Leeds United in 1992, the year before the Premier League began.

2016-07-13T17:45:23+00:00

Osama Bin Haroon

Roar Rookie


I completely concur with the writer as the English have got to instill a foreign manager at the helm. For so long, they have tried to muggle their way into tournaments without a recognized figure as their head whether it be Roy Hodgson or Glenn Hoddle. They need out-of-the-box thinking which can only be provided by a foreign manager. I hope England doesn't fall into the trap of Sam Allardyce!

2016-07-13T00:53:37+00:00

pauly

Guest


The FA just need to have enough gusto and determination to stand up the bully boys of Fleet Street. The main problems foreign managers have had to put up with have been generated by the English press.

2016-07-12T20:17:11+00:00

Da Spoon

Guest


Need to get fergie out of retirement. The one British manager who was light years ahead of his foreign rivals in the EPL. The English would accept a Scot but not sure about an Aussie. Sean Dyche would be good. He Knows how to. Get the best out of a team of non-stars.

2016-07-12T04:09:34+00:00

j binnie

Guest


Syd -Australia's Rugby Union and Cricket teams have in the past won "World Cups" in their relative sports as ,by the way,so have England so where do you get the idea that "Aussies" are the best coaches to be had in the world , based on a few results that have occurred over the last season or two. If your logic is correct then the sooner the Aussie hierarchies of both sports go on a visit to New Zealand and India then we can all look forward to improved performances immediately. No? Is that what you are saying or is it comic relief. Cheers jb

2016-07-12T03:58:25+00:00

j binnie

Guest


Apaway- True ,very true, just like serving an apprenticeship,but never forget, that when a trade is "finished" the learning doesn't, and that's how we get fitters/ turners becoming ,chief engineers,becoming chief executive officers then on to founding /or owning engineering premises. That learning process can only be added to by personal experience and further education and not every club manager has the knowledge. tact,understanding, or man management skills to manage in the required 3 directions ,downwards ,sideways,and probably most important of all, upwards,hence the high turnover,when the "suits", not really knowing what the game is all about ,do the obvious thing and get rid of the manager as soon as they deem necessary,under the false assumption that a new face will solve the problem. Having used our own situation before, we can see, at all levels, assumptions being made that when a player has played for his country and, takes a certificate in coaching, he is ready for the "big time", and I have a feeling that you too may appreciate that that thinking is taking the "learning curve" a step too far. Thanks for the reply Cheers jb

AUTHOR

2016-07-12T02:55:27+00:00

apaway

Roar Guru


JB, they are great points. I've always said the role of a National team boss is vastly different to that of a club manager (and in a limited way have experienced it myself). However, the "learning tree" for NT managers is club football - there is very little other way to learn how to deal with the needs of players and supporters.

2016-07-12T02:49:58+00:00

Syd

Guest


Why don't they just do what the English Rugby Union and Cricket teams have done and name an Aussie as Coach? Worled wonders for those 2 teams.

2016-07-12T00:04:26+00:00

Punter

Guest


Australia gets it, but England doesn't!!! You just see the way the English/British football pundits treated the fairytale wins by Leicester & Portugal to understand that it's just not in the English Psyche, entertainment over technique. I jumped on board the Leicester bandwagon & started watching them, they were well organised, had a strong defence, a workaholic midfield, a touch of French genius in the final third & a quick, aggressive striker. They were bereft of real technical ability or the ability to play out tight places. But they were fast & direct. The Portuguese were structured & methodical, they were in no rush. you could see from their winner they could construct an attack with technical skills, they were patience.

2016-07-11T23:32:38+00:00

j binnie

Guest


Apaway - Nice discussion but have you ever considered something most people ignore in such exploratory investigations. You have listed a "menu" of managers with accompanying facts about their performances in respective areas mostly in the lower reaches of the EPL or even lower. Your debate actually shows the dilemma facing "the suits" for not only does it highlight the absence of a truly outstanding National team manager but it fails to point out the essential difference between being a National team manager and a successful club manager while a close look at the two tasks show up vast differences in the day to day operations of both tasks A club manager is faced with the task of welding a limited amount of players into a winning combination with only 7 days between contests in which to make corrections he deems necessary always remembering he has a reasonably good idea of the strengths and weaknesses of his immediate opponents On the other hand a National team manager has unlimited resources when building a team,the only restrictions being usually "birth certificates", and to do this well he has to have an outstanding aim in how he wants a team to play, then ,having finally arrived at that point, has to start picking the players (nowadays from around the world) who can conform to his ideas whilst at the same time be constantly on the lookout on how and where he can improve upon those already selected to further his aforesaid ideas. The men who can do this are very scarce due to the relatively small number of positions in where to gain such experience and one does not have to look far to see the almost endless line of "failures" in such positions,not only in England ,but around the football world. That brings us to the question,what is the "tenure expectancy" of a National team coach/manager. A brief foray into statistics will show it is not a job for longevity and our own country is a classic example with,since Rale Rasic took the Socceroos to Germany in 1974,, we have had 23 different coaches in those 42 years. Even an examination of those 23 positions will show that during that time we had the " suits" filling the position 8 times with what they termed "caretaker managers" and from all that info we find ,getting back to birthright,only 3 of those selected were actually born in Australia those being Frank Farina,Graham Arnold and Aurelio Vidmar, the latter 2 holding down caretaker roles very briefly. So you see, England is not the only country to be faced with this problem. Take the world leaders Spain who in the same time frame have had 8 coaches, with del Bosque, the latest "victim" after an 8 year success rate of 76%, success remember, playing in National team competitions.!!!!!!. So my friend, not an easy problem for the English "suits " to solve is it???? Cheers jb

2016-07-11T23:00:21+00:00

Caltex & SBS support Australian Football

Guest


If ever there was a stage set, for a long time serving EPL manager to come to the fore, as the new England manager; it is Arsene Wenger's time. Surely, the FA are not going to hold the view of him being a Frenchman, that is going to rule him out..?

Read more at The Roar