In part two of my blog, I will look into Team Sky’s dominance of the Tour in recent times, and question some of the key contender’s motives.
Team Sky’s tactics
Maybe people’s feelings of overall boredom are not about the actual race situation, but the way in which Team Sky have been able to assert such suffocation over their rivals since Bradley Wiggins rode into yellow back in 2012. These feelings have been slowly growing since that time, and every year seem to get just that little bit more noticeable.
People have been asking the question of how to solve the issue of Sky’s dominance. It’s a hard one to solve. Team Sky have shown definite signs of weakness on two notable occasions over the last two years, being the backend of the 2015 Tour de France, and on the final stage of the 2014 Criterium du Dauphine.
On both occasions, when a team sent riders up the road and attacked the race early, did the race start to work in their favour. We did not see any of this during this Tour.
In fact, we saw the complete opposite, with Chris Froome attacking on the descent of the Col de Peyresourde, something we had not seen so far in Froome’s career.
Even though the descent was quite open, and not very technical, he looked fantastic on the wide open roads, and was able to win Stage 8 by 13 seconds.
The same cannot be said for the other favourites, most notably Nairo Quintana who let the gap open up at the top of the descent. A mistake yes, but one that should not have been a problem on such a wide open, pedalling descent.
Quintana’s teammate Valverde attempted to bridge, however did not get any support until BMC came to the front in the final few kilometres, when the gap was already too far to bridge.
Both BMC, Movistar, and in my opinion, both Daniel Martin and Joaquin Rodriguez should have all helped to pull that break from Froome back. Martin, Rodriguez and Valverde would have been the favourites to win from the reduced sprint finish had there been one.
Stage 8 was the start of a Tour full of potential winners of the race waiting for others to do the work for them.
Another instance of questionable tactics was on Stage 19, when Astana attacked early in the stage with a team attack, however, failed to ram home the advantage and make the attack more than just a show of numbers at the front.
We as fans always love the surprise attacks and whether they succeed or not, we will respect the challengers for making such attacks. Contador’s attack to win the Vuelta in 2012 and Schleck taking a 60 kilometre escape to win a top of the Galibier in 2011 are just some of the incredible moments over the last ten years that have captivated cycling fans because such attacks were thought to be a tad crazy.
If Sky is not going to get attacked, then it is not their fault that the race is boring or uninteresting. That’s the way they win, why would they stop doing that?
The main cause for concern is the fact that the key contenders (Quintana, I am referring to you) did not put in one major attack against Sky this year. Therein lies the problem; too many people racing for second place.
Maybe that is the smart thing to do, as they may know that they do not have the legs to compete with Froome, however, you won’t know what your abilities are if you do not try.
Some had their reasons, like Adam Yates and Louis Meintjes, who were revelations this Tour, however, for the other contenders, they only have themselves to blame for not winning, if that was even their objective in the first place.
Part 3 of my blog will discuss the next crop of riders coming through, and sum up the main reasons why I found this Tour to be intriguing.
Rob Gremio
Roar Pro
Definitely the two leader strategy at BMC was bad business for Richie Porte. That Porte had by far the better form heading into the Tour should have given Porte the leadership - he had gone very well in the Dauphine while Van Garderen struggled at the Tour de Swiss. I think the fact that BMC is registered in America meant they felt pressure to maintain an American leader. They might think differently in the future...
tyrone
Guest
they might change their name, otherwise get used to it
mudjimba
Guest
There were 2 occassions when Ritchie was left on his own. Firstly the puncture & then he had a crash & had NO ONE with him. He tried attacking later in the stage but didn't have it in him after having to race back on after the crash. That would NEVER happen at SKY. I don't want to be watching SKY in the lead for the next 4-5 years. Boring. Although Froome won me over with his daring this tour.
Diggs
Roar Rookie
BMC made potentially the mistake of having two leaders. When Porte had that puncture Van Garderan was also in a good position, I think they got confused whether to help Porte back or keep supporting Tejay maintain his position. Pretty risky going in with two leaders and an average support cast. As it turned out, Porte suffered from bad luck but clearly was one of the best in the final week and Tejay suffered by not being good enough...again. Top 5 finishes seem a long way away and I believe he should target classics and 1 week events.
BrainsTrust
Guest
The big winner tactically in this tour was Quintana, a podium when he didn't looked top 10 , Val Verde was clearly better than him and sacrificed himself for nothing. I think Froome was too worried about Qunitana and stretched himself unecessarily trying to get Quintana to go after him solo on the flat without success. Quintana never lost his cool and while Froome gained some seconds and a lot of brownie points for his attacks those efforts probably cost him easier domination in the mountainous stages. Quintana the only times he did attack was perfect tactically and he still lost time.I actually think Team Sky helped Quintana the most with the steady tempo. The biggest joke of a team was BMC and how they treated Porte, they left him behind the one time he needed them and were useless or looking for individual glory otherwise. He has made the same mistake as Cadel Evans , getting into teams that are not that big budget, not that supportive and use them to try and carry others into contention.
tyrone
Guest
"The main cause for concern is the fact that the key contenders (Quintana, I am referring to you) did not put in one major attack against Sky this year. Therein lies the problem; too many people racing for second place. Maybe that is the smart thing to do, as they may know that they do not have the legs to compete with Froome, however, you won’t know what your abilities are if you do not try." Maybe he knew his abilities and realised that second is better than third or worse. Every cyclist wants to win, I think every cyclist in the race knew they were racing for second due to the course and how damn good Froome is. I think Movistar did try to attack but to get a gap they were so far in the red that they would have been shot out the back of the peloton quick smart and not even got into the top ten.