Cloke and blunted dagger: Why teams must avoid Travis

By Jay Croucher / Expert

There were moments in Travis Cloke’s 12 years at Collingwood where it looked like he was on the verge of towering over the competition with his colossal stature, and might finally grip it in his vice-like hands.

I sat in the stands of the MCG for the 2011 grand final and witnessed the ‘Travis Cloke game’.

Cloke entered the season finale as the All Australian centre half forward. The most powerful and imposing physical force in the league.

The one player you didn’t want to cut in front of at the cab rank next to Flinders St Station at 4am.

In the first half of the grand final he imposed his will like no other player. He kicked three goals, all incredible shots from outside 50 (the first was from beyond 70), and manhandled his opponents like they were schoolkids, making Harry Taylor look like Harry Potter without the powers.

But then Tom Lonergan moved onto Cloke in the second half and took him out of the game. Cloke was totally unsighted after halftime, making the transition from imposing to impotent, and Collingwood lost. A performance that looked like it might be remembered for decades didn’t even make it to 7pm.

It was perfectly symbolic of Cloke’s career – a player who promised so much, delivered more than a little, but ultimately left you with a bitter taste in your mouth. (Click to Tweet)

Cloke’s breathtaking first half serves as nothing but a footnote to that grand final, and his career will only make for a sentence or two in the book of Collingwood’s most sustained era of success since the 1950s, when for so long it looked like it would have its own paragraph, at least.

The numbers have never done justice to Cloke, positively or negatively. Yes, he’s only kicked above 40 goals in three of his 12 seasons. But his value was never as goalkicker – how could it be with the way he kicked for goal – it was as the link man between defence and attack, the player who would bail out plodding movement and the long ball lofted in desperation to the wing with a bruising, unlikely pack mark that kept the chains moving.

His work-rate for a man of his size was the best in the league outside of Nick Riewoldt. He covered the ground improbably well for a 108-kilogram titan, and got to more contests than seemed reasonable.

But that figure, its stature and its reality – the Adonis who kept on running – has been dismantled, and what’s left is entirely unremarkable.

Once the man who bailed out plodding movement, now Cloke is that plodding movement. Given his size, his most iconic moments – the brutish victories in one-on-one contests, the destructive pack marks – and his lack of grace at the best of times, it’s easy to forget that Cloke in his youth and his prime was surprisingly agile.

That’s gone. Now he’s painfully lumbering, with the turning circle of a truck. Between Cloke and Nathan Brown, it’s been a rough year at both ends for Collingwood fans wanting some lateral quickness from their key position players.

The question that the Bulldogs, Cloke’s declared team of choice for 2017, need to ponder is simple: what exactly does Travis Cloke do well anymore?

In his prime his strengths were self-evident: Herculean strength, hands of glue, and phenomenal endurance. Those steady hands have started to tremble, and while he’s still got the occasional breathtaking clunk in him, now he regularly spills regulation marks. He doesn’t cover the ground nearly as well anymore, and his strength, while still impressive, is no longer remarkable. And he’s not making up for those deficiencies with a deadeye for goal.

That sadly is going to be how I remember Cloke most. I’ll remember the fact that he spent several years as one of the top three of four forwards in the league, yet I cringed whenever he marked inside 50, hoping that Alan Didak or Scott Pendlebury might be mercifully running past for a handball.

It’s difficult to describe the existential pain that comes with supporting a star forward who can’t kick. Richmond and St Kilda fans know a bit about it – with their histories with Matthew Richardson and Riewoldt – but when it comes to goal-kicking debacles, Cloke’s golden crown shines the brightest.

The only person who had less faith in Travis Cloke kicking for goal than I did was Travis Cloke. You could see the dread on his face, the palpable nerves, the thoughts going through his head of ‘I can do this. I can do this. I definitely can’t do this.’

The upside of his woeful inaccuracy was that the times he got it right were some of the most euphoric you could imagine. Shock multiples ecstasy tenfold. His set-shot goal to put Collingwood in front in the 2011 preliminary final against Hawthorn with five minutes to go might be the loudest I’ve heard the MCG – tens of thousands of rabid Collingwood fans, myself among them, screaming in agonised jubilation, revelling in a moment of bliss that never should have been.

The downside was when he almost cost Collingwood a premiership by missing two point-blank shots at goal just before halftime of the first 2010 decider. If he makes either of those, which any 12-year-old with a semblance of hand-eye coordination would be expected to, Leon Davis gets to say that he played in a premiership.

That was the Travis Cloke life as a Collingwood fan. He was a tough player to love. Between the soul-crushing set-shot misses and the fact that he had a permanent snarl on his face, always looking like he’d had seven too many and was about to beat up the guy with the topknot grinding his girlfriend on the dance-floor, you could never cherish Cloke the same way you could a Didak.

But he always seemed to lift in finals and his effort until this season could rarely be questioned. His best was transcendent, with some of the most dominant individual performances in recent AFL history, games that reminded you of the sheer authority and influence a classical power forward can have on a game (seven goals, 14 marks – six contested – against Richmond in 2013 springs to mind).

It sure was a time, Travis – a good time? I’m not entirely sure, but a time all the same.

Enjoy Bulldogs fans, or Richmond fans, or, God forbid, Collingwood fans – whoever finds him on their list next season. At the best of times, Travis was a struggle. And those times are long gone.

The Crowd Says:

2016-09-08T12:01:19+00:00

Colin Wood

Guest


Sorry Dave but he will absolutely be playing for someone next year, I've got my eye on Honeychurch for him.

2016-09-08T11:06:32+00:00

Slane

Guest


He should go to GWS and only play home games.

2016-09-08T10:31:41+00:00

dave

Guest


Sorry Trav I think your chances of playing again are about the same as some club asking Fev to make a comeback to AFL. Sorry again but I think If it were my team I'd prefer take Fev.

2016-09-08T09:33:57+00:00

Bretto

Guest


The bloke comments on every article about Collingwood. And not so much providing opinion as predictable vitriol. Get a life.

2016-09-08T09:22:54+00:00

Simoc

Guest


Maybe you haven't watched these guys in training or the warm up. They all nail kicks from everywhere, easy as. Then game on and the shots go every way, sometimes straight. And sometimes they go straight but are poorly aimed. That's match pressure and some thrive and others like Cloke don't. It's a mental thing for all players and always has been.

2016-09-08T07:13:19+00:00

Pumping Dougie

Guest


Never heard of him matty, but sounds like we're on the same page.

2016-09-08T07:08:29+00:00

Colin Wood

Guest


Didn't do the off club extra flexibility and mobility training to change his body shape the way the coach asked him to and the way other more professional players on less money did to keep up with the modern game. Long term contracts produce lazy players!

2016-09-08T05:57:01+00:00

I hate pies

Guest


Matty's on the ball. My comments on Dogs articles and bullishness about their chances probably gives that away. I admit it though, I don't like pies, but that's got no correlation to Collingwood articles. In fact, there aren't that many Collingwood articles on the Roar, which makes a nice change from the usual saturation. Of course, this is an opinion website, so I'm just doing what's expected.

2016-09-08T05:46:42+00:00

richo

Guest


i think Clokey is a fair bit fitter, Schulz has struggled with head injury and thats finished him

2016-09-08T05:44:53+00:00

richo

Guest


he has struggled with pressure, its all been mental for him. he works hard on technique and does a lot of training. at one stage he was training with an ipod that had crowd noise on it to try and simulate environment. its those clutch moments that have let him down his whole career, and the reason why he hasnt achieved greatness only very goodness

2016-09-08T05:39:32+00:00

richo

Guest


i hate richmond and always look forward to reading articles about how crap they are...lol

2016-09-08T05:23:24+00:00

mattyb

Guest


Dougie,I'm pretty keen on us using one of our late picks to recruit Hannan from our VFL side. He is much smaller than Cloke but can certainly take a mark. He also can play that lead up role taking marks on the wing which I'm guessing Cloke would do. I'm thinking Hannan could work in a similar fashion to what Adams was and he certainly has more up side and would probably be a lot cheaper than Cloke.

2016-09-08T05:17:26+00:00

mattyb

Guest


Bretton, unless of course he barracks for the Doggies,which is the club Cloke has in fact nominated. In that case his comments would be perfectly fine and normal while at the same time making yours both misinformed and rather harsh.

2016-09-08T04:22:01+00:00

Franko

Guest


If a club is out there looking for a "mature" forward to straighten them up, surely Jay Schulz is the man? Schulz can lead, crash a pack and is a beautiful kick. Not disputing Cloke can take a great mark, but that's when the problems start...

2016-09-08T04:14:20+00:00

Bretto

Guest


For someone who hates the Pies, you are nearly always one of the first to comment on articles that are about Collingwood. It's really a bit strange, and quite sad.

2016-09-08T03:15:16+00:00

Penster

Guest


He's not that bad, just too much hype, expectation and money around him. He'd be a good ruckman who could go forward and kick the occasional (very occasional) goal, big body in the packs, overhead marking handy. Away from Bucks and the Pies, may regain some form. And he'll come as a bargain no doubt. Good pick up for the Doggies if they've got him.

2016-09-08T02:56:52+00:00

Pumping Dougie

Guest


Hardly a fair trade either, for a young emerging player who is getting a regular game in a finals outfit, versus an ageing player who is in the VFL side of a non-finals side. I can't see him coming to the Doggies unless Collingwood delist him, or accept a 4th round pick and base rates. I think the Doogies would be better off recruiting a young key forward as insurance, like James Cameron from GWS.

2016-09-08T01:52:51+00:00

PartTimeZombie

Guest


Tom, I'm sure you're right, he must have been offered something, or he wouldn't have nominated the Bulldogs, but that still doesn't answer the why. He might be swapped for Lin Jong, but that's hardly like for like, they're not the same kind of player. I'm still baffled.

2016-09-08T01:07:03+00:00

Lamby

Roar Rookie


The thing I can't understand is how he has not improved his goal kicking. That is the one thing that he could have worked on and improved. I keep comparing him to Josh Jenkins, and maybe Josh knew he was a plodder so the only way to get a game was to make the most of the few opportunities that came his way. Josh had the worst set shot percentage in the league in 2013 - and an overall percentage at 50%. His next few years were 60%, 68%, 70% (this year) - so he has improved his kicking accuracy every year. He has improved so he turns a 30 goal year to a 40 goal year, or (this year) turns a 50 goal year to a 60 goal year. If you look at Travis - he has been terrible his whole career from 2006-2016 the accuracy was: 33%, 50%, 61%, 45%, 49%, 58%, 63%, 57%, 56%, 59%, 51%. They are some terrible numbers. How can a fully professional sportsman who's job it is to kick goals NOT improve over a 10 year period? That is why I would not pick him up. If he cannot be bothered (?) to improve his kicking over his career, how is he going to be better or help another club? A club is better off picking a youngish 'Podsiadly' out of a local comp.

2016-09-08T01:03:23+00:00

Colin Wood

Guest


Yes they should... no they won't!

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar