Improved Wallabies must find more to beat the Pumas

By Elisha Pearce / Expert

A win does a lot for one’s outlook in sport and on the weekend we’ll see what’s changed about how the Wallabies see themselves – and the world – against Argentina.

A 23-17 win against South Africa that left me and many others without many fingernails during the last 15 minutes is still a win. The end was scratchy but it will build self-belief.

And that win is the first positive for the Wallabies since their great first 20 minutes in the first England Test – how long ago does that feel now?

During the Brisbane Test, Rod Kafer reported one of the messages in the Wallabies rooms during halftime was not to be so surprised when they play well. It’s an odd message to pass on, but anyone who has been on the end of multiple losses knows it makes you question everything.

Now the Wallabies have a win under their belt, it can be expected that they will have a bit more self-belief. And they’ll need it.

The truth is hosting Argentina this weekend is going to be another step up from the Springboks if the Pumas play anything like they did against the All Blacks.

The Pumas played with a speed, skill and consistency that made the All Blacks work hard. The final score line doesn’t show how well the Pumas played for a lot of that game.

On Twitter during the match, I questioned whether any team could keep up over 80 minutes the speed and adventurous play the Pumas tried on against New Zealand. The answer for the Argentines – like the Welsh who tried a similar gambit in their first Test – was no.

But the first half was enough to show the Pumas have the game to trouble anyone, and their victory against the Springboks is further evidence.

Here are two pleasing Wallabies improvements against South Africa, then two areas on which they must improve.

Lineouts
The Wallabies were able to secure more of their lineout ball against the Boks than in the two Bledisloe Cup matches.

In those two matches, Australia won 71 per cent and then 67 per cent of their own throws. The second figure is a debacle at Test level.

That figure improved to 86 per cent in Brisbane, which should climb to at least 90 per cent before you are content, but the leap back to respectability was important.

The lineouts weren’t pretty, but they were more effective.

Stealing a lineout was never going to happen – the Wallabies were always late and hardly ever in line with the South African leaper – but winning your own ball is a baseline to grow from.

Composure
Australia conceded a try just four minutes into the Brisbane Test, then conceded a second after an intercept while they were hot on attack 15 minutes later.

Despite falling behind 14-3 early, the Wallabies played like they still believed they could win, and worked hard to find a way to do so.(Click to Tweet)

They showed composure when they could have wilted in the face of a sizeable deficit, with a sixth straight loss looming.

Against England and then New Zealand it wasn’t just falling behind that threw the Wallabies off their game, although it did. They got caught into niggle and argy-bargy action that sent them spinning as well.

Against South Africa there was about the usual amount of physicality, in the game and after the whistle, but even when they got involved it didn’t change the Wallabies’ play. It didn’t greatly change their demeanour and they remained focused on finding a way to win the match instead of the next fight.

Midfield ruck support
The first of the tries the Springboks scored, and other good attacking moments, came because they secured turnovers at the ruck in midfield.

The Aussie combination of Quade Cooper and Bernard Foley at 10 and 12 leaves them somewhat vulnerable to ruck turnovers in space. Flankers and other bigger backs will be hard targets to remove if either Cooper or Foley are the first person to a ruck in support.

The Springboks were good at targeting those opportunities. Turnovers and slow ruck ball are a worry for the Wallabies in midfield.

Foley and Cooper must be accurate and effective in backing each other up at the ruck. But the Australian forwards have to be wary of the threat and plan ways to arrive quickly, especially of set piece ball.

Defence around the ruck
The Wallabies’ defence wasn’t especially bad around the ruck in Brisbane, as they made 87 per cent of their tackles – a decent and improved statistic on the previous two matches.

But the Pumas were extremely effective around the ruck against the All Blacks, meaning the task will be hard for the Wallabies too.

Great offloads, short passes, and wing runners around the ruck will be part of the Argentine gameplan again. If they do it as well as they did against the All Blacks, holding them to their 22 points of last weekend will be a challenge.

Will Genia will have to make some more clean-up tackles as well, but ideally the forwards will stay on their game and prevent traffic getting through.

Forwards are going to have to stay vigilant in the first and second channels from the ruck. Lazy and tired forwards will be punished on the inside if they don’t stay in the line or turn their shoulder across the field too early.

The Wallabies just tasted victory for the first time this year. They’ll want to get that winning feeling back for a second week in a row after a drought.

They should have the tenacity and confidence to scrape home in this one, but nothing can be taken for granted against this Pumas side.

The Crowd Says:

2016-09-15T21:09:00+00:00

Upfromdown

Guest


The caveat was if Cheika picks the right team, they would be closer. Even as s fan of Cheika his selections have been poor this year. He (understandably) displayed loyalty earlier in the year, but he now needs to start moving guys on. Maybe that will come as the year goes by.

2016-09-15T19:54:31+00:00

Karl Knuth

Roar Pro


1. Dan Coles 2. Creevy 3. Franks 4. Rettalick 5. Etzebeth 6. Kaino 7. Pocock 8. Read/Vermeulan 9. Smith 10. Barrett 11. Folau 12. Crotty 13. Davies 14. Dagg 15. B.Smith 16. Dane Coles 17. Moody 18. Marler 19. Whitelock 20. Savea 21. Genia 22. Cooper/Cruden 23. Nahalo/Savea

2016-09-15T06:32:38+00:00

taylorman

Roar Guru


Oh, so you found it necessary to say oz have had it harder so far because they played NZ first? Gee. Stirring stuff. Who'd have guessed that?

2016-09-15T03:13:19+00:00

Richard

Guest


Uglykiwi..You were never to smart neither,,

2016-09-15T02:42:21+00:00

John

Guest


Average fullback at best....Wallabies Rookie of the Year, 2 x Wallabies Player of the Year, catalyst for Super Rugby Championship, catalyst for Rugby Championships, World Cup finalist.

2016-09-15T02:38:30+00:00

John

Guest


Folau is the best winger, centre and fullback in Australian Rugby, comfortably.

2016-09-15T02:37:12+00:00

John

Guest


"He has that rare quality of being able to see opportunities and change the course of a game." haha not as rare as you think BF.

2016-09-15T02:27:48+00:00

Browny

Roar Rookie


"Unfortunately for you Hoges stats don’t lie mate…tries, assists, offloads, metres gained, defenders beaten…" After evening up the numbers to match Folau's minutes played: Tries: Folau 11, Kerevi 5.7, Kuridrani 1.9 Assists: Folau 5, Kerevi 4.5, Kuridrrani 1.9 Offloads: Folau 24, Kerevi 26, Kuridrani 4.6 Metres Run: Folau 1234, Kerevi 1118.3, Kuridrani 535.9 Defenders Beaten: Folau 55, Kerevi 70.2, Kuridrani 31.5 Carries: Folau 169, Kerevi 206, Kuridrani 128.9 Clean Breaks: Folau 24, Kerevi 28.3, Kuridrani 11.1 Tackles: Folau 43, Kerevi 78.1, Kuridrani 75.1 Folau obviously gets the 'bonus metres' from returning kicks from fullback where he defends. Kuridrani the best defensive centre (I think we all knew that anyay), Kerevi crushes it on carries, offloads, defenders beaten, clean breaks and Folau has metres, tries & assists. Not as clear cut in favour of Folau as you seem to suggest. And I've only looked at the three prominent Australian's and not anyone else abroad... Personally I'd still like to see the three of them in a row now Cooper is steering the ship, either at 11-12-13 or 12-13-14...

2016-09-15T02:03:02+00:00

lassitude

Guest


Folau would be a winger in NZ with a roving brief and might drift to fullback later in the game but there are too many holes in his skillset for him to start there IMO. He wouldn't be 13 yet - his skillset is simply not good enough particularly his positional defence. However if he'd entered the NZ system when he converted then his fullback skills would be better than they are now. Possibly his center skills would be as well. But to be honest I wouldn't trade him for either Bender or Dagg.

2016-09-15T01:39:08+00:00

Browny

Roar Rookie


Ok, John. Folau cannot kick at the level of a tier 1 international fullback. He's genuinely the worst kick of any of the top 10 nations. He's a great runner and great under the high ball, as is Smith, but he lacks the nous to position himself correctly at times, struggles to pass and has zero playmaking ability. unlike Smith. I'm also going to call you on the best centre in Super Rugby... the guy wasn't even the best centre of the Australian teams...cough, cough, Samu Kerevi... Just because he runs the ball from the midfield in attack doesn't make him a centre, at least not until he learns how to tackles and can defend in the 13 channel. Folau could be a better wing than Smith but alas he doesn't play there...

2016-09-15T00:48:47+00:00

taylorman

Roar Guru


Yeah thanks, with Smith you don't need a memory

2016-09-15T00:33:28+00:00

Richard

Guest


Don't know these blokes?? 13 kerivi 14 falua

2016-09-15T00:31:59+00:00

Buzzard

Guest


Fooley is a dud. Hooper is ARU`S Golden boy. Mummy is soft. Chieka is a dope.

2016-09-15T00:18:57+00:00

Terry

Guest


Forget the injured players, only current players who aren't injured... Beale No De Jager No SBW No Moala No

2016-09-15T00:15:09+00:00

Huh?

Guest


Hooper world class ??..hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

2016-09-15T00:13:37+00:00

Terry

Guest


Well Uglykiwi the world " 23 " would be the AIGS wouldn`t it??

2016-09-15T00:08:37+00:00

Terry

Guest


Hooper will be on the wing most of the game trying to score a try as per normal, he will win his 5th SEIKO MOTM award on that stat alone..

2016-09-14T23:55:49+00:00

Blind Freddy

Guest


John just so you know there are lies, damn lies and statistics! You can prove anything you like with statistics. A for your claim that Folau is superior to Ben Smith. That is the most fanciful thing that I have ever read on this site. Ben Smith is the best player in world rugby. He has vison, pace and a rugby brain, scores loads of ties and creates just as many. he has become the go to man when the ABs get in trouble, as per the most recent test against Argentina. He has that rare quality of being able to see opportunities and change the course of a game.

2016-09-14T23:25:12+00:00

Porkie

Guest


With you all the way ugly dud

2016-09-14T23:23:50+00:00

Dave

Guest


Ha- one eyed fanbois. Folau is average at best at full back. His position is wing and even then he hasn't got top end pace.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar