If I were Joe Root, I would be afraid of Ravi Ashwin

By Anindya Dutta / Roar Guru

He is the top-ranked Test bowler in the world. And there is good reason for this.

In the past year and a half, Ravi Ashwin’s average is 16.77 with 101 wickets from 15 Tests. These Tests have been played in India, the West Indies and Sri Lanka.

He is the second fastest to reach 200 Test wickets after the legendary Charlie Grimmett. And the way he has progressed since then, few would bet against him getting to the 300 mark before anyone else. If he does so, he would have eclipsed Dennis Lillee’s record which has stood for over three decades.

And he is rapidly becoming talked about as the main contender for the top all-rounder slot long vacated by Jacques Kallis.

Questions continue to be asked about Ashwin’s perceived lack of success on foreign soil – the West Indies is dismissed by one of the leading Dailies in the UK recently as “almost sub-continental” – because 70 per cent of his wickets have come at home, where he has bowled 60 per cent of his overs.

But as I pointed out in my article in The Roar last month, Lillee bowled 69 per cent of his overs at home and took 67 per cent of wickets on Australian pitches. So ‘home advantage’ is not Ashwin’s alone but applies to most bowlers.

Let’s also not forget that spinners mature late, and Ashwin’s perceived lack of success on South African and English pitches was three years ago when he was still developing his craft. He didn’t bowl badly in Australia in 2015, and is a much-improved bowler 18 months later. So at the age of 30, he is getting to the peak of his prowess.

And it is in this context that batsmen around the world are paying attention to a trend that for them is far more worrying.

You are the best batsman in the team? Don’t say it too loudly around Ravi Ashwin!

Kumar Sangakkara is one of the best batsmen to have come out of Sri Lanka as a part of their Golden Generation.

134 Tests. 12400 Runs. Batting Average 57.40. Highest score of 319.

Statistics that can only draw out one reaction – Wow!

A remarkable career was topped off by his second award as Wisden’s Leading Cricketer in the World in 2014, and the series against India in August 2015 was his swan song, where he would help Sri Lanka win the series and retire in a blaze of glory.

Unfortunately, no one sent Ravi Ashwin this script.

Sangakkara had scores of 5, 40, 32 and 18 in the two Tests that he played. While those were not the scores the great man was looking for, one could point to Bradman’s last innings duck and just focus on Sangakkara’s fantastic career.

What rankled however, was, that in his last series, the leading cricketer in the world became Ravi Ashwin’s bunny, falling to his guile in all of the four times that he came out to bat.

Bad luck, one would say. If not for what happened 12 months later.

Kane Williamson came to India as Wisden’s Leading Cricketer for the World in 2015 and one of Wisden’s Leading Cricketers for 2016.

52 Tests. 4393 Runs. Batting Average 51.08. Highest Score of 242 not out.

A century or more against every Test-playing country in the world.

Captain of New Zealand.

Not bad for a 26-year-old with perhaps a decade of cricket in front of him.

But not good enough to prevail against Ravichandran Ashwin.

In a repeat of the fate that befell his predecessor at the top of the Wisden list, Williamson played two Tests in India and was Ashwin’s bunny, getting out all four times to him. Other than a score of 75 in his first innings, it would count as a series this young batting sensation would like to forget.

With Joe Root coming to India with a reputation as England’s best batsman, and the memory of a 254 against Pakistan at Old Trafford still bringing a spring to his step, we should get ready for a battle royale.

But if the past 18 months and the shattered egos of Sangakkara and Williamson are any indication, if I were Joe Root, I would slip quietly past Mumbai customs, without declaring any silverware.

With Ravi Ashwin taking a well-deserved rest before the series, I would be afraid.

Very afraid.

The Crowd Says:

2016-10-24T14:40:54+00:00

Tanmoy kar

Guest


The way England won the First Test against Bangladesh by only 22 runs from the jaws-of-defeat, one can easily predict that they are going to loose at least 4 of the 5 Test matches against India.

AUTHOR

2016-10-24T14:40:41+00:00

Anindya Dutta

Roar Guru


I am so looking forward for him to be exposed because I am bit tired about hearing how good he is against spin.

2016-10-24T14:29:57+00:00

Tanmoy kar

Guest


How good is Cook against spin we have witnessed in the First Test against Bangla Desh!

AUTHOR

2016-10-18T04:39:48+00:00

Anindya Dutta

Roar Guru


Indeed he does. He is in the list of the best current test all rounders at the moment I would think.

2016-10-18T04:09:29+00:00

BurgyGreen

Guest


Yes, but the point is the DK example doesn't actually support the article's argument whatsoever.

AUTHOR

2016-10-18T03:51:35+00:00

Anindya Dutta

Roar Guru


Interesting point Tim. Shami and Yadav (although I am less enamoured with his brain dead approach to fast bowling) can be effective on many Indian wickets and may be a factor indeed.

2016-10-18T03:20:24+00:00

Tim Holt

Roar Guru


The aforementioned bunch before Cook for they all give you a chance. You would never see Cook running down the pitch to sacrifice like Smith did in SL. You have to get Cook out, which is a foreign concept to modern batsmen

AUTHOR

2016-10-18T03:07:26+00:00

Anindya Dutta

Roar Guru


Absolutely JimmyB! Its one of my favourite places for sports reading :) I like to think my writing just put a spin on the situation with a slightly different perspective.

AUTHOR

2016-10-18T03:05:28+00:00

Anindya Dutta

Roar Guru


Nail on the head Andy! Thanks.

2016-10-18T02:58:00+00:00

Harvey

Guest


Ashwin also averages 33 with the bat and has 4 centuries to his name

2016-10-18T02:54:58+00:00

JimmyB

Guest


So you read the article in the Guardian as well then Anindya?!

2016-10-18T02:37:53+00:00

Andy

Guest


I wonder if bowlers would prefer to play against a player like Root, Smith, Kholi, Williamson or a player like Cook, assuming they were in their best form. Would a bowler prefer to play against someone who scores quickly and can totally take the game away from you but you feel you can get them out or someone who scores half as fast but just doesnt give you anything and who you know you cannot tempt.

2016-10-18T02:31:10+00:00

Andy

Guest


There are probably better examples but none as topical for an Australian reader or as well known.

2016-10-18T02:29:53+00:00

Andy

Guest


Nah its a great article, the basic claim that Root is afraid is obviously written as overblown. The author doesnt actually think that Root is afraid but its also just as obvious that Ashwin is bowling wonderfully and that the contest between them could be very very good. I dont read the article as provocative at all but just a fun article that is looking to see if Root can succeed where Wliliamson failed. When we tour India this article should just be copy and pasted exchanging Roots name with Smiths and either adding how Root failed or succeeded.

AUTHOR

2016-10-18T02:27:28+00:00

Anindya Dutta

Roar Guru


Spruce cannot disagree on past evidence. The next two yeras will define exactly how good he is on different surfces (or isn't). Personally, i think he will be a different bowler next time he is on the road. But the proof of the pudding will no doubt be in the eating.

2016-10-18T01:51:43+00:00

spruce moose

Guest


Hmm...yeah, partially agree. But his record in Aus/Eng/SA is not just poor. It's appalling. He is given an overwhelming leg up on Indian pitches there. I fully expect him to be given ridiculously prepared turners when Australia comes over. Heck, after seeing Australia's performance in Sri Lanka, I bloody well would too.

2016-10-18T01:18:50+00:00

BurgyGreen

Guest


I agree, there are surely better examples than DK, whose home and away averages are virtually identical (although according to Statsguru his home strike rate (49.9) is better than his away strike rate (55.9). Ashwin's average is almost 13 runs higher away from home.

AUTHOR

2016-10-18T00:54:41+00:00

Anindya Dutta

Roar Guru


It wasn't meant to be a relative comparison against Lillee. I am just making the point that Ashwin is not the only one with a better home record than away.

2016-10-18T00:38:32+00:00

JMarlin

Guest


The home ground advantage comparison to DK Lillee actually supports the argument against. Ashwin strikes at almost 50% better at home than away (only 30% of wickets away from 40% of tests). By contrast, DK had a better strike rate away from home than at home.

AUTHOR

2016-10-18T00:16:34+00:00

Anindya Dutta

Roar Guru


I think when the away series' start in a few months people will realise this.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar