Behind the scenes of building Collingwood’s playing list

By AJ Mithen / Expert

The work of an AFL recruiter affects a huge number of people. Aside from players, there are coaches, whose employment prospects largely depend on the quality of your work.

There’s corporate areas, reliant on your work to generate excitement and drive for memberships. There’s also the club’s supporters, who count on you every November to give them a reason to believe for the years ahead.

Dominic Milesi is National Recruiting Manager for the Collingwood Football Club, the biggest club in the land, if not the biggest in Australian sport. He’s been with the Pies since 2008, going full-time in 2010.

It’s been a long road to get to this point — his early career scouting and recruiting AFL prospects were unpaid volunteer hours at the Box Hill Hawks in the VFL.

Milesi’s role at Collingwood is the culmination of nine years of part-time and volunteer work at Box Hill, Hawthorn and his own research work, all while holding down a full-time job ‘on the side’.

Talking to the Australian sports podcast ‘A Sporting Discussion’, Milesi tells what goes on behind the scenes of drafting players for Australia’s most famous club.

The Set Up
Collingwood’s full-time recruiting team consists of four people – Milesi, Derek Hine (List Manager, responsible for contracts and trades) and recruiters Matthew Rendell and Adam Shepard.

“We’ve got four, which is actually one of the smaller (full-time) teams across the AFL,” Milesi says. “Some of the others run with seven, eight or nine.

“We’ve got about 15-16 part time staff scattered across Australia. They’re probably the unsung heroes of the football industry – they do all the hard yards going to games in the country that we can’t get to, a lot of them have normal jobs, they work Monday to Friday and they just do it for the love of footy.”

“We rely very heavily on them to be our eyes and ears on the ground because we can’t be everywhere at once.”

Travel, analysis then more travel and more analysis
Counting preseason, school competitions and leagues around Australia, Milesi says he’d attend over 100 games a year. “A lot of the time you’re only at a game for two quarters, three quarters then you’re off to the next one, it’s hard to keep an accurate count. I tried to once and gave up!”

The hard yards start each Monday at the Holden Centre, reviewing statistics from competitions across Australia, talking to part-time staff, interviewing prospects and moving the obligatory magnetic names around on the whiteboard.

The team receives up to 50 games’ worth of video footage from the Australian leagues. The footage is provided by Champion Data and is coded by player, giving Milesi and his team deep access to potential draftees.

“Basically, Tuesday and Wednesday is watching edits of players we might not have seen a lot of, guys who have been recommended. There’s a lot of sitting in front of the computer watching footy,”

Milesi is quick to point out that video isn’t the ‘be all and end all’ for deciding on a player. “All the video in the world might not give you the whole story on a player. There’s never any substitute for watching a player live.

“You have to go and watch them live and see what their running patterns are like, what they’re like at the breaks, at the huddles, in the warmup. They probably don’t think we’re watching them at those times, but we are, we see how a kid reacts if they’re dragged.”

Looking past talent
The profile of your typical AFL recruit has changed a lot over the years. It used to be that raw talent alone could get you drafted, but as Milesi explains, this has evolved for the ‘modern AFL’.

“It’s really changed from when I started a few years ago – you have to really have to know what the learning style of the kid is, what kind of coaching style is going to work for him.”

“AFL footy is so structured and most of the kids are coming out of a competition where they’re really encouraged to play. They don’t actually have much structure in terms of their setups and we prefer that, we can just assess them on their playing ability – but then the issue is they come in and have to learn how to adapt to whatever game style that particular team is playing.”

Collingwood pays a lot of attention to a prospect’s off-field life. “We have to do a lot of assessment on their psychological makeup – we have a psych employed who helps us with that – but a lot of it is just talking to people – teammates, coaches, school teachers, his boss at work – get a bit of a feel for them that way.”

Baking the bread
With the work of the recruiter so entwined with a coaches role, it’s easy to assume that a coach would lean on the recruiting team for a specific type of player or indeed a particular individual. Not so, says Milesi.

“When I started at Collingwood Mick Malthouse was coach at the time and he had a saying, ‘Let the baker bake the bread’ and Bucks (Collingwood coach Nathan Buckley) is of a similar opinion – they’re there to coach, we’re there to recruit. They don’t know these kids like we do, they haven’t been watching them for three years.

“They might get to see them once and watch a bit of vision, so they don’t get too involved saying you should pick this player or that player. They might say ‘we might need another midfielder’ or ‘we might need another key back’ but these days with free agency, the ability to take mature age rookies and the trade period being much more open, you can balance up your list in other ways. It’s not as reliant on the draft as it was.”

A good example of ‘list balancing’ was Collingwood’s recruitment of Adam Treloar from Greater Western Sydney in 2015. “Usually we start targeting guys a fair way out, it’s not like you get to trade period and go ‘this guy might be good.’” Milesi says.

“With Adam Treloar, we put an enormous amount of work into him in terms of watching him for 12 months in the lead up before we started negotiating with GWS.”

The best versus the best fit
It’s the key question for recruiters in the heat of the draft – do you take the best player available, or do you draft to address the club’s specific needs? Milesi says it’s a mix of both.

“Everyone likes to say you’re going to pick the best player available, and in an ideal world you would, particularly early on that’s what tends to happen. But I do think as the draft opens up and it becomes very even, clubs do start going a bit more towards needs.”

“We try to balance it a bit – we wouldn’t pick five ruckmen in a national draft, but at the same time you have to be careful that you’re not reaching too much for a particular type of player.”

“We really make sure we know what the depth is in each position and we won’t go overboard and pick a player 20 positions higher just because he’s a key forward or a key back.”

Ignore the present, plan the future
When Milesi joined Collingwood in 2008 it was a time of high prosperity – the club was playing finals regularly and the ‘premiership window’ was well and truly open. In these times, it can be easy to get caught up and forget to lay a foundation for the future (see Brisbane’s results in the mid-2000s). Milesi is fully aware that his job is to secure the club’s on-field fortunes.

“You’ve got to keep to a plan of sustained success – you can’t throw all your eggs in the basket of winning a flag next year and whatever happens after that, we’ll pick up the pieces. Every player we pick, we have a view that they’re going to fit in to give us a sustained run at it over a several year period.”

Collingwood has been taking heat in recent years for its list turnover, particularly from its supporters who expect a high level of performance. Milesi encourages a patient approach.

“We’ve regenerated the list quite a bit since Nathan’s taken over – we’re still in the bottom half for average games played. We’re certainly confident with this group, we’ve got a strong group between 20-24 and we think they’re going to stick together for the next few years and provide a sustained crack at the finals.”

Milesi also has some clear advice for those fans who expect each draft crop to walk onto the field and dominate: “A lot of the players who get drafted in 2016 will realistically play their best footy in 2022-24. You hope a guy will have an impact in his first year, but realistically you’re only going to get your Chris Judds and the like once every ten years.”

One that got away
Every now and again a draft has ‘that’ player recruiters dream of picking – the total package that can serve a club for decades. Unfortunately, there’s 17 other clubs who want that player too. There’s always hard luck stories – Milesi’s was Dyson Heppell, drafted by Essendon in 2011.

“He was probably the best interview I’ve done in my time, but our first pick was number 45 that year. We interviewed him in February and we didn’t see him again because we knew he was an absolute no-brainer. The next time we saw him was at the draft, he came up and shook hands and remembered every recruiters name, you could tell that not only was he going to be a great player, he would be a great leader around whatever club got him.”

Nailing it
There’s good news stories too – the times when a recruiter is especially proud of how a player he’s picked up flourishes. Take Josh Smith, who started at Collingwood last season.

“Our stats analyst Michael O’Loughlin should take a lot of credit for this one. He was running the numbers and kept pushing him up, saying this guy was doing really well on all our key metrics in the NEAFL – so we went up and watched him.”

“He was 22 and had been through the system and just slowly improved, so Derek and I went and interviewed him before the draft and he was that hungry for an opportunity, just desperate. He was working in childcare, was a fantastic person and just wanted to take whatever opportunity came. We walked out and said ‘we’ve gotta give this kid a chance.’”

Collingwood drafted Smith in the second round of the 2015 rookie draft. He ended up playing 18 senior games and finished seventh in the Copeland Trophy, the club’s best-and-fairest award.

Pies fans across the country will be hoping that Milesi and his team can hit the target again in 2016.

The Crowd Says:

2016-12-08T08:35:51+00:00

Gungadin

Guest


Even in this year of extra ordinary results across the world its hard to imagine Nathan developing 'IT'. That qualty that comes naturally. Recruiters see it all the time. Its a shame that high profile presidents can't identify the right people for the right position. Its easy to burn down the grandstand, the yank voters certainly found it easy, but I have to support Xrays comments. Everybody wants success, but its hard to put aside true leadership when you ask men to follow you. Sometimes its the snake oil salesman who can motivate. The much played audio of Ted Whitten "You've got to inspire me" or John Kennedy " Dont think do" still have a place in football. The same game where the goal to goal line was how you built a team and flashy midfielders followed.

2016-11-28T18:14:34+00:00

Pete

Guest


Buckley has a pretty amazing record really for a coach entering his 6th year. Each year he has coached his team has won less games then the year before. It has to be a rare achievement for a coach to last this long with that sort of record.

2016-11-28T13:27:08+00:00

Tricky

Guest


So you're saying that Nathan is "setting" them up and will get the sack so the next coach can take a contender list? But hang on a minute I'm pretty sure going on memory that the team Nathan took over from 2011 had close to if not the most dominant home and away seasons of all time. So going by your logic then the team Nathan took should've played in a dynasty! But the results aren't there, but what is more disappointing is that club don't admit we're a basket case at the moment - as a member I would like the club to just admit the succession plan was a failure instead it's all rose coloured glasses and that's insulting! BTW Gubby is gone and now we have a stand in for that position - hardly a "stable" situation

2016-11-28T03:21:06+00:00

Bill

Guest


Listen lads Buckley knows what he wants remember Beveridge didnt build this bulldogs side it was the chap before him cant recall his name could be MAC SOMEONE.........Remember he was much scrutinised when he took over the Bulldogs helped change their game plan and taught them how to play tougher footy but it caused his demise beacuse he was a hard nut......When he was sacked Bullies were on their kness the club looked like it was going to implode they got rid of some gun stallwart players like Griffen and paid 1 million a year for a younf kp forward who under beveridges guidance played well and stood up in the finals. Bevo stepped into an already hardened side and with a bit of tweeking they won the flag aginst great odds.........But that would be a culmination of game plan and DESIRE to win at all costs.....The same desire the pies had in 2010......We need to get that winning desire back. Back to the old story apart from Shaw what other player that has been moved on from the premiership year year 2010 has done anything ?......none. With Gubby coming into the club aside from our retirements every player that was let go this year couldnt kick straight hence now we have a young team with better skills and so see what 2017 brings..Finals hopefully or as Buckley has already stated if we dont make finals he will not be head coach.

2016-11-27T17:12:33+00:00

Tricky

Guest


Imagine what Bevo would've done with that 2011 team, yeah that team with highest ever percentage and 20 wins from 22 starts For certain a dynasty and at least 1 more in the cabinet For the record I don't think club denies where it's at and how it (shouldnt've) go there - they just won't admit it to us the paying members and that I find insulting

2016-11-27T00:23:03+00:00

Xray

Guest


You are right it does take time to build success, as was clearly demonstrated by Luke Beveridge catapulting the also ran Dogs to a premiership in just two seasons. That is the difference between someone who is actually capable of coaching at an elite level, and individuals who just talk and continually make excuses. The truth hurts and Buckley’s failure is a matter of public record; five years of ongoing decline with one more almost certainly on the way. Optimism is one thing, denying what is patently obvious is another matter entirely.

2016-11-26T14:07:29+00:00

Tricky

Guest


"Collingwood has been taking heat in recent years for its list turnover, particularly from its supporters who expect a high level of performance. Milesi encourages a patient approach." It's been 5 years and IMO that club has not got the results it thought it would - surely since 2011 this can not be looked upon as planned as part of a bigger picture Actually the club encourages patience among it's members and supporters and they're right to do do. This has to be a 2 way street - since Buckley and the "regeneration" it has not gone to plan but we get all sorts of spin and it'll be alright - we are intelligent - treat us as such and be honest, don't tell us what you "think" us members and supporter might "want" to read and hear. IMO supporters and paid up members have a right to be frustrated as the club won't admit the failing of the succession plan. Now some would argue that it has not actually been a failure (the club is always 1st to defend) - so if it was not a failure (and it may not be) then tell your paid up members and supporters- why - don't just try and put positive spin on it every time. Now I'll admit there is a positive future and have faith (paid up for 2017) in Gary (who for the past 2 seasons predicted finals) and Ed but the patience is wearing thin - just come out and be honest not just with us but yourselves as a club. At the end of the day the results are not there and we probably have been patient enough to get an honest answer

2016-11-26T00:37:13+00:00

Pies forever

Guest


What a nice person you are. I hope you are not a Collingwood supporter because we don't need people like you. Can't you read it takes time to get a group together and play good football. I am sick and tired of people like you putting Nathan Buckly down at every chance you get. So get a life and go elsewhere.

2016-11-25T22:44:10+00:00

Xray

Guest


The only thing that Collingwood supporters can genuinely look forward to during 2017, is the end of the season when they will finally be rid of Nathan Buckley. How long it will take a decent coach to rebuild the team is anyone's guess, given the amount of damage that has been caused by Buckley's incompetence. Unfortunately for the likes of Pendlebury, who has maintained strong support for the person that handed him the captaincy, his career will in all likelihood be well and truly over, before the Pies are able to regain their winning ways. If Milesi seriously believes that after five years of failure with another one on the way, Collingwood supporters still need to be more patient, then he should get ready to pack his bags along with Buckley and the other dregs, including McGuire, Pert and co. Mliesi's reference to the Pies list being 'regenerated' must surely be a joke, as 'butchered' would be a much more accurate assessment.

Read more at The Roar