Cheika gets graceless over Garces with Grand Slam gone

By Matt Porter / Roar Guru

With his Grand Slam dream dashed, Michael Cheika reverted to petulant type and wallowed in the blame game in Dublin at the weekend.



The charm and grace that largely typified the Wallaby coach’s demeanour throughout a gruelling European Tour suddenly deserted him when confronting his first loss to the hands of the brave and gallant Irish.



Referee Jerome Garces’ lopsided penalty count against the Wallabies made it “impossible” for the Australians to win, according to Cheika, who promised to take the matter up with World Rugby referees’ chief Alain Rolland in the post-match presser.



”I thought we played a lot of footy, but we got penalised a lot, didn’t we,” Cheka said.



“It’s something I will be dealing with Alain Rolland afterwards. He is the referee’s boss so I’ll go through the proper channels as opposed to making it an issue out here.”



Although he wasn’t hopeful of a resolution.



”And let’s see if we can get something out of it – but I doubt it.

“A 13-3 penalty count costs you field position, territory and then obviously points as well.

“You can’t win a Test match giving away that many penalties or [having] that big a difference between the two teams. [It is] impossible.”

The outburst is true to form of Cheika’s recent reactions to losses, typified by the near state of apoplexy he whipped himself into following ‘clowngate’ in Bledisloe three at Eden Park last month.

There he somehow conflated the New Zealand Herald‘s dressing him up as a clown on the morning of the match with the All Blacks disrespecting the Wallabies.



Discipline starts from the top, so maybe Cheika should be asking deeper questions and looking much closer to home when trying to fathom why his team was so badly on the receiving end of the ref’s whistle.

]



The coach’s inability to rein himself in during post-match press conferences could be more than symptomatic of his team’s ill-discipline and may actually be part of a malaise that’s causing it.



Either way it’s not a good look.

Once he got the initial angst of his chest, Cheika actually settled into a more considered position that suggested the repeated infringing was an issue the Wallabies needed to address.



“We want to play good footy, we’ve just got to play it for longer and after this game we’ve got to try and be more disciplined because that spread of penalties is that large you can’t win a game with that,” he said.

Eventually he congratulated the Irish on their win.



One of the most-discussed decisions was Ireland’s second try to Garry Ringrose in the 34th minute that had the Aussies crying foul that Ireland lock Devin Toner obstructed his Wallabies counterpart Rory Arnold, – although the referee awarded it after reviewing the vision, a non-decision Cheika said showed up some inconsistencies.



Reviewing the footage it clearly shows the right call was made. Toner was merely standing his ground and does not intentionally disrupt Arnold who was simply too slow to react to stop Ringrose, as were up to three other Wallaby defenders.



When quizzed abut it, Cheika drew reference to David Pocock being man-handled many metres away as somehow having an impact:



“I didn’t really get a look at it. It’s all about consistency of the application of the laws. Pocock was taken out about 10 metres beyond the maul.

“That’s something that we would have got penalised for against New Zealand a few weeks ago.”

Whatever Michael.

Sure, Garces’ was a less than perfect refereeing performance. No doubt the Wallabies had some harsh calls go against them, but he appeared to get all the big ones right, including the two yellow cards against Dean Mumm and Bernard Foley for ‘tipping’ players beyond the horizontal.

Mumm’s especially was technically inarguable while Foley’s was so late in the piece it was inconsequential.



The All Blacks racked up similar disproportionate penalty counts against Ireland in both their Tests. Maybe this Irish outfit is as clean and disciplined as the mounting evidence would suggest?



The reality is Ireland were well and truly there for the taking had the Wallabies been more ruthless, clinical and, yes, disciplined at the weekend.



With mere seconds left of the first half the visitors were 17-0 down, having been subjected to a virtual shut out of territory (73% to Ireland) and possession (70% to Ireland) since kick off.



Then Dane Haylett-Petty, one of the Wallabies’ best, broke into the clear to score under the black dot, conversion to Foley, and the sheds at half time were suddenly a more palatable place for the Aussies.



The Wallaby resurgence continued full steam ahead after the break. The men in gold looked to have finally found their mojo, hanging onto ball with quick recycles and an attack that was suddenly crisp and clean. Henry Speight was over three minutes after the resumption, but was correctly pulled back for a forward pass.

Three minutes later Tevita Kurundrani was in for a legitimate five-pointer to continue his hot try-scoring form.

 Replacement winger Sefanaia Naivalu had the Wallabies’ third try and an unlikely 21-20 lead in the 57th minute.


There would have been another six minutes prior to that had Israel Folau not butchered a three-on-one overlap.

At this point I thought the Wallabies were simply going to run over the top of a visibly tiring and broken Ireland in an All Blackesque final quarter blitz.



Already without their talismanic back Johnny Sexton, forward Sean O’Brien (a late injury withdrawal) and the impressive Robbie Henshaw, Ireland had long lost game-breaking fullback Rob Kearney and wing Andrew Trimble, off injured in the first half an hour. 



Centre Jared Payne failed to emerge after the break, forcing replacement halfback Kieran Marmion to the wing and third-string fly half Joey Carbery to fullback.

The Ireland backline was hanging together by a bit of glue and some string and looked set to be cut to pieces by the Aussies, but it wasn’t to be.



With the chocolates in sight, the Wallabies inexplicably eased back on the throttle and their forwards went back into their shells, allowing the obdurate Irish to drag themselves off the canvas and back into the lead with a Keith Earls’ try with 15 to go. A huge-hearted defensive effort was enough for them to get, exhausted, over the line.



It really was heroic stuff, demonstrating this Ireland team, having already conquered the Southern Hemisphere’s big three this year, could be on the cusp of something quite special.

For the Wallabies, more lessons and a real examination of character as to how they will front against the equally resurgent Poms with no Grand Slam on the line this weekend.





Will wiping the smirk off Eddie Jones’ face be motivation enough?

The Crowd Says:

2016-12-01T21:39:58+00:00

Vic rugby

Guest


The tiger Woods analogy doesnt work here. Tiger won competitions

2016-12-01T21:29:45+00:00

Vic rugby

Guest


Dont get any tears on your keyboard

2016-11-30T21:51:08+00:00

Objective

Guest


Thanks for confirming my position, Mike. You can't support your argument with fact so you go on a personal offensive. As Jack Gibson used to say: " The lowest form of lack of talent."

2016-11-30T14:37:33+00:00

nothing if not critical

Guest


It's really appalling behaviour from a national coach. But complaining about Cheika usually ends up in state-based rivalry, so don't want to go down that rabbit hole. However, I do hope that one of the analysts from The Roar - maybe Nick Bishop? - does an article that focuses on the strategies used by Cheika this year. Based on just watching how the games have been played, it's easy to see that Cheika lacks the ability to draw up contingency plans or is incapable of imagining how the opposition is going to play and preparing for that.

2016-11-30T11:22:52+00:00

Blue Balls Fan

Guest


Cheika is the Worst Wallabies Coach of all time, both on and off the field. We need a new coach and the sooner the better. We can't wait until after the next World Cup when Cheika's contract is up, but unfortunately, Bill Pulver lacks the balls to do anything about it. Australian Rugby is only going to go backwards with Cheika at the helm.

2016-11-30T11:13:44+00:00

Blue Balls Fan

Guest


remove 'sore' and your comment is spot on.

2016-11-30T09:30:59+00:00

Jokerman

Guest


O'Driscoll should have just faced the Haka like normal but no he couldn't do that and decided to mix the potion. Silly.

2016-11-30T05:46:00+00:00

ClarkeG

Guest


Daire - If any player commits an act of foul play that deserves a red card then yes that player should be sent off whether he is playing for the NZ AB's,the Waikikamukau club side, or Mullingar. Your problem however is that you want AB blood and you don't want it today or yesterday, you want it 5 decades ago seemingly - and you want it so badly you are prepared to fabricate an incident as Jacko points out. And you want this, based on your perception that the ABs somehow get the 'rub of the green'. Please show me a case where an international player in recent times has been issued a red card for a tackle such as that which Fekitoa has been suspended for. There are however many cases in top level rugby where players that have been issued with YC's have subsequently been suspended.The Fekitoa incident was handled in the same manner as many others before it. As a comparison lets consider the Cooper tackle on Smith in last years Bledisloe cup game at Eden Park. One might argue that this tackle was equally - if not more - as dangerous as the Fekitoa tackle yet Cooper, although YCed, was not cited. You raised the O'Driscoll incident. You know very well that those types of incidents are treated much more harshly today than they were in 2005 and you know that it was not seen by the match officials unlike the similar type tackle by Darcy on Tipoki in the Maori match which resulted in no more than a penalty. I feel red cards are better reserved for incidents where the foul play is so blatant as to leave no doubt in the referees mind that a red card is deserved - much like the Heaslip incident at New Plymouth in 2010. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L3HvvvnlGQI

2016-11-30T02:22:57+00:00

Jacko

Guest


You mean the "eye eye"

2016-11-30T02:18:14+00:00

Jacko

Guest


But the Irish were wrong going by the scoreboard. The Irish have become a shocking team of whingers since their first win over the ABs. Its embarrassing for them. They were such a polite nation of fans but NO MORE. Fair enough but you get back what you throw out

2016-11-30T02:14:52+00:00

Jacko

Guest


Moniano you are wrong-was all over the Georgian press....Since when did press exisience validate it

2016-11-30T02:09:17+00:00

Jacko

Guest


I think thats where we are both from. DOWN UNDER. Nothing PERSONAL tho Pete

2016-11-30T02:09:14+00:00

Chivas

Guest


Try reading Brett's article about Steve Hansen a short while back. I don't mind Brett's comments and approach mostly, but they are still opinions not facts.. no matter whether or not he is supported by his own entourage. I also agree that Chieka hasn't been particularly graceless and in fact handled himself well, but to suggest he isn't coming across as peeved at the ref and suggesting he is commenting on consistency of interpretation between different refs might also be construed as a little lazy. If you listen to the entire interview, Chieka does indeed comment on the inconsistency of the ref within the game, not merely inconsistencies across games. So this holier than though attitude towards Matt is not entirely fitting or correct either in my view.

2016-11-30T02:05:28+00:00

Jacko

Guest


he doesnt want to bring it up here but brings it up anyway. Very deliberate

2016-11-30T02:03:53+00:00

Jacko

Guest


And if a New Zealander doesnt deserve a card dont try to fabricate reasons to give one out and also if you want to start looking bact to 1967 to find reasons for one then your point seems rather weak

2016-11-30T01:25:36+00:00

Chivas

Guest


And here I thought you had just come to the conclusion you had nothing to contribute.

2016-11-30T01:19:05+00:00

Chivas

Guest


Ok Rhys, so this is the conclusion you arrived at. Must be true then. I think this sort of well considered logic may have a bit to do with why people can't be bothered with trawling through the comments. I can't comment on what you wrote and by the sounds of your rant here, are hardly an objective voice, but instead appear to be just another rage filled, self-important commentator trying to right or balance perceived wrongs.

2016-11-30T01:13:11+00:00

Chivas

Guest


Done both and still don't get: What exactly was poorly researched Which of PK's points was valid which Matt missed What specifically was lazy? A silly throwaway comment doesn't make you objective or demonstrate intelligence. Your conclusions may be obvious to you.. but I wonder if you consider there are other views out there. Does your own intelligence extend that far?

2016-11-29T22:22:12+00:00

Mike Huber

Roar Pro


Objective You are a 360 degree poster , you go around in circles unable to accept and address substantial referring issues on the game . Your assertion that we all love rugby because of its complex nature is utter bollocks . Indeed it is its complex nature and ambiguities with interpretations of laws/rules which makes the game less and an indictment for confused newcomers . If I want to criticise officiating I will , as a professional coach should in protecting his investment - his team . Next rugby game you attend , go get some pom poms and cheer the refs - maybe a cartwheel or two !

2016-11-29T16:45:56+00:00

Ridzenieks

Guest


I wonder if the attitude and actions of the current Australian manager and leadership are reducing the "marketability " of Australian rugby? In my business, our sponsors expect us to present ourselves as ethical, mature, and well-balanced.

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar