Santa Waugh brings Virat Kohli's troops a late Christmas present

By Anindya Dutta / Roar Guru

One can imagine David Boon, Merv Hughes, or even Shane Warne (a decade ago) as Santa Claus, but Mark Waugh?

For Indian fans however, Waugh is their Kris Kringle, bringing a bag full of goodies, albeit a couple of months late.

The fans will forgive him the tardiness, considering Waugh and his fellow selectors’ generosity.

The Indian batting order currently reads as follows: Murali Vijay, KL Rahul, Virat Kohli, Cheteshwar Pujara, Ajinkya Rahane, Karun Nair, Parthiv Patel, Ravichandran Ashwin, Ravindra Jadeja, Mohammad Shami and Umesh Patel.

The top nine are reasonably accomplished batsmen, and while 18 months ago there were questions regarding Indians against spin, that phase is clearly behind them.

Look at the career averages of just three of these players in Tests played in India against spinners: Vijay’s career averages playing Adil Rashid, Mitchell Santner, Rangana Herath and Ish Sodhi are 98, 76, 87 and 65 respectively.

Kohli’s career averages playing Lyon, Rashid, Moeen Ali and Smait Patel are 50, 61, 167 and 114 respectively.

Pujara’s career averages playing Graeme Swann, Imran Tahir, Patel, Nathan Hauritz and Sodhi are 56, 53, 104, 72 and 78 respectively.

Given that background, it is mind numbing that Australia chose to go with four frontline spinners – Nathan Lyon, Steve O’Keefe, Mitchell Swepson and Ashton Agar – for their four Tests in India.

To put this in context, Australia has never taken more than two spinners on a tour to the subcontinent in the past ten years.

And if you thought that two of the spinners were there just as backup, both chairman of selectors Trevor Hohns and selector Mark Waugh hinted over the past week that Australia may play without Josh Hazlewood, using three spinners.

Now that is icing on the cake for Kohli’s men.

The greatest spin bowlers of our age, Shane Warne and Muttiah Muralitharan, struggled in India throughout their careers and averaged above 40. More recently, Herath’s average in India is around 50.

Lyon averages 37 in India, which is not bad, but along with O’Keefe, he hardly evokes awe in a batsman’s minds like Warne or Murali.

Importantly, Kohli has made it clear that he does not want or encourage rank turners. So doctored pitches, as was apparent during the England series, have probably died a quick death, with the change in leadership and the confidence the current crop of players have.

What would make sense, given the experience of New Zealand and England recently, is Australia relying on their strength rather than falling into the misguided trap of thinking that the bowling attack needs to suit the condition they perceive will prevail.

Dropping Hazlewood and choosing to go with three spinners would be like undertaking a foray into enemy territory with no exit plan.

The last time that happened, Lord Tennyson was around to pen a poem about it. Perhaps this time, a modern poet will call it ‘The Charge of the Spin Brigade’?

The Crowd Says:

AUTHOR

2017-01-19T03:38:34+00:00

Anindya Dutta

Roar Guru


Indeed!

2017-01-18T19:42:07+00:00

qwetzen

Guest


In the award winning TV series 'House,' one of Dr Gregory House's dictums was; "People lie". You should consider this.

AUTHOR

2017-01-18T18:34:14+00:00

Anindya Dutta

Roar Guru


I don't think the Indian batting would mind either. After Starc and Hazlewood, the rest are very ordinary bowlers. Faulkner is well loved by the Indian batters. Starc and Hazlewood along with O'Keefe and Lyon with Maxwell as backup and perhaps Mitch Marsh or Bird as the third seamer is probably the best combo for Australia in my view.

AUTHOR

2017-01-18T18:30:53+00:00

Anindya Dutta

Roar Guru


Thanks Chinmoy much appreciated. The answer to your last question I believe is that Zampa has not performed at all if I recall in the longer format and is generally not well regarded as a Test bowler. He is a bit of a Warney clone as far as action is concerned but in skill he needs to improve a lot.

AUTHOR

2017-01-18T17:55:20+00:00

Anindya Dutta

Roar Guru


Thanks Rats. If Aus go with the correct combo instead of 3 spinners, I agree that it's the batting which will determine the result of the series.

2017-01-18T17:21:47+00:00

Chinmoy Jena

Guest


The Australian selectors should have concentrated on their strength and that is their speedsters. It seems they did not learn any lesson from that disastrous tour of Sri Lanka last year. Smith used Starc in short spells and was rewarded with 24 wickets in a series dominated by the Lankan spinners and Herath running amok. Three spinners may be but four are an absolute waste. Perhaps the Australian readers can answer this better but why hasn't Zampa played a single Test? Perfect analysis Anindya.

2017-01-18T13:55:41+00:00

Rats

Guest


I also get a feeling Aus are not going to lose the series because of their bowling.

2017-01-18T13:54:44+00:00

Rats

Guest


Good one, Anindya. Aus spinners look too weak for the current Indian lot. But I still feel picking 4 spinners in the squad is not a bad idea... They need that for variety and can rotate them. Only 2 spinners must play in one game. I would want Aus to go with 5 proper bowlers and the batsmen taking additional responsibilities.

2017-01-18T05:54:15+00:00

Adrian

Guest


Who would India rather face? (A) Starc, Hazlewood, Sayers, Bird and backed up by Faulkner? Or: (B) O'Keefe, Lyon, Swepson, Agar and backed up by Maxwell? If Starc is the only pace bowler, he is going to break down and then will be out of the series, if not worse. We do not want Starc + 4 spinners, even if Mitchell Marsh is the other pace bowler. Not at all. Starc as one of 3 pace bowlers is risky. Starc as the only one is suicidal.

AUTHOR

2017-01-18T02:01:37+00:00

Anindya Dutta

Roar Guru


Agreed Ram. As I said in response to Ritesh above, once we are done with Starc and Hazlewood, the rest of the pace attack is very ordinary. But it would make more sense to play maxwell as the 3rd spinner and use his batting power and experience in indian conditions than go in for that extra spinner.

AUTHOR

2017-01-18T01:59:21+00:00

Anindya Dutta

Roar Guru


Thanks Ritesh. The problem is the Aussie pace cupboard is not overflowing either. They have included Bird who has the pace of a Bhuvaneshwar Kumar. In terms of a real world class attack, Starc and Hazlewood are formidable, but it essentially stops there for now.

AUTHOR

2017-01-18T01:55:58+00:00

Anindya Dutta

Roar Guru


Thanks Kersi! That could be an alternate wrap up line for sure!

AUTHOR

2017-01-18T01:54:31+00:00

Anindya Dutta

Roar Guru


The last was a typo and it should have read Umesh Yadav. Apols. But I am not convinced Saha will get an immediate look back in given the form Parthiv is in. He should, but whether he will is another question.

AUTHOR

2017-01-18T01:52:21+00:00

Anindya Dutta

Roar Guru


Fair point and if that's the way it goes then it makes sense. Doesnt say much about the confidence of the selectors in the team's chances of winning in india though, does it?

AUTHOR

2017-01-18T01:49:43+00:00

Anindya Dutta

Roar Guru


Agreed Chris. I can't see Hazlewood being dropped in favour of a 3rd spinner. Taking Mxwell instead of Marsh in the XI is the best way of still ensuring that you have horses for courses.

AUTHOR

2017-01-18T01:47:14+00:00

Anindya Dutta

Roar Guru


Nice one. I am sure Smith would say the same if he had those pacemen in reserve!

AUTHOR

2017-01-18T01:46:07+00:00

Anindya Dutta

Roar Guru


That would indeed be the sensible move James. Maxwell could very well be the 3rd spinner.

2017-01-17T22:27:33+00:00

Kersi Meher-Homji

Guest


Agree with you, Anindya. One change I would like to make in your thinkpiece. I would have ended the story with "The collapse of the spin brigade" in March 2017.

2017-01-17T22:23:19+00:00

Les Mara

Roar Rookie


No, India's batting order has Pujara at 3, Kohli at 4, Ashwin at 6, Saha as their 7, Umesh Yadav or Ishant Sharma at 11.

2017-01-17T22:12:05+00:00

Rob JM

Guest


If Starc, Hazlewood, Okeef and lyon can't take twenty wickets then no one can. If the series is over give the future talent a chance to get experience in these conditions so we can be competive next time. That's why Agar and Swepson are there, not to win this time around but for next time. If your playing a dead rubber test and both Hazlewood and Lyon have struggled they why not give the other two spinners a go?

More Comments on The Roar

Read more at The Roar