The Butler who does it all: Chicago's superstar continues to keep them afloat

By Jay Croucher / Expert

Even on a team more notable for its headlines than its play, Jimmy Butler remains basketball’s most underrated superstar.

Amid the Chicago chaos – the incomprehensible free agent signings, the trades ranging from problematic to plain dumb, the identity crisis on the court and the general crisis off of it – Butler has been the Bulls’ rock.

He’s the reason – almost the sole reason – that a team that has spent the season engulfed in self-inflicted controversy and mediocrity has stayed, improbably, in the thick of the playoff race.

The Bulls are 31-31, with the league’s 20th best offence and 13th best defence. They are nowhere right now, and ‘somewhere’ is further away for the franchise than it’s been for a while. The season feels like a disappointment, but then you take a step back and realise that it’s not. It can’t be. This is all the Bulls were ever going to be.

Their off-season roster construction was a 2001 fever dream, signing both 35-year-old Dwyane Wade and no-longer-good-at-basketball Rajon Rondo to play with Butler, a capable but below-average shooter. The Bulls have spent this season paying almost $55 million for a big name perimeter trinity that averages two made threes per game – less than CJ Miles averages by himself each night.

Chicago attempts the fewest number of threes per game in the league, barely half as many as Houston. They take plenty of pull-up jumpers and rank in the bottom four for catch and shoot shots. Every time they take the court they’re fighting a mathematical deficit, an equation that persistently weighs against them.

The antiquated, unsuccessful style combined with the personality issues and infighting should have been a cocktail much too poisonous, a basketball death sentence.

But they endure, because of Butler.

Butler’s star turn was the least foreseeable of any recent top-10 player in the league. And still, today, despite the unquestionable production of an elite player (24-6-5 on good efficiency with two steals per game and a low turnover rate), his aesthetic doesn’t necessarily cohere with the superstar archetype.

He doesn’t score in explosive bunches like Stephen Curry and he doesn’t loom over the game and its every breath as a force of nature like LeBron James. He doesn’t have nuclear athleticism like Russell Westbrook or move with the slithering grace of Paul George or Kawhi Leonard, the two players he’s most often compared to.

What ultimately makes Butler special is his strength and balance. He is the antithesis of ‘Slippin’ Jimmy’. He doesn’t glide to the hoop as much as he powers toward it, and the power is workmanlike, unlike Westbrook, who ascends more than he drives. While Westbrook seems like a cyborg, with Butler, you can see that he feels pain.

His strength is remarkable in a graspable, human way, and he makes opponents feel it with his relentless rim attacks, getting to the line more than anyone except Westbrook, James Harden and DeMarcus Cousins. In the Chicago congestion, Butler has no space to drive, but he creates it through sheer might, genius and fearlessness.

On defence though, lies the true beauty of Butler. He’s a perfect marriage of anticipation, quickness, poise and muscle, with the speed to chase JJ Redick around screens, the savvy and balance to stay in front of and close to Chris Paul, and the brute strength to hold up in the post on a switch against Blake Griffin.

He hits his free throws at an elite rate, crashes the glass, knows when to gamble for steals and when to stay honest, and has gradually become an adept passer and competent shooter from deep. With everything falling apart around him, Butler has held things together in Chicago, a Super Saiyan version of the ‘glue guy’.

On most nights, Butler will seem like the third or fourth biggest personality on the court. He’s not flashy and he’s not iconic. But then you look up, and it’s the fourth quarter against Golden State, and Butler is outplaying Curry, Klay Thompson and Draymond Green, and leading his flawed team to their best win of the season.

Outside of Butler, the Bulls are a high-profile nothing. Wade is still capable, but his old-man game is getting less effective with age, and he’s having the least efficient season of his career. He’s taking more threes than usual and making them at a career-best rate, but that rate would be the career-worst rate for most proficient marksmen. Wade remains a defensive liability, and it’s been three years since his team has been better with him on the floor.

Despite a post-controversy return to flirting with competence, Rondo is finished, and the rest of the team’s point guard situation sits somewhere on the spectrum between ‘vaguely fascinating’ and ‘calamitous’, on most nights skewing towards the latter.

Robin Lopez is fine but almost aggressively unremarkable, and while they have flashes, normal vision sees Nikola Mirotic and Bobby Portis as disappointments. At least the Bulls have Paul Zipser to build around.

Butler has to do it all for Chicago, and for the most part he’s been able to. While stars like Anthony Davis, DeMarcus Cousins, Carmelo Anthony and Damian Lillard languish on teams well below .500, Butler has dragged the Bulls into respectability. Take him off this team and they’re the Nets.

He has his limitations, not least of all his ability to stay on the court (he missed at least 15 games each of the past three seasons), a weakness possibly inextricably linked to what most will know him for – ALL those minutes.

But with Kyle Lowry out, Butler will head into the East playoffs as the second best player in the conference. The Bulls won’t be relevant until they (somehow) surround Butler with a capable supporting cast, or decide it’s best to burn it all down and rebuild with the assets they’d receive in trading him away.

Until that moment comes or doesn’t, though, Butler will keep them afloat, even if dry land is much too far away to reach.

The Crowd Says:

2017-03-08T21:11:04+00:00

express34texas

Guest


Lazy according to who? You? I guess almost everyone is lazy then since most have Thomas ahead of Butler. If you're actually reading what I'm saying you'd see I'm complimenting Butler quite a bit. The fact that Thomas is leading his team better and having more of in impact isn't fantasy. I'm unimpressed by a few fancy #'s. I think they're pretty close in ability, but I give slight nod to Thomas. Butler have plenty of help to do better than 42-40 last year and certainly make the playoffs, but he didn't. We're starting to see a trend with him.

2017-03-08T09:03:09+00:00

Mushi

Guest


At the moment if we agree I find myself having to recheck the evidence given how lazy your views are

2017-03-08T09:00:30+00:00

Mushi

Guest


High and mighty, you make ridiculous claims that are lazy and bereft of anything to support them. Butler doesn't struggle his team does when he isn't on the court. You just, as usual, ignore the evidence. Butler and Thomas have near identical raw +/- but Butlers adjusted numbers (given the celtics are significantly better than the bulls) are massively above Thomas, probably because thomas is amongst the worst defenders in the league. But yes again players are clearly not very good if they can't influence the game through extistential powers when they aren't playing.

2017-03-08T03:56:13+00:00

express34texas

Guest


Please Mushi, don't act so mighty. If you can't see someone like Thomas having a greater impact on his team than Butler has over his team, fine. It is up for debate, but I'd rather Thomas. But to think Butler is so much better while struggling so much is ridiculous.

2017-03-07T22:13:52+00:00

Mushi

Guest


That you take Thomas just reinforces my current policy.

2017-03-07T22:10:13+00:00

Mushi

Guest


Um no. They were poorly constructed pre trade and worse now. Look at his real plus minus. Hell look at his raw plus minus if you can't understand the "real". On court his team is up more than 2 pts a game but over the course of the entire game they are down on average... But your right great supporting cast and clearly he's not that good if he can't jedi mind trick his team into dominance from the bench. If you "haven't seen" it's because you are flat out too lazy to look

2017-03-07T20:58:53+00:00

express34texas

Guest


CHI is definitely worse after the trade, but they were still underachieving before. Butler has a solid all-around game, no doubt, but I haven't really seen it take shape into that much impact on wins/losses, unlike Harden/Thomas for two examples.

2017-03-07T20:45:50+00:00

Mushi

Guest


That chi team is horrendous compare to the thunder who wouldn't you swap? Thomas makes James Harden look like a perennial defensive poy

2017-03-07T15:44:59+00:00

express34texas

Guest


Butler's good and an excellent two-way player, but look at his track record. CHI missed the playoffs last year, and middling this year. In the East, that's bad. His cast isn't contender quality this year, but if worse than any of the teams below CHI in standings in East, barely. CHI still seems like they're underachieving. Guys like Thomas/Wall/Lowry/DeRozan have elevated their teams more. I'd definitely take Giannis over him. WAS/BOS are only 4 games back of CLE in the loss column. If James has a strong case for MVP, Wall/Thomas seem to be elevating their teams more relative to their casts, and might have stronger cases than James for MVP. Irving is a big-time player and played like an MVP in the FInals last season. He's a perennial AS-caliber player. He isn't really geared or good enough to lead a team to a title over the longhaul, but I wouldn't say any of these other guys you mentioned are either, except maybe Giannis eventually if given the chance. And James isn't either anymore for that matter. He coasts through the regular season and takes games off. He's lucky he's always been in the weaker conference where there's often no other true contenders such as this season. Lowry is solid, but isn't even the best player on his team.

2017-03-07T11:05:59+00:00

Swampy

Guest


Lowry started well but fell away after New Years before he got injured. Wall was first mentioned by the way. I was just throwing names out there - surprised me that there weren't any better options for the title of 2nd best player in east. Irving is pretty good - has big game chops - just needs James to get him there!

2017-03-07T05:34:35+00:00

Rossy

Guest


Tend to agree: DeRozan - worse defensively about the same offensively Thomas - see above (IT would be a better offensive weapon however) PG - is Buttler Lite Giannis - Would have on par with Jimmy Irving - You have to be kidding me right? Love - You really have to be kidding me right? What does Kyle Lowry have to do to be in the conversation? John Wall? I would have both of those over Irving, Love and DeRozan.

2017-03-07T05:26:07+00:00

Swampy

Guest


You're probably right - I just hadn't thought of him in that way. Right here right now I might take Wall alternately as his team appears to be winning but he definitely has better team mates than Jimmy.

AUTHOR

2017-03-06T22:24:42+00:00

Jay Croucher

Expert


Give me Butler over all of them. Giannis is the only one who makes me hesitate.

2017-03-06T19:38:07+00:00

Swampy

Guest


Nodding my head all the way through - then you got me with 'second best player in conference'. That can't be right can it? Wall, DeRozan, Thomas, George, Antetekoumpo, Irving, Love?

Read more at The Roar