Nick Kyrgios, your time is now

By perry cox / Roar Guru

It is time. You can only talk about potential, and ‘coming of age’ for so long, and raw talent can only get you so far.

Just ask Roger Federer.

In a season, thus far, where Kyrgios has beaten a future hall of famer twice in two weeks, and has had the greatest to play the game, Roger Federer, comparing his own past to that of the Australian, the time is now for Nick to take his game to the level that everyone knows exists.

There’s no denying that Novak Djokovic is in a slump at the moment (a potential downward spiral, though that is for others to eulogise).

But to annihilate the world number two in consecutive tournaments as Kyrgios has is still utterly impressive.

It simply cannot be ignored.

Off the back of that performance, the great Federer has then not only spoken of a quarter final meeting with Kyrgios with heightened anticipation, (a meeting that unfortunately did not eventuate) Federer has done the unthinkable; he has compared his own career to that of the 16th ranked men’s player in the world.

“I think he’s more established than I was back then already, because he’s already beaten great players for a while now,” said Federer.

“I’m very impressed with him taking out Novak, back-to-back weeks, on Novak’s best surface,” said Federer. “I hope it’s going to lead to something great for Nick and that he realises if he puts his head down and focuses, he can bring it day in and day out, week in and week out.”

These are significant statements, and cannot be merely acknowledged as kind words from an ageing warrior.

You start to feel like Nick Kyrgios in a lot of ways is like Matt Damon out of Good Will Hunting: a talented rogue who just needs a bit of guidance.

I only hope that Roger Federer ends up being Nick’s Robin Williams (though granted, in somewhat better shape and with less facial hair).

Federer has little to nothing to gain personally from talking up the Australian, nor is he there to be mates.

Rather, Federer is an historian of the game himself, and one of the truly deep thinkers. Roger considers all players to be custodians of the game, and would only be talking for the benefit, as he sees it, of the game.

Federer is aware of the past (and current) greats of the game, names like Emerson, Laver, Connors, Lendl, Courier, Edberg, Sampras, Agassi, Nadal, and Djokovic.

All the greats come, and they invariably go, and they pass the game to the next players, hoping that the game will be entrusted into the care of those who are worthy.

If Federer is likening a young Kyrgios to himself, saying that all the tools are in place for the young Australian to now take over the mantel, these words cannot be ignored. It is a case of the greatest recognising greatness.

So truly, it is time.

It is an understatement to say it has been a hard road for a willing public to watch Nick over the last few years.

From a young upstart beating Nadal at Wimbledon, to the outbursts, the hair-dos, the social media, and the apparent flaws.

And, honestly, who even cares about the flaws? We all have them, and none of us have to learn to deal with our flaws while they are highlighted for all the world to see.

However, it is as Federer says: the talent is there. Nick has been beating great players, consistently, for his entire career.

Now is the time to put everything in place.

I can only hope that Kyrgios is reading these words for him, or at least taking into full consideration the words of the greatest.

Nick Kyrgios, you now have a choice that not very many are presented with.

Nick, you can choose to embrace greatness, or you can choose to bypass it.

You can now choose to apply yourself, with the hard work and single-minded focus that the greatest player to have played tennis has said you are capable of, to use your gift in a way that not only you can enjoy producing, but others can enjoy witnessing.

So very few of us are presented with that choice.

I would implore you: choose greatness.

I like to tweet, on Twitter that is, @kdogroars

The Crowd Says:

2017-03-22T03:18:04+00:00

Tennis lover

Guest


Anyone who watched the entire press interview he gave after defeating Djokovic the second time can't help but be impressed. Federer is; Agassi is; Courier is; Stan is; just read the articles from every news source from around the world - Nick is starting again. He has explained what happened last year and doesn't guarantee it won't happen again so, as Agassi says - give him space and he will do what this writer hopes he will. It must have taken enormous courage to say what he said off the cuff. Watching those two massive games was fantastic. The world must not drive this guy back under again. He's got some of the greats supporting him: who are we to argue. PS - Sock is also a great racquet smasher and nick's good friend. And it was Nole who destroyed his racquet in that match, not Nick!

2017-03-20T21:53:24+00:00

Jock Cornet

Guest


That's the main problem he is dumb as dog poo

2017-03-20T15:29:10+00:00

krista

Guest


I have a suggestion-just watch Sock, Thiem, Pouille and several other great players instead. We, along with millions of tennis fans, have no time to pander to the vile behaviour of a self-entitled adolescent. Why should we? If that is entertainment or excitement then those who find it as such have to be suffering from a very low IQ.

AUTHOR

2017-03-20T02:42:30+00:00

perry cox

Roar Guru


Hi Winston, I definitely take on board what you say. And perhaps I could have been a bit clearer. I didn't intend to say he should be allowed to do what he pleases. And certainly, Nick's flaws and subsequent actions should not go unchecked (or indeed reprimanded where appropriate). The point I was more trying to make is that, as you point out: we all have them. And as you say, we all have to deal with our flaws. However, you don't have to deal with your mistakes with the spotlight of the media and everyone in the world with an interest having their opinion. I don't think Nick has bigger problems, but I do think that the circumstances he finds himself in, having to deal with issues, can provide different types of difficulties. Thanks for the feedback.

2017-03-20T01:38:59+00:00

Winston

Guest


Despite me being in the majority camp of not liking this guy, I don't have a problem with your positivity. After all wouldn't it be great if Nick steps up his game. However, I have a huge problem with this: "And, honestly, who even cares about the flaws? We all have them, and none of us have to learn to deal with our flaws while they are highlighted for all the world to see." That is completely not true. All of us have to deal with our flaws in life. If my boss or client tells me I'm doing something wrong, I either have to fix it or I'm out. It is not fair to say Nick has bigger problems than me, you or any Joe Blog. That he can't deal with it thus far, that's the real problem. It is no excuse at all that he has a bigger audience.

2017-03-19T23:17:16+00:00

Bored

Guest


Out of all the years I have been watching tennis, this bloke is someone I drop anything I am doing at the time to watch. There has only been a few in the 30 odd years. An entertainment magnet and the kids love him. A breath of fresh air is an understatement. Tennis is so much richer for having a human being playing against the 1000 odd robots out there.

Read more at The Roar